Bitcoin Forum
May 27, 2024, 11:13:48 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 ... 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 [170] 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 ... 849 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [ANN] [ASIC-RESISTANT] UltraCoin (UTC) - Ultrafast 6 second transactions!!  (Read 946566 times)
This is a self-moderated topic. If you do not want to be moderated by the person who started this topic, create a new topic.
sakr
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 364
Merit: 250



View Profile
February 11, 2014, 02:26:27 PM
 #3381

I need mac users to TEST this miner:

http://speedy.sh/9rpV7/Mac-GPU-miner-build.zip



Getting this while trying:

Code:
 cgminer version 3.7.2 - Started: [2014-02-11 10:20:59]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 (5s):0.000 (avg):0.000h/s | A:0  R:0  HW:0  WU:0.0/m
 ST: 2  SS: 0  NB: 1  LW: 4  GF: 0  RF: 0
 Connected to ultra.coinsnipers.com diff 16 with stratum as user derBruchpilotPro.pc4
 Block: 919f4804...  Diff:15  Started: [10:21:08]  Best share: 0
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 [P]ool management [G]PU management [S]ettings [D]isplay options [Q]uit
 GPU 0:                | OFF   / 0.000h/s | A:0 R:0 HW:0 WU:0.0/m I: 0
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 [2014-02-11 10:20:58] Started cgminer 3.7.2
 [2014-02-11 10:20:58] Probing for an alive pool
 [2014-02-11 10:20:59] Pool 0 difficulty changed to 16
 [2014-02-11 10:21:08] Disabling extra threads due to dynamic mode.
 [2014-02-11 10:21:08] Tune dynamic intensity with --gpu-dyninterval
 [2014-02-11 10:21:08] Network diff set to 15
 [2014-02-11 10:21:08] Error -54: Enqueueing kernel onto command queue. (clEnqueueNDRangeKernel)
 [2014-02-11 10:21:08] GPU 0 failure, disabling!
 [2014-02-11 10:21:08] Error -54: Enqueueing kernel onto command queue. (clEnqueueNDRangeKernel)
 [2014-02-11 10:21:08] GPU 0 failure, disabling!

Okey, its a 2009 Mac Mini with NVIDIA GeForce 9400 256 MB, not really a mining hardware.
I can test this on my iMac with AMD GPU later on the evening too.


thanks for posting test results, these NVIDIA cards are known to have mining issues under osx, looking forward for your AMD tests with this.
vizique
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2415
Merit: 1636



View Profile
February 11, 2014, 02:36:22 PM
 #3382

This is interesting and provides a little insight to the pools issues recently
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-26136774
cointradero
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 224
Merit: 100


View Profile
February 11, 2014, 02:45:10 PM
 #3383

I need mac users to TEST this miner:

http://speedy.sh/9rpV7/Mac-GPU-miner-build.zip



Getting this while trying:

Code:
 cgminer version 3.7.2 - Started: [2014-02-11 10:20:59]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 (5s):0.000 (avg):0.000h/s | A:0  R:0  HW:0  WU:0.0/m
 ST: 2  SS: 0  NB: 1  LW: 4  GF: 0  RF: 0
 Connected to ultra.coinsnipers.com diff 16 with stratum as user derBruchpilotPro.pc4
 Block: 919f4804...  Diff:15  Started: [10:21:08]  Best share: 0
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 [P]ool management [G]PU management [S]ettings [D]isplay options [Q]uit
 GPU 0:                | OFF   / 0.000h/s | A:0 R:0 HW:0 WU:0.0/m I: 0
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 [2014-02-11 10:20:58] Started cgminer 3.7.2
 [2014-02-11 10:20:58] Probing for an alive pool
 [2014-02-11 10:20:59] Pool 0 difficulty changed to 16
 [2014-02-11 10:21:08] Disabling extra threads due to dynamic mode.
 [2014-02-11 10:21:08] Tune dynamic intensity with --gpu-dyninterval
 [2014-02-11 10:21:08] Network diff set to 15
 [2014-02-11 10:21:08] Error -54: Enqueueing kernel onto command queue. (clEnqueueNDRangeKernel)
 [2014-02-11 10:21:08] GPU 0 failure, disabling!
 [2014-02-11 10:21:08] Error -54: Enqueueing kernel onto command queue. (clEnqueueNDRangeKernel)
 [2014-02-11 10:21:08] GPU 0 failure, disabling!

Okey, its a 2009 Mac Mini with NVIDIA GeForce 9400 256 MB, not really a mining hardware.
I can test this on my iMac with AMD GPU later on the evening too.


thanks for posting test results, these NVIDIA cards are known to have mining issues under osx, looking forward for your AMD tests with this.


Typically, that error is a result of an intensity issue that is due to a computer or GPU not having enough RAM to handle the intensity. 
ziggy909
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 46
Merit: 0


View Profile
February 11, 2014, 02:50:04 PM
 #3384

Please move away from ultra.nitro.org, it is still the largest pool

There is a list of pools at www.ultracoin.net/pools.html.
morituri13
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 84
Merit: 10


View Profile
February 11, 2014, 03:00:19 PM
 #3385

Bumface. I edited your rant a bit. I took out some spelling errors and cleaned it up a bit. I think a more professional appearance can go a long way. PM me for further assistance..

Hello all,

I want to make some things VERY clear..... The UTC team is trying to make something positive and every day I find myself battling another army of trolls who seem to be blackbelts in the exercise of futility. UTC is trying to be a counterpart for scamcoins and ‘pump and dump’ schemes by presenting a long term ambition. To these ends, I will take the time here to rebuke every troll and hopefully take away their ammunition by providing some logical reasoning and common sense (2 great enemies of the troll).

The removing of comments:

"THIS THREAD IS SELF MODERATED, TROLLING AND BASELESS ACCUSATIONS ARE REMOVED WITHOUT WARNING"

This statement has been on this thread from day 1. If you are surprised by this fact it means you did not even read the post, which is indicative of a person who is here just to spread fud in a feeble attempt to destabilize what we are trying to accomplish (or devalue UTC so you can buy cheap and make a quick profit).

Negative comments are NOT removed if they present an reasonable argument or opinion. This means you must make a claim AND then provide evidence. Statements such as "this coin is an ultrascammmm!!!" with no supporting evidence are removed. These types of comments are not productive.

If you are merely coming here to throw feces like a primate, your comment will be removed.

I welcome and love a challenge (be it a venture or an intellectual challenge), and if you have honest criticisms they will most assuredly NOT be removed. Please do so by using adult language and logical reasoning with evidence to substantiate your claim and formulate a sound argument.

I wish to publicly voice the disgust I have for some comments here; most of which are blatant lies. The people responsible should be very ashamed of themselves. For example "PM bumface for a  secret miner that has more hash it costs 0,5btc".This comment really hurt me. People who know me know that I could not code to save my life. I can barely program a wake up alarm on my telephone...

Thanks for your time.
pieterjanvh
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 668
Merit: 500


View Profile
February 11, 2014, 03:07:22 PM
Last edit: February 11, 2014, 03:21:16 PM by pieterjanvh
 #3386

This is interesting and provides a little insight to the pools issues recently
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-26136774


Haven't heard about DDoSing with NTP yet. Thanks for sharing!
vizique
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2415
Merit: 1636



View Profile
February 11, 2014, 06:15:34 PM
 #3387

http://www.coindesk.com/massive-concerted-attack-launched-bitcoin-exchanges/
kle-sg
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 67
Merit: 10


View Profile
February 11, 2014, 07:04:03 PM
 #3388

what's wrong with this transaction? I got no confirm at all.  Huh

Rabbit80
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 120
Merit: 100


View Profile
February 11, 2014, 08:11:11 PM
 #3389

Price has divebombed.. 0.4USD  Cry Cry
NickPortland
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 98
Merit: 10


View Profile
February 11, 2014, 08:16:12 PM
 #3390

Devs must be dumpin! Utc is done?

Official Ambassador for UTC-PND relations
*donations here*
 UTC: Ujff1xrc8brmHkRaFG3BcG5nVScXdh5Wu1 BTC: 159uuxJCfUsG44N52NUsydi2bCNeFSYyTi
nanoprobe
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 980
Merit: 1000


Traveling in subspace


View Profile
February 11, 2014, 08:24:28 PM
 #3391

Does cgwatcher work with scrypt-jane? Have not been able to make it work. Keeps asking for url even though it's listed in the pools tab. The miner and config files show in settings but there are no arguments showing. What am I missing?

You'll never know what you're living for until you know what you're willing to die for.
Never look back, something might be gaining on you.
fredeq
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1537
Merit: 1005


View Profile WWW
February 11, 2014, 08:29:16 PM
 #3392

Does cgwatcher work with scrypt-jane? Have not been able to make it work. Keeps asking for url even though it's listed in the pools tab. The miner and config files show in settings but there are no arguments showing. What am I missing?

I run my just fine but with arguments, not conf file

https://whattomine.com - Check what to mine Smiley
sakr
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 364
Merit: 250



View Profile
February 11, 2014, 08:32:04 PM
 #3393

Does cgwatcher work with scrypt-jane? Have not been able to make it work. Keeps asking for url even though it's listed in the pools tab. The miner and config files show in settings but there are no arguments showing. What am I missing?

I run my just fine but with arguments, not conf file

runs fine with conf file here
sakr
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 364
Merit: 250



View Profile
February 11, 2014, 08:39:42 PM
 #3394

Devs must be dumpin! Utc is done?

i would not worry yet, as the price quickly retraced up near 100%, means bulls still strong!
NickPortland
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 98
Merit: 10


View Profile
February 11, 2014, 08:41:16 PM
 #3395

Devs must be dumpin! Utc is done?

i would not worry yet, as the price quickly retraced up near 100%, means bulls still strong!
What are you referring to?

current price is 0.00075 and falling

Official Ambassador for UTC-PND relations
*donations here*
 UTC: Ujff1xrc8brmHkRaFG3BcG5nVScXdh5Wu1 BTC: 159uuxJCfUsG44N52NUsydi2bCNeFSYyTi
Rabbit80
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 120
Merit: 100


View Profile
February 11, 2014, 08:50:56 PM
 #3396

Does cgwatcher work with scrypt-jane? Have not been able to make it work. Keeps asking for url even though it's listed in the pools tab. The miner and config files show in settings but there are no arguments showing. What am I missing?

Sure it does.. just put --scrypt-jane in the miner arguments or download and use the ultracoinminer. To make it see the ultracoinminer.exe file, type a * in the filename box and press enter Wink I have set up a couple this way (not both mine though unfortunately)
sakr
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 364
Merit: 250



View Profile
February 11, 2014, 08:51:11 PM
 #3397

Quote
What are you referring to?

current price is 0.00075 and falling

Check UTC/USD graph at crypto-trade, the price quickly recovered from 0.4, also check the weekly graph, the price started at 0.25, finally a serious dump would drop the price below 0.2 or more as the market is still young and would not support huge sells yet, so i don't think stake holders would want to sell below 0.2

as for UTC/BTC it is also affected by BTC changes. anyway i'm still holding now, still looks safe for me!
Jarod1231
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 951
Merit: 252



View Profile
February 11, 2014, 08:56:11 PM
 #3398

Devs must be dumpin! Utc is done?

i would not worry yet, as the price quickly retraced up near 100%, means bulls still strong!
What are you referring to?

current price is 0.00075 and falling

Weak hands selling, I keep buying what I can... But I'm ultra-poor in crypto

PaulR1
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 320
Merit: 250


View Profile
February 11, 2014, 09:16:27 PM
 #3399

Why would someone mine UTC first with between 50.000 and 60.000 KH/s and mine now since today with more than 105.000 KH/s ??

What does this miner has more info or now more than us ?

Or is this miner just a big gambler or a big believer ?

http://ultracoin.net/ ~ Ultracoin Website         http://ultracointalk.org/ ~ UltracoinTalk Forum
jakiman
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1638
Merit: 1011


jakiman is back!


View Profile
February 11, 2014, 09:31:30 PM
 #3400

Why would someone mine UTC first with between 50.000 and 60.000 KH/s and mine now since today with more than 105.000 KH/s ??

They probably determined that UTC was most profitable by mining and then immediately dumping with current amount of buy orders.

Pages: « 1 ... 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 [170] 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 ... 849 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!