Hey, @TheQuin, did you get my message???
Yes and I replied to it despite it being a generic question that could have been asked here rather than in a PM.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
My PM 1:Your PM answer 1:No. The provably fair spin procedure is identical so therefore obviously has the same range of results.
My PM 2:I know the principle (fair spin and so on), I'm talking about the table. Basically, now the table says: "I don't expect you to win the rolex or iphone, that's why I don't even have cells for those prizes". Look veeeery strange.
Your PM answer 2:Those prizes are actually paid in BTC so they would be listed there. Funny how some people's failure to understand simple things leads them to ridiculous conclusions. You claim to understand how the results are calculated so if that's true you must know that it is possible to win all the prizes. Now explain one thing about you that not only looks but is actually strange. Why are you asking generic support questions in PM. What could possibly be "personal" about this conversation?
Ridiculous conclusions? Failure to understand? You serious? Ok, why are the Rolex and Iphone even there (on the WHEEL)? Right? "Those prizes are actually paid in BTC so they would be listed there" - that's it?
Why even use the wheel, right? Just make a list with possible prizes you could win and that's it! Simple. BUT if you make a wheel with the prizes on it, and then you create a TABLE with the prizes - PUT ALL prizes in that table - otherwise it MAKES NO SENSE (maybe except you
).
Why are you asking generic support questions in PM. What could possibly be "personal" about this conversation?
Happy?