CloudzEye
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 33
Merit: 0
|
|
January 24, 2017, 06:34:07 PM |
|
So you reusing old interface as new interface? I kinda like that, it looks nicer and cleaner than the current one on 4.6. It seems like you still using Swing, have you consider porting to JavaFX?
|
|
|
|
Sampey (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2632
Merit: 1040
|
|
January 24, 2017, 06:48:03 PM |
|
So you reusing old interface as new interface? I kinda like that, it looks nicer and cleaner than the current one on 4.6. It seems like you still using Swing, have you consider porting to JavaFX? No it's only an old screenshot It looks cleaner and nicer because there were only some parameters and basic functions. Less info, less configuration for the user. When you start adding parameters you need to reorganize GUI. About JavaFX, i consider it in 2013, but i haven't found any reason to use it. Swing is ok for what i need
|
|
|
|
CloudzEye
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 33
Merit: 0
|
|
January 24, 2017, 07:17:32 PM |
|
So you reusing old interface as new interface? I kinda like that, it looks nicer and cleaner than the current one on 4.6. It seems like you still using Swing, have you consider porting to JavaFX? No it's only an old screenshot It looks cleaner and nicer because there were only some parameters and basic functions. Less info, less configuration for the user. When you start adding parameters you need to reorganize GUI. About JavaFX, i consider it in 2013, but i haven't found any reason to use it. Swing is ok for what i need I never saw the old version, can't believe it just so simple back in the day I thought you reorganize everything to make it looks cleaner. As a Java developer myself I can definitely see the appeal of using Swing but JavaFX would definitely give the CAT more professional looking, in my opinion. It just a thought anyway.
|
|
|
|
Sampey (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2632
Merit: 1040
|
|
January 24, 2017, 07:27:33 PM |
|
I never saw the old version, can't believe it just so simple back in the day I thought you reorganize everything to make it looks cleaner. As a Java developer myself I can definitely see the appeal of using Swing but JavaFX would definitely give the CAT more professional looking, in my opinion. It just a thought anyway. Well i first released 20 Beta Version and 46 Official version. Every CAT Version have some add-ons : parameters, log, improvements. So, early CAT version could seems easier at GUI level, but every CAT version is more power than the previous one :-) I think CAT is clean, but of course i need to put parameters/log/table somewhere : have 3 parameters 1 log and 5 table is different than have 60 parameters, 3 logs and 10 table. About JavaFX well i'm not sure about the improvements i could get. At Swing level there'a lot of support and code example....
|
|
|
|
CloudzEye
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 33
Merit: 0
|
|
January 24, 2017, 07:36:49 PM |
|
Well i first released 20 Beta Version and 46 Official version. Every CAT Version have some add-ons : parameters, log, improvements. So, early CAT version could seems easier at GUI level, but every CAT version is more power than the previous one :-) I think CAT is clean, but of course i need to put parameters/log/table somewhere : have 3 parameters 1 log and 5 table is different than have 60 parameters, 3 logs and 10 table. About JavaFX well i'm not sure about the improvements i could get. At Swing level there'a lot of support and code example....
Well that is true for sure. Do you have an ETA for official 4.7 and how much liqui is gonna cost?
|
|
|
|
Sampey (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2632
Merit: 1040
|
|
January 24, 2017, 07:38:07 PM |
|
ETA is 10-15 Days (because i'm doing a lot of test and i've made a lot of changes) Liqui will be FREE.
|
|
|
|
CloudzEye
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 33
Merit: 0
|
|
January 24, 2017, 10:55:19 PM |
|
ETA is 10-15 Days (because i'm doing a lot of test and i've made a lot of changes) Liqui will be FREE.
Great I am looking forward to it and I might add Liqui when it is available
|
|
|
|
Thefrolly
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 672
Merit: 250
CryptoTalk.Org - Get Paid for every Post!
|
|
January 26, 2017, 04:16:44 AM |
|
whats current price?
|
|
|
|
Sampey (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2632
Merit: 1040
|
|
January 26, 2017, 07:35:34 AM |
|
whats current price?
Hi, price depends by the API you wants to add to the CORE License. Actually there's a 50% Discount, if you want you can PM me the API you need and i will give you the final price.
|
|
|
|
akaman
|
|
January 26, 2017, 12:53:11 PM |
|
I would like to change the default pool parameters. Is the unit in the fields below in BTC or the altcoin I am trading in that pool (except where its percentages, obviously)?
|
|
|
|
Sampey (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2632
Merit: 1040
|
|
January 26, 2017, 01:14:06 PM |
|
I would like to change the default pool parameters. Is the unit in the fields below in BTC or the altcoin I am trading in that pool (except where its percentages, obviously)? Limit is expressed always as PartnerCurrency (BTC in your CASE) Reuse % is expressed as PartnerCurrency (% Will be applied on TOTAL Value, so QTY X PRICE) Never Create is applied on QTY PUT % IS expressed as the COIN you see in the label (MAID or BTC in that case). When % Parameter is applied on MAID (ex PUT 1% if your MAID, you have 200 MAID so 2 MAID will be put into pool) CAT will automatic calculate the price of 2 MAID x Current Market Price = 2 MAID Value expressed as BTC. BUT you must set a QTY value for that parameter.
|
|
|
|
Sampey (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2632
Merit: 1040
|
|
January 29, 2017, 01:18:31 PM |
|
Hi all, would sell my regular copy of C.A.T. The software is amazing, perfectly running and i spike profit after some days of usage, the support by Sampey is wonderful and complete, he is always available to explain everything. I'm selling my copy because after running some tests i understood that for me and for my use is not the needed solution. I sell the software core for 0.23 BTC (no api KEY as i have the Yobit one that come for free) PM if someone interested!
Just 2 Things : - To sell copies use the appropriate Marketplace section. Write about selling copies here is not allowd. - If someone get a copy from you and wants a Yobit api key there are 2 possibility : 1- You give him your api key 2- He get the Yobit key from me, but due to the fact that 1 Yobit api is already active for that CAT license, the APi key change costs is 0.05 BTC, so he will pay 0.28 BTC that is higher than get a new CAT copy.
|
|
|
|
Bitcoin_Delivery
|
|
January 29, 2017, 01:37:51 PM |
|
Hi all, would sell my regular copy of C.A.T. The software is amazing, perfectly running and i spike profit after some days of usage, the support by Sampey is wonderful and complete, he is always available to explain everything. I'm selling my copy because after running some tests i understood that for me and for my use is not the needed solution. I sell the software core for 0.23 BTC (no api KEY as i have the Yobit one that come for free) PM if someone interested!
Just 2 Things : - To sell copies use the appropriate Marketplace section. Write about selling copies here is not allowd. - If someone get a copy from you and wants a Yobit api key there are 2 possibility : 1- You give him your api key 2- He get the Yobit key from me, but due to the fact that 1 Yobit api is already active for that CAT license, the APi key change costs is 0.05 BTC, so he will pay 0.28 BTC that is higher than get a new CAT copy. I'm really sorry for writing in the wrong place Thanks for informations about the API key, and of course for your amazing support
|
|
|
|
Sampey (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2632
Merit: 1040
|
|
January 29, 2017, 03:22:25 PM |
|
I am finding some inconsistencies between fees reported by C.A.T. and fees reported by Poloniex. Take this trade for example: Here is a trade in C.A.T.: Here is the same trade in Poloniex: While C.A.T. reports a tradefee of 0.00000015 BTC, Poloniex reports a tradefee of 0.0001 BTC. So, Polo is reporting a 666% higher trade fee that C.A.T! WTF is going on? Is Satan taking my money? Hi, what CAT Version are you using? Because on version before 4.6 (or 4.5 i don't remember) there was an errore on CAT fees. In fact, i tought Poloniex put in the FEES field, the calculated fee amount, but then i notice that there was the % and not the calculated fees. In your case 0.00000015 BTC is probably 0.15% (then i must calculate trade qtyxprice - 0.15% = total without fees). This is why i think you're not using CAT 4.6
|
|
|
|
akaman
|
|
January 29, 2017, 03:30:23 PM |
|
Hi, what CAT Version are you using? Because on version before 4.6 (or 4.5 i don't remember) there was an errore on CAT fees. In fact, i tought Poloniex put in the FEES field, the calculated fee amount, but then i notice that there was the % and not the calculated fees.
In your case 0.00000015 BTC is probably 0.15% (then i must calculate trade qtyxprice - 0.15% = total without fees). This is why i think you're not using CAT 4.6
Never mind. I made a mistake. The 0.001 was the TOTAL column, i.e. BUY amount + FEE and not just FEE (in BTC). My error. Tried to remove the post, but you replied too fast :-) Using CAT 4.6. In any case, there is something strange going on, which is why I started looking at the logs on Polo. The Trade History page on Polo suggests that I have lost more than 1 BTC total on ADRD trading alone: I have only traded ADRD with C.A.T. so this is very odd, as the Cumulative Gain reported by C.A.T. is positive 0.05 BTC. I am still trying to figure out where this inconsistency comes from. I have looked at other coins traded too, and see a similar trend there. There is thousands of numbers to crunch here so this will obviously take a while to figure out.
|
|
|
|
Sampey (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2632
Merit: 1040
|
|
January 29, 2017, 03:35:03 PM |
|
yes i confirm this is very strange. But i don't know what's the meaning of that attribute on Poloniex : is the total profit/loss about what? And starting from your previoous portfolio value?
|
|
|
|
otp
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 21
Merit: 0
|
|
January 29, 2017, 04:22:25 PM |
|
In any case, there is something strange going on, which is why I started looking at the logs on Polo. The Trade History page on Polo suggests that I have lost more than 1 BTC total on ADRD trading alone: https://pixeldra.in/api/getfile/dSqKxjI have only traded ADRD with C.A.T. so this is very odd, as the Cumulative Gain reported by C.A.T. is positive 0.05 BTC. I am still trying to figure out where this inconsistency comes from. I have looked at other coins traded too, and see a similar trend there. There is thousands of numbers to crunch here so this will obviously take a while to figure out. Poloniex's trade analyzer is completely bogus. Someone should tell them. The method it uses to calculate profit and losses would not pass an accounting class. Don't ever use it.
|
|
|
|
klixion
|
|
January 29, 2017, 04:29:36 PM |
|
When is the 50% special offer over? Thank you.
|
|
|
|
Sampey (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2632
Merit: 1040
|
|
January 29, 2017, 04:32:46 PM |
|
When is the 50% special offer over? Thank you.
50% is still active. It will be disable when the new price list will comes.
|
|
|
|
otp
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 21
Merit: 0
|
|
January 29, 2017, 04:37:29 PM |
|
FYI, I'm using C.A.T. 4.6 and I'm still seeing trades on Poloniex being calculated incorrectly. For example, I buy 0.80 BTC worth of Qora at 10 satoshi's using CAT (8000000.00000000 qora). Fee is 0.15%, which is 12,000 qora. However, CAT leaves behind 0.1 % or 8,000 qora. These are not sold at 11 satoshis. Instead, only 7980000 are sold, 8,000 fewer than should have been.
Is the Poloniex API returning the wrong fee or is CAT still hard-coded for 0.25% for Poloniex for all trades?
|
|
|
|
|