[ANN][DASH] Dash (dash.org) | First Self-Funding Self-Governing Crypto Currency

[Kai Proctor]

When I see how the "competition" acts, I remember why I have a 100% Darkcoin portfolio. Be the most innovative not the best in mudslinging.

[1714318039]

1714318039

[1714318039]

1714318039

[1714318039]

1714318039

[MrWHALE]

While It is theoretically impossble for something to be 100% anonymous,

With cryptocoins, Darkcoin is the biggest contender for anonymity, every other "anonymous" coin, has either been a scam(XC,Libertycoin), or a Copy/Clone(MRO, Quazar)

XC anon proof:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_uTgnZAFuNU&feature=youtu.be

Now shut it bagholder.  

XC has an "coin mixer" in it's wallet and no other anonymous features, except for copying the x11 algo from Darkcoin and also Copying Darkcoin's previous name, Xcoin... They claim to have other features in the making, and so far, everything has only been talk and No action, why? Because it's all a ruse/lie, just like Libertycoin's was.

Bitcoin has the same thing, Darkwallet.

They're not trustless^^^So you have to place trust that the XC Dev wouldn't just take all your coins...

XC was originally made by loljosh who makes altcoins for BTC, according to info I've read, which means the XC dev atm has no idea what he's doing, as he's paying someone else to code for him

Darkcoin is trustless, you don't rely on an external wallet for anonymity, as it's Built in.

Yes, XC was made by loljosh, which is why they now have anon mixer that is decentralized using xnodes up on testnet.  See: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_uTgnZAFuNU&feature=youtu.be

loljosh must be making a killing with that decentralized anon code that XC bought, damn man.  #sarcasm

You're such a delusional DRK bagholder.  Learn to use your fucking brain.

[coins101]

I guess xc people are posting because xc thread is self-moderated so their is no means of retort; they are looking for fresh blood to keep stoking the boiler room fire; and to find a home to lay the blame for the end result.

[Donho]

No sync with Mac Wallet 0.9.4.6

update to 0.9.4.11
http://darkcoin.io/getstarted.html

[MrWHALE]

"Why CoinJoin, as Used in DarkCoin,does NOT bring Full Anonymity"

http://www.scribd.com/doc/227369807/Bitcoin-Coinjoin-Not-Anonymous-v01


Sad...

^ you got an answer for that Evan?  Or you going to stay silent until you can finish dumping your 1.5 million DRK premine? 

#scam

Let's get back on topic.  ^

[MrWHALE]

Yep.

http://www.scribd.com/doc/227369807/Bitcoin-Coinjoin-Not-Anonymous-v01
^--Doesn't this also apply to XC?

Dan Metcalf: it does NOT apply to XC
Dan Metcalf: because of the multipath
Dan Metcalf: we don't use any coinjoin
Dan Metcalf: type of solution

Sad day for DRK

[coins101]

why do you feel the need to be here? just go away.

[Kai Proctor]

No sync with Mac Wallet 0.9.4.6

DarkCoin Mac OS X Update v0.9.4.11
updated 26 May 2014

URL: https://www.darkcoin.io/downloads/DarkCoin-Qt-MacOSX-v0.9.4.11.zip

mirror: https://www.dropbox.com/s/uf9gybph3xvicp7/DarkCoin-Qt-MacOSX-v0.9.4.11.zip

zip shasum: 91aa1e02920db4e65b243144e1e1e84bfd12a9ba

Note: The network may currently cause syncing issues due to the hard fork.

If your wallet fails to update to the latest block, do the following:

0. just a reminder: backup your wallet.dat (regularly do this)
1. make sure that your DarkCoin.app resides in your Applications folder and is closed
2. delete peers.dat and remove all addnode= entries from your darkcoin.conf (if you have one)
3. fire up Terminal.app and paste this to reindex the Blockchain:

Code:

/Applications/DarkCoin-Qt.app/Contents/MacOS/DarkCoin-Qt -reindex

-- voilà, it syncs to the latest block.


Mac users, if you appreciate this release please support it by sending DRK: 1 helps!

DRK tips: XtwzEuurDTNeVK5a26AzzZDdVkkPkAQ7Eu

Donation List (pm me your username to appear here),  thank you!

2014-05-05     +1.45662795   
2014-05-13     +5         
2014-05-14     +30       (thx Evan!)
2014-05-16     +0.01
2014-05-18     +1
2014-05-21     +0.1
2014-05-21     +0.4
2014-05-27     +1
2014-05-27     +2        (thx bloxton!)
2014-05-28     +5

[Joshuar]

While It is theoretically impossble for something to be 100% anonymous,

With cryptocoins, Darkcoin is the biggest contender for anonymity, every other "anonymous" coin, has either been a scam(XC,Libertycoin), or a Copy/Clone(MRO, Quazar)

I'm a liar.

XC has an "coin mixer" in it's wallet and no other anonymous features, except for copying the x11 algo from Darkcoin and also Copying Darkcoin's previous name, Xcoin... They claim to have other features in the making, and so far, everything has only been talk and No action, why? Because it's all a ruse/lie, just like Libertycoin's was.

Bitcoin has the same thing, Darkwallet.

They're not trustless^^^So you have to place trust that the XC Dev wouldn't just take all your coins...

XC was originally made by loljosh who makes altcoins for BTC, according to info I've read, which means the XC dev atm has no idea what he's doing, as he's paying someone else to code for him

Darkcoin is trustless, you don't rely on an external wallet for anonymity, as it's Built in.

I admit I'm a liar

That's pretty funny, if you look at loljosh's trust rating list, atsecure gave him a positive rating, the day after XC was released....Sure buddy, keep lying to yourself, maybe you could leave without much loss when XC tanks like Libertycoin did.

[Freckleg]

Please stop discussing anything other than Dark and ignore the trolls....thanks I know it's hard

[pbleak]

Anyone else have trouble moving coins from exchanges to the wallet?

[Kai Proctor]

Can you edit out his post when you reply. He likes it when you are bumping his BS.

[Freckleg]

Anyone else have trouble moving coins from exchanges to the wallet?

Going through your posts you seem to have that everyday. Strange it only happens to you

[biggernugs]

While It is theoretically impossble for something to be 100% anonymous,

With cryptocoins, Darkcoin is the biggest contender for anonymity, every other "anonymous" coin, has either been a scam(XC,Libertycoin), or a Copy/Clone(MRO, Quazar)

so says someone who's signature states 100% anonymous

[pbleak]

Indeed, which is why I am asking (I'm a holder with DRK, but Cryptsy seems to be tricky with it).

[Propulsion]

Has anyone mentioned the XC pre mine yet? It's pretty large.

[Freckleg]

Ignore the trolls"........

[Kai Proctor]

Yeah right you hold some DRK... That's the introduction before every FUD. Be more creative.

[MrWHALE]

Just trying to be an upstanding citizen by organizing some relevant information for investors who want to know the truth:

DRK's method of coinjoin does not nor will not ever bring 100% truly anonymous transfers.
Proof: "Why CoinJoin, as Used in DarkCoin,does NOT bring Full Anonymity"
http://www.scribd.com/doc/227369807/Bitcoin-Coinjoin-Not-Anonymous-v01

Does this same proof apply to XC as well?  The short answer: No, this does not apply to XC because XC uses a unique multi-path solution and NOT coinjoin.  

Does XC's anon function even work?  Yes!
Proof: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_uTgnZAFuNU&feature=youtu.be

All I want is investors to make the most informed decisions when investing their money.  Why invest in DRK when Evan himself says the anon feature is not complete nor did he ever promise 100% anon transfers? See proof: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=421615.msg7060893#msg7060893

Spend your money wisely folks.  Everything written here is true, but don't take my word for it, do your own research.

[Joshuar]

XC was paid to be made by atsecure(XC dev), just like coingen website makes alt coins for BTC.

Above pic is atsecure(XC dev) leaving loljosh(guy who makes alt coins for BTC) a positive comment, 1 day after XC is released

Stop trying to promote coingen, pay-to-be-made, coins, thanks.