Bitcoin Forum
May 22, 2024, 12:03:08 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 ... 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 [117] 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 »
  Print  
Author Topic: DefaultTrust changes  (Read 84400 times)
marlboroza
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1932
Merit: 2270


View Profile
June 29, 2020, 04:52:24 PM
 #2321

Indeed.... us clown car common folk should never question the word of the almighty TECSHARE....
"It's fact, you know"  Grin
~
You can write essay, you can provide as much proofs as you can, you can say grass is green and send green grass to TECSHARE and he will never agree that grass is green, he will blame clown car for painting grass in green color. It is pointless, really...

Techy evaded question again, take a look:

Last of the V8s is doing exactly what peloso is doing, he is just doing it more tactfully.

It looks like he answered it but he really didn't. @T, what V8s did?
Timelord2067
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3682
Merit: 2218


💲🏎️💨🚓


View Profile
June 29, 2020, 06:21:59 PM
 #2322

Did anyone happen to notice four of LV8's trust list have all given me distrust (same "gang" I wonder?)

and the last one is also wanting to become a merit font and like LV8 is refusing to answer my straight forward questions in their thread where they seek to become said merit font?


Quote
Trust list for: Last of the V8s (Trust: +4 / =0 / -1) (1785 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP) (created 2019-09-14_Sat_06.11h)
Back to index

Last of the V8s Trusts:
1. Foxpup (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (3) 557 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
4. hilariousandco (Trust: +20 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (46) 648 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
5. suchmoon (Trust: +15 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (45) 2904 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
6. nutildah (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (11) 1258 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)

Not connected (but are DT1)

Quote
2. philipma1957 (Trust: +25 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (18) 878 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
3. TMAN (Trust: +27 / =0 / -1) (DT1! (24) 1053 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
7. tmfp (Trust: +6 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (16) 448 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
8. DireWolfM14 (Trust: +8 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (7) 743 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)

Refuses to answer my merit font questions:

Quote
9. mikeywith (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (1164 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)

marlboroza
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1932
Merit: 2270


View Profile
June 29, 2020, 06:48:06 PM
Merited by Last of the V8s (1)
 #2323

Did anyone happen to notice four of LV8's trust list have all given me distrust (same "gang" I wonder?)

and the last one is also wanting to become a merit font and like LV8 is refusing to answer my straight forward questions in their thread where they seek to become said merit font?
I honestly believe deep in my hearth that you are the good guy, but, you are just trowing random unnecessary false accusations and that is one of the main reasons why many members of this forum have you excluded from their trust networks and they mostly don't take you seriously, and, what is very important here, many of them have you on their ignore list, including me...that is very sad because you are really great investigator. What really happened man, we were great and you were one of the users I admired most when I came here and at some point you become very angry  Huh

I am just saying, maybe it is time to investigate scammers and stop harassing forum members who don't have red/gray history and they just want to become merit sources or, if you have some evidence, post them in front of everyone...just saying...
LoyceV
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3318
Merit: 16678


Thick-Skinned Gang Leader and Golden Feather 2021


View Profile WWW
June 29, 2020, 07:14:52 PM
 #2324

Did anyone happen to notice four of LV8's trust list have all given me distrust (same "gang" I wonder?)
What gang is that? From what I've seen, Foxpup, hilariousandco, suchmoon and nutildah are quite different.

Quote
Refuses to answer my merit font questions:
I've seen you use this phrase before, but what does it mean? Do you mean "Merit source"?
If he doesn't want to answer, let him Smiley

I honestly believe deep in my hearth that you are the good guy
Agreed. I think Timelord2067 is one of the good guys indeed, but he went a bit overboard. I like Last of the V8s' neutral feedback on Timelord2067, that's promising:
Quote
Started giving more accurate feedback when prompted.
If you only look for scammers, chances are you start seeing them everywhere.

you are really great investigator. What really happened man, we were great
I know Timelord2067 is very good at investigating large amounts of evidence, even to the point that it's often too long for me to review. He's not the only one, but when posts have like 20 quotes with ETH-addresses, I just can't find myself to review the evidence. And if I don't review it, I won't tag anyone for it either.

marlboroza
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1932
Merit: 2270


View Profile
June 29, 2020, 07:49:20 PM
 #2325

you are really great investigator. What really happened man, we were great
I know Timelord2067 is very good at investigating large amounts of evidence, even to the point that it's often too long for me to review. He's not the only one, but when posts have like 20 quotes with ETH-addresses, I just can't find myself to review the evidence. And if I don't review it, I won't tag anyone for it either.
He doesn't investigate ETH connections as far as I know. I am observing his investigations and sometimes he just sees patterns even if they don't exist, he makes conclusions based on them and he doesn't want to listen anyone. I have experienced this from first hand (if this is correct expression). It's something like: "you are LoyceV and you are marlboroza, you both have "L" and "o" in the nick, there is something going on". And he has lots of good investigations, but he is acting like a troll when he is wrong, he just doesn't want to accept mistake...no apologies and so on...

It's just like some big forum family  Grin
suchmoon
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3682
Merit: 8922


https://bpip.org


View Profile WWW
June 29, 2020, 08:17:24 PM
 #2326

Quote
So his ineleigability was self imposed for 38 weeks.
You may be right though Smiley

We'll see in a few days. I doubt he's blacklisted.

Did anyone happen to notice four of LV8's trust list have all given me distrust (same "gang" I wonder?)
What gang is that? From what I've seen, Foxpup, hilariousandco, suchmoon and nutildah are quite different.

Obviously it's a Dalek gang.
eddie13
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2296
Merit: 2262


BTC or BUST


View Profile
June 29, 2020, 09:04:08 PM
 #2327

I was a Newbie once too, and this place felt quite scary. You can get negative feedback for the smallest things, without much of a chance to ever correct it.

I don't think it's as bad as it used to be... The new trust system has really improved the chances of appeals in that a false claim now can/will really make the claimant look like a fool and possibly removed based just on the general consensus..

DTs must be much more careful about what claims they make now, or be publicly blasted..

Chancellor on Brink of Second Bailout for Banks
Timelord2067
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3682
Merit: 2218


💲🏎️💨🚓


View Profile
June 30, 2020, 03:04:34 AM
Last edit: May 16, 2023, 03:09:43 AM by Timelord2067
Merited by LoyceV (6)
 #2328

I honestly believe deep in my hearth that you are the good guy, but, you are just throwing random unnecessary false accusations and that is one of the main reasons why many members of this forum have you excluded from their trust networks and they mostly don't take you seriously,

Most if not all of the ones on DT1 who have me on distrust have peddled in trading accounts at one point or another.  The rest of what you said is just spin.

Did anyone happen to notice four of LV8's trust list have all given me distrust (same "gang" I wonder?)
What gang is that? From what I've seen, Foxpup, hilariousandco, suchmoon and nutildah are quite different.

Maybe not - perhaps "like minded persons" instead?

Quote
I know Timelord2067 is very good at investigating large amounts of evidence, even to the point that it's often too long for me to review. He's not the only one, but when posts have like 20 quotes with ETH-addresses, I just can't find myself to review the evidence. And if I don't review it, I won't tag anyone for it either.

Just to clarify, I've never investigated ETH addresses, but I will sift through BTC wallets and if there are dozens of wallet addresses that are used by multiple alts then the connections are there.  Solid Gold.

He doesn't investigate ETH connections as far as I know.

Correct.

Quote
I am observing his investigations and sometimes he just sees patterns even if they don't exist, he makes conclusions based on them and he doesn't want to listen anyone. I have experienced this from first hand (if this is correct expression). It's something like: "you are LoyceV and you are marlboroza, you both have "L" and "o" in the nick, there is something going on". And he has lots of good investigations, but he is acting like a troll when he is wrong, he just doesn't want to accept mistake...no apologies and so on...

Well... this statement is certainly contradictory.

A few people will, from time to time misinterpret my findings and instead of discussing the issue will simply state such chants as "you're wrong" or "here we go again" or "he's just a troll, ignore him" or even "he used to be good, but now..."  yet none of those who say these things will ever take the time to show where they think that I am wrong.  Sometimes when a person has a different interpretation, they will dig there heals in.  I'm not the only one guilty of that.




Saying "You are wrong" "You are actually wrong and here is the proof of where you are wrong". 




Whenever I have been contacted by anyone I've given negative trust feedback to has contacted me I will always walk them through the evidence I have presented (wallet addresses etc).




I honestly believe deep in my hearth that you are the good guy
Agreed. I think Timelord2067 is one of the good guys indeed, but he went a bit overboard. I like Last of the V8s' neutral feedback on Timelord2067, that's promising:
Quote
Started giving more accurate feedback when prompted.

Again, another contradictory statement.

Simultaneous (or near enough) I asked LV8 a series of reasonable questions in their pursuit of becoming a merit font source. LV8's responses weren't exactly stellar then gave me the above.  He couldn't even explain the contradictory nature of *distrusting me* then leaving a glowing (but neutral) trust feedback.  That just doesn't add up.

Obviously it's a Dalek gang.

Ho Ho Ho... It is a jolly thing you said...  Roll Eyes How's that suchmoon.com and twitter.com/suchmoon sites (that you don't know anything about) going? - You say a silly thing = I say a silly thing...




In other news (and to get the discussion back on topic), does anyone have any questions about this:

http://loyce.club/trust/2020-06-27_Sat_05.02h/131361.html

Quote
Trust list for: Timelord2067 (Trust: +8 / =6 / -1) (DT1 (-11) 448 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP) (created 2020-06-27_Sat_05.02h)
Back to index

Timelord2067 Trusts these users' judgement:
1. Removed canton (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (31 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
1. KWH (Trust: +8 / =2 / -0) (45 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
2. doof (Trust: neutral) (1 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
3. Removed lavajumper (Trust: neutral) (28 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
3. Removed lyno (Trust: neutral) (7 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
3. Removed hedgy73 (Trust: +21 / =0 / -0) (72 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
3. Removed Nerull (Trust: neutral) (10 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
3. Removed miningpoolhub (Trust: neutral) (6 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
3. Removed chronicsky (Trust: +45 / =1 / -0) (145 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
3. LFC_Bitcoin (Trust: +17 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (11) 2361 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
4. RHavar (Trust: +6 / =0 / -0) (596 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
5. mocacinno (Trust: neutral) (1387 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
6. actmyname (Trust: +20 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (14) 970 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
7. SFR10 (Trust: +15 / =0 / -0) (437 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
8. TwitchySeal (Trust: +6 / =1 / -0) (640 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
9. jackg (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (730 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
10. Gunthar (Trust: +11 / =0 / -0) (110 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
11. Removed findblocks.com (Trust: neutral) (0 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
11. Removed roughswap (Trust: neutral) (8 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
11. DireWolfM14 (Trust: +18 / =1 / -0) (1752 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
12. Ratimov (Trust: +8 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (10) 1513 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
13. Timelord2o67 (Trust: neutral) (15 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
14. geophphreigh (Trust: +12 / =0 / -0) (527 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
15. zasad@ (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (7) 1082 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
16. Rikafip (Trust: +5 / =1 / -0) (1132 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
17. Neopotism Banned! (Trust: neutral) (3 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)

I look to have had a minimum of 11 and a maximin of 27 UID's on my default trust list over the last 76 weeks.  I've usually added or subtracted just one or two in a week, but in week six I had what can be described as a massive clean out of my trust list.  I removed six and added two to my DT trust list taking that tally to eleven.  I removed ninety three UID's from my distrust list at the same time (this was covered in the "Reference post: Why have I excluded members on my trust list?" thread around the same time)

Week five I removed two from my trust list and just one week prior I added three UID's (who were then removed two week's later in week six).




Week 4:

Quote
Trust list for: Timelord2067 (144 Merit earned) (Trust feedback) (Trust list) (BPIP) (created 2019-02-12_Tue_19.34h)
Back to index

Timelord2067 is Trusted by:
1. KWH (33 Merit earned) (Trust feedback) (Trust list) (BPIP)
2. mnightwaffle (0 Merit earned) (Trust feedback) (Trust list) (BPIP)
3. Gimpeline (5 Merit earned) (Trust feedback) (Trust list) (BPIP)
4. lyno (0 Merit earned) (Trust feedback) (Trust list) (BPIP)
5. Quartx (4 Merit earned) (Trust feedback) (Trust list) (BPIP)
6. whywefight (22 Merit earned) (Trust feedback) (Trust list) (BPIP)
7. Removed Thule (23 Merit earned) (Trust feedback) (Trust list) (BPIP)
7. Vadi2323 (33 Merit earned) (Trust feedback) (Trust list) (BPIP)
8. mocacinno (375 Merit earned) (Trust feedback) (Trust list) (BPIP)
9. Mooncoin_Foundation (0 Merit earned) (Trust feedback) (Trust list) (BPIP)
10. endlasuresh (3 Merit earned) (Trust feedback) (Trust list) (BPIP)
11. DutchFinity (2 Merit earned) (Trust feedback) (Trust list) (BPIP)
12. Danica22 (0 Merit earned) (Trust feedback) (Trust list) (BPIP)
13. BeEvil (31 Merit earned) (Trust feedback) (Trust list) (BPIP)
14. Removed ac2eugenio (1 Merit earned) (Trust feedback) (Trust list) (BPIP)
14. Removed Bazinga442 (24 Merit earned) (Trust feedback) (Trust list) (BPIP)

14. Deena (38 Merit earned) (Trust feedback) (Trust list) (BPIP)
15. Removed mr.creampie (10 Merit earned) (Trust feedback) (Trust list) (BPIP)
15. chickinini (11 Merit earned) (Trust feedback) (Trust list) (BPIP)
16. cryptorgasm (4 Merit earned) (Trust feedback) (Trust list) (BPIP)
17. Removed TinaMoran (10 Merit earned) (Trust feedback) (Trust list) (BPIP)
17. Pablojob (10 Merit earned) (Trust feedback) (Trust list) (BPIP)
18. PiningGarcia (10 Merit earned) (Trust feedback) (Trust list) (BPIP)
19. PingGermoco (10 Merit earned) (Trust feedback) (Trust list) (BPIP)
20. Removed NilaMutac (10 Merit earned) (Trust feedback) (Trust list) (BPIP)
20. cryptopov (4 Merit earned) (Trust feedback) (Trust list) (BPIP)
21. poypototoy (10 Merit earned) (Trust feedback) (Trust list) (BPIP)
22. H8bussesNbicycles (8 Merit earned) (Trust feedback) (Trust list) (BPIP)
23. NEW ito-marketing (0 Merit earned) (Trust feedback) (Trust list) (BPIP)
24. gwsukabokepjepang (0 Merit earned) (Trust feedback) (Trust list) (BPIP)


I don't think I took much attention to it at the time, but let's have a look at something:

Code:
15 July 2014, 01:35:37 Date Registered: 	Thule

17 October 2017, 08:10:02 Date Registered: ac2eugenio
25 October 2017, 05:13:41 Date Registered: Bazinga442

04 January 2018, 02:33:05 Date Registered: mr.creampie
05 January 2018, 10:59:13 Date Registered: TinaMoran
05 January 2018, 11:26:55 Date Registered: NilaMutac

2/12/2019 5:07:44 PM password reset via email Thule
19 February 2019, 21:03:13 Last Active: Bazinga442
21 February 2019, 23:13:57 Last Active: NilaMutac
25 February 2019, 13:55:29 Last Active: mr.creampie

14 June 2019, 19:19:35 Last Active: ac2eugenio

26 July 2019, 20:27:01 Last Active: TinaMoran

3/3/2020 7:47:53 PM password reset via email Thule
3/6/2020 10:59:02 PM password reset via email Thule

27 June 2020, 06:27:26 Last Active: Thule

Without knowing *anything* about these UID's (and no having a sneek peak at the trust feedback) don't you suppose it's entirely possable some, if not all of these users are alts *just* looking at the two seperate pieces of information, (1) they all withdrew their default trust of me the same week and (2) some registered within a 24 hour period of each other and then in close proximity one by one they stopped being active.

Won't you at least conceed if you had never seen these users' names before that that is at least a *little* bit suspicious?

Now throw in the information from their trust feedback:



How surprising!  The ones in the "untrusted feedback" are the very ones who say that I am wrong - that I am crazy, that I am a Troll... yet here they are doing the exact same thing - identifying alts and slapping them with negatives.

Their feedback connects some of these alts to H8bussesNbicycles - so *if* you were to conceed that Thule is an alt of these listed above, then surely H8bussesNbicycles and Thule are alts?

Wasn't H8bussesNbicycles etc banned and or black-banned from voting in the DT?  Thule (and these alts listed just above) should also be banned / blacklisted from voting in the month to month DT.

Do you agree OP - @theymos ?

LoyceV
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3318
Merit: 16678


Thick-Skinned Gang Leader and Golden Feather 2021


View Profile WWW
June 30, 2020, 06:13:09 PM
 #2329

Maybe not - perhaps "like minded persons" instead?
That makes sense. But if they're "like minded", isn't it likely they have similar Trust lists too?

Quote
Just to clarify, I've never investigated ETH addresses, but I will sift through BTC wallets and if there are dozens of wallet addresses that are used by multiple alts then the connections are there.  Solid Gold.
Thanks for the correction. The long lists of ETH-addresses was the first that came to mind. But long posts take a lot of time to read and verify, especially if it requires checking references.

Quote
In other news (and to get the discussion back on topic), does anyone have any questions about this:

http://loyce.club/trust/2020-06-27_Sat_05.02h/131361.html
Without checking all usernames: from what I've seen last time, this is an improvement.

Quote
Without knowing *anything* about these UID's
I instantly recognize several of those users from this topic: User got voted into DT1 by sockpuppets.

Timelord2067
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3682
Merit: 2218


💲🏎️💨🚓


View Profile
June 30, 2020, 11:26:09 PM
 #2330

Maybe not - perhaps "like minded persons" instead?
That makes sense. But if they're "like minded", isn't it likely they have similar Trust lists too?

An interesting question.

Quote
Quote
Just to clarify, I've never investigated ETH addresses, but I will sift through BTC wallets and if there are dozens of wallet addresses that are used by multiple alts then the connections are there.  Solid Gold.
Thanks for the correction. The long lists of ETH-addresses was the first that came to mind. But long posts take a lot of time to read and verify, especially if it requires checking references.

(Just a thought bubble here)  Perhaps if there are 100 links that also have archived links and you were to randomly choose five out of those 100 references, then (statstically speaking) wouldn't it stand to reason if you could randomly verify five to be valid, then more if not all references would be valid.

I'm always surprised at the sheer numbers of ETH investigations, it'll take me minutes to find connections, then an hour to type up a report.

Quote
Quote
In other news (and to get the discussion back on topic), does anyone have any questions about this:

http://loyce.club/trust/2020-06-27_Sat_05.02h/131361.html
Without checking all usernames: from what I've seen last time, this is an improvement.

Thanks, it's always good to do a little sweep out of the cobwebs.

Quote
Quote
Without knowing *anything* about these UID's
I instantly recognize several of those users from this topic: User got voted into DT1 by sockpuppets.

I hadn't thought to check  ito-marketing as well as it was adding me, not removing.  It turns out that's yet another shill/alt of the others, so

Code:
~ito-marketing

etc.

LoyceV
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3318
Merit: 16678


Thick-Skinned Gang Leader and Golden Feather 2021


View Profile WWW
July 01, 2020, 09:28:01 AM
 #2331

(Just a thought bubble here)  Perhaps if there are 100 links that also have archived links and you were to randomly choose five out of those 100 references, then (statstically speaking) wouldn't it stand to reason if you could randomly verify five to be valid, then more if not all references would be valid.
If those 5 are enough for conclusive evidence, then yes. But if that's the case, the other 95 could have been omitted from the post to make it much easier in the first place. As an example: for this scam accusation, I could probably have written 20 times more if I spent several days going through all the evidence. Instead, I posted enough to confirm there was a scam, and left a small heading "There's much more" to point readers to some of the other shady things without showing the details.

marlboroza
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1932
Merit: 2270


View Profile
July 01, 2020, 02:49:25 PM
 #2332

A few people will, from time to time misinterpret my findings and instead of discussing the issue will simply state such chants as "you're wrong" or "here we go again" or "he's just a troll, ignore him" or even "he used to be good, but now..."  yet none of those who say these things will ever take the time to show where they think that I am wrong.  Sometimes when a person has a different interpretation, they will dig there heals in.  I'm not the only one guilty of that.




Saying "You are wrong" "You are actually wrong and here is the proof of where you are wrong".  

Blah...last time I checked, you mentioned something in one of your "investigatory" topics and then you ignored me, trolled me etc etc:

Why is my nick in this thread?
So if you don't mind explain what is my nick doing in this thread
What is this now?



Why are you defaming me in this topic Timelord2067? Why do you write lies in my trust feedback?

Where did I abuse merit?

Post proofs for your claims timelord2067
Memory lost or something?

How surprising!  The ones in the "untrusted feedback" are the very ones who say that I am wrong - that I am crazy, that I am a Troll... yet here they are doing the exact same thing - identifying alts and slapping them with negatives.
You just don't get it, right?


Speaking of on-topic thingies, Timelord attacked someone because they had irrelevant alt account in their trust network, surprisingly, timelord included his own alt account to his trust network http://loyce.club/trust/2020-06-27_Sat_05.02h/131361.html. @Timelord2067, Isn't that something you called abuse? Wink
TECSHARE
In memoriam
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3318
Merit: 1958


First Exclusion Ever


View Profile WWW
July 01, 2020, 03:02:40 PM
 #2333

it is becoming more clear over time that you are yet another one who is cultivating this image in order to get your own ticket to the special boys club
You mean the clown car, right?

If it feels like everyone else is wrong, have you considered your own view might be the problem?

I haven't interacted much with V8, but what I've seen gave me no reason to excluded him. The same goes for you for that matter. If you don't agree with me, you can either try to use arguments, or just ignore the question and blame whatever boys club you think exists. Up to you, see my personal text.

If there's a girls club I can join, let me know!

I didn't say you were a member of the clown car, perhaps just clown car adjacent. I did see a red clown nose roll out of your pocket the other day and it gave me cause for concern. Lots of people enjoy making the argument of being correct because it is popular, but that is not an argument, it is a logical fallacy. I have interacted with V8, and what he has done HAS given me cause for concern. Have you ever considered you might just be doing what is popular instead of what is right?


Did anyone happen to notice four of LV8's trust list have all given me distrust (same "gang" I wonder?)
What gang is that? From what I've seen, Foxpup, hilariousandco, suchmoon and nutildah are quite different...

Oh please. Except for hilariousandco, those three might as well be the same person, they are like a fucking human centipede consuming eachother's excrement.
LFC_Bitcoin
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3542
Merit: 9638


#1 VIP Crypto Casino


View Profile
July 01, 2020, 03:29:54 PM
 #2334

TECSHARE, I’ve met V8 in real life numerous times & he’s as trustworthy as they come, really nice, friendly guy too. I can’t see how anybody could not like him.

.
.BITCASINO.. 
.
#1 VIP CRYPTO CASINO

▄██████████████▄
█▄████████████▄▀▄▄▄
█████████████████▄▄▄
█████▄▄▄▄▄▄██████████████▄
███████████████████████████████
████▀█████████████▄▄██████████
██████▀██████████████████████
████████████████▀██████▌████
███████████████▀▀▄█▄▀▀█████▀
███████████████████▀▀█████▀
 ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀██████████████
          ▀▀▀████████
                ▀▀▀███

.
......PLAY......
Timelord2067
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3682
Merit: 2218


💲🏎️💨🚓


View Profile
July 01, 2020, 04:52:24 PM
 #2335

Wankety

Wankety

Wankety




timelord included his own alt account to his trust network http://loyce.club/trust/2020-06-27_Sat_05.02h/131361.html.

Wankety ... abuse

Perhaps you should learn to read:


Do's and Don'ts
  • It's okay to include your alt-account on your own Trust list. This means you trust the feedback you left from that account. Example:
    Quote
    hilariousandco Trusts these users' judgement:
    7. hilariousetc (Trust: +3 / =1 / -0) (1725 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
  • Don't include your main account from your alt account(s). This could influence DT1-voting, and although that's not part of this guide, it's bad.

After all... respect is a two way street.

LoyceV
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3318
Merit: 16678


Thick-Skinned Gang Leader and Golden Feather 2021


View Profile WWW
July 01, 2020, 04:57:44 PM
 #2336

Speaking of on-topic thingies, Timelord attacked someone because they had irrelevant alt account in their trust network, surprisingly, timelord included his own alt account to his trust network http://loyce.club/trust/2020-06-27_Sat_05.02h/131361.html. @Timelord2067, Isn't that something you called abuse? Wink
I remember that, but I'd say Timelord2067 has just improved his understanding of the Trust system since then. Improving on mistakes is a good thing.

I have interacted with V8, and what he has done HAS given me cause for concern.
Great, now if you'd also explain what the cause is, we're getting somewhere!

Quote
Have you ever considered you might just be doing what is popular instead of what is right?
No.

fillippone
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2170
Merit: 15588


Fully fledged Merit Cycler - Golden Feather 22-23


View Profile WWW
July 01, 2020, 10:05:53 PM
Merited by LoyceV (2)
 #2337

DT update!


And what a strange bunch we are.
We should have a pool: who's going to be the last (wo)man standing? 20 now, 16 next month, then 13, 10, ... and at some point 2 years from now the last DT1 who never lost will lose his spot for the first time.
I put my money on theymos Cheesy

Theymos is out  Shocked  Wink


Who's in?

These users have never been excluded from DT1 (number of DT1 inclusions since March 2019):
Code:
Lesbian Cow   18

We have a verdict:
Lesbian Cow finally won the duel!

January Exclusions (Fillippone Failed attempt at computing)
February Exclusions
March Exclusions
April Exclusions
May Exclusion
June Duel Extension

█▀▀▀











█▄▄▄
▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀
e
▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄
█████████████
████████████▄███
██▐███████▄█████▀
█████████▄████▀
███▐████▄███▀
████▐██████▀
█████▀█████
███████████▄
████████████▄
██▄█████▀█████▄
▄█████████▀█████▀
███████████▀██▀
████▀█████████
▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀
c.h.
▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄
▀▀▀█











▄▄▄█
▄██████▄▄▄
█████████████▄▄
███████████████
███████████████
███████████████
███████████████
███░░█████████
███▌▐█████████
█████████████
███████████▀
██████████▀
████████▀
▀██▀▀
suchmoon
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3682
Merit: 8922


https://bpip.org


View Profile WWW
July 01, 2020, 11:29:35 PM
 #2338

These users have never been excluded from DT1 (number of DT1 inclusions since March 2019):
Code:
Lesbian Cow   18

This doesn't seem right. March 2019 through July 2020 - that's only 17 months. Where is the 18 coming from?
fillippone
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2170
Merit: 15588


Fully fledged Merit Cycler - Golden Feather 22-23


View Profile WWW
July 01, 2020, 11:40:43 PM
 #2339

These users have never been excluded from DT1 (number of DT1 inclusions since March 2019):
Code:
Lesbian Cow   18

This doesn't seem right. March 2019 through July 2020 - that's only 17 months. Where is the 18 coming from?

Looks like you are doing my same error I did back in January, when LoyceV corrected  me!
LoyceV has stated the official counting paradigm, and I just adjusted to that.

Basically: in March 2019 it was the first reshuffle, but elected members got spent 2 months in DT1!

█▀▀▀











█▄▄▄
▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀
e
▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄
█████████████
████████████▄███
██▐███████▄█████▀
█████████▄████▀
███▐████▄███▀
████▐██████▀
█████▀█████
███████████▄
████████████▄
██▄█████▀█████▄
▄█████████▀█████▀
███████████▀██▀
████▀█████████
▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀
c.h.
▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄
▀▀▀█











▄▄▄█
▄██████▄▄▄
█████████████▄▄
███████████████
███████████████
███████████████
███████████████
███░░█████████
███▌▐█████████
█████████████
███████████▀
██████████▀
████████▀
▀██▀▀
suchmoon
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3682
Merit: 8922


https://bpip.org


View Profile WWW
July 01, 2020, 11:54:54 PM
 #2340

These users have never been excluded from DT1 (number of DT1 inclusions since March 2019):
Code:
Lesbian Cow   18

This doesn't seem right. March 2019 through July 2020 - that's only 17 months. Where is the 18 coming from?

Looks like you are doing my same error I did back in January, when LoyceV corrected  me!
LoyceV has stated the official counting paradigm, and I just adjusted to that.

Basically: in March 2019 it was the first reshuffle, but elected members got spent 2 months in DT1!

I'm still not following. LoyceV's numbers start from January 2019, in which case 18 would make sense (if LC was in DT1 in Jan or Feb 2019). But if you're saying "number of DT1 inclusions since March 2019" then it can't be 18. You should say "since January 2019" or not count before March 2019.

Sorry for nitpicking, this has inflamed my OCD.
Pages: « 1 ... 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 [117] 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!