Casinos not asking for KYC to register and play, but do require it to withdraw

[EarnOnVictor]

But here is a thing though, I have come to learn to respect casinos that will ask a customer to pass kyc verification immediately after the customer finish signing up, that is, they make it mandatory to pass the kyc verification before you are allowed to even deposit on the casino.
Casinos like this are the ones doing it right.

You are right, bro; that's also what I said earlier. Some casinos would not allow customers to deposit, or even after a deposit, they would not be allowed to gamble until they passed KYC. Some casinos always state on their T&P that "they may and they have the right to ask for KYC anytime they like." Which means they can ask a customer to do KYC before withdrawal; it was in their terms and policy, and a customer cannot change it. 

Well said. Despite being against so many casinos in many ways, the KYC is not always part of it, and so long as the casinos did not tell you they are no-KYC casinos, it is in their every right to ask you for the KYC completion at any time regardless of the situation. The issue with our people is that they are too trusting and relaxed about this. Too trusting in the sense that since the casinos did not ask them for the KYC for years because they are losing or not making a reasonable amount of money from their pocket, they believe they will not ask them if they now started making regular or big withdrawals. They are also relaxed in the sense that what are they waiting for when they are dealing with centralised casinos that they can't complete their KYC as and when due?

If you never wanted to complete a KYC, why not go for the decentralised casinos? That's the way I view it. Now, it becomes an inconvenience when they are hoping to get their withdrawal as fast as possible but the casino requested for the KYC to be completed. This could be so annoying but I will always absolve KYC casinos or the ones that are silent about it of any wrongdoing. If at all it is not stated in their terms and conditions, so far they also have not advertised a no-KYC, it is the right of the person to ask the support for clarification, and that is what I do.

Above all, I complete my KYC even before I send my first deposit and I think it is smart enough to avoid later issues.

[piebeyb]

Above all, I complete my KYC even before I send my first deposit and I think it is smart enough to avoid later issues.

This is the way I do it too because it sometimes sucks when there are problems when trying to make a withdrawal, I once experienced a problem that annoyed me a little with this KYC system, from the start when I played and made a deposit the site didn't ask for my KYC identity and when withdrawing money Instead they asked for it, I had to provide my KYC identity whereas at that time I only withdrew around $30, actually that was very little money for me to withdraw and risk my identity, I left my money there then left without complaining about it in this forum. I returned after some time and found that the site had gone bankrupt.

But I will try to complete my KYC identity on a site that is trusted and really has a good reputation at the start of registering to avoid problems later, so I don't need to worry about my identity either, although there is still a chance that the site will be hacked and The identity of all users will not be safe, it all comes back to the trust of each user, all gamblers must be smart and choose a casino that can be trusted to follow the rules, for example providing identity to follow the rules.

[Mr. Magkaisa]

Above all, I complete my KYC even before I send my first deposit and I think it is smart enough to avoid later issues.

This is the way I do it too because it sometimes sucks when there are problems when trying to make a withdrawal, I once experienced a problem that annoyed me a little with this KYC system, from the start when I played and made a deposit the site didn't ask for my KYC identity and when withdrawing money Instead they asked for it, I had to provide my KYC identity whereas at that time I only withdrew around $30, actually that was very little money for me to withdraw and risk my identity, I left my money there then left without complaining about it in this forum. I returned after some time and found that the site had gone bankrupt.

But I will try to complete my KYC identity on a site that is trusted and really has a good reputation at the start of registering to avoid problems later, so I don't need to worry about my identity either, although there is still a chance that the site will be hacked and The identity of all users will not be safe, it all comes back to the trust of each user, all gamblers must be smart and choose a casino that can be trusted to follow the rules, for example providing identity to follow the rules.

          -   As for me, if I know if the casino here is reputable for cryptocurrency such as stakes, bc.games, cryptogames, duelbits, and rollbit, it's fine for me to submit KYC because it's not really a big deal to me. I would prefer that, from the very beginning of my decision to deposit money, I myself would have taken the initiative to submit KYC to the casino platform.

Whether I win big or not, I don't have any problems to face in the end if ever the opportunity comes for me to win a big amount on their platform. But I will never give kyc to a casino that is new in this field of crypto gambling business.

[mak013]

Yes, there are such casinos. And it is normally to choose your way - with KYC or without it. But today`s realty is that the main part of well-known casinos ask KYC. I don`t afraid KYC, it`s not a problem for me, i`m ready to KYC if i like casino. But i don`t like KYC during withdrawal. The best way is to make a new standard - an opportunity to KYC by gambler.

As much as possible it would really be that best that you should really be not able to submit any KYC and this is where crypto is really be that known for on which on the moment
that they would really be that able to encounter such thing then they would really be not that much of having that liking in terms of KYC but its true that as long you dont do something
or having any issues about of your identification then i dont really see such about having that too much issue on where people are really that tending to avoid it into.
We are really that living in a world where everything would really be known and centralized or simply being licensed on which it do basically means that we would really be going
ahead about such integration.

Nowadays we KYC everywhere. There are huge quantity of services, who get our data and we don`t care about it. Lots of street cams makes our photos everyday and we don`t care about it. But why the casino must avoid the KYC? It is the same service like others. But anyway if it is critical to someone - he can find casino without KYC yet.
But if the casino use KYC - it must use it fair.

[Fatunad]

Yes, there are such casinos. And it is normally to choose your way - with KYC or without it. But today`s realty is that the main part of well-known casinos ask KYC. I don`t afraid KYC, it`s not a problem for me, i`m ready to KYC if i like casino. But i don`t like KYC during withdrawal. The best way is to make a new standard - an opportunity to KYC by gambler.

As much as possible it would really be that best that you should really be not able to submit any KYC and this is where crypto is really be that known for on which on the moment
that they would really be that able to encounter such thing then they would really be not that much of having that liking in terms of KYC but its true that as long you dont do something
or having any issues about of your identification then i dont really see such about having that too much issue on where people are really that tending to avoid it into.
We are really that living in a world where everything would really be known and centralized or simply being licensed on which it do basically means that we would really be going
ahead about such integration.

Nowadays we KYC everywhere. There are huge quantity of services, who get our data and we don`t care about it. Lots of street cams makes our photos everyday and we don`t care about it. But why the casino must avoid the KYC? It is the same service like others. But anyway if it is critical to someone - he can find casino without KYC yet.
But if the casino use KYC - it must use it fair.

Yes, this is why you should really be that getting used to it because this is how reality works and would really be something inevitable because gambling business is really that involving huge revenue or simply having those tons of incoming and outgoing transactions on which it couldnt really be just that simply ignored by the government. In order for them to be able to operate then they would really be needing up those licenses and permissions for them to be able to proceed on. We do know that they would really be needing up to comply on what are those rules and trying out to implement. This is why sooner or later it wouldnt really be that much different if we do tend to compare fiat casinos and crypto ones but of course there would really be still those platforms who wont really be that ending up on having this kind of set up.

So it would really be that still depending into you whether you would really be confidently be able to play up with these platforms or not.

[Kavelj22]

Nowadays we KYC everywhere. There are huge quantity of services, who get our data and we don`t care about it. Lots of street cams makes our photos everyday and we don`t care about it. But why the casino must avoid the KYC? It is the same service like others. But anyway if it is critical to someone - he can find casino without KYC yet.
But if the casino use KYC - it must use it fair.

If we are forced to complete Kyc procedures in any of the services we use, this does not mean that we do not care about those procedures or that we do not care about sharing our personal data. We must ensure that these procedures are also imposed on the platform within the activity license and that this is related to the anti-money laundering and suspicious activities policy. On this basis, there is no problem in completing these procedures, provided that we ensure that the platform is reliable and qualified to maintain this data, and that the platform is committed not to share our data with any third party or use it in any way. For example, there is no point in having an anonymous casino that does not have an activity license, and at the same time imposes KYC procedures.

It is true that there are decentralized casinos for those who want to maintain their privacy, but unfortunately these platforms require knowledge and experience, in addition to not providing all the features that we find on centralized casinos.

[Slow death]

Above all, I complete my KYC even before I send my first deposit and I think it is smart enough to avoid later issues.

This is the way I do it too because it sometimes sucks when there are problems when trying to make a withdrawal, I once experienced a problem that annoyed me a little with this KYC system, from the start when I played and made a deposit the site didn't ask for my KYC identity and when withdrawing money Instead they asked for it, I had to provide my KYC identity whereas at that time I only withdrew around $30, actually that was very little money for me to withdraw and risk my identity, I left my money there then left without complaining about it in this forum. I returned after some time and found that the site had gone bankrupt.

But I will try to complete my KYC identity on a site that is trusted and really has a good reputation at the start of registering to avoid problems later, so I don't need to worry about my identity either, although there is still a chance that the site will be hacked and The identity of all users will not be safe, it all comes back to the trust of each user, all gamblers must be smart and choose a casino that can be trusted to follow the rules, for example providing identity to follow the rules.

          -   As for me, if I know if the casino here is reputable for cryptocurrency such as stakes, bc.games, cryptogames, duelbits, and rollbit, it's fine for me to submit KYC because it's not really a big deal to me. I would prefer that, from the very beginning of my decision to deposit money, I myself would have taken the initiative to submit KYC to the casino platform.

Whether I win big or not, I don't have any problems to face in the end if ever the opportunity comes for me to win a big amount on their platform. But I will never give kyc to a casino that is new in this field of crypto gambling business.

unfortunately nowadays people no longer have a choice when it comes to kyc, even though people are afraid of doing kyc in a new casino, but if they want to use the new casino then I recommend that they do kyc before putting money in, and it is a fact that most new casinos are suspicious and become scams, it is a fact that the sign up bonus is no longer easy to claim because the wagering requirements are very high, it even seems that new casinos have combined, because in most casinos I have seen 40x wagering requirements in many new casinos when they give the sign-up bonus and they only give it to people who deposit amounts above $300, something that I don't think is worth it.

but there are still people who are fooled by these sign-up bonuses and keep chasing new casinos, for these people, my advice is to do kyc before depositing money in the casino and deposit small amounts of money, and pray that the casino does not fail. become a scam and don't sell or leak customer documents

[paxmao]

Above all, I complete my KYC even before I send my first deposit and I think it is smart enough to avoid later issues.

This is the way I do it too because it sometimes sucks when there are problems when trying to make a withdrawal, I once experienced a problem that annoyed me a little with this KYC system, from the start when I played and made a deposit the site didn't ask for my KYC identity and when withdrawing money Instead they asked for it, I had to provide my KYC identity whereas at that time I only withdrew around $30, actually that was very little money for me to withdraw and risk my identity, I left my money there then left without complaining about it in this forum. I returned after some time and found that the site had gone bankrupt.

But I will try to complete my KYC identity on a site that is trusted and really has a good reputation at the start of registering to avoid problems later, so I don't need to worry about my identity either, although there is still a chance that the site will be hacked and The identity of all users will not be safe, it all comes back to the trust of each user, all gamblers must be smart and choose a casino that can be trusted to follow the rules, for example providing identity to follow the rules.

          -   As for me, if I know if the casino here is reputable for cryptocurrency such as stakes, bc.games, cryptogames, duelbits, and rollbit, it's fine for me to submit KYC because it's not really a big deal to me. I would prefer that, from the very beginning of my decision to deposit money, I myself would have taken the initiative to submit KYC to the casino platform.

Whether I win big or not, I don't have any problems to face in the end if ever the opportunity comes for me to win a big amount on their platform. But I will never give kyc to a casino that is new in this field of crypto gambling business.

unfortunately nowadays people no longer have a choice when it comes to kyc, even though people are afraid of doing kyc in a new casino, but if they want to use the new casino then I recommend that they do kyc before putting money in, and it is a fact that most new casinos are suspicious and become scams, it is a fact that the sign up bonus is no longer easy to claim because the wagering requirements are very high, it even seems that new casinos have combined, because in most casinos I have seen 40x wagering requirements in many new casinos when they give the sign-up bonus and they only give it to people who deposit amounts above $300, something that I don't think is worth it.

but there are still people who are fooled by these sign-up bonuses and keep chasing new casinos, for these people, my advice is to do kyc before depositing money in the casino and deposit small amounts of money, and pray that the casino does not fail. become a scam and don't sell or leak customer documents

KYC is sometimes a risk in itself, so not checking for reputation is absolutely a bad idea. The site will eventually have lots of personal data even if they sub-contract the checks to a thrid party or supplier and they have to keep the records for a long time. Why would you not think that these may end up in the dark web sold in bulk to some hacker group?

[wxa7115]

unfortunately nowadays people no longer have a choice when it comes to kyc, even though people are afraid of doing kyc in a new casino, but if they want to use the new casino then I recommend that they do kyc before putting money in, and it is a fact that most new casinos are suspicious and become scams, it is a fact that the sign up bonus is no longer easy to claim because the wagering requirements are very high, it even seems that new casinos have combined, because in most casinos I have seen 40x wagering requirements in many new casinos when they give the sign-up bonus and they only give it to people who deposit amounts above $300, something that I don't think is worth it.

but there are still people who are fooled by these sign-up bonuses and keep chasing new casinos, for these people, my advice is to do kyc before depositing money in the casino and deposit small amounts of money, and pray that the casino does not fail. become a scam and don't sell or leak customer documents

Those harsh policies are making less attractive to try new casinos as we did on the past, so if to try a new casino I have to go through KYC before I even make a deposit, receive a disappointing bonus and deal with wagering requirements that are basically impossible to beat, then I can simply keep gambling at my regular casino and forget about other casinos.

So I think that at some point some casinos may realize this situation and improve their polices a little bit on an effort to attract new customers, because if casinos do not do this, many gamblers will begin to think like I do and will refuse to play at different casinos.

[mak013]

Nowadays we KYC everywhere. There are huge quantity of services, who get our data and we don`t care about it. Lots of street cams makes our photos everyday and we don`t care about it. But why the casino must avoid the KYC? It is the same service like others. But anyway if it is critical to someone - he can find casino without KYC yet.
But if the casino use KYC - it must use it fair.

If we are forced to complete Kyc procedures in any of the services we use, this does not mean that we do not care about those procedures or that we do not care about sharing our personal data. We must ensure that these procedures are also imposed on the platform within the activity license and that this is related to the anti-money laundering and suspicious activities policy. On this basis, there is no problem in completing these procedures, provided that we ensure that the platform is reliable and qualified to maintain this data, and that the platform is committed not to share our data with any third party or use it in any way. For example, there is no point in having an anonymous casino that does not have an activity license, and at the same time imposes KYC procedures.

It is true that there are decentralized casinos for those who want to maintain their privacy, but unfortunately these platforms require knowledge and experience, in addition to not providing all the features that we find on centralized casinos.

Of course my words doesn`t mean that we must share our data with everybody. But i often see how people give their data to unknown internet services without any guarantee of it`s security and the same time cry that casino can steal their data. It is strange enough as for me.
About license i can add my opinion, may be it isn`t true - i`m not a big player and never was cheated big sums. I don`t know how Curacao license can help me to return my money, if the casino decide to cheat me. 

[Kavelj22]

Nowadays we KYC everywhere. There are huge quantity of services, who get our data and we don`t care about it. Lots of street cams makes our photos everyday and we don`t care about it. But why the casino must avoid the KYC? It is the same service like others. But anyway if it is critical to someone - he can find casino without KYC yet.
But if the casino use KYC - it must use it fair.

If we are forced to complete Kyc procedures in any of the services we use, this does not mean that we do not care about those procedures or that we do not care about sharing our personal data. We must ensure that these procedures are also imposed on the platform within the activity license and that this is related to the anti-money laundering and suspicious activities policy. On this basis, there is no problem in completing these procedures, provided that we ensure that the platform is reliable and qualified to maintain this data, and that the platform is committed not to share our data with any third party or use it in any way. For example, there is no point in having an anonymous casino that does not have an activity license, and at the same time imposes KYC procedures.

It is true that there are decentralized casinos for those who want to maintain their privacy, but unfortunately these platforms require knowledge and experience, in addition to not providing all the features that we find on centralized casinos.

Of course my words doesn`t mean that we must share our data with everybody. But i often see how people give their data to unknown internet services without any guarantee of it`s security and the same time cry that casino can steal their data. It is strange enough as for me.
About license i can add my opinion, may be it isn`t true - i`m not a big player and never was cheated big sums. I don`t know how Curacao license can help me to return my money, if the casino decide to cheat me. 

Curacao or any other type of license will not return your money directly to you, but it requires the platform to secure users’ assets before granting the license, including providing an insurance reserve. If any problems occur with the platform, the license can be withdrawn from it, and this is what any platform will avoid, and therefore it will avoid any problems with users in order to preserve its reputation.

Unfortunately, citizens in some countries cannot file lawsuits against any casino if they are exposed to gambling, because their countries do not support this type of activity, and this may cause them to be held legally accountable. On the other hand, they can file a lawsuit in other countries, but this has a cost that no one will be able to bear, especially if the amount they are claiming is small compared to the amount of the cost.

It will always be better to deal with platforms that have an approved activity license than to use unknown platforms under the pretext of maintaining privacy. It is an illusion to think about privacy while using any central platform, especially since there are no alternative options.

[Zadicar]

Nowadays we KYC everywhere. There are huge quantity of services, who get our data and we don`t care about it. Lots of street cams makes our photos everyday and we don`t care about it. But why the casino must avoid the KYC? It is the same service like others. But anyway if it is critical to someone - he can find casino without KYC yet.
But if the casino use KYC - it must use it fair.

If we are forced to complete Kyc procedures in any of the services we use, this does not mean that we do not care about those procedures or that we do not care about sharing our personal data. We must ensure that these procedures are also imposed on the platform within the activity license and that this is related to the anti-money laundering and suspicious activities policy. On this basis, there is no problem in completing these procedures, provided that we ensure that the platform is reliable and qualified to maintain this data, and that the platform is committed not to share our data with any third party or use it in any way. For example, there is no point in having an anonymous casino that does not have an activity license, and at the same time imposes KYC procedures.

It is true that there are decentralized casinos for those who want to maintain their privacy, but unfortunately these platforms require knowledge and experience, in addition to not providing all the features that we find on centralized casinos.

Of course my words doesn`t mean that we must share our data with everybody. But i often see how people give their data to unknown internet services without any guarantee of it`s security and the same time cry that casino can steal their data. It is strange enough as for me.
About license i can add my opinion, may be it isn`t true - i`m not a big player and never was cheated big sums. I don`t know how Curacao license can help me to return my money, if the casino decide to cheat me. 

You wont really be having no issues if you are really just that a small time gambler on which you wouldnt really be having any problems in regarding to this one because you could really just that simply choose up other platforms if they would really be tending to ask out some KYC because there are indeed people who doesnt really like on sharing up their information on which its normal but just like you have said
that there are ones who do really just that carelessly sharing up their information which is something that would really be more risky than on sending up your details on a licensed casino.
So far we do still have platforms which that doesnt ask out some KYC into their customers or players on which this one is great but once you do hit up a particular withdrawal threshold
then you might be asked for one on which this one is always been that stated on their terms and conditions. This is why it would really be that important that you should really be aware on such thing.
Sticking up with reputable sites is something that give out that kind of assurance that you would be getting paid on the moment that you would be making up some huge wins
and it would be just that fine for you that once they would ask out information then i dont see for someone not to agree on.

[Wakate]

Nowadays we KYC everywhere. There are huge quantity of services, who get our data and we don`t care about it. Lots of street cams makes our photos everyday and we don`t care about it. But why the casino must avoid the KYC? It is the same service like others. But anyway if it is critical to someone - he can find casino without KYC yet.
But if the casino use KYC - it must use it fair.

If we are forced to complete Kyc procedures in any of the services we use, this does not mean that we do not care about those procedures or that we do not care about sharing our personal data. We must ensure that these procedures are also imposed on the platform within the activity license and that this is related to the anti-money laundering and suspicious activities policy. On this basis, there is no problem in completing these procedures, provided that we ensure that the platform is reliable and qualified to maintain this data, and that the platform is committed not to share our data with any third party or use it in any way. For example, there is no point in having an anonymous casino that does not have an activity license, and at the same time imposes KYC procedures.

It is true that there are decentralized casinos for those who want to maintain their privacy, but unfortunately these platforms require knowledge and experience, in addition to not providing all the features that we find on centralized casinos.

Of course my words doesn`t mean that we must share our data with everybody. But i often see how people give their data to unknown internet services without any guarantee of it`s security and the same time cry that casino can steal their data. It is strange enough as for me.
About license i can add my opinion, may be it isn`t true - i`m not a big player and never was cheated big sums. I don`t know how Curacao license can help me to return my money, if the casino decide to cheat me. 

I think many people at still ignorant about data sales that is why they are always eager to give our their data unknown source or company that could use their data against them. We don't have to keep sharing our date with online casino just because we want to play games, have fun and make money. There are other casinos too we can get the same thing from that would never ask us if our data because they felt it is unreasonable. Bad hands can get to use our data on Internet fraud and out us in great danger. We just need to be wise and keep doing the right thing.

[lienfaye]

I think many people at still ignorant about data sales that is why they are always eager to give our their data unknown source or company that could use their data against them. We don't have to keep sharing our date with online casino just because we want to play games, have fun and make money. There are other casinos too we can get the same thing from that would never ask us if our data because they felt it is unreasonable. Bad hands can get to use our data on Internet fraud and out us in great danger. We just need to be wise and keep doing the right thing.

But nowadays it's already common for casinos to ask their players to go KYC, even they didn't ask it at first, but sooner or later, sure they will do (as they're regulated and abiding the law). Thus, it is up to us if we still want to continue playing even knowing this fact. That's why it's crucial to be careful on choosing where casino to play in because many are shady and just existing to trick their gamblers. So only play in trusted casinos that even you opted to comply on their kyc verification, you won't get worried your info might be use against your will.

[Mr. Magkaisa]

Above all, I complete my KYC even before I send my first deposit and I think it is smart enough to avoid later issues.

This is the way I do it too because it sometimes sucks when there are problems when trying to make a withdrawal, I once experienced a problem that annoyed me a little with this KYC system, from the start when I played and made a deposit the site didn't ask for my KYC identity and when withdrawing money Instead they asked for it, I had to provide my KYC identity whereas at that time I only withdrew around $30, actually that was very little money for me to withdraw and risk my identity, I left my money there then left without complaining about it in this forum. I returned after some time and found that the site had gone bankrupt.

But I will try to complete my KYC identity on a site that is trusted and really has a good reputation at the start of registering to avoid problems later, so I don't need to worry about my identity either, although there is still a chance that the site will be hacked and The identity of all users will not be safe, it all comes back to the trust of each user, all gamblers must be smart and choose a casino that can be trusted to follow the rules, for example providing identity to follow the rules.

          -   As for me, if I know if the casino here is reputable for cryptocurrency such as stakes, bc.games, cryptogames, duelbits, and rollbit, it's fine for me to submit KYC because it's not really a big deal to me. I would prefer that, from the very beginning of my decision to deposit money, I myself would have taken the initiative to submit KYC to the casino platform.

Whether I win big or not, I don't have any problems to face in the end if ever the opportunity comes for me to win a big amount on their platform. But I will never give kyc to a casino that is new in this field of crypto gambling business.

unfortunately nowadays people no longer have a choice when it comes to kyc, even though people are afraid of doing kyc in a new casino, but if they want to use the new casino then I recommend that they do kyc before putting money in, and it is a fact that most new casinos are suspicious and become scams, it is a fact that the sign up bonus is no longer easy to claim because the wagering requirements are very high, it even seems that new casinos have combined, because in most casinos I have seen 40x wagering requirements in many new casinos when they give the sign-up bonus and they only give it to people who deposit amounts above $300, something that I don't think is worth it.

but there are still people who are fooled by these sign-up bonuses and keep chasing new casinos, for these people, my advice is to do kyc before depositing money in the casino and deposit small amounts of money, and pray that the casino does not fail. become a scam and don't sell or leak customer documents

       -   You're right, mate, because at least from the beginning they are unaware of such things, not when they are doing a transaction because they want to release a large amount because of their winning prize for playing games. that they don't have to question anymore.

That's what always happens, doesn't it? When you withdraw a lot of money from a casino, KYC is requested before you can withdraw from a gambling platform. Although there are others who don't immediately ask for KYC, like BcGames, as long as you haven't reached their withdrawal limits, This is, if I'm not mistaken.

[Dr.Bitcoin_Strange]

That's what always happens, doesn't it? When you withdraw a lot of money from a casino, KYC is requested before you can withdraw from a gambling platform. Although there are others who don't immediately ask for KYC, like BcGames, as long as you haven't reached their withdrawal limits, This is, if I'm not mistaken.

Well, like I already said before, casinos that request KYC always make it obvious in their T&P, and any gambler that carefully reads those TOs should agree to it or decline by not using the casino. Since those KYC casinos have always stated that they have the right to ask for KYC anytime they feel like, the gambler is supposed to keep in mind that the casino can ask him or her to pass their KYC before they can withdraw. Like BCGame, which you mentioned, I know they don't ask for KYC immediately after registration. I have used it a few times and made withdrawals without KYC, but every casino has different rules. 

[piebeyb]

That's what always happens, doesn't it? When you withdraw a lot of money from a casino, KYC is requested before you can withdraw from a gambling platform. Although there are others who don't immediately ask for KYC, like BcGames, as long as you haven't reached their withdrawal limits, This is, if I'm not mistaken.

Well, like I already said before, casinos that request KYC always make it obvious in their T&P, and any gambler that carefully reads those TOs should agree to it or decline by not using the casino. Since those KYC casinos have always stated that they have the right to ask for KYC anytime they feel like, the gambler is supposed to keep in mind that the casino can ask him or her to pass their KYC before they can withdraw. Like BCGame, which you mentioned, I know they don't ask for KYC immediately after registration. I have used it a few times and made withdrawals without KYC, but every casino has different rules. 

I also think this cannot be called a trap because there are already regulations from them there which some people might miss reading, so the most correct thing is to complete the KYC process at the beginning of registration, that is the best step to avoid problems like that, it's true. sometimes it's annoying when playing at the beginning of registration they don't ask users for KYC but surprisingly brands will ask for KYC at the end of the game or say when making a withdrawal, it is also a rule that they have written asking for KYC whenever they want.

I think all new users have a lot to learn from some experienced gamblers. There are lots of things that happen that are undesirable at the end of the game, that's why every gambler has to decide which gambling site he wants to play consistently, at least find out the reputation of the site and also the reviews of many people. Regarding gambling sites, if everything is safe, there is no harm in completing KYC at the beginning of registration, especially if we are playing with large amounts of money. Don't ever try to make a deposit but are not ready to complete KYC at the end of the game.

[Radek4921]

If a casino does this, I think they hope that someone will make a deposit and lose money in the meantime. If you don't allow a player to withdraw without kyc - you shouldn't allow him to deposit either. Such practices prove that the website only cares about profits and does not care about the user.

As much as I agree with you, I also will not blame casinos entirely for this type of move, reasons being that, most casinos gamblers hate kyc, and as soon as they sign up on a casino, and the casino ask them to pass kyc verification before they can be able to deposit and play on the platform, that gambler will immediately abandon that casino and go for another one where they can deposit, play without having to go through/pass kyc verification.

This is majorly why a greater number of casinos this day would allow a gambler register, deposit and play without kyc, but the moment that such a player wins and requests a withdrawal, such user will be asked to pass kyc verification, and they do this at time of withdrawal because the gambler have no other choice or option this moment, other than to submit the requested documents for the verification, doing otherwise, the gambler may never be able to access his or her money, lol 😂.

You are right, this way the website leads the player to situation when he has to send his document, otherwise he will not receive the money he is owed. I think it would be better if this website paid him the money once and informed him that KYC would be required for subsequent withdrawals. Then, if the player agrees, he is fully informed, the website has shown him its content - everyone is satisfied.

[Fivestar4everMVP]

If a casino does this, I think they hope that someone will make a deposit and lose money in the meantime. If you don't allow a player to withdraw without kyc - you shouldn't allow him to deposit either. Such practices prove that the website only cares about profits and does not care about the user.

As much as I agree with you, I also will not blame casinos entirely for this type of move, reasons being that, most casinos gamblers hate kyc, and as soon as they sign up on a casino, and the casino ask them to pass kyc verification before they can be able to deposit and play on the platform, that gambler will immediately abandon that casino and go for another one where they can deposit, play without having to go through/pass kyc verification.

This is majorly why a greater number of casinos this day would allow a gambler register, deposit and play without kyc, but the moment that such a player wins and requests a withdrawal, such user will be asked to pass kyc verification, and they do this at time of withdrawal because the gambler have no other choice or option this moment, other than to submit the requested documents for the verification, doing otherwise, the gambler may never be able to access his or her money, lol 😂.

You are right, this way the website leads the player to situation when he has to send his document, otherwise he will not receive the money he is owed. I think it would be better if this website paid him the money once and informed him that KYC would be required for subsequent withdrawals. Then, if the player agrees, he is fully informed, the website has shown him its content - everyone is satisfied.

Well, some trusted, or should I say, reputable casinos still allow their users to withdraw without kyc most of the times, but there is always a limit in amount to which a user can withdraw without having to pass kyc verification, like from $1 to $500 for some casinos, while for some others, it's from $1 to $999, and this means that withdrawals that is above this specified amounts usually trigger the kyc system.

And I know this because I've deposited, played and withdrawn from several casinos without kyc, and for most of the casinos, I only was asked to pass kyc when my withdrawal amount was above either $500 or $1000.

There are other casinos like Stake, where it's withdrawal of $10,000 and above that triggers the kyc system, but this was before Stake updated their terms of service last year or the previous one.

So in the nutshell and to summarize, some casinos do allow withdrawals without kyc, but the amount allowed it limited, and they won't also tell you if they will be asking kyc for subsequent withdrawals, you have to pass the kyc verification when ever they impose it on you.

[mak013]

Of course my words doesn`t mean that we must share our data with everybody. But i often see how people give their data to unknown internet services without any guarantee of it`s security and the same time cry that casino can steal their data. It is strange enough as for me.
About license i can add my opinion, may be it isn`t true - i`m not a big player and never was cheated big sums. I don`t know how Curacao license can help me to return my money, if the casino decide to cheat me. 

I think many people at still ignorant about data sales that is why they are always eager to give our their data unknown source or company that could use their data against them. We don't have to keep sharing our date with online casino just because we want to play games, have fun and make money. There are other casinos too we can get the same thing from that would never ask us if our data because they felt it is unreasonable. Bad hands can get to use our data on Internet fraud and out us in great danger. We just need to be wise and keep doing the right thing.

I saw a bot in telegram, that showed information about telephone number owner. I searched information about people, i know in real life. I`ve got information about all of them - id, address, job, something else, i don`t remember. We are in the world of data. Big data. And there are people who can work with it. As the result we can get such information from the telegram bot. May be it was stolen, i don`t know, but anyway i think that data about all of us can be find in internet.