Bitcoin Forum
February 29, 2020, 01:25:40 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 0.19.0.1 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 ... 1939 1940 1941 1942 1943 1944 1945 1946 1947 1948 1949 1950 1951 1952 1953 1954 1955 1956 1957 1958 1959 1960 1961 1962 1963 1964 1965 1966 1967 1968 1969 1970 1971 1972 1973 1974 1975 1976 1977 1978 1979 1980 1981 1982 1983 1984 1985 1986 1987 1988 [1989] 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034 2035 2036 2037 2038 2039 ... 2565 »
  Print  
Author Topic: NXT :: descendant of Bitcoin - Updated Information  (Read 2756415 times)
jl777
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1176
Merit: 1090


View Profile WWW
March 03, 2014, 05:34:46 AM
 #39761

There can only be one asset named "DOGE" so different gateways would have "myDOGE" or "otherDOGE", etc.

This is the confusion I am worried about. There is no guarantee that the community will get the asset named "DOGE", it will go to the highest bidder the block AE goes live. I am hopeful that in community spirit the ones that obtain the pure names like "DOGE", "BTC", etc would sell all the assets to the community after issuing the full billion. In ripple, anybody can issue any asset, so it becomes a very dangerous thing for the unaware. With NXT, there can be only one, but there is no guarantee the community will get the pure names...

I am thinking of offering a bounty starting at 5000 NXT for the popular crypto names, with a sliding scale from BTC down to unpopularcoin. Hopefully, a quick 4000 NXT profit and community spirit will allow the community gateways to have the pure names.

My plan B) on this is to just add a random string to all the pure names and get the one that is available across the board. It would then look a bit funny with "djwBTC" "djwLTC" and "djwDOGE" being the community crypto assets, but this way we wont be held hostage by somebody that wants 1 million NXT for the BTC asset. It shouldnt be much work for the clients to special case the "djw" prefix, and it might actually help to have a common prefix so we can have a crypto assets page

James

Can asset names be transfered from one Nxt account to another?  I would imagine that we would want the community asset names owned by one account.  If multiple people register the community asset names, we want to make sure they can transfer them.

If the community cannot get the plain asset names BTC, DOGE, LTC, etc, I would recommend registering the names BTC.nxt, DOGE.nxt, LTC.nxt, etc.
No punctuation. I think it is like aliases. Possible to transfer, but not yet. It wont matter that the assets are issued by different accounts. I have a #define for asset # and this is something that will need to be done for each supported coin. Also, I am monitoring the gateway addresses so for ease of use people could just use one of the gateway addresses to redeem

The authorized assets (total issue amount) would be transferred to the community acct with the understanding that it will never directly sell the assets. Each gateway would then get a reasonable amount each to deal with deposits. If we need to get more asset into circulation, the community acct would distribute more.

At any given time the difference between total issued and (quantity of assets held in trust and gateways) should match what is in the multisig acct. This will be publicly viewable and the gateway code will be requiring the balances to match within reason. Pending deposits show up as different amounts to the different bitcoinds due to the sometimes long block times.

James

http://www.digitalcatallaxy.com/report2015.html
100+ page annual report for SuperNET
1582939540
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1582939540

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1582939540
Reply with quote  #2

1582939540
Report to moderator
1582939540
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1582939540

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1582939540
Reply with quote  #2

1582939540
Report to moderator
AWARD-WINNING
CRYPTO CASINO
ASKGAMBLERS
PLAYERS CHOICE 2019
PROUD
PARTNER OF
1500+
GAMES
2 MIN
CASH-OUTS
24/7
SUPPORT
100s OF
FREE SPINS
PLAY NOW
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
1582939540
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1582939540

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1582939540
Reply with quote  #2

1582939540
Report to moderator
1582939540
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1582939540

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1582939540
Reply with quote  #2

1582939540
Report to moderator
msin
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1246
Merit: 1001


View Profile
March 03, 2014, 05:39:30 AM
 #39762

We should support this project if we are looking for another charity, they accept BTC, maybe Nxt?

https://www.outernet.is/
jl777
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1176
Merit: 1090


View Profile WWW
March 03, 2014, 06:05:05 AM
 #39763

I dont know why I thought it wasnt possible to do cold storage for the multisig deposit acct.

On a typical day, less than 10% of overall deposits would be withdrawn, maybe much less. There is no need for a super complicated shifting of funds to and from many multisig accts. We just need to have a multisig cold wallet using 2 of 3 signers where the signers would be Anon136, rickyjames and klee. When the gateway multisig acct gets excess deposits, each server would authorize transfer to the cold multisig wallet. When a big withdrawal comes in, then 2 of the 3 cold wallet signers would need to approve.

All of the deposits and withdrawals and multisig acct info would be public, so all these funds transfers will be visible to all.

The incentive for two of the three gateway operators to collude is reduced dramatically. The trust required for gateways drops 90% and shifts to the cold wallet trio.

What do you think?

James

http://www.digitalcatallaxy.com/report2015.html
100+ page annual report for SuperNET
2Kool4Skewl
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 630
Merit: 250

CryptoTalk.Org - Get Paid for every Post!


View Profile WWW
March 03, 2014, 06:22:43 AM
 #39764

I dont know why I thought it wasnt possible to do cold storage for the multisig deposit acct.

On a typical day, less than 10% of overall deposits would be withdrawn, maybe much less. There is no need for a super complicated shifting of funds to and from many multisig accts. We just need to have a multisig cold wallet using 2 of 3 signers where the signers would be Anon136, rickyjames and klee. When the gateway multisig acct gets excess deposits, each server would authorize transfer to the cold multisig wallet. When a big withdrawal comes in, then 2 of the 3 cold wallet signers would need to approve.

All of the deposits and withdrawals and multisig acct info would be public, so all these funds transfers will be visible to all.

The incentive for two of the three gateway operators to collude is reduced dramatically. The trust required for gateways drops 90% and shifts to the cold wallet trio.

What do you think?

James

I think Anon136, rickyjames and klee are good choices.

In early December, the community voted to set the asset registration fee at 1000 NXT.  
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=353325.0

Is the asset registration fee still going to be set at 1000 NXT?

 
                                . ██████████.
                              .████████████████.
                           .██████████████████████.
                        -█████████████████████████████
                     .██████████████████████████████████.
                  -█████████████████████████████████████████
               -███████████████████████████████████████████████
           .-█████████████████████████████████████████████████████.
        .████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████
       .██████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████.
       .██████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████.
       ..████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████..
       .   .██████████████████████████████████████████████████████.
       .      .████████████████████████████████████████████████.

       .       .██████████████████████████████████████████████
       .    ██████████████████████████████████████████████████████
       .█████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████.
        .███████████████████████████████████████████████████████████
           .█████████████████████████████████████████████████████
              .████████████████████████████████████████████████
                   ████████████████████████████████████████
                      ██████████████████████████████████
                          ██████████████████████████
                             ████████████████████
                               ████████████████
                                   █████████
CryptoTalk.org| 
MAKE POSTS AND EARN BTC!
🏆
Eadeqa
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 644
Merit: 500


View Profile
March 03, 2014, 06:26:04 AM
 #39765

I'm almost considering creating a warning post outside of this thread... people don't seem to realize that currently, one entity controls 50% of the total Auroracoin supply (10,500,000) while there are only ~100k coins being traded by everyone else.

Don't please. There is no reason to go around attacking other coins. It's not our business

Let it be.


NXT-GZYP-FMRT-FQ9K-3YQGS
https://nxtforum.org
allwelder
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1526
Merit: 1004



View Profile
March 03, 2014, 06:27:54 AM
 #39766

Just an article about internet security of seven keys all over the world.http://www.theguardian.com/technology/2014/feb/28/seven-people-keys-worldwide-internet-security-web

 
                                . ██████████.
                              .████████████████.
                           .██████████████████████.
                        -█████████████████████████████
                     .██████████████████████████████████.
                  -█████████████████████████████████████████
               -███████████████████████████████████████████████
           .-█████████████████████████████████████████████████████.
        .████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████
       .██████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████.
       .██████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████.
       ..████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████..
       .   .██████████████████████████████████████████████████████.
       .      .████████████████████████████████████████████████.

       .       .██████████████████████████████████████████████
       .    ██████████████████████████████████████████████████████
       .█████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████.
        .███████████████████████████████████████████████████████████
           .█████████████████████████████████████████████████████
              .████████████████████████████████████████████████
                   ████████████████████████████████████████
                      ██████████████████████████████████
                          ██████████████████████████
                             ████████████████████
                               ████████████████
                                   █████████
.CryptoTalk.org.|.MAKE POSTS AND EARN BTC!.🏆
CIYAM
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1890
Merit: 1003


Ian Knowles - CIYAM Lead Developer


View Profile WWW
March 03, 2014, 06:32:10 AM
 #39767

Is the asset registration fee still going to be set at 1000 NXT?

One idea that comes to mind is perhaps to have different Asset "classes" and price them differently (allowing Assets to be affordable to most but perhaps making A class Assets more expensive to list than B class).

I'd still keep the name to be unique (so no confusion) and a client might simply display A class assets in say a different color to B class ones.

With CIYAM anyone can create 100% generated C++ web applications in literally minutes.

GPG Public Key | 1ciyam3htJit1feGa26p2wQ4aw6KFTejU
jl777
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1176
Merit: 1090


View Profile WWW
March 03, 2014, 06:47:58 AM
 #39768

Is the asset registration fee still going to be set at 1000 NXT?

One idea that comes to mind is perhaps to have different Asset "classes" and price them differently (allowing Assets to be affordable to most but perhaps making A class Assets more expensive to list than B class).

I'd still keep the name to be unique (so no confusion) and a client might simply display A class assets in say a different color to B class ones.

The longer the asset name, the lower the cost?

http://www.digitalcatallaxy.com/report2015.html
100+ page annual report for SuperNET
chihao87
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 29
Merit: 0


View Profile
March 03, 2014, 07:11:25 AM
 #39769

Is there any new updates, projects on NXT? any progress?
longzai1988
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 77
Merit: 10


View Profile
March 03, 2014, 07:15:59 AM
 #39770

Is there any new updates, projects on NXT? any progress?

One of the big stakeholder offer 3m nxt for atomic cross-chain bounty, nxt source code just released few days ago.

sweet & happy cryptocurrency , cheers Smiley
NXT : NXT-HSBE-8PWL-CUCD-BHUD6
BTCD : RTaMoRXsA7uCv869dX1TfCZmHw4ExbMVmQ
landomata
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1904
Merit: 1000


View Profile WWW
March 03, 2014, 07:17:27 AM
 #39771

Is the asset registration fee still going to be set at 1000 NXT?

One idea that comes to mind is perhaps to have different Asset "classes" and price them differently (allowing Assets to be affordable to most but perhaps making A class Assets more expensive to list than B class).

I'd still keep the name to be unique (so no confusion) and a client might simply display A class assets in say a different color to B class ones.


Something like Blue Chips, penny stocks, etc.

wakasaki808
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 476
Merit: 500



View Profile
March 03, 2014, 07:18:13 AM
 #39772

Is there any new updates, projects on NXT? any progress?

Cryptsy added NXT
wakasaki808
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 476
Merit: 500



View Profile
March 03, 2014, 07:18:52 AM
 #39773

Is there any work being done to get BTC38 to add NXT? Now that Cryptsy has added NXT.
chihao87
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 29
Merit: 0


View Profile
March 03, 2014, 07:21:45 AM
 #39774

Code:
[2014-03-02 00:46:15.186] DEBUG: Invalid peer address: olne.dynip.com
java.net.UnknownHostException: olne.dynip.com
at java.net.Inet4AddressImpl.lookupAllHostAddr(Native Method)
at java.net.InetAddress$1.lookupAllHostAddr(InetAddress.java:894)
at java.net.InetAddress.getAddressesFromNameService(InetAddress.java:1286)
at java.net.InetAddress.getAllByName0(InetAddress.java:1239)
at java.net.InetAddress.getAllByName(InetAddress.java:1155)
at java.net.InetAddress.getAllByName(InetAddress.java:1091)
at java.net.InetAddress.getByName(InetAddress.java:1041)
at nxt.peer.Peers.addPeer(Peers.java:372)
at nxt.peer.Peers$3.run(Peers.java:302)
at java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.call(Executors.java:471)
at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.runAndReset(FutureTask.java:304)
at java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ScheduledFutureTask.access$301(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:178)
at java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ScheduledFutureTask.run(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:293)
at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1145)
at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:615)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:724)

I actually had the same issue before. you may need to remove the peer to fix the issue.
Fatih87SK
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 616
Merit: 500



View Profile
March 03, 2014, 07:22:14 AM
 #39775

Is there any work being done to get BTC38 to add NXT? Now that Cryptsy has added NXT.

Allwelder said something about that. He said that NXT had to be registered somewhere else before BTC38 can add it.

He said something about voting on a website, but it was Chinese and didn't understand what I should do.

2Kool4Skewl
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 630
Merit: 250

CryptoTalk.Org - Get Paid for every Post!


View Profile WWW
March 03, 2014, 07:30:47 AM
 #39776

Is the asset registration fee still going to be set at 1000 NXT?

One idea that comes to mind is perhaps to have different Asset "classes" and price them differently (allowing Assets to be affordable to most but perhaps making A class Assets more expensive to list than B class).

I'd still keep the name to be unique (so no confusion) and a client might simply display A class assets in say a different color to B class ones.


What would differentiate a "Class A" asset from a "Class B" asset?

 
                                . ██████████.
                              .████████████████.
                           .██████████████████████.
                        -█████████████████████████████
                     .██████████████████████████████████.
                  -█████████████████████████████████████████
               -███████████████████████████████████████████████
           .-█████████████████████████████████████████████████████.
        .████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████
       .██████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████.
       .██████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████.
       ..████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████..
       .   .██████████████████████████████████████████████████████.
       .      .████████████████████████████████████████████████.

       .       .██████████████████████████████████████████████
       .    ██████████████████████████████████████████████████████
       .█████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████.
        .███████████████████████████████████████████████████████████
           .█████████████████████████████████████████████████████
              .████████████████████████████████████████████████
                   ████████████████████████████████████████
                      ██████████████████████████████████
                          ██████████████████████████
                             ████████████████████
                               ████████████████
                                   █████████
CryptoTalk.org| 
MAKE POSTS AND EARN BTC!
🏆
weichao
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 29
Merit: 0


View Profile
March 03, 2014, 07:34:38 AM
 #39777

Is there any new updates, projects on NXT? any progress?

One of the big stakeholder offer 3m nxt for atomic cross-chain bounty, nxt source code just released few days ago.

Thanks buddy. Would you mind providing the bounty link? I am very interested in it.
igmaca
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 168
Merit: 100


View Profile
March 03, 2014, 07:36:48 AM
 #39778

How to upgrade your NXT node guide.

(text wall)


I update with your instructions my vps client to 0.8.3 but i can not see in my local browser nxt client

What URL are you using to access the client UI? Have you seen the previous comments?

https://188.226.169.81:7874/ does not work
http://188.226.169.81:7874/ does not work
https://188.226.169.81:7875/ does not work
http://188.226.169.81:7875/ does not work
https://188.226.169.81:7876/ does not work
http://188.226.169.81:7876/ does not work

Java seems is working well

I have not tried to activate ssl but
If you have no nxt.apiSSL=true and nxt.uiSSL=true, do not try to enter https, that will not work.

7875 is the interface
7876 is the API

1) nxt.allowedBotHosts=*
2) nxt.allowedUserHosts=127.0.0.1, localhost; 0:0:0:0:0:0:0:1; VPS IP; YOUR IP;
3) nxt.uiServerHost=VPS URL                       (ditto nxt.myAddress)
4) nxt.uiServerCORS = true

Test this!

it worked

thanks,  Smiley
Anon136
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1666
Merit: 1211



View Profile
March 03, 2014, 07:48:06 AM
 #39779

We should support this project if we are looking for another charity, they accept BTC, maybe Nxt?

https://www.outernet.is/

amiable i suppose but i have a hard time trying to support people who are trying to offer things for "free". altruism will rarely ever get you very far. the best way to get internet into the hands of the masses is to figure out how to make a profit while doing it. that will lead to a model thats actually sustainable and not riddled with tragedy of the commons problems.

Rep Thread: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=381041
If one can not confer upon another a right which he does not himself first possess, by what means does the state derive the right to engage in behaviors from which the public is prohibited?
longzai1988
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 77
Merit: 10


View Profile
March 03, 2014, 07:52:40 AM
 #39780


Thanks buddy. Would you mind providing the bounty link? I am very interested in it.


Here you go :
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=345619.msg5464970#msg5464970

sweet & happy cryptocurrency , cheers Smiley
NXT : NXT-HSBE-8PWL-CUCD-BHUD6
BTCD : RTaMoRXsA7uCv869dX1TfCZmHw4ExbMVmQ
Pages: « 1 ... 1939 1940 1941 1942 1943 1944 1945 1946 1947 1948 1949 1950 1951 1952 1953 1954 1955 1956 1957 1958 1959 1960 1961 1962 1963 1964 1965 1966 1967 1968 1969 1970 1971 1972 1973 1974 1975 1976 1977 1978 1979 1980 1981 1982 1983 1984 1985 1986 1987 1988 [1989] 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034 2035 2036 2037 2038 2039 ... 2565 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!