|
|
|
matt608
|
 |
March 16, 2014, 11:52:00 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
jrich76
|
|
March 16, 2014, 11:54:04 AM |
|
Bitcoin was loss making for years.
I am so glad you mentioned this. It was very disappointing to see people declare good coins "dead" at 2 weeks old. Not that I heard this said about DRK, but lots of alt coins have had the supposed gurus of altcoins act like they know nothing about the history of the most successful coin ever, BTC. Forget the pump/mine/dump coins, give real ones like DRK a chance. I know we will all be glad we hoarded DRK when it was dirt cheap, maybe 3 years from now. Don't sell at the first bubble, I can't imagine a bitcoin seller liquidating at $45.00 in Sept 2013 then realizing what a mistake that was in Nov 2013. |
|
|
|
|
|
tifozi
|
|
March 16, 2014, 11:56:52 AM |
|
ha!, our frient hrt is at it on the new clone wreaking havoc with his fake hashes. Clone comeuppance  |
|
|
|
|
CHAOSiTEC
Legendary
 Offline
Activity: 1358
Merit: 1002
|
|
March 16, 2014, 11:59:08 AM |
|
ha!, our frient hrt is at it on the new clone wreaking havoc with his fake hashes. Clone comeuppance i just posted the solution for the fix in their thread, no need to give the cheater a chance of gaining money |
node-vps.com - Tron / Masternode hosting services
|
|
|
traumschiff
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1498
Merit: 1001
180 BPM
|
|
March 16, 2014, 12:02:51 PM |
|
Upvoted and commented every1, I would ask everyone to do the same. |
|
|
|
|
luke997
|
|
March 16, 2014, 12:05:05 PM |
|
I just watch (and buy  ) in amusement people selling this coin on cryptsy... This is one of the very few truly innovative coins, with real value - anonymity - which makes it a commodity, not just a trading instrument. As such, it is very resistant to any pump/dump schemes (and we've seen how well it handled dump of ~5% coins in existence through the exchange theft). I mine and buy it not because what it's worth now, but what's it'll be worth in several months. Supply is very limited, and the market for anonymous transactions will be huge. 500-750mln market cap this year is very real. Not unlike the bitcoin, people will regret ignoring Darkcoin when it hits 10$, then 100$, and then more... Well, I better get back to mining. |
|
|
|
|
|
EfterlysT
|
|
March 16, 2014, 12:10:01 PM |
|
Holding, for a year or so  Mining DRK 100% |
|
|
|
|
|
Madychoux
|
|
March 16, 2014, 12:14:45 PM |
|
Upvoted and commented every1, I would ask everyone to do the same. I'v done the same :-) |
|
|
|
|
|
sippsnapp
|
|
March 16, 2014, 12:20:30 PM |
|
Welcome to the 27MHS miner on my node with 1% DOA,  |
Πάντα ῥεῖ
Bitcoin + Altcoin node pool setup - pm
|
|
|
coins101
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1456
Merit: 1000
|
|
March 16, 2014, 12:25:16 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
boubou
|
|
March 16, 2014, 12:56:34 PM |
|
Srry to say that, but I'm SO HAPPY to see your problem.
I got the exact same problem, asking all over the internet in various language and seems to be the only one until now.
I have 3 290 that do exactly the same: start at 2500 then get back to 2100 (all in the exact same second) after 10 minutes. I'm under Bamt, and it only do that with the 290 AND darkcoin. No problem in Scrypt, no problem in Darkcoin with my other kind of cards.
If you (or others) found a workaround, do not hesitate to share. I'll be glad to offer a few Darkcoins to someone able to fix this.
The quote train was getting a little long there lol. I'm sure we're not alone. I'm using windows 7 . . so clearly it's not our platforms. This leaves something specific to 290's or the miner/kernel. Anyone have a clue? Which 290 series are you running? I have 5 Sapphire 290 Tri-x OC that I can normally get 2.4-2.5mh/s but right now I can only run 4 cards. I have them running great at 2.345+/- or 9.290mh/s combined on all 4. I'm having issues with my mobo and had to RMA ram. My rejects are .01% on 2 cards and 0% on the other 2. WU 0.033-0.0334/m per card. I'm using the Sph-SGminer in Win 8.1 Enterprise 2.345+/- Settings"kernel" : "darkcoin", "gpu-threads" : "1", "gpu-engine" : "1000:1000", "gpu-memclock" : "1300:1300", "gpu-powertune" : "0", "intensity" : "19", "thread-concurrency" : "32765", "worksize" : "256", "lookup-gap" : "2", "gpu-fan" : "75", "temp-overheat" : "78", "temp-cutoff" : "80", "no-pool-disable" : true, "failover-only" : true, "expiry" : "1", "log" : "5", "queue" : "0", "scan-time" : "1" 2.4-2.5mh/s Settings"kernel" : "darkcoin", "gpu-threads" : "1", "gpu-engine" : "1020:1000", "gpu-memclock" : "1500:1300", "gpu-powertune" : "10", "intensity" : "22", "thread-concurrency" : "32765", "worksize" : "256", "lookup-gap" : "2", "temp-overheat" : "78", "temp-cutoff" : "80", "no-pool-disable" : true, "failover-only" : true, "expiry" : "1", "log" : "5", "queue" : "0", "scan-time" : "1" [06:59:08] CL Platform 0 vendor: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. [06:59:08] CL Platform 0 name: AMD Accelerated Parallel Processing [06:59:08] CL Platform 0 version: OpenCL 1.2 AMD-APP (1348.4) [06:59:08] Platform 0 devices: 1 [06:59:08] 0 Hawaii [06:59:08] Number of ADL devices: 1 [06:59:08] ATI ADL Overdrive5 API found. [06:59:08] ATI ADL Overdrive6 API found. [06:59:08] Found 6 ADL adapters [06:59:08] GPU 0 assigned: iAdapterIndex:0 iPresent:1 strUDID:256:26545:4098:57989:5963 iBusNumber:1 iDeviceNumber:0 iDrvIndex:0 iFunctionNumber:0 iVendorID:4098 name:AMD Radeon R9 290 Series [06:59:08] ADL index 1, id 2055687152 - BIOS partno.: 113-E285HOC-X002, version: 015.043.000.001.000000, date: 01/15/14 01:50 [06:59:08] ADL index 2, id 2055687152 - BIOS partno.: 113-E285HOC-X002, version: 015.043.000.001.000000, date: 01/15/14 01:50 [06:59:08] ADL index 3, id 2055687152 - BIOS partno.: 113-E285HOC-X002, version: 015.043.000.001.000000, date: 01/15/14 01:50 [06:59:08] ADL index 4, id 2055687152 - BIOS partno.: 113-E285HOC-X002, version: 015.043.000.001.000000, date: 01/15/14 01:50 [06:59:08] ADL index 5, id 2055687152 - BIOS partno.: 113-E285HOC-X002, version: 015.043.000.001.000000, date: 01/15/14 01:50 [06:59:08] GPU 0 AMD Radeon R9 290 Series hardware monitoring enabled [06:59:08] ADL GPU 0 is Adapter index 0 and maps to adapter id 2055687152 [06:59:08] GPU 0 BIOS partno.: 113-E285HOC-X002, version: 015.043.000.001.000000, date: 01/15/14 01:50 [06:59:08] 1 GPU devices max detected Im at 2100 kh/s with this setting. For 20 watt more It can come from drivers and other apps. What did you use ? So apparently it was one of the settings I was using in sgminer. Here's my old config (had been a long time since I've changed anything besides xintensity): "xintensity" : "555", "kernel" : "darkcoin", "worksize" : "256", "lookup-gap" : "2", "thread-concurrency" : "32765", "shaders" : "0", "gpu-engine" : "947", "gpu-fan" : "60", "gpu-memclock" : "1250", "gpu-powertune" : "20", "gpu-vddc" : "0.000", "no-submit-stale" : true, "temp-cutoff" : "99", "temp-overheat" : "95", "temp-target" : "85", "api-listen" : false, "api-mcast-port" : "4028", "api-port" : "4028", "expiry" : "120", "failover-only" : true, "gpu-threads" : "1", "log" : "5", "queue" : "2", "scan-time" : "60", "temp-hysteresis" : "3", "failover-switch-delay" : "60", "no-pool-disable" : true, "kernel-path" : "/usr/local/bin" } and new config, thanks to Kuriso: "xintensity" : "555", "kernel" : "darkcoin", "worksize" : "512", "lookup-gap" : "2", "thread-concurrency" : "32765", "gpu-engine" : "947", "gpu-fan" : "60", "gpu-memclock" : "1250", "gpu-powertune" : "0", "no-submit-stale" : true, "temp-cutoff" : "99", "temp-overheat" : "95", "temp-target" : "85", "expiry" : "1", "failover-only" : true, "gpu-threads" : "1", "log" : "5", "queue" : "0", "scan-time" : "1", "kernel-path" : "/usr/local/bin" } It's been running for half an hour now and nothing has dropped, and they're holding at 2266-2375 depending on the card. Thanks for posting your config . . it was clearly my miner settings. Don't know which one though that's why I posted my old config. Has anyone seen any particular TC to be better than others with this coin? I'm not looking for a specific number . . just that there is one. Any playing around I've done gave me pretty much the same hashes. I use the same config file on my R9 sapphire 290, and I went down to 2000 1à min later, so it did not fix anything for me. Does the fix work for you? |
BEHNZiP6UZunp41vurNaQi4r2hvgG57yzi : BdG
|
|
|
traumschiff
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1498
Merit: 1001
180 BPM
|
|
March 16, 2014, 12:58:35 PM |
|
Can someone write down a cfg file for DKR wallett here?
Ty in advance.
|
|
|
|
traumschiff
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1498
Merit: 1001
180 BPM
|
|
March 16, 2014, 01:39:14 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
yugu
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 238
Merit: 100
^_^
|
|
March 16, 2014, 01:48:04 PM
Last edit: March 16, 2014, 01:59:59 PM by yugu |
|
Best GPU for DRK miningIf anybody is looking to set up the rig for DRK mining, I konw the best card which gives the hisghest mhs per $. PM me for info, and be ready to touch me with some DRK for the info if it will be helpful for you (sure, it will be).
|
CHANGE — First Decentralised Global Crypto Bank | ICO | DISCUSSION |
|
|
eduffield (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1176
Merit: 1036
Dash Developer
|
|
March 16, 2014, 01:50:14 PM |
|
Evan,
Just wondering what you think the effect of "stealth addresses" in bitcoin would have on DRK? Do you think it will devalue DRK? Would it provide the same level of anonymity as DarkSend?
Thanks!
I don't think they're nearly as strong as something like DarkSend. Although, I could implement that into the client and call it "StealthSend" or something. |
Dash - Digital Cash | dash.org | dashfoundation.io | dashgo.io
|
|
|
goin2mars
Member
Offline
Activity: 112
Merit: 10
|
|
March 16, 2014, 01:55:41 PM |
|
Does the fix work for you?
It went back to having the problem after 2 hours . . about half an hour after I posted everything was great lol. |
|
|
|
|
Jungian
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 930
Merit: 1010
|
|
March 16, 2014, 02:08:27 PM |
|
Evan,
Just wondering what you think the effect of "stealth addresses" in bitcoin would have on DRK? Do you think it will devalue DRK? Would it provide the same level of anonymity as DarkSend?
Thanks!
I don't think they're nearly as strong as something like DarkSend. Although, I could implement that into the client and call it "StealthSend" or something. Great idea. All levels of anonymity is needed. The more the marrier! |
|
|
|
chowmeow
Member
Offline
Activity: 98
Merit: 10
|
|
March 16, 2014, 02:33:43 PM |
|
Anyone know why the new wallett isnt syncing?
I updated yesterday, it synced pretty fast, woke up now and it just wont bother even after a restart.
I just redownloaded the QT, deleted everything except wallet.dat and it gets stuck at the same point @ 16 hours left. Does it have anything to do with the fork? Someone mentioned adding these nodes a few pages back when other people were having the same problem: addnode=62.141.39.175 addnode=54.80.16.112 addnode=mightypool.net addnode=213.229.88.102 addnode=85.131.127.26 addnode=q30.qhor.net addnode=207.12.89.180 addnode=54.186.8.140 addnode=uswest01.mine.nu addnode=uswest02.mine.nu addnode=darkcoin.fr addnode=asia02.mine.nu addnode=asia01.mine.nu addnode=42.121.58.91 addnode=drkpool.com addnode=lotterymining.com addnode=dark.hashrapid.com addnode=cpu-pool.net addnode=drk.plasr.com addnode=Dark.SuchPool.pw addnode=drk.yobapool.net addnode=drk.justmine.us addnode=nimuecrypto.com/ addnode=darckcoin.mine.nu addnode=boundarytesters.com addnode=cryptsy.com addnode=mintpal.com addnode=c-cex.com addnode=Coin-Swap.net addnode=coins-e.com addnode=pool.darkcoin.io addnode=85.102.51.213 addnode=66.128.80.203 addnode=98.178.131.72 addnode=188.142.39.105 addnode=62.141.39.175 addnode=42.121.58.91 addnode=50.19.116.123 addnode=50.17.98.53 I can't say that they'll work, because it sounds like I did the same thing you did and mine didn't have a problem syncing. Ty anyway will try it. OK have now deleted and redownloaded blockchain TWICE with new Windows client, and TWICE stuck on Block 34110. Will sync fine up to that point and then will not move, even after waiting several hours and after adding the above nodes. Any method of directly downloading the full blockchain to get past this hump? |
|
|
|
|
AlexGR
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1708
Merit: 1049
|
|
March 16, 2014, 02:35:20 PM |
|
Not sure what all you people are talking about with regards to profitability. I just did a calculation and for me it came out to ~0.017 BTC/day for DRK @ 8.8 MH/s vs. ~0.017 BTC/day for top scrypts @ 2.5 MH/s. This is at the current DRK price of 0.00125 and with free electricity (which I do have; if you don't then DRK wins by a wide margin).
Btw, it's even better for some cards (5xxx / 6xxx) that pull like 3.6-3.8x vs scrypt. |
|
|
|
|
|
