wissy
|
|
August 28, 2018, 12:01:49 PM |
|
I guess the number one challenge for the devs is how they could get scientists and innovators to utilize the platform and if this will be resolve accordingly, then I am sure this project will be successful in no time. They would need to work hard on attracting projects to their platform - a good marketing strategy would be handy in this situation. Hope the team is working on it.
|
|
|
|
king_of_alts
Member
Offline
Activity: 476
Merit: 10
|
|
August 28, 2018, 12:19:05 PM |
|
I guess the number one challenge for the devs is how they could get scientists and innovators to utilize the platform and if this will be resolve accordingly, then I am sure this project will be successful in no time. They would need to work hard on attracting projects to their platform - a good marketing strategy would be handy in this situation. Hope the team is working on it. Also word of mouth could be helpful. Usually, scientists know their colleagues around the world and if they can tell them that there is a new way to get funding it could help.
|
|
|
|
levyashin
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 980
Merit: 276
$CYBERCASH METAVERSE
|
|
August 28, 2018, 01:18:22 PM |
|
I guess the number one challenge for the devs is how they could get scientists and innovators to utilize the platform and if this will be resolve accordingly, then I am sure this project will be successful in no time. They would need to work hard on attracting projects to their platform - a good marketing strategy would be handy in this situation. Hope the team is working on it. Yeah the crucial part is the project is this. If they can lure projects in their platform, the project becomes amazing, if not, another dead token. But their team looks like they can.
|
|
|
|
loup
|
|
August 28, 2018, 01:42:07 PM |
|
I guess the number one challenge for the devs is how they could get scientists and innovators to utilize the platform and if this will be resolve accordingly, then I am sure this project will be successful in no time. They would need to work hard on attracting projects to their platform - a good marketing strategy would be handy in this situation. Hope the team is working on it. Yeah the crucial part is the project is this. If they can lure projects in their platform, the project becomes amazing, if not, another dead token. But their team looks like they can. Indeed at the end of the day the success of the projects they can get is the success of the platform.
|
|
|
|
batako
|
|
August 28, 2018, 01:48:03 PM |
|
Hopefully markets will turn to green and we'll see the latest bull run soon. Lots of high potential projects are going down to recycle bins due to this market conditions, as you said, a mvp or demo is a must.
I wonder if this will be a project for known scientists or if there is a possible opening for upcoming geniuses Just sayin, there are a lot of people with bright ideas or studies.. As they are going to evaluate every project I guess everyone is going to have their opportunity. Each projects that look good to be funded with the platform will have the opportunity to be included. More smart people will benefit from this platform for sure.
|
|
|
|
wissy
|
|
August 28, 2018, 02:55:41 PM |
|
I guess the number one challenge for the devs is how they could get scientists and innovators to utilize the platform and if this will be resolve accordingly, then I am sure this project will be successful in no time. They would need to work hard on attracting projects to their platform - a good marketing strategy would be handy in this situation. Hope the team is working on it. Yeah the crucial part is the project is this. If they can lure projects in their platform, the project becomes amazing, if not, another dead token. But their team looks like they can. Indeed at the end of the day the success of the projects they can get is the success of the platform. The platform will provide a lot of opportunities to the scientific community, so with good execution I don't see why scientificcoin platform wouldn't be successful.
|
|
|
|
omwibya
Member
Offline
Activity: 434
Merit: 10
|
|
August 28, 2018, 03:49:48 PM |
|
I guess the number one challenge for the devs is how they could get scientists and innovators to utilize the platform and if this will be resolve accordingly, then I am sure this project will be successful in no time. They would need to work hard on attracting projects to their platform - a good marketing strategy would be handy in this situation. Hope the team is working on it. Yeah the crucial part is the project is this. If they can lure projects in their platform, the project becomes amazing, if not, another dead token. But their team looks like they can. Indeed at the end of the day the success of the projects they can get is the success of the platform. The platform will provide a lot of opportunities to the scientific community, so with good execution I don't see why scientificcoin platform wouldn't be successful. if they manage to attract the capital and get things done on time it will succeed.
|
|
|
|
levyashin
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 980
Merit: 276
$CYBERCASH METAVERSE
|
|
August 28, 2018, 04:20:18 PM |
|
I guess the number one challenge for the devs is how they could get scientists and innovators to utilize the platform and if this will be resolve accordingly, then I am sure this project will be successful in no time. They would need to work hard on attracting projects to their platform - a good marketing strategy would be handy in this situation. Hope the team is working on it. Yeah the crucial part is the project is this. If they can lure projects in their platform, the project becomes amazing, if not, another dead token. But their team looks like they can. Indeed at the end of the day the success of the projects they can get is the success of the platform. The platform will provide a lot of opportunities to the scientific community, so with good execution I don't see why scientificcoin platform wouldn't be successful. Yeah, everything is about execution. I am agreeing with you completely if they execute well, it would be successful. And i'm betting on that they will.
|
|
|
|
kurko2017
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 112
Merit: 0
|
|
August 28, 2018, 05:10:15 PM |
|
Hey. Will there be specific criteria for evaluating projects? And how will the market be evaluated?
|
|
|
|
ParRus
|
|
August 28, 2018, 05:31:00 PM |
|
I guess the number one challenge for the devs is how they could get scientists and innovators to utilize the platform and if this will be resolve accordingly, then I am sure this project will be successful in no time. They would need to work hard on attracting projects to their platform - a good marketing strategy would be handy in this situation. Hope the team is working on it. Yeah the crucial part is the project is this. If they can lure projects in their platform, the project becomes amazing, if not, another dead token. But their team looks like they can. Indeed at the end of the day the success of the projects they can get is the success of the platform. The platform will provide a lot of opportunities to the scientific community, so with good execution I don't see why scientificcoin platform wouldn't be successful. Yeah, everything is about execution. I am agreeing with you completely if they execute well, it would be successful. And i'm betting on that they will. I hope in the near future the team will appear on various crypto events, when they will be heard by everyone - community and the project will grow.
|
|
|
|
wissy
|
|
August 28, 2018, 05:45:41 PM |
|
Hey. Will there be specific criteria for evaluating projects? And how will the market be evaluated?
I bet everyone would want to know that, but I'm not sure these criteria are available yet. I don't really understand the question about market evaluation...will scientificcoin also do that?
|
|
|
|
Jay2408
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 518
Merit: 101
🚀🚀 ATHERO.IO 🚀🚀
|
|
August 28, 2018, 06:13:06 PM |
|
Hey. Will there be specific criteria for evaluating projects? And how will the market be evaluated?
I bet everyone would want to know that, but I'm not sure these criteria are available yet. I don't really understand the question about market evaluation...will scientificcoin also do that? According to their beta platform criteria are e.g. evaluation of project developer, project recognition, science intensity, project results, novelty, profitability, etc. They have also listed some projects with scores but don't know if this is already for real.
|
|
|
|
loup
|
|
August 28, 2018, 06:19:00 PM |
|
Hey. Will there be specific criteria for evaluating projects? And how will the market be evaluated?
I bet everyone would want to know that, but I'm not sure these criteria are available yet. I don't really understand the question about market evaluation...will scientificcoin also do that? I also don't understand what he means with market evaluation. Maybe means the business opportunity of the project in the market?
|
|
|
|
Amelie Poulain
|
|
August 28, 2018, 06:20:06 PM |
|
Hey. Will there be specific criteria for evaluating projects? And how will the market be evaluated?
I bet everyone would want to know that, but I'm not sure these criteria are available yet. I don't really understand the question about market evaluation...will scientificcoin also do that? According to their beta platform criteria are e.g. evaluation of project developer, project recognition, science intensity, project results, novelty, profitability, etc. They have also listed some projects with scores but don't know if this is already for real. With time all this will be clarified and improved, I think that after launch the platform, amendments will be made to make this rating as objective as possible.
|
|
|
|
belechau
|
|
August 28, 2018, 06:30:02 PM |
|
Hey. Will there be specific criteria for evaluating projects? And how will the market be evaluated?
I bet everyone would want to know that, but I'm not sure these criteria are available yet. I don't really understand the question about market evaluation...will scientificcoin also do that? According to their beta platform criteria are e.g. evaluation of project developer, project recognition, science intensity, project results, novelty, profitability, etc. They have also listed some projects with scores but don't know if this is already for real. With time all this will be clarified and improved, I think that after launch the platform, amendments will be made to make this rating as objective as possible. Actually, before finalizing an Ico it is complicated to provide all the support as they have done and work in partnerships, conferences, and at the same time keep working on the platform full time. I think after this period, there should be specific people to act on this point
|
|
|
|
ParRus
|
|
August 28, 2018, 06:53:50 PM |
|
Hey. Will there be specific criteria for evaluating projects? And how will the market be evaluated?
I bet everyone would want to know that, but I'm not sure these criteria are available yet. I don't really understand the question about market evaluation...will scientificcoin also do that? According to their beta platform criteria are e.g. evaluation of project developer, project recognition, science intensity, project results, novelty, profitability, etc. They have also listed some projects with scores but don't know if this is already for real. With time all this will be clarified and improved, I think that after launch the platform, amendments will be made to make this rating as objective as possible. Actually, before finalizing an Ico it is complicated to provide all the support as they have done and work in partnerships, conferences, and at the same time keep working on the platform full time. I think after this period, there should be specific people to act on this point You are right, it requires funding - work of analysts who can create platform with a detailed study of each criterion. I hope in their team there are specialists who will cope with this task.
|
|
|
|
Vladrak
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 168
Merit: 0
|
|
August 28, 2018, 07:02:06 PM |
|
It seems to me that this platform will help to finance its projects to scientists who want to invent new things. I think this is the future of scientific investigation.
|
|
|
|
KnyazED
|
|
August 28, 2018, 07:07:27 PM |
|
I guess the number one challenge for the devs is how they could get scientists and innovators to utilize the platform and if this will be resolve accordingly, then I am sure this project will be successful in no time. They would need to work hard on attracting projects to their platform - a good marketing strategy would be handy in this situation. Hope the team is working on it. Yeah the crucial part is the project is this. If they can lure projects in their platform, the project becomes amazing, if not, another dead token. But their team looks like they can. Indeed at the end of the day the success of the projects they can get is the success of the platform. The platform will provide a lot of opportunities to the scientific community, so with good execution I don't see why scientificcoin platform wouldn't be successful. Yeah, everything is about execution. I am agreeing with you completely if they execute well, it would be successful. And i'm betting on that they will. I am also sure of this team. I see here a high potential, and I think that it can develop at a high level, the team will create it.
|
|
|
|
king_of_alts
Member
Offline
Activity: 476
Merit: 10
|
|
August 28, 2018, 07:17:22 PM |
|
I wonder if you could hire scientists on www.hireascientist.com to do a your science homework or a physics project for school.
|
|
|
|
martincic
Member
Offline
Activity: 146
Merit: 10
|
|
August 28, 2018, 07:23:11 PM |
|
Will you have an app for iOS or Android? SCIENTFICCOIN interested me, but it's not always convenient to follow through the browser.
|
|
|
|
|