BC.GAME - CASINO-SPORTBOOK, OFFICIAL SPONSOR LEICESTER CITY!

[Zwei]

Hey guys, does anybody see this warning on the BC game thread?

I am not sure why I am seeing this warning. I checked the reference, and it seems the scam accusation was resolved. But the flag is still on their profile, and it shows a warning to me. I assume it if because of the custom trust list. But I am curious if anyone else sees this warning when you visit the BC game thread. Gekkebelg should ask people to remove their support since the issue was solved already.

yeah, it's because of your custom trust list, as the warning is only visible to you alone.

Gekkebelg should ask people to remove their support since the issue was solved already.

he was last online on March 25, and he has not posted since the end of last year, so i doubt he gonna do that any time soon.
best option right now is to @tag those users and ask them to remove their support, but i'm not sure about that.

[kawetsriyanto]

~~~
I am not sure why I am seeing this warning. I checked the reference, and it seems the scam accusation was resolved. But the flag is still on their profile, and it shows a warning to me. I assume it if because of the custom trust list.

I see everything normal. There is no any warning in the OP.
Check again your custom trust list or your trust settings!! You may made a negative feedback, or you follow a flag of an accusation.  

Anyway, is there a real problem with bc.game to make eveyone of us cautious? i dont see any except some individuald have problems, but there will be always those who are happy and unhappy with service.

Agree. I also have no issue on the BC.Game site.
There will be always complains or feedbacks for a better service. I think it is a normal thing, we shouldn't be so worried as long as it isn't a crucial matter. Well, no doubt that "happy or unhappy" with the service can be quite subjective. Each person can have a different view.

[Bitcoin_Arena]

Hey guys, does anybody see this warning on the BC game thread?



I am not sure why I am seeing this warning. I checked the reference, and it seems the scam accusation was resolved. But the flag is still on their profile, and it shows a warning to me. I assume it if because of the custom trust list. But I am curious if anyone else sees this warning when you visit the BC game thread. Gekkebelg should ask people to remove their support since the issue was solved already.

I don't see any red banner warning either, and it's probably because your custom trust list, as others mentioned. From my side I see only 2 DT members who are in support of the flag, and it is inactive.

I am certain that those members are not even aware that the case was resolved, as Gekkebelg just decided to disappear without alerting any of them.

[God Of Thunder]

Guys, I figured out the problem. Yes, it is because of my custom trust list. Those guys who supported the flag, one of them is in my Trust list, but the other two, who are not DT users, are not in my trust list directly, but they are on the trust list of people who are in my trust list. So, the flag is visible to me. I think it's a very rare case, and I don't remember seeing something like this before.

This is why the casino needs to contact the player and ask them to update their case with the latest information so the forum members can remove their support from the flag. In this case, the player becomes inactive, and there is no way to reach them.

[Strongkored]

Auckland is the most amateur team. BC game bookies do not give odds on this team, while I see other bookies giving odds of 1.01x which is the same as without odds.



The day I made a combo bet by betting on the favorite team only according to the bookie, I felt this was quite sure even though Bayern Munich's odds were a bit big which is likely where Benfica will put up a fight, but statistically Bayern Munich might be better than Benfica so bet on it.

I was very confident that Bayern would win against Benfica, and bet on them on the moneyline with pretty good odds of around @2.00, actually I felt strange seeing these odds because I thought Bayern's odds were only around @1.50 - @1.80, so I saw this as an opportunity but unfortunately it was very disappointing, only 1 goal behind and Bayern failed to win.
Before making the bet I thought Bayern would not play hard in this match because they were already sure of qualifying, but I ignored that and it made me lose my bet.

[salad daging]

...

I was very confident that Bayern would win against Benfica, and bet on them on the moneyline with pretty good odds of around @2.00, actually I felt strange seeing these odds because I thought Bayern's odds were only around @1.50 - @1.80, so I saw this as an opportunity but unfortunately it was very disappointing, only 1 goal behind and Bayern failed to win.
Before making the bet I thought Bayern would not play hard in this match because they were already sure of qualifying, but I ignored that and it made me lose my bet.

Bad luck in this bet. Lol.

You were almost certain that Bayern Munich would win, but in reality they lost by 1 goal, which was scored by Benfica in the early minutes.

Flamengo - failed to win. I know this team is quite good, but this time they failed to get 3 points.

Only Chelsea won easily.

[Wiwo]

Hey guys, does anybody see this warning on the BC game thread?



I am not sure why I am seeing this warning. I checked the reference, and it seems the scam accusation was resolved. But the flag is still on their profile, and it shows a warning to me. I assume it if because of the custom trust list. But I am curious if anyone else sees this warning when you visit the BC game thread. Gekkebelg should ask people to remove their support since the issue was solved already.

This warning will not appear on the page for someone who is an active participant on the discussion on this BC game ANN thread, it shows because you visiting the thread for the first time or you have not been active on this thread for a long time let say 120 days not sure though.

Try to visit the thread again you will see that the warning have disappeared already.

[darbitmobilerecovery]

Pretty strange to see the thread higlighted as a warning for a user like you godofthunder.

I mean i understand why is this happening and is ok but i feel also like for one guy in our trust list gave one negative feedback destroy all the other good feedbacks is crazy.

Well anyways is also ok because that is the function of the trustlist, so dont mind me so much.


About betting on yesterday games..... What a disaster for the guys who backed Boca with a handicap.

[Wapfika]

This is why the casino needs to contact the player and ask them to update their case with the latest information so the forum members can remove their support from the flag. In this case, the player becomes inactive, and there is no way to reach them.

Probably representative that use their account doesn’t see any problem already on their trust since all the flag against them is inactive in general.

I’m not aware too that a warning like that will appear when someone I trust support a flag. I thought that red warning is only visible if visiting a thread without any login account since I frequently get those warning when browsing the forum anonymously.

[BABY SHOES]

About betting on yesterday games..... What a disaster for the guys who backed Boca with a handicap.

Many lost in yesterday's match. Boca was a disaster for those who bet on the handicap. Imagine if the underdog team had won, it might have been a different story, considering that the Auckland team is made up of office workers.

I myself lost in the Benfica vs Bayern match with an Over 1.5 bet, but in reality there was only 1 goal... Damn, this time I'm not so enthusiastic about betting on Bayern Munich.

[Ruttoshi]

About betting on yesterday games..... What a disaster for the guys who backed Boca with a handicap.

Many lost in yesterday's match. Boca was a disaster for those who bet on the handicap. Imagine if the underdog team had won, it might have been a different story, considering that the Auckland team is made up of office workers.

I myself lost in the Benfica vs Bayern match with an Over 1.5 bet, but in reality there was only 1 goal... Damn, this time I'm not so enthusiastic about betting on Bayern Munich.

I wouldn't like to bet on any of the group stage matches until it get to the knockout stage. I feel that's when these big clubs will take the competition seriously. However, Kompany performance is poor when it comes to competitions outside Germany. I feel that he will adapt to these competitions and come up with a strategy that will be in his favor.

Football is unpredictable, sometimes the club that you feel will win the match loses it. Those that bet on Boca was disappointed and lost their bet.

[BABY SHOES]

Many lost in yesterday's match. Boca was a disaster for those who bet on the handicap. Imagine if the underdog team had won, it might have been a different story, considering that the Auckland team is made up of office workers.

I myself lost in the Benfica vs Bayern match with an Over 1.5 bet, but in reality there was only 1 goal... Damn, this time I'm not so enthusiastic about betting on Bayern Munich.

I wouldn't like to bet on any of the group stage matches until it get to the knockout stage. I feel that's when these big clubs will take the competition seriously. However, Kompany performance is poor when it comes to competitions outside Germany. I feel that he will adapt to these competitions and come up with a strategy that will be in his favor.

Football is unpredictable, sometimes the club that you feel will win the match loses it. Those that bet on Boca was disappointed and lost their bet.

Because in some previous bets, it was profitable with several wins, taking advantage of low teams against elite teams, sometimes victory is easy to guess, so bet on the group stage.

Kompany should have adapted for a long time because he has been at Bayern Munich for more than a season, besides losing against Benfica, he was already in his comfort zone so they played (not seriously) maybe in the knockout round this tournament will be more interesting.

[Boiyboomers]

I have requested "one year self exclusion " for my account on December, 5th 2023. Last week I contacted the support team, but one of their support said I have requested permanent exclusion. Ofcourse it was a mistake, I lost my account now.

PM me your UID, I'll reach my contact. Hopefully we'll get a broader context. If you don't have any access to your UID, give me your email address and perhaps username or other identifier that you can get. It'll help my contact zeroing into your account.

Was there anything valuable on your account left? If there was nothing left, maybe you can just make another account and dont stick to the past? [...]

Bad idea. In any casino, following an exclusion [even when the person is currently in the middle of an exclusion period or already choose to permanently excluded] if someone create a new account, it'll be an insta-ban and give the casino right to confiscate everything as it'll be considered as circumventing self-exclusion.

Thank you.
I think it's enough for me , I didn't have much time to tell everything in order to open my account,  no more interest to play on bcgame again.

[EarnOnVictor]

But people have a habit to change their decisions. 35 years ago I wanted to be a firefighter. After many years, I have chosen different profession. People opinion change with time, after a decision. Not saying that casinos should immediately welcome their former clients who have chosen self exclusion, but will it be bad if a gambler returns after 10 years? From ToS - yes, as solution would be having another account. From moral point of view - I would give a chance if a person really wants to return.

First, your example of wanted to be a firefighter is not inline with this subject matter, both are of a change, but one is risky and psycholgical than the other.

Aside from that, I fully agree with you. Is the self-exclusion feature even truly functioning strictly like that? I doubt it with most casinos. Even if it is boldly written in the ToS, they might look away if the gambler returns in a few months or even weeks. Let's assume that the gambler returned after 10 years, what harm can that possibly do anymore? And even if he slips back into his old bad ways, he must have taken enough fresh breath to take bigger blows before he self-exclude himself again, if need be.

[TopTort777]

But people have a habit to change their decisions. 35 years ago I wanted to be a firefighter. After many years, I have chosen different profession. People opinion change with time, after a decision. Not saying that casinos should immediately welcome their former clients who have chosen self exclusion, but will it be bad if a gambler returns after 10 years? From ToS - yes, as solution would be having another account. From moral point of view - I would give a chance if a person really wants to return.

First, your example of wanted to be a firefighter is not inline with this subject matter, both are of a change, but one is risky and psycholgical than the other.

Aside from that, I fully agree with you. Is the self-exclusion feature even truly functioning strictly like that? I doubt it with most casinos. Even if it is boldly written in the ToS, they might look away if the gambler returns in a few months or even weeks. Let's assume that the gambler returned after 10 years, what harm can that possibly do anymore? And even if he slips back into his old bad ways, he must have taken enough fresh breath to take bigger blows before he self-exclude himself again, if need be.

I only wanted to explain that persons wish and goal can change with time I simply dont like permanent exclusion = closing doors for a client forever. Today I can be a gambler who is afraid of addiction, in 10 years I might be a totally different person. More smart, more self controlling person, possibly more wealthy, have different views on life and priorities. But because of self-exclusion 10 years ago, I will not be allowed to return or make another account. I think that wrong. A casino should individually consider every customer that returns after total self-exclusion, instead of "our NO is final".

[darbitmobilerecovery]

Is someone is an addict is ok for me to say NO as a result of his self exclution or not, we are not talking here about some minor thing we are talking about a real and serious problem, you cant provide again to an addict the sustance that make him addict, so the NO with capital leters is the way to go.

And i dont feel sorry to the one who wants to bet again, take it as a chance to keep your "new" balance life outside of the things that destroy you in the past.

[logfiles]

Thank you.
I think it's enough for me , I didn't have much time to tell everything in order to open my account,  no more interest to play on bcgame again.

Providing just a UID or email address should not have taken a lot of time. He was actually trying to help you get into the bottom of the issue so that you know what actually triggered the permanent exclusion, but since you have already made up your mind after a few replies, then I guess it's a closed case.

[The Cryptovator]

Thank you.
I think it's enough for me , I didn't have much time to tell everything in order to open my account,  no more interest to play on bcgame again.

Since you posted on the announcement thread regarding your self-exclusion, you have to share your UID. Unless you share more details regarding your account, how can we help you? The BC game doesn't ban you, but you ask for self-exclusion. There might happen mistakes from both ends. So it's a matter of investigation to come to a solution. Unless you abuse the system, BC game needs their user back. It really depends on you; either play on BC game or move to any others. But instead of getting angry, your cooperation would help you to get back your account.

[rdluffy]

Are you guys having any luck betting on the Club World Cup?

I got off to a good start, with a few good hits, but in the last few games I've ended up losing several bets, especially multiple bets 
Several surprising results

As of the round of 16, which starts tomorrow, I don't want to risk so much and don't want to make any more multiples to try and break the losing streak hehehe
I hope you guys are doing better than me 

[Ruttoshi]

Are you guys having any luck betting on the Club World Cup?

I got off to a good start, with a few good hits, but in the last few games I've ended up losing several bets, especially multiple bets 
Several surprising results

As of the round of 16, which starts tomorrow, I don't want to risk so much and don't want to make any more multiples to try and break the losing streak hehehe
I hope you guys are doing better than me 

I have not yet bet on any of these matches played in the group stage because I don't know the strength of those clubs that are not from Europe. I believe that since the round of 16 will kick off tomorrow, many of these clubs will take their matches seriously because if they don't, they will be kicked out from the competition.

I will look at just one match to bet on tomorrow since I can start betting on these clubs because some of them will love to make it to the finals.