[BBR] Boolberry: Privacy and Security - Guaranteed Since 2014

[btc-mike]

Anyone would be kind enough to compile and share simpleminer for mining on pools? Thanks!

What operating system?

[1714188819]

1714188819

[ripplebtc]

crypto_zoidberg is a dev powerhouse. I'm very confident about the future of BBR. 

[33zer0w0lf]

crypto_zoidberg is a dev powerhouse. I'm very confident about the future of BBR. 

+1
I do wish we had a better miner than simpleminer.. some alternative such as minerd.

[molecularfir]

crypto_zoidberg is a dev powerhouse. I'm very confident about the future of BBR. 

+1
I do wish we had a better miner than simpleminer.. some alternative such as minerd.

+1 cryto_zoidberg is doing a fantastic job. Wallet looks great!

[33zer0w0lf]

Extreme Pool Features - New and Improved!

Features
•2% Fee
•Longpolling Enabled on http ports
•Payouts after 60 block confirmations
•Latest pool code
•Variable Difficulty based on your individual CPU performance
•Verified Secure
•Dedicated Staff
•Exceptional Support

Extreme Pool currently offers a pool for every cryptonote coin, including Boolberry.

We are constantly working with all the communities to provide whatever services need to be provided, from testing functionality to setting up bounties!

Visit us at http://www.extremepool.org
Email us @ support@extremepool.org
Talk to us on IRC, Server Freenode, channel #extremepool

Hope to mine with you soon!

[Lordoftherigs]

crypto_zoidberg is a dev powerhouse. I'm very confident about the future of BBR. 

kudos to crypto_zoidberg

[crypto_zoidberg]

crypto_zoidberg is a dev powerhouse. I'm very confident about the future of BBR. 

kudos to crypto_zoidberg

 

[q327K091]

I don't know how yo all are doin' ,  Difficulty: 66640425354, Block Found: Never  pretty funny

[crypto_zoidberg]

I don't know how yo all are doin' ,  Difficulty: 66640425354, Block Found: Never  pretty funny

Which pool do you mean?

[pt7]

I don't know how yo all are doin' ,  Difficulty: 66640425354, Block Found: Never  pretty funny

Which pool do you mean?

poolberry.org and bbr.extremehash.com

[cubydu]

You can help these pools to find blocks

[q327K091]

You can help these pools to find blocks

but the difficulty level is crazy high.. I do however LOVE what you did with network graphs

http://boolberry.com/state.html

sub-word berry is cool too, I don't think raspberry will mind.. maybe it can be connected somehow (client for raspberry)

too bad on the difficulty level, impossible to mine on my rig.. and it is quite powerful rig (CPU wise) AMD's low watts lots of power

it is not just me.. block finding problem can be bad for the coin unfortunately...

"Does anyone know what is up with #Boolberry ?  Was mining for 12 hours with no blocks found.  Back to mining bla bla"

https://twitter.com/intent/retweet?tweet_id=474309773416869888

[33zer0w0lf]

http://bbr.extremepool.org  pool is finding blocks!

http://www.extremepool.org

[dga]

I've added preliminary multithreading support to simpleminer.  It's annoying launching all of those processes manually.

I've just now sent it as a pull request to crypto_zoidberg, but if anyone wants to test it, this is my test repository:

https://github.com/dave-andersen/boolberry

(For the paranoid, the only files that are changed are simpleminer.h and simpleminer.cpp, so you can copy those into your own checkout from the official release).

Note:  That repository is going to go away if and when the changes are merged.

This is now merged into the main boolberry source, please update.

As a warning, it's still suboptimal.  It spends too much time waiting for jobs from the servers. The starting diff for the pools will need to be adjusted for multithreaded clients, at minimum.  Better would, of course, be adding stratum support and a better miner architecture, but this is a start in the right direction.

a)  If you use it, be sure to connect to the highest starting difficulty port available on your pool.

b)  Latency is important.  Make sure you find a pool that responds fast to your job requests!  Look at the log output and see the time between "Getting next job" and the report of starting work (either job didn't change or applying scratchpad diff).

c)  The new arg is --mining-threads #

Testing comments appreciated.  This is alpha-quality -- I've run it on my own machine but that's it.

from bbr.extremehash.com:

Last Share Submitted: less than a minute ago
 Hash Rate: 256.71 KH/sec
 Total Hashes Submitted: 182280000

that's running 8 threads on an i7-4770.  It's still slower than solo mining, but it's getting better.

[btc-mike]

I've added preliminary multithreading support to simpleminer.  It's annoying launching all of those processes manually.

I've just now sent it as a pull request to crypto_zoidberg, but if anyone wants to test it, this is my test repository:

https://github.com/dave-andersen/boolberry

(For the paranoid, the only files that are changed are simpleminer.h and simpleminer.cpp, so you can copy those into your own checkout from the official release).

Note:  That repository is going to go away if and when the changes are merged.

As a warning, it's still suboptimal.  It spends too much time waiting for jobs from the servers. The starting diff for the pools will need to be adjusted for multithreaded clients, at minimum.  Better would, of course, be adding stratum support and a better miner architecture, but this is a start in the right direction.

a)  If you use it, be sure to connect to the highest starting difficulty port available on your pool.

b)  Latency is important.  Make sure you find a pool that responds fast to your job requests!  Look at the log output and see the time between "Getting next job" and the report of starting work (either job didn't change or applying scratchpad diff).

c)  The new arg is --mining-threads #

Testing comments appreciated.  This is alpha-quality -- I've run it on my own machine but that's it.

from bbr.extremehash.com:

Last Share Submitted: less than a minute ago
 Hash Rate: 256.71 KH/sec
 Total Hashes Submitted: 182280000

that's running 8 threads on an i7-4770.  It's still slower than solo mining, but it's getting better.

great work! i will test shortly.

[q327K091]

I've added preliminary multithreading support to simpleminer.  It's annoying launching all of those processes manually.

I've just now sent it as a pull request to crypto_zoidberg, but if anyone wants to test it, this is my test repository:

https://github.com/dave-andersen/boolberry

(For the paranoid, the only files that are changed are simpleminer.h and simpleminer.cpp, so you can copy those into your own checkout from the official release).

Note:  That repository is going to go away if and when the changes are merged.

As a warning, it's still suboptimal.  It spends too much time waiting for jobs from the servers. The starting diff for the pools will need to be adjusted for multithreaded clients, at minimum.  Better would, of course, be adding stratum support and a better miner architecture, but this is a start in the right direction.

a)  If you use it, be sure to connect to the highest starting difficulty port available on your pool.

b)  Latency is important.  Make sure you find a pool that responds fast to your job requests!  Look at the log output and see the time between "Getting next job" and the report of starting work (either job didn't change or applying scratchpad diff).

c)  The new arg is --mining-threads #

Testing comments appreciated.  This is alpha-quality -- I've run it on my own machine but that's it.

from bbr.extremehash.com:

Last Share Submitted: less than a minute ago
 Hash Rate: 256.71 KH/sec
 Total Hashes Submitted: 182280000

that's running 8 threads on an i7-4770.  It's still slower than solo mining, but it's getting better.

will this beat performance wise cpuminer-multi ? thanks

https://github.com/LucasJones/cpuminer-multi

[surfer43]

will this beat performance wise cpuminer-multi ? thanks

https://github.com/LucasJones/cpuminer-multi

cpuminer-multi cannot mine Boolberry yet.

[q327K091]

I've added preliminary multithreading support to simpleminer.  It's annoying launching all of those processes manually.

I've just now sent it as a pull request to crypto_zoidberg, but if anyone wants to test it, this is my test repository:

https://github.com/dave-andersen/boolberry

(For the paranoid, the only files that are changed are simpleminer.h and simpleminer.cpp, so you can copy those into your own checkout from the official release).

Note:  That repository is going to go away if and when the changes are merged.

As a warning, it's still suboptimal.  It spends too much time waiting for jobs from the servers. The starting diff for the pools will need to be adjusted for multithreaded clients, at minimum.  Better would, of course, be adding stratum support and a better miner architecture, but this is a start in the right direction.

a)  If you use it, be sure to connect to the highest starting difficulty port available on your pool.

b)  Latency is important.  Make sure you find a pool that responds fast to your job requests!  Look at the log output and see the time between "Getting next job" and the report of starting work (either job didn't change or applying scratchpad diff).

c)  The new arg is --mining-threads #

Testing comments appreciated.  This is alpha-quality -- I've run it on my own machine but that's it.

from bbr.extremehash.com:

Last Share Submitted: less than a minute ago
 Hash Rate: 256.71 KH/sec
 Total Hashes Submitted: 182280000

that's running 8 threads on an i7-4770.  It's still slower than solo mining, but it's getting better.

you did a great job on fastrie (riecoin,) used it for a while with success, now attacking cryptonight coins.. thanks for all your contributions! (not to mention cudaminer work.. and speed up you have achieved.. that was phenomenal...)

[dga]

will this beat performance wise cpuminer-multi ? thanks

https://github.com/LucasJones/cpuminer-multi

cpuminer-multi cannot mine Boolberry yet.

Once it can, it will probably be better.  There are a few things left to fix in simpleminer to improve efficiency -- mostly about the % time spent mining vs waiting for work from the network.  Some of this can be fixed with the current protocol and some wants something like Stratum support.

They're a bit more work than what I did already - I'll try to fix some of them next weekend or so if time permits and lucasjones doesn't add boolberry to cpuminer-multi first.

[q327K091]

will this beat performance wise cpuminer-multi ? thanks

https://github.com/LucasJones/cpuminer-multi

cpuminer-multi cannot mine Boolberry yet.

unfortunately not finding blocks was not because of that.. used straight out minerd, I love your coin.. such a shame on the difficulty (people must have rented CPU farms..)