[ANN] [BSV] [Bitcoin SV] Original Satoshi Vision

[Bitcoin SV]

BSV Team - Are community of honesty peoples, supporters, volunteers, coders etc.

BSV is not only CSW & Ayre.

Don't touch BSV, trolls. Send all your claims to CSW

Theymos, sorry please if something offended you

BSV Team

[1714910290]

1714910290

[1714910290]

1714910290

[1714910290]

1714910290

[1714910290]

1714910290

[1714910290]

1714910290

[hv_]

Wow - we got attracted the biggest FXTroll into the house of BSV Posts  - yey

 

[ðºÞæ]

Wow - we got attracted the biggest FXTroll into the house of BSV Posts  - yey

 

Why would that be?

[hv_]

Wow - we got attracted the biggest FXTroll into the house of BSV Posts  - yey

 

Thankfully I have no need to sink to the abhorrent level of all of those involved with BSV.

Not even trolling you! Simply posting facts, which are clear as day.

CSW is not Satoshi and BSV is not Bitcoin.

...

"Have a nice life!" - CSW

Just all wrong

BSV is best possible Bitcoin

CSW is and was always best guess to be Satoshi

I agree about: 100% does not exist

[hv_]

"If You Don’t Cannibalize Yourself, Someone Else Will"

Steve Jobs

[PAMPT]

"If You Don’t Cannibalize Yourself, Someone Else Will"

Steve Jobs

Cool, so that's what the Bitcoin forks are doing right?

The forks are contingent on the premise that there is a consensus to do or fix something that larger portion of the community fails to condone. Forks had been taking place in all coins long before this discussion even started. There is a lot of cookies we can get from forking, for example, mark the beginning of a new milestone in adoption or development. I have made a plea to fork Do_zzze, namely add another round of fat around the outer edge of a butthole.

[ðºÞæ]

"If You Don’t Cannibalize Yourself, Someone Else Will"

Steve Jobs

Cool, so that's what the Bitcoin forks are doing right?

BitCoin forks

[omicron1]

Have transacted on both BTC and BSV chains, both work fine.
We are in uncharted territory, nobody knows what's going to happen in the next year/ 10 year.
It's always wise to spread risk.

[hv_]

BitCoin forks

Then why does the BSV protocol contain changes made by Peter Wuille, Greg Maxwell and Amaury Sechet?

Unfuckening is still on the road map. Be assured that all that stupid crap will go away, cause it's not Bitcoin and got into by dumb ppl and their communism

Good you asked

[Bitcoin SV]

CSW is not Satoshi and BSV is not Bitcoin.

Bitcoin SV $133.51  +21.33%

Any questions? Who is a real Bitcoin now? Thats' right: BSV - Original Bitcoin. Satoshi Vision

WHO'S THE BOSS NOW:
https://youtu.be/dQSZRGWwPXg?t=138

[hv_]

"If You Don’t Cannibalize Yourself, Someone Else Will"

Steve Jobs

Cool, so that's what the Bitcoin forks are doing right?

Entire crypto scams are about it.

BSV still the true DNA and lots of things are protected by nChains patents.

So try to complete against original BitCoin, but choose a different name like Litecoin did, btc could be called SegwitCoin, that s fine

[hv_]

Fxtroll does proof of trash post.

I wonder how such do survive these days.

 

[jbreher]

"You can not patent code. You can only patent an invention which is implemented in your code. An invention is a new and unique way of doing something. Most of all, it must be something nobody did before. If anyone used the same technique which you describe in your patent, that's called prior art and invalidates your patent. So trying to get a patent on something somebody else invented and implemented in code would be futile. ..."

No shit. Relevance?

[suzanne5223]

Hey world I pass over this wire in a gust of wind between two chemo session and I see that there is still as much degenerated bulb around here! the level of some discussion is gigantic childish! what a waste of time, which could be used to study or make love to your wife... ha I forgot others are already doing it for you...


Keep the time !

Source: https://np.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/dlvokv/how_i_lost_4_btc_on_lightning_network/?user_id=50219676261

Four Bitcoins have been ‘lost’ on the Lightning network due a user force-closing a channel using an older invalid state.

Reddit user ZipoTm posted a thread entitled “How I lost 4BTC on the Lightning Network” where he detailed a conversation with support who said the Bitcoin was irretrievable.

“Yes, if you force close using an older invalid state, they can take the money while it’s time locked if their node is online,” they wrote to the aggrieved user.

“Wow… looks like I lost 4BTC because my LND wasn’t synchronised, that’s weird.” ZipoTM replied.

“You have already closed all your channels with an older state? That’s it, the money is gone,” the support reiterated.


Oliver Knight
@KnightCoinRivet
Lightning network seems to be going well. https://np.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/dlvokv/how_i_lost_4_btc_on_lightning_network/ …#Layer0

15
12:49 PM - Oct 23, 2019
Twitter Ads info and privacy
See Oliver Knight's other Tweets
The Lightning network has been touted as the solution to Bitcoin’s scaling dilemma for the past two years, with advocates claiming that all Bitcoin transactions will one day take place on the super-fast Lightning network, which would legitimise Bitcoin as a viable payment method.

However, examples like this highlight that the network is far from ready and that users should proceed with caution while development is still in a relatively early phase.

Volume on the Lightning Network has been fairly disappointing. According to 1ML, there are just 10,249 nodes and 35,419 channels on the Lightning Network – far less than what was expected ahead of its launch last year.

BTC it's not always good! I prefer BSV at least the Devs know how to handle

I guess that's because you're an alt account used by the team or you're just naive and don't know that Craig and teams stemming coin from BCH which legitimate make BSV shitcoin of Bitcoincrash. In fact, this is the reason why the OP of this thread ignore the statement made by nutildah

CSW is not Satoshi and BSV is not Bitcoin.

Bitcoin SV $133.51  +21.33%

Any questions? Who is a real Bitcoin now? Thats' right: BSV - Original Bitcoin. Satoshi Vision

WHO'S THE BOSS NOW:
https://youtu.be/dQSZRGWwPXg?t=138

Cryptonex $1,610.68  +310.87%

Hey look! It's gained over 10x as much as BSV, therefore it's a better coin!

Guys, don't brag with them cause some or later the coin will quench off the market. Mind you, the current spot claimed by the coin belong to some altcoin before.

[hv_]

"You can not patent code. You can only patent an invention which is implemented in your code. An invention is a new and unique way of doing something. Most of all, it must be something nobody did before. If anyone used the same technique which you describe in your patent, that's called prior art and invalidates your patent. So trying to get a patent on something somebody else invented and implemented in code would be futile. ..."

No shit. Relevance?

Did you somehow forget your dev is crypto's biggest patent troll?

Apparently being a fraud and a conman wasn't low enough for him.

On a frozen, locked down protocol design, there is no dev needed

Telling ppl to trust into devs is the fraud,
 

BitCoin is fine, complete and functional as delivered

BSV is compliant and honest with that.

No ppl needed in such, only trolls do name calling and circlejerk proof of crap to sell their bags

[Bitcoin SV]

BSV - is Original Bitcoin.

In this topic, complete freedom of speech and anarchy

That's why BSV is Original Bitcoin (Satoshi Vision)

[Bitcoin SV]

CSW is not Satoshi and BSV is not Bitcoin.

CSW is co-author of Bitcoin and BSV is Original Bitcoin.

[Bitcoin SV]

CSW is not Satoshi and BSV is not Bitcoin.

1. CSW is co-author of early Bitcoin. Satoshi is just pseudonym

2. BSV is Original Bitcoin, because current Bitcoin is not accords to early Bitcoin Principes

[Viper1]

Bitcoin is not accords to early Bitcoin Principes

Neither is Bitcoin SV which is born out right from the posts from Satoshi on this very forum.

[hv_]

In this topic, complete freedom of speech and anarchy

Except for the 303 comments you have deleted 

Might as well just keep deleting them dude. Theymos isn't going to close my thread, but you can delete my comments from this one.

U wanna have some overview about how many ( not only of mine) posts got deleted by just arguing pro on chain scaling and against introducing technical debt like Segshit or 'privacy features' into the original protocol?

Many sane legends have left this place also because of censorship

Did you somehow forget your dev is crypto's biggest patent troll?

Apparently being a fraud and a conman wasn't low enough for him.

On a frozen, locked down protocol design, there is no dev needed

That's funny. Just yesterday you said there was still work to be done in "unfuckening" the protocol. Sounds like you're gonna need a dev for that.

Telling ppl to trust into devs is the fraud,

Especially if its your dev.

Slowly u might get that, sure there is refactoring needed
 
Most due to the shit that got injected by devs having no clue what BitCoin was designed to do.

But all such things are cleaning and scaling tasks, so that after Genesis release we have TCP/IP like state of protocol stability, and all BSV apps will be smoothly running after for many years
without any fear of getting 'deved out of functioning' by insanity