Bitcoin Forum
June 20, 2024, 05:05:51 PM *
News: Voting for pizza day contest
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 ... 2562 2563 2564 2565 2566 2567 2568 2569 2570 2571 2572 2573 2574 2575 2576 2577 2578 2579 2580 2581 2582 2583 2584 2585 2586 2587 2588 2589 2590 2591 2592 2593 2594 2595 2596 2597 2598 2599 2600 2601 2602 2603 2604 2605 2606 2607 2608 2609 2610 2611 [2612] 2613 2614 2615 2616 2617 2618 2619 2620 2621 2622 2623 2624 2625 2626 2627 2628 2629 2630 2631 2632 2633 2634 2635 2636 2637 2638 2639 2640 2641 2642 2643 2644 2645 2646 2647 2648 2649 2650 2651 2652 2653 2654 2655 2656 2657 2658 2659 2660 2661 2662 ... 7012 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [ANN][DASH] Dash (dash.org) | First Self-Funding Self-Governing Crypto Currency  (Read 9722681 times)
Drobek
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 504
Merit: 251



View Profile
August 15, 2014, 01:41:23 AM
 #52221

I think Kristov's review will be key. That provides the rubber stamp.

I sympathize for his job, as he is not reviewing static code but rather something that is constantly changing / evolving / reprogrammed to new functionality. You can't really rubber stamp if you have to face this (otherwise positive) problem.

Quote
This has been my only long-standing concern for DRK; are even the crypto-people too stupid to see what it can do?

Crypto-traders, buyers, etc do not usually understand technical concepts, not necessarily because they are stupid, but because they might lack the knowledge to properly evaluate stuff.

1. We've seen that in "complex" coins: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=637645 (read post #2 and post #9 by me)

2. We've seen that in the anonymous market: a lot of people were unable to properly evaluate the worthiness of certain coins in the marketplace. People were getting excited by vapor, believing FUD as truth, claiming scummy P&Ds are innovative anonymous coins, equating DRK being trustless and decentralized with other trusted and centralized solutions, not understanding the difference between actual coins that can be used versus proof-of-concept coins etc etc.

have gone through the posts and could not agree more, cryptos are cryptic Wink
Ignition75
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 462
Merit: 250


www.dashpay.io


View Profile
August 15, 2014, 01:41:49 AM
 #52222

On the other hand there are lots of smart people staying away from darkcoin who normally love privacy and anonymity. People like... Taaki

Actually... Grin
Quote from: AmirTaaki

Thanks for that, I just re-tweeted  Smiley

The new generation have arrived and they brought their own currency...
camosoul
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 560
Merit: 500


www.OroCoin.co


View Profile WWW
August 15, 2014, 01:43:43 AM
 #52223

I think Kristov's review will be key. That provides the rubber stamp.

I sympathize for his job, as he is not reviewing static code but rather something that is constantly changing / evolving / reprogrammed to new functionality. You can't really rubber stamp if you have to face this (otherwise positive) problem.

Quote
This has been my only long-standing concern for DRK; are even the crypto-people too stupid to see what it can do?

Crypto-traders, buyers, etc do not usually understand technical concepts, not necessarily because they are stupid, but because they might lack the knowledge to properly evaluate stuff.

1. We've seen that in "complex" coins: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=637645 (read post #2 and post #9 by me)

2. We've seen that in the anonymous market: a lot of people were unable to properly evaluate the worthiness of certain coins in the marketplace. People were getting excited by vapor, believing FUD as truth, claiming scummy P&Ds are innovative anonymous coins, equating DRK being trustless and decentralized with other trusted and centralized solutions, not understanding the difference between actual coins that can be used versus proof-of-concept coins etc etc.
have gone through the posts and could not agree more, cryptos are cryptic Wink
That's a fancy way of saying that stupid isn't stupid...

Sir, I protest. Stupid is, in fact, stupid.

What did I know about crypto 5 years ago?

I stepped up and used my brain. Failure to do so is failure.

Not doing a thing you know damn well you should be doing... Stupid is as stupid does.

Every human being on this planet has the same fucking brain that I have. I am not special. I jsut use mine and most people don't. That is stupid.

.
.OROCOIN.
▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀

  █
  █
█ █ █
█ █ █
█ █ █
█ █ █
█ █ █
█ █ █
█ █ █
  █

  █
  █
█ █ █
█ █ █
█ █ █
█ █ █
█ █ █
█ █ █
█ █ █
  █

  █
  █
█ █ █
█ █ █
█ █ █
█ █ █
█ █ █
█ █ █
█ █ █
  █
Drobek
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 504
Merit: 251



View Profile
August 15, 2014, 01:47:38 AM
 #52224

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=3

is this guy who I think it is?
HiddenDark
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 196
Merit: 100


View Profile
August 15, 2014, 01:48:25 AM
 #52225

What's causing some coins to get stuck as unconfirmed during the anonymisation process? I currently have 20 unconfirmed, and they have been like that from a day. And if I go to transactions there are 2 transactions that don't seem to have reached the network. Will this sort itself out or is there something I should do?

Beginner’s Guide to Darkcoin www.darkcoinguide.us
HiddenDark
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 196
Merit: 100


View Profile
August 15, 2014, 01:50:53 AM
 #52226


Yes. There's been quite a lot of discussion about his second to last post before.

Quote
It would have been nice to get this attention in any other context.  WikiLeaks has kicked the hornet's nest, and the swarm is headed towards us.

Beginner’s Guide to Darkcoin www.darkcoinguide.us
oblox
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1442
Merit: 1018


View Profile
August 15, 2014, 01:51:35 AM
 #52227

What's causing some coins to get stuck as unconfirmed during the anonymisation process? I currently have 20 unconfirmed, and they have been like that from a day. And if I go to transactions there are 2 transactions that don't seem to have reached the network. Will this sort itself out or is there something I should do?

Did you update to 29?
camosoul
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 560
Merit: 500


www.OroCoin.co


View Profile WWW
August 15, 2014, 01:51:54 AM
 #52228

Aren't you Ouija Boardists going to say something about cup and handle?

;-)

.
.OROCOIN.
▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀

  █
  █
█ █ █
█ █ █
█ █ █
█ █ █
█ █ █
█ █ █
█ █ █
  █

  █
  █
█ █ █
█ █ █
█ █ █
█ █ █
█ █ █
█ █ █
█ █ █
  █

  █
  █
█ █ █
█ █ █
█ █ █
█ █ █
█ █ █
█ █ █
█ █ █
  █
camosoul
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 560
Merit: 500


www.OroCoin.co


View Profile WWW
August 15, 2014, 01:53:09 AM
 #52229

What's causing some coins to get stuck as unconfirmed during the anonymisation process? I currently have 20 unconfirmed, and they have been like that from a day. And if I go to transactions there are 2 transactions that don't seem to have reached the network. Will this sort itself out or is there something I should do?
The TXes not on the blockchain should be deleted. They may be what's holding it up.

It's due to a timing issue that has been fixed in latest release. Essentially, Evan made DS+ run so fast that it was moving faster than the users. I had over 7000DRK "stuck" due tot he same problem. It's no big deal. But, if it exists in your wallet already, you have to remove them. The updated wallet will respect them, it just won't make the mistake of creating more. It's up to you to determine what needs removed. Evan's way of making sure it didn't "automagically" remove something it shouldn't, then you'd REALLY be pissed...

.
.OROCOIN.
▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀

  █
  █
█ █ █
█ █ █
█ █ █
█ █ █
█ █ █
█ █ █
█ █ █
  █

  █
  █
█ █ █
█ █ █
█ █ █
█ █ █
█ █ █
█ █ █
█ █ █
  █

  █
  █
█ █ █
█ █ █
█ █ █
█ █ █
█ █ █
█ █ █
█ █ █
  █
Drobek
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 504
Merit: 251



View Profile
August 15, 2014, 01:56:03 AM
 #52230


Yes. There's been quite a lot of discussion about his second to last post before.

Quote
It would have been nice to get this attention in any other context.  WikiLeaks has kicked the hornet's nest, and the swarm is headed towards us.

Cool, will do some googling, thanks!
Icebucket
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 409
Merit: 250


View Profile
August 15, 2014, 01:59:26 AM
 #52231

stupid.
For someone of your caliber, you really should add some other word into your vocabulary.

stu·pid
lacking intelligence or common sense.

Synonyms:   unintelligent, ignorant, dense, foolish, dull-witted, slow, simpleminded, vacuous, vapid, idiotic, imbecilic, imbecile, obtuse, doltish; informalthick, dim, dimwitted, slow-witted, dumb, dopey, dozy, moronic, cretinous, pea-brained, halfwitted, soft in the head, brain-dead, boneheaded, thickheaded, wooden-headed, muttonheaded, daft
"they're rather stupid"
foolish, silly, unintelligent, idiotic, scatterbrained, nonsensical, senseless, harebrained, unthinking, ill-advised, ill-considered, unwise, injudicious;
inane, absurd, ludicrous, ridiculous, laughable, risible, fatuous, asinine, mad, insane, lunatic;
informalcrazy, dopey, cracked, half-baked, dimwitted, cockeyed, lamebrained, nutty, batty, cuckoo, loony, loopy
"that was a really stupid thing to do"

I personaly like informalthick and muttonheaded  Grin

“Every morning we are born again. What we do today is what matters most.”
― Gautama Buddha
camosoul
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 560
Merit: 500


www.OroCoin.co


View Profile WWW
August 15, 2014, 02:02:00 AM
 #52232

stupid.
For someone of your caliber, you really should add some other word to your vocabulary.

stu·pid
lacking intelligence or common sense.

Synonyms:   unintelligent, ignorant, dense, foolish, dull-witted, slow, simpleminded, vacuous, vapid, idiotic, imbecilic, imbecile, obtuse, doltish; informalthick, dim, dimwitted, slow-witted, dumb, dopey, dozy, moronic, cretinous, pea-brained, halfwitted, soft in the head, brain-dead, boneheaded, thickheaded, wooden-headed, muttonheaded, daft
"they're rather stupid"
foolish, silly, unintelligent, idiotic, scatterbrained, nonsensical, senseless, harebrained, unthinking, ill-advised, ill-considered, unwise, injudicious;
inane, absurd, ludicrous, ridiculous, laughable, risible, fatuous, asinine, mad, insane, lunatic;
informalcrazy, dopey, cracked, half-baked, dimwitted, cockeyed, lamebrained, nutty, batty, cuckoo, loony, loopy
"that was a really stupid thing to do"

I personaly like informalthick and muttonheaded  Grin
Does failing to learn about something you're throwing money into fit any of those?

I think it does.

Why waste creativity on the stupid? They're stupid... If I crafted a special phrase, they wouldn't realize I'm talking about them... Then, it's not helpful, is it? That would be, wait for it, stupid!

.
.OROCOIN.
▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀

  █
  █
█ █ █
█ █ █
█ █ █
█ █ █
█ █ █
█ █ █
█ █ █
  █

  █
  █
█ █ █
█ █ █
█ █ █
█ █ █
█ █ █
█ █ █
█ █ █
  █

  █
  █
█ █ █
█ █ █
█ █ █
█ █ █
█ █ █
█ █ █
█ █ █
  █
kadrek
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 327
Merit: 250



View Profile
August 15, 2014, 02:08:53 AM
 #52233

Guys, we're only behind by a few votes! VOTE!!! It's on the left hand side.

https://coingateway.net/


SWIPE         │

│   Monetizing mobile engagement data,
on the blockchain            [      
SWIPE
.
WHITEPAPER
]            
TELEGRAM
TWITTER
MEDIUM
REDDIT
HiddenDark
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 196
Merit: 100


View Profile
August 15, 2014, 02:11:19 AM
 #52234

What's causing some coins to get stuck as unconfirmed during the anonymisation process? I currently have 20 unconfirmed, and they have been like that from a day. And if I go to transactions there are 2 transactions that don't seem to have reached the network. Will this sort itself out or is there something I should do?

Did you update to 29?

Just prior to making post about the issue.

Beginner’s Guide to Darkcoin www.darkcoinguide.us
Icebucket
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 409
Merit: 250


View Profile
August 15, 2014, 02:13:01 AM
Last edit: August 15, 2014, 02:25:06 AM by Icebucket
 #52235

Aren't you Ouija Boardists going to say something about cup and handle?

;-)

no cup and handle in sight, but a more reliable pattern is
A double bottom  Cheesy

Edit: A double bottom can differ 2-5% from the original bottom, just a small hint for those of you who are waiting for an exact bottom at 0.00725  Wink

“Every morning we are born again. What we do today is what matters most.”
― Gautama Buddha
rrodent
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 112
Merit: 10


View Profile
August 15, 2014, 02:15:00 AM
 #52236

What's causing some coins to get stuck as unconfirmed during the anonymisation process? I currently have 20 unconfirmed, and they have been like that from a day. And if I go to transactions there are 2 transactions that don't seem to have reached the network. Will this sort itself out or is there something I should do?

Did you update to 29?

Just prior to making post about the issue.

make sure you set it to only 1 round as well...  already checked to see if .29 fixed the multiple rounds thing and it still appears to be sticking the wallet into a loop.

I'd like to thank eduffield and the other developers for this critically important evolution in virtual currency. DarkCoin is what bitcoin should have been. Some might call it "Bitcoin 2.0" but would do better by saying: "DarkCoin is digital cash." - Child Harold - February 28, 2014
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=421615.msg5424980#msg5424980
HiddenDark
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 196
Merit: 100


View Profile
August 15, 2014, 02:15:35 AM
 #52237

What's causing some coins to get stuck as unconfirmed during the anonymisation process? I currently have 20 unconfirmed, and they have been like that from a day. And if I go to transactions there are 2 transactions that don't seem to have reached the network. Will this sort itself out or is there something I should do?
The TXes not on the blockchain should be deleted. They may be what's holding it up.

It's due to a timing issue that has been fixed in latest release. Essentially, Evan made DS+ run so fast that it was moving faster than the users. I had over 7000DRK "stuck" due tot he same problem. It's no big deal. But, if it exists in your wallet already, you have to remove them. The updated wallet will respect them, it just won't make the mistake of creating more. It's up to you to determine what needs removed. Evan's way of making sure it didn't "automagically" remove something it shouldn't, then you'd REALLY be pissed...

How do I remove transactions?

Beginner’s Guide to Darkcoin www.darkcoinguide.us
HiddenDark
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 196
Merit: 100


View Profile
August 15, 2014, 02:19:49 AM
 #52238

What's causing some coins to get stuck as unconfirmed during the anonymisation process? I currently have 20 unconfirmed, and they have been like that from a day. And if I go to transactions there are 2 transactions that don't seem to have reached the network. Will this sort itself out or is there something I should do?

Did you update to 29?

Just prior to making post about the issue.

make sure you set it to only 1 round as well...  already checked to see if .29 fixed the multiple rounds thing and it still appears to be sticking the wallet into a loop.

I had it on 2 rounds, then 3 when I was running .26 and nothing was happening, so when I updated to .27 I reduced it to one round as people on here said to. I'm now on .29 with it set to one round and 15 to be anonymized (I currently have a little over 20 anonymized, probably due to having set higher amounts when I was using .26).

Beginner’s Guide to Darkcoin www.darkcoinguide.us
rrodent
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 112
Merit: 10


View Profile
August 15, 2014, 02:24:06 AM
 #52239

What's causing some coins to get stuck as unconfirmed during the anonymisation process? I currently have 20 unconfirmed, and they have been like that from a day. And if I go to transactions there are 2 transactions that don't seem to have reached the network. Will this sort itself out or is there something I should do?
The TXes not on the blockchain should be deleted. They may be what's holding it up.

It's due to a timing issue that has been fixed in latest release. Essentially, Evan made DS+ run so fast that it was moving faster than the users. I had over 7000DRK "stuck" due tot he same problem. It's no big deal. But, if it exists in your wallet already, you have to remove them. The updated wallet will respect them, it just won't make the mistake of creating more. It's up to you to determine what needs removed. Evan's way of making sure it didn't "automagically" remove something it shouldn't, then you'd REALLY be pissed...

How do I remove transactions?

smh...  The last posting from your IP was less than 360 seconds ago. Please try again later.

go to the debug console and type in "erasetransaction <txid>" I believe you only want to do that on transactions that haven't hit the block chain yet 0/6 confirmations yada yada

I'd like to thank eduffield and the other developers for this critically important evolution in virtual currency. DarkCoin is what bitcoin should have been. Some might call it "Bitcoin 2.0" but would do better by saying: "DarkCoin is digital cash." - Child Harold - February 28, 2014
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=421615.msg5424980#msg5424980
oblox
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1442
Merit: 1018


View Profile
August 15, 2014, 02:24:16 AM
 #52240

What's causing some coins to get stuck as unconfirmed during the anonymisation process? I currently have 20 unconfirmed, and they have been like that from a day. And if I go to transactions there are 2 transactions that don't seem to have reached the network. Will this sort itself out or is there something I should do?
The TXes not on the blockchain should be deleted. They may be what's holding it up.

It's due to a timing issue that has been fixed in latest release. Essentially, Evan made DS+ run so fast that it was moving faster than the users. I had over 7000DRK "stuck" due tot he same problem. It's no big deal. But, if it exists in your wallet already, you have to remove them. The updated wallet will respect them, it just won't make the mistake of creating more. It's up to you to determine what needs removed. Evan's way of making sure it didn't "automagically" remove something it shouldn't, then you'd REALLY be pissed...

How do I remove transactions?

In the debug console:

erasetransaction <txid>
Pages: « 1 ... 2562 2563 2564 2565 2566 2567 2568 2569 2570 2571 2572 2573 2574 2575 2576 2577 2578 2579 2580 2581 2582 2583 2584 2585 2586 2587 2588 2589 2590 2591 2592 2593 2594 2595 2596 2597 2598 2599 2600 2601 2602 2603 2604 2605 2606 2607 2608 2609 2610 2611 [2612] 2613 2614 2615 2616 2617 2618 2619 2620 2621 2622 2623 2624 2625 2626 2627 2628 2629 2630 2631 2632 2633 2634 2635 2636 2637 2638 2639 2640 2641 2642 2643 2644 2645 2646 2647 2648 2649 2650 2651 2652 2653 2654 2655 2656 2657 2658 2659 2660 2661 2662 ... 7012 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!