[ANN][DASH] Dash (dash.org) | First Self-Funding Self-Governing Crypto Currency

[TanteStefana2]

Mrs Robinson, first how come you know what etsy is, and second how do you know they sold it on silk road?

 

I'm old, I'm slow, but that also means I'm worldly   LOL

[1714238031]

1714238031

[1714238031]

1714238031

[1714238031]

1714238031

[TanteStefana2]

That is what Silk Road was about, that is what they were arrested for.  Not for using cryptos, in fact, the US government sold those coins, and put over a cool 2 million bucks in their pockets!  Nice, they should reduce our taxes, but Obama has already spent the money

Surely, 100k coins should be worth more than 2mn  

I was trying to remember the total, the last one I saw, I think I remember 2, but my memory sucks, so I said "over" LOL  besides, knowing the stupidity of the government, they probably sold 'em for $10 each, LOL

[minerjav]

History maybe repeating itself.
http://tav.espians.com/why-bitcoin-will-fail-as-a-currency.html

Thanks for the link
Just for fun, from previous article(published Jun 2011)

...we can be sure that it[bitcoin] will eventually serve as nothing more than as a collector's item...

[chaeplin]

(XC implementation of mixer)
Meaning(my guess)

1) a type of mixer server is used which is implemented to client.
2) user send money to mixer with encrypted real payee adress.
3) money is spllited to 2 ~ many small amount, so many tx created. (or ... )
3) mixer takes user money(all tx), and send to real payee.
 

Money paid to mixer.

Fedoracoin already implemented mixer.


What will be multipath(my guess) ?
As many tx created, each tx will use another mixer. or just one mixer, transmission path is altered ?


What about fee (my guess) ?
Minimum mixer fee will be splitted to each tx.


Edit:

As XC dev mentioned it, Current version is, trust me, if you send your money to me, i will send your money to your payee, trust 3rd party implementation.

[TsuyokuNaritai]

Off-topic.

Could you guys please at least be clear you're not talking about darkcoin, as newcomers might assume, this being the DRK thread and all. Thanks.

[chaeplin]

Off-topic.

Could you guys please at least be clear you're not talking about darkcoin, as newcomers might assume, this being the DRK thread and all. Thanks.

I edit it. sorry.

[evtrmm]

hey all,
I won't say this is off topic as I feel it pertains to both sides.

First, let me say that we hold DRK as well as XC.  Just a lot more XC since we mined it from day 1.  

I am glad the garbage over the last couple days has subsided, as there was never a need for it in the first place.  I have also said this in the XC thread and on Twitter.

I promote the idea that our communities work together and support each other and move on to even bigger things, not for only our fanboy coin, but also for the crypto world in general.  The Coindesk article made both sides look like idiots.  

Both of these coins have great promise, and there are real world applications for both.  It may be true that DRK is further along than XC, but DRK has also been around for much longer.  Kind of like an older brother.

Let's do our best to promote cryptos in general, support innovation, and stop making the community look like a bunch of teenage girls.

Thank you

[Sleepyx]

hey all,
I won't say this is off topic as I feel it pertains to both sides.

First, let me say that we hold DRK as well as XC.  Just a lot more XC since we mined it from day 1.  

I am glad the garbage over the last couple days has subsided, as there was never a need for it in the first place.  I have also said this in the XC thread and on Twitter.

I promote the idea that our communities work together and support each other and move on to even bigger things, not for only our fanboy coin, but also for the crypto world in general.  The Coindesk article made both sides look like idiots.  

Both of these coins have great promise, and there are real world applications for both.  It may be true that DRK is further along than XC, but DRK has also been around for much longer.  Kind of like an older brother.

Let's do our best to promote cryptos in general, support innovation, and stop making the community look like a bunch of teenage girls.

Thank you

Sure thing. However, 90% of the things that have been brought up about xc by dark holders has been from a viewpoint of legitimate concern. Its only about 10% fud. Yet xc runs around saying fud fud fud dark is the reason our price went down. They think theres a 100% direct correlation to what people from dark say and the price of their coin dropping. Its just not true.

[mulga]

is there any news on the Bitfinex front yet?

[evtrmm]

hey all,
I won't say this is off topic as I feel it pertains to both sides.

First, let me say that we hold DRK as well as XC.  Just a lot more XC since we mined it from day 1.  

I am glad the garbage over the last couple days has subsided, as there was never a need for it in the first place.  I have also said this in the XC thread and on Twitter.

I promote the idea that our communities work together and support each other and move on to even bigger things, not for only our fanboy coin, but also for the crypto world in general.  The Coindesk article made both sides look like idiots.  

Both of these coins have great promise, and there are real world applications for both.  It may be true that DRK is further along than XC, but DRK has also been around for much longer.  Kind of like an older brother.

Let's do our best to promote cryptos in general, support innovation, and stop making the community look like a bunch of teenage girls.

Thank you

Sure thing. However, 90% of the things that have been brought up about xc by dark holders has been from a viewpoint of legitimate concern. Its only about 10% fud. Yet xc runs around saying fud fud fud dark is the reason our price went down. They think theres a 100% direct correlation to what people from dark say and the price of their coin dropping. Its just not true.

I hear you.  The biggest problem with the 90% concern is that 50% of that has already been gone over and put to rest.  At that point they call it "fud" - I absolutely HATE that reference - FUD - Kind of like when you buy a Harley and have to get an entire new wardrobe.   Regardless, we will all move forward and hopefully be better for it. 

Keep up the good work here guys.  And remember: With new minds come new innovations

[whazzledazzle]

is there any news on the Bitfinex front yet?

Official response from Bitfinex here, at the end:

http://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/26uhkp/warning_bitfinex_is_bugged/chusmc1

[Sleepyx]

hey all,
I won't say this is off topic as I feel it pertains to both sides.

First, let me say that we hold DRK as well as XC.  Just a lot more XC since we mined it from day 1.  

I am glad the garbage over the last couple days has subsided, as there was never a need for it in the first place.  I have also said this in the XC thread and on Twitter.

I promote the idea that our communities work together and support each other and move on to even bigger things, not for only our fanboy coin, but also for the crypto world in general.  The Coindesk article made both sides look like idiots.  

Both of these coins have great promise, and there are real world applications for both.  It may be true that DRK is further along than XC, but DRK has also been around for much longer.  Kind of like an older brother.

Let's do our best to promote cryptos in general, support innovation, and stop making the community look like a bunch of teenage girls.

Thank you

Sure thing. However, 90% of the things that have been brought up about xc by dark holders has been from a viewpoint of legitimate concern. Its only about 10% fud. Yet xc runs around saying fud fud fud dark is the reason our price went down. They think theres a 100% direct correlation to what people from dark say and the price of their coin dropping. Its just not true.

I hear you.  The biggest problem with the 90% concern is that 50% of that has already been gone over and put to rest.  At that point they call it "fud" - I absolutely HATE that reference - FUD - Kind of like when you buy a Harley and have to get an entire new wardrobe.   Regardless, we will all move forward and hopefully be better for it.  

Keep up the good work here guys.  And remember: With new minds come new innovations

Thank you for the level headed reply good sir.

is there any news on the Bitfinex front yet?

Official response from Bitfinex here, at the end:

http://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/26uhkp/warning_bitfinex_is_bugged/chusmc1

Its more than rumour since darkcoin was on one of their pages for a period of time Hopefully they were preparing for it.

[Ignition75]

I heard a rumor that some groups are now coming up with FairX11Coin (FXC) due to perceived scam of XC. This just keeps getting nasty 

I heard a rumour that some groups are coming up shortly with the EqualFairX11Coin (EFX11C) due to the perceived planned scam of FXC.

I'm waiting for EqualFairX11CoinPlusLite to be honest... I heard someone has come up with BlockChain 3.0 and Ring Signatures 2.0... They are making a PDF of how it works, so it must be better than DarkCoin...

[zombie6]

Great sport Amir 

He is a technologist and not as biased. He is already rich and has probably been accumulating Darks.

Perhaps he can team up with Evan... imagine the following:

1. Amir buys DRKs...
2. Amir proposes to team up with Evan.
3. Announcement of team up goes public
4. DRK booms.
5. Amir is now FILTHY rich

Amir is not in in for the money, he's in it for the revolution.

[zombie6]

is there any news on the Bitfinex front yet?

Official response from Bitfinex here, at the end:

http://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/26uhkp/warning_bitfinex_is_bugged/chusmc1

Not denying it of course it could also be that someone @ bitfinex is/was holding lots of DRK

[eltito]

is there any news on the Bitfinex front yet?

Official response from Bitfinex here, at the end:

http://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/26uhkp/warning_bitfinex_is_bugged/chusmc1

Rumors on DRK are just rumors, there is nothing to say at this point.

That's PR speak for "you weren't supposed to know about that yet".

[Ignition75]

Not to mention if this were to ever be even a remote possibility, DRK would have to become REGULATED by the U.S government (or anywhere that is trying to use DRK in business).  Which it is not and will not be for quite some time at least.  

Accountants believe everything has to be REGULATED. But here is a technology that CANNOT be regulated.  Seriously, you need to do some basic homework! You're embarrassing yourself and your profession by revealing your ignorance.

+1 ... I was cringing at the stupidity...

[Icebucket]

I really dont understand this, will it get onto this or that exchange. Regardless of theyr volume, it is really easy for traders of any exchange to move theyr BTC from what ever exchange to the next with really no cost. so if there was someone wanting to jump over to the dark side but had a account on xyz exchange. would that not just take him 1 hr to move his BTC to mintpl or whatever and get in on the drk action. all this exhanges,volume thing baffles me .. dont get me wrong I love drk... but really does it matter? .. the thing that matters is the innovation and the belief that we put into its developers and its future.. and I believe with all my heart

[stizz]

This has been floating around since January, so apologies if you've already seen it, but its good info for other DRK bambies like myself. A very good read on how BTC users can be linked to their addresses.

http://people.csail.mit.edu/spillai/data/papers/bitcoin-transaction-graph-analysis.pdf

To me it shows how DRK fills a niche BTC simply cannot.

[Mountaineeer]

DRK/USD market now showing up on Crypsty...of course no fiat markets are available yet but this is very bullish...NICE!!!!