The End Of The Bounty.

[Kryten12]

I think it is still possible to find some great bounties out there but you should be very picky about which campaigns you decide to join. Make sure the price of the token in ICO is going to be enough to generate a decent return for your time invested. Also have a look at taking on some of the more difficult or time consuming bounty tasks such as content creation these tend to get less participants and as a result the stakes are higher. Twitter and Facebook are simple reposts as as its easy everyone wants to do it so you get a smaller share from your efforts.

[jackmoon]

I really dislike the fact that a large number of people are involved in the same bounty project, which is not necessary. No matter how good the project is, when I find that too many people are involved, I will choose to leave.

[ajaymukund]

Currently, there are a huge number of ICO projects. Of course, we all understand that half of these projects are either Scam or just very weak projects that nobody needs. But now there are at least such projects. What will be in a year, when the ICO every day will be less and less until it reaches the point that one project per month will be released? It is also worth mentioning that the number of participants in the bounty companies is increasing day by day, and the money allocated to the bounty companies are becoming less.  Conclusion: the bounty of the company will exist for another year, or a maximum of two.
What do you think about this?


If anyone agrees with me or if someone wants to do a good deed, then share the merit. I would be very grateful 

I have thought about it but the bonuses will still be in the future. Because the current Crypto market is a highly valued market. We should believe it because Crypto has brought so many benefits to everyone in the world.
So it deserves to last longer and grow stronger. As a result, ICO projects will grow more and more.

[gurupauts]

this time is a lot of bounty that ends with a scam and has wasted time, there are also bounty that change the rules and allocations during the distribution of coins so that make loss bounty participants, but there is also a good bounty and have a good team and manager so the results obtained well worth it, hopefully bounty will remain and get better

[viquynhh555]

There are a lot of participants, but there are a lot of projects. So I do not consider this a big problem. Moreover, the budgets of the campaigns are large, enough for all.
 

[facezboj1299]

the generosity won't end until the new ideas appear and will begin to be developed. baunt it is necessary for advertizing and the best understanding of the project. projects are even the existing companies which introduce these business processes through blockchain technology.

[AdfdfdhBrrrr]

Yes, it is really bad. The allocations of some bounties are the very law with the huge crowd. Also, many scam projects around us. So these days it's very hard to find a good project. But there are some famous bounty community teams. if we join a bounty that management a good bounty team will be able to get a better profit.

[pootutus]

I don't think bounty is going to end this way, but there may be a change. We all know that several social media have banned ICO ads in the last few months, and I think the promotion task for the future media may be a lot less.

[IL.Guerreiro]

Bounty will never end because it helps the project to become known and also the team behind it. So technically it will always exist with ICO.

[kokota185]

there is nothing that is impossible, but as far as I'm concern, in as much new projects will still be coming to world of crypto, there can't an end to bounty because this is a means of advertising and promoting the new incoming project.

[gabmen]

Bounty will never end because it helps the project to become known and also the team behind it. So technically it will always exist with ICO.

Right. And there are a lot of icos coming in that needes introduction and promotion so bounties would likely thrive. It's just an issue now of whether you get a legitimate bounty campaign or a bogus one. Probably there will be additional regulations for bounties to limit people wasting their time and effort on bogus bounty campaigns

[Eclipse2021]

I saw a very smart comment. Indeed participation number of users should be limited but it's hard I saw bounty programs threads with "huge rewards" and they don't even achieve the softcap so this might be an issue for those who are working hard to be in this bounty programs and I'm not talking about me as I'm a passive bounty hunter and I always join when I have some free time besides working and familly.

[charlotte04]

Currently, there are a huge number of ICO projects. Of course, we all understand that half of these projects are either Scam or just very weak projects that nobody needs. But now there are at least such projects. What will be in a year, when the ICO every day will be less and less until it reaches the point that one project per month will be released? It is also worth mentioning that the number of participants in the bounty companies is increasing day by day, and the money allocated to the bounty companies are becoming less.  Conclusion: the bounty of the company will exist for another year, or a maximum of two.
What do you think about this?


If anyone agrees with me or if someone wants to do a good deed, then share the merit. I would be very grateful 

Yep, but this community is so decentralize and no one can stop it unless governments do work a regulation on it to less the scams and useless ICO projects.

[admtall]

I dont see the end of bounty as of now. The only thing that will kill bounty is when there will be no ICO. If the Age of ICO is done then so do the bounty so lets just continue to support legit ICO.

[maichimoto]

Currently, there are a huge number of ICO projects. Of course, we all understand that half of these projects are either Scam or just very weak projects that nobody needs. But now there are at least such projects. What will be in a year, when the ICO every day will be less and less until it reaches the point that one project per month will be released? It is also worth mentioning that the number of participants in the bounty companies is increasing day by day, and the money allocated to the bounty companies are becoming less.  Conclusion: the bounty of the company will exist for another year, or a maximum of two.
What do you think about this?


If anyone agrees with me or if someone wants to do a good deed, then share the merit. I would be very grateful 

not really. I think the bounty campaigns will start choosing participants, unlike what is happening today. So they will quickly check the backrgound etc to find the best ones.

[Wayan_Pedjeng]

With signature campaigns which pays in Bitcoin becoming more and more scarce, a lot of the users are turning to bounty campaigns for a source of passive income. The problem is two-fold. First, the quality of the ICOs and bounty programs are going down. And secondly, the increase in the number of participants mean that the reward per user is going down.

[indopool]

I really do not like it when the prize manager does not limit the number of participants. I'm sure this is not true and unfair. Now many people want to participate in that gift. Often the project does not have much money. so there is little we can get for the work project for weeks.

[derigop]

Abundance will keep on existing, in spite of the fact that not ICO-molded. Be that as it may, abundance more molded ICO in light of the fact that the paymant is huge. As I would like to think, if genuine abundance will be lost unquestionably in this discussion will be tranquil. As a bitcointalk client, I am here likewise searching for an abundance for my extra income.

[arunakiran]

I don't think it will end, but they will reduce bounty reward and they may restrict for some people to participate in the bounty campaign.

[Alex Bogo]

I think, a large number of a bounty will lead to the fact that there will be a separate class of the people who are engaged bounty. Fans of easy money to be eliminated, because of a large number of a skam and low payment. And those who approach a question with sufficient care will participate only in really worthy bounty.