ANN-EMC2 Einsteinium FUNDING THE FUTURE WITH THE FUTURE OF CURRENCY KMD-dPoW

[Varvarin]

hello. I have heard this coin is run by the US government.
Can you clue me in about that? (please make it short i don't have time to read pages of explanations)

Ah that would be me .. and I will use the next General Election to legalise EMC2 as our national currency and in one go pay off the national debt.

[jaipagare]

All,

I need your help.

My local desktop doesn't sync. Its giving out me error; "No Block Source Available". I used the .conf file which is on Page 1 but doesn't works.

No Firewall, No router. All settings are right. Please help

Any there anyone interested helping me please..

..

the .conf file should look like this

rpcuser=user
rpcpassword=pass
rpcallowip=127.0.0.1
rpcport=41879
port=41878
maxconnections=100
addnode=37.59.24.15
addnode=70.49.180.162:41878
addnode=79.117.41.206:41878
addnode=78.105.64.60:41878
addnode=188.226.151.76:41878
addnode=138.91.18.37:41878
addnode=190.193.145.112:41878
addnode=78.161.22.228:41878
addnode=72.209.39.24:41878
addnode=168.63.233.174:41878

Missed the post .. will check front page and update.

No luck.

I changed .conf file. Deleted all files except wallet.dat. Restarted wallet twice. Disappointment Continues.

[egghead123]

article 12 relating to removal of directors without cause where a quorum is present.How many trustees make up a quorum and what if some hardworking director simply becomes "unpopular without cause"?How is the vote carried if say for example only two are remotely present to execute a decision leading to expulsion?Can two directors carry a vote on such a matter without cause?.Is without cause also without fair warning of transgression of bylaw beforehand or ability of colleagues to dismiss at will of unwanted party etc?

thanks for the question egghead123

This is actually Article 5, section 12. Re: BOARD OF DIRECTORS, it says: "Any member of the Board of Directors may be removed with or without cause, at any time, at a special meeting properly called for that purpose of the members and where a quorum is present.   A board member who has been removed as a member shall automatically be removed from the board."

A quorum is half of the eligible voters, that means this action is seeking high voter turnout, not necessarily high voter participation.  As opposed to the current vote to pass the EMC2 bylaws which requires high voter turnout and high voter participation.  

Let's say the eligible voters for EMC2 community is 20, the quorum would mean that at least 10 people need to be at the election, if only 3 people vote a decision will have been made even though the vote was low.   Please note the count is of the membership not of the board members because the People voted him in the People should be the final deciders.   The more people that vote on an issue the more fair the decision will be.

To address your question on the matters of: 'hardworking', 'popularity', and 'fairness' when it comes to voting it is almost always about popularity, rarely is it about what makes the most sense.  'Without cause' essentially means 'no reason', it doesn't mean there was no warning, and it doesn't mean the process is unfair.   The process allows you to fairly hear (fair hearing) what all of the relevant parties have to say on the matter.  

The EMC2 board needs hardworking people (popular or not) to serve on the board and or on committees.

Ok, that was my explanation of section 12 of article 5, perhaps others may chime in on this.  But what wording do you feel would be most fitting for that section?

Thanks for the response Armis.The terms stated in the article are clear enough but my only issue really was protection from unfair dismissal or some leave to appeal an unfair decision but most company bylaws have similiar wording however most corporate entities are regulated by labour court etc.

Regarding corporate for profit entities usually Bylaws typically contain specific provisions detailing:

    The purposes or mission of the organization.
    How directors are elected or otherwise selected.
    How the board may take an action.
    How board meetings are called and noticed.
    How board meetings are conducted.
    The officers the corporation will have.
    The duties and responsibilities of each officer.
    The authorization of board and non-board committees.
    The level of indemnification provided by the corporation to protect its directors, officers and other agents.
    The reports due to directors.


Bylaws of nonprofit corporations with voting members will contain additional provisions detailing:

    The classes and qualifications of membership.
    The rights of membership.
    How a member may be suspended or terminated.
    What actions the membership may take.
    How the membership may take an action.
    How membership meetings are called and noticed.
    How membership meetings are conducted.
 

[egghead123]

All,

I need your help.

My local desktop doesn't sync. Its giving out me error; "No Block Source Available". I used the .conf file which is on Page 1 but doesn't works.

No Firewall, No router. All settings are right. Please help

Any there anyone interested helping me please..

..

the .conf file should look like this

rpcuser=user
rpcpassword=pass
rpcallowip=127.0.0.1
rpcport=41879
port=41878
maxconnections=100
addnode=37.59.24.15
addnode=70.49.180.162:41878
addnode=79.117.41.206:41878
addnode=78.105.64.60:41878
addnode=188.226.151.76:41878
addnode=138.91.18.37:41878
addnode=190.193.145.112:41878
addnode=78.161.22.228:41878
addnode=72.209.39.24:41878
addnode=168.63.233.174:41878

Missed the post .. will check front page and update.

No luck.



I changed .conf file. Deleted all files except wallet.dat. Restarted wallet twice. Disappointment Continues.

have you tried opening using rescan or reindex?You said you deleted ALL files except wallet.dat?Maybe you should just have added the nodes you were given into your .conf but left all the other files where they were?

If all else fails you probably can get new executables off someone on this thread but maybe you should back up your wallet again and import the private keys for all the addresses you have in your wallet and keep in a safe place in case you need to download a new wallet.Hope this helps

[RJF]

Yes, i support the bylaws

[einsteinium]

An Election to vote in the Bylaws written by the Einsteinium Board Members will be held from December 2nd 2014 6pm EST to December 9th 2014 6pm EST. We're giving a 2 days notice for comments, corrections, and critiques. 5 days (from December 4th 6pm EST to December 9th 6pm EST) of voting will be used.
The vote will be held in this thread by the comment '' Yes, i support the bylaws''.
*The bylaws will need 11 positive votes from members of this community to be accepted.
**No vote from members without post on this thread prior to this announcement will be accepted.

you can find the bylaws here: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1eZoES8nKwh3iN4jeEhaa_b8gw8pCEwmQ8le4hWrxEuo/edit?usp=sharing

The bylaws require 11 votes to pass, here is the running vote count:



   1)  Armis
   2)  Varvarin
   3)  RJF
   4)
   5)
   6)
   7)
   8)
   9)
  10)
=>11)
  12)
  13)
  14)
=>15)
  16)
  17)
  18)
  19)
=>20)


11 votes required to adopt measure
15 votes would be overwhelming adoption
20 votes would be high super-majority

[egghead123]

I dont hold any EMC2 at the moment but wish you people the best of luck with your project.You certainly deserve it

[einsteinium]

article 12 relating to removal of directors without cause where a quorum is present.How many trustees make up a quorum and what if some hardworking director simply becomes "unpopular without cause"?How is the vote carried if say for example only two are remotely present to execute a decision leading to expulsion?Can two directors carry a vote on such a matter without cause?.Is without cause also without fair warning of transgression of bylaw beforehand or ability of colleagues to dismiss at will of unwanted party etc?

thanks for the question egghead123

This is actually Article 5, section 12. Re: BOARD OF DIRECTORS, it says: "Any member of the Board of Directors may be removed with or without cause, at any time, at a special meeting properly called for that purpose of the members and where a quorum is present.   A board member who has been removed as a member shall automatically be removed from the board."

A quorum is half of the eligible voters, that means this action is seeking high voter turnout, not necessarily high voter participation.  As opposed to the current vote to pass the EMC2 bylaws which requires high voter turnout and high voter participation.  

Let's say the eligible voters for EMC2 community is 20, the quorum would mean that at least 10 people need to be at the election, if only 3 people vote a decision will have been made even though the vote was low.   Please note the count is of the membership not of the board members because the People voted him in the People should be the final deciders.   The more people that vote on an issue the more fair the decision will be.

To address your question on the matters of: 'hardworking', 'popularity', and 'fairness' when it comes to voting it is almost always about popularity, rarely is it about what makes the most sense.  'Without cause' essentially means 'no reason', it doesn't mean there was no warning, and it doesn't mean the process is unfair.   The process allows you to fairly hear (fair hearing) what all of the relevant parties have to say on the matter.  

The EMC2 board needs hardworking people (popular or not) to serve on the board and or on committees.

Ok, that was my explanation of section 12 of article 5, perhaps others may chime in on this.  But what wording do you feel would be most fitting for that section?

Thanks for the response Armis.The terms stated in the article are clear enough but my only issue really was protection from unfair dismissal or some leave to appeal an unfair decision but most company bylaws have similiar wording however most corporate entities are regulated by labour court etc.

Regarding corporate for profit entities usually Bylaws typically contain specific provisions detailing:

    The purposes or mission of the organization.
    How directors are elected or otherwise selected.
    How the board may take an action.
    How board meetings are called and noticed.
    How board meetings are conducted.
    The officers the corporation will have.
    The duties and responsibilities of each officer.
    The authorization of board and non-board committees.
    The level of indemnification provided by the corporation to protect its directors, officers and other agents.
    The reports due to directors.


Bylaws of nonprofit corporations with voting members will contain additional provisions detailing:

    The classes and qualifications of membership.
    The rights of membership.
    How a member may be suspended or terminated.
    What actions the membership may take.
    How the membership may take an action.
    How membership meetings are called and noticed.
    How membership meetings are conducted.
 

however most corporate entities are regulated by labour court

That would be very interesting to see, since 'labor' usually connotes non management salary earners, not nonsalaried elected officials that management reports to.

"How a member may be suspended or terminated."  This is covered in Article 3 Section 4.  Please note there is a sharp distinction between 'members' and 'board members'.  However the process from removing privileges is the same, only by majority vote of the membership.

I dont hold any EMC2 at the moment but wish you people the best of luck with your project.You certainly deserve it

Your engagement is appreciated, stay as long as you wish, as a guest or as a EMC2 owner (when you decide to make a purchase)

Are you involved in science in any way?

[Guyinanutshell]

Yes, i support the bylaws

[Oldminer]

hello. I have heard this coin is run by the US government.
Can you clue me in about that? (please make it short i don't have time to read pages of explanations)

This is the first I heard of it 

Googling this statement, the only relative thing I could find was this https://bitcointa.lk/threads/ann-emc2-einsteinium-launch-1st-march-mining-starts-now-pools-up.272041/page-212 but this is referring to the US dollar, not EMC2.

[Oldminer]

Yes, I support the proposed bylaws.

[Armis]

An Election to vote in the Bylaws written by the Einsteinium Board Members will be held from December 2nd 2014 6pm EST to December 9th 2014 6pm EST. We're giving a 2 days notice for comments, corrections, and critiques. 5 days (from December 4th 6pm EST to December 9th 6pm EST) of voting will be used.
The vote will be held in this thread by the comment '' Yes, i support the bylaws''.
*The bylaws will need 11 positive votes from members of this community to be accepted.
**No vote from members without post on this thread prior to this announcement will be accepted.

you can find the bylaws here: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1eZoES8nKwh3iN4jeEhaa_b8gw8pCEwmQ8le4hWrxEuo/edit?usp=sharing

The bylaws require 11 votes to pass, here is the running vote count:



   1)  Armis
   2)  Varvarin
   3)  RJF
   4)  Guyinanutshell
   5)  Oldminer
   6)  
   7)  
   8)  
   9)  
  10)  
=>11)
  12)  
  13)  
  14)  
=>15)  
  16)
  17)
  18)
  19)
=>20)


11 votes required to adopt measure
15 votes would be overwhelming adoption
20 votes would be high super-majority







On a different note, does anyone here trade on cryptex?

https://cryptex.biz/market/105

[neleonele]

Yes, i support the bylaws


Thanks and regards to all

Nele

[djnocide]

Video from bitcoin rush on twitter about coins and einsteinium is part of it : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AFNZ5JnDV18.

you can send some BTC to support him, he's working with the donations he receives.
17vPhPit8cZP3sspyFw57f4Tj98ab9Hm3g

[djnocide]

I support the bylaws

[torpedo]

Yes, i support the bylaws!! 

[Armis]

[[UPDATE]]

An Election to vote in the Bylaws written by the Einsteinium Board Members will be held from December 2nd 2014 6pm EST to December 9th 2014 6pm EST. We're giving a 2 days notice for comments, corrections, and critiques. 5 days (from December 4th 6pm EST to December 9th 6pm EST) of voting will be used.
The vote will be held in this thread by the comment '' Yes, i support the bylaws''.
*The bylaws will need 11 positive votes from members of this community to be accepted.
**No vote from members without post on this thread prior to this announcement will be accepted.

you can find the bylaws here: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1eZoES8nKwh3iN4jeEhaa_b8gw8pCEwmQ8le4hWrxEuo/edit?usp=sharing

The bylaws require 11 votes to pass, here is the running vote count:



   1)  Armis
   2)  Varvarin
   3)  RJF
   4)  Guyinanutshell
   5)  Oldminer
   6)  neleonele
   7)  djnocide
   8)  torpedo
   9)  [edit] matauc12
  10)  
=>11)
  12)  
  13)  
  14)  
=>15)  
  16)
  17)
  18)
  19)
=>20)


11 votes required to adopt measure
15 votes would be overwhelming adoption
20 votes would be high super-majority

[matauc12]

I support the proposed bylaws

[djnocide]

Emc2 added to cryptoine: https://twitter.com/cryptoine/status/541342765570068480

[Varvarin]

...
No luck.

I changed .conf file. Deleted all files except wallet.dat. Restarted wallet twice. Disappointment Continues.

Download this .rar of the wallet content (without the wallet.dat). https://www.dropbox.com/s/gx3t29k7upuqcn9/Einsteinium.rar?dl=0

It should bring you right up to date. if not, send me a PM and we'll work it out.