semajjames
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
April 29, 2014, 11:04:34 AM |
|
Hi I have 3 minning rigs all running on one LAN
Now if i want to Solo mine hbn straight to a wallet do i have to install the wallet on each of the minning pc's or can i install the wallet just once on a 4th pc and have the 3 minners use the one wallet on the 4th pc
thanks
|
|
|
|
unick
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
April 29, 2014, 11:56:09 AM |
|
Hi I have 3 minning rigs all running on one LAN
Now if i want to Solo mine hbn straight to a wallet do i have to install the wallet on each of the minning pc's or can i install the wallet just once on a 4th pc and have the 3 minners use the one wallet on the 4th pc
thanks
You need to have one pc (not on the miners) running the client in the HoboNickels.con file of that pc running the client, you should add the rpcallowip= for each ip of your rigs (if you are on the same subnet, I believe you can use wildcards like rpcallowip=192.168.1.*). If you are behind a router, you only need to put your public IP there. Then on your rigs, simply add a pool and put the IP as the url from the pc running the client and the rpcport= (like URL:PORT) the username password will be the rpcusername= and rpcpassword= from that same config file Newly mined block rewards will be on the wallet from that pc, you can then transfer those coins back to your main wallet when they mature.
|
|
|
|
dogechode
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
April 29, 2014, 01:10:50 PM |
|
Tranz I don't quite understand why you need to specify that you want 500 keys assigned when you create a wallet. I did not do this (I didn't specify anything I just created a second wallet using buttons/menus not by typing commands. Am I going to run into a problem?
|
|
|
|
semajjames
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
April 29, 2014, 01:50:02 PM Last edit: April 29, 2014, 03:13:14 PM by semajjames |
|
Hi I have 3 minning rigs all running on one LAN
Now if i want to Solo mine hbn straight to a wallet do i have to install the wallet on each of the minning pc's or can i install the wallet just once on a 4th pc and have the 3 minners use the one wallet on the 4th pc
thanks
You need to have one pc (not on the miners) running the client in the HoboNickels.con file of that pc running the client, you should add the rpcallowip= for each ip of your rigs (if you are on the same subnet, I believe you can use wildcards like rpcallowip=192.168.1.*). If you are behind a router, you only need to put your public IP there. Then on your rigs, simply add a pool and put the IP as the url from the pc running the client and the rpcport= (like URL:PORT) the username password will be the rpcusername= and rpcpassword= from that same config file Newly mined block rewards will be on the wallet from that pc, you can then transfer those coins back to your main wallet when they mature. thanks in this .conf file why is there two different ports OR is it a mistake listen=1 daemon=1 server=1 rpcuser=*your hobo name* rpcpassword=*Your hobo quote* port=7372 rpcport=7373 rpcconnect=127.0.0.1 addnode=5.249.152.30
|
|
|
|
brother3
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
April 29, 2014, 05:01:34 PM |
|
Hi I have 3 minning rigs all running on one LAN
Now if i want to Solo mine hbn straight to a wallet do i have to install the wallet on each of the minning pc's or can i install the wallet just once on a 4th pc and have the 3 minners use the one wallet on the 4th pc
thanks
You need to have one pc (not on the miners) running the client in the HoboNickels.con file of that pc running the client, you should add the rpcallowip= for each ip of your rigs (if you are on the same subnet, I believe you can use wildcards like rpcallowip=192.168.1.*). If you are behind a router, you only need to put your public IP there. Then on your rigs, simply add a pool and put the IP as the url from the pc running the client and the rpcport= (like URL:PORT) the username password will be the rpcusername= and rpcpassword= from that same config file Newly mined block rewards will be on the wallet from that pc, you can then transfer those coins back to your main wallet when they mature. thanks in this .conf file why is there two different ports OR is it a mistake listen=1 daemon=1 server=1 rpcuser=*your hobo name* rpcpassword=*Your hobo quote* port=7372 rpcport=7373 rpcconnect=127.0.0.1 addnode=5.249.152.30 not a mistake 7373 is the port you solo with
|
|
|
|
unick
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
April 29, 2014, 06:52:49 PM |
|
Hi I have 3 minning rigs all running on one LAN
Now if i want to Solo mine hbn straight to a wallet do i have to install the wallet on each of the minning pc's or can i install the wallet just once on a 4th pc and have the 3 minners use the one wallet on the 4th pc
thanks
You need to have one pc (not on the miners) running the client in the HoboNickels.con file of that pc running the client, you should add the rpcallowip= for each ip of your rigs (if you are on the same subnet, I believe you can use wildcards like rpcallowip=192.168.1.*). If you are behind a router, you only need to put your public IP there. Then on your rigs, simply add a pool and put the IP as the url from the pc running the client and the rpcport= (like URL:PORT) the username password will be the rpcusername= and rpcpassword= from that same config file Newly mined block rewards will be on the wallet from that pc, you can then transfer those coins back to your main wallet when they mature. thanks in this .conf file why is there two different ports OR is it a mistake listen=1 daemon=1 server=1 rpcuser=*your hobo name* rpcpassword=*Your hobo quote* port=7372 rpcport=7373 rpcconnect=127.0.0.1 addnode=5.249.152.30 not a mistake 7373 is the port you solo with that's correct, you need to point your miners to the IP:rpcport of the wallet described above. The other port setting is for the listening port connecting to other nodes on the network.
|
|
|
|
brother3
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
April 30, 2014, 12:45:09 AM |
|
My first stake ever ! Feels like a proud papa ![Grin](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/grin.gif) ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2Fh4KqG3y.jpg&t=665&c=TUHwxFzrbdpZOA)
|
|
|
|
presstab
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1330
Merit: 1000
Blockchain Developer
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
April 30, 2014, 03:12:37 AM |
|
My first stake ever ! Feels like a proud papa ![Grin](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/grin.gif) ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2Fh4KqG3y.jpg&t=665&c=TUHwxFzrbdpZOA) My first stake I remember thinking "it worked, it actually worked!"
|
|
|
|
Tranz (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1540
Merit: 1060
May the force bit with you.
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
April 30, 2014, 03:16:06 AM |
|
Tranz I don't quite understand why you need to specify that you want 500 keys assigned when you create a wallet. I did not do this (I didn't specify anything I just created a second wallet using buttons/menus not by typing commands. Am I going to run into a problem?
Most likely no.. Especially if are primarily staking and not much sending/receiving. You can always top up the keypool and then back it up. The larger the keypool the more keys are in you wallet, the more transactions it can do before it is necessary to back it up again. This applies for every coin out there.
|
|
|
|
dogechode
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
April 30, 2014, 02:30:42 PM |
|
Tranz I don't quite understand why you need to specify that you want 500 keys assigned when you create a wallet. I did not do this (I didn't specify anything I just created a second wallet using buttons/menus not by typing commands. Am I going to run into a problem?
Most likely no.. Especially if are primarily staking and not much sending/receiving. You can always top up the keypool and then back it up. The larger the keypool the more keys are in you wallet, the more transactions it can do before it is necessary to back it up again. This applies for every coin out there. When you say back it up, do you mean back up the wallet? I back up all my wallets obsessively. Does backing it up do something related to the keys? Sorry I really am not familiar with the inner workings of coin wallets...
|
|
|
|
unick
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
April 30, 2014, 03:33:57 PM |
|
Tranz I don't quite understand why you need to specify that you want 500 keys assigned when you create a wallet. I did not do this (I didn't specify anything I just created a second wallet using buttons/menus not by typing commands. Am I going to run into a problem?
Most likely no.. Especially if are primarily staking and not much sending/receiving. You can always top up the keypool and then back it up. The larger the keypool the more keys are in you wallet, the more transactions it can do before it is necessary to back it up again. This applies for every coin out there. When you say back it up, do you mean back up the wallet? I back up all my wallets obsessively. Does backing it up do something related to the keys? Sorry I really am not familiar with the inner workings of coin wallets... yes. When you ask for a new address in the client, it does not create a new address on the fly, it takes it from the key pool most likely generated when you first created your wallet. By default it creates 100 addresses (or 101, I'm not sure). If you always reuse the same address, you'll never use up all the keypool's addresses. But if you need let's say 200 addresses, you need to generate the missing addresses. What happens is that the keypool will now contain 200 addresses but your backup will still have only 100 addresses. Now if something goes wrong and you used addresses between 100 and 200. They won't be backed up and you might lose the coins sent to those address. That's why Tranz said that when you generate a new set of addresses, it is good practice to back up the wallet right after they have been generated to make sure you have in a safe place all your private/public key pair. Try to play with the RPC command dumpwallet. You will visually see in a text file, all your keys and this will make more sense. It's also a nice way to print out your keypool and physically store it in a safe place.
|
|
|
|
tricass
Sr. Member
![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif) ![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif) ![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif)
Offline
Activity: 394
Merit: 250
Crypto enthusiast
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
April 30, 2014, 04:38:57 PM |
|
tranz,
wanted to get your opinion on Reddcoin's new innovation Proof of Stake Velocity (PoSV)
|
|
|
|
dogechode
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
April 30, 2014, 05:36:09 PM |
|
tranz,
wanted to get your opinion on Reddcoin's new innovation Proof of Stake Velocity (PoSV)
I wouldn't get too excited about it. They can't seem to provide any meaningful information in the "whitepapers" and when questioned about the basic functionality they explain like a politician. They have been asked if their system would just encourage people to send coins back and forth between addresses they control, and the response was basically "oh no they won't need to do that, there wouldn't be a reason to" but then they say "the system rewards users who make transactions." So in other words this garbage will launch, and people will just send back and forth between their own addresses and abuse it, and the whole thing will be a clusterfuck.
|
|
|
|
Tranz (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1540
Merit: 1060
May the force bit with you.
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
April 30, 2014, 09:30:14 PM |
|
Try to play with the RPC command dumpwallet. You will visually see in a text file, all your keys and this will make more sense. It's also a nice way to print out your keypool and physically store it in a safe place.
dumpwallet is a good way to see your keys. This is also in the GUI under File->Export Wallet
|
|
|
|
Tranz (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1540
Merit: 1060
May the force bit with you.
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
April 30, 2014, 09:31:51 PM |
|
tranz,
wanted to get your opinion on Reddcoin's new innovation Proof of Stake Velocity (PoSV)
I wouldn't get too excited about it. They can't seem to provide any meaningful information in the "whitepapers" and when questioned about the basic functionality they explain like a politician. They have been asked if their system would just encourage people to send coins back and forth between addresses they control, and the response was basically "oh no they won't need to do that, there wouldn't be a reason to" but then they say "the system rewards users who make transactions." So in other words this garbage will launch, and people will just send back and forth between their own addresses and abuse it, and the whole thing will be a clusterfuck. Once the code is released, I'll have a look. But if it is anything like rewarding people for sending coins, all you are going to get a bloated block chain.
|
|
|
|
presstab
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1330
Merit: 1000
Blockchain Developer
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
May 01, 2014, 02:09:02 AM |
|
tranz,
wanted to get your opinion on Reddcoin's new innovation Proof of Stake Velocity (PoSV)
I wouldn't get too excited about it. They can't seem to provide any meaningful information in the "whitepapers" and when questioned about the basic functionality they explain like a politician. They have been asked if their system would just encourage people to send coins back and forth between addresses they control, and the response was basically "oh no they won't need to do that, there wouldn't be a reason to" but then they say "the system rewards users who make transactions." So in other words this garbage will launch, and people will just send back and forth between their own addresses and abuse it, and the whole thing will be a clusterfuck. Once the code is released, I'll have a look. But if it is anything like rewarding people for sending coins, all you are going to get a bloated block chain. The last thing HBN needs is adding more bloat to the chain. I was thinking about txcomments but then got to thinking that it adds extra bloat.
|
|
|
|
brother3
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
May 01, 2014, 02:54:44 AM |
|
tranz,
wanted to get your opinion on Reddcoin's new innovation Proof of Stake Velocity (PoSV)
I wouldn't get too excited about it. They can't seem to provide any meaningful information in the "whitepapers" and when questioned about the basic functionality they explain like a politician. They have been asked if their system would just encourage people to send coins back and forth between addresses they control, and the response was basically "oh no they won't need to do that, there wouldn't be a reason to" but then they say "the system rewards users who make transactions." So in other words this garbage will launch, and people will just send back and forth between their own addresses and abuse it, and the whole thing will be a clusterfuck. I can't believe they call that "innovation"!!! What a freakin' mess ![Grin](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/grin.gif)
|
|
|
|
dogechode
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
May 01, 2014, 03:25:06 AM |
|
I can't believe they call that "innovation"!!! What a freakin' mess ![Grin](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/grin.gif) Hey don't get me wrong, if they have some valid explanation of how it is actually some amazing revolutionary new thing, I am more than willing to hear it. But the papers they released are a joke and when questioned about basic things they just deflect/ignore.
|
|
|
|
Tranz (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1540
Merit: 1060
May the force bit with you.
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
May 01, 2014, 04:08:36 AM |
|
tranz,
wanted to get your opinion on Reddcoin's new innovation Proof of Stake Velocity (PoSV)
I wouldn't get too excited about it. They can't seem to provide any meaningful information in the "whitepapers" and when questioned about the basic functionality they explain like a politician. They have been asked if their system would just encourage people to send coins back and forth between addresses they control, and the response was basically "oh no they won't need to do that, there wouldn't be a reason to" but then they say "the system rewards users who make transactions." So in other words this garbage will launch, and people will just send back and forth between their own addresses and abuse it, and the whole thing will be a clusterfuck. Once the code is released, I'll have a look. But if it is anything like rewarding people for sending coins, all you are going to get a bloated block chain. The last thing HBN needs is adding more bloat to the chain. I was thinking about txcomments but then got to thinking that it adds extra bloat. HBN is actually doing fairly well regarding block chain size. Heading in on close to a year and just pushing 400meg size. Also closing in on 1 million blocks. So the size is good overall, just many small blocks. I think this is a better problem to have then lower number of blocks, but bigger in size.
|
|
|
|
emdje
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
May 01, 2014, 07:37:24 AM |
|
The new wallet 1.4.0.0 keeps crashing. I tried redownloading the blockchain several times, and after a while the wallet crashes. Anyone any ideas?
|
|
|
|
|