|
bigj
|
 |
October 13, 2014, 12:59:52 PM |
|
wait how big was that wall? I missed it
It was 2.7 btc around 0.0028x. There is another one at around 0.00296 at polo. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If you see garbage posts (off-topic, trolling, spam, no point, etc.), use the "report to moderator" links. All reports are investigated, though you will rarely be contacted about your reports.
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
wachtwoord
Legendary
 Offline
Activity: 2324
Merit: 1125
|
|
October 13, 2014, 01:14:07 PM |
|
wait how big was that wall? I missed it
2.3 BTC @ 0.00276 when I wanted to buy into it. |
|
|
|
|
|
AnonCoinTwitter
|
|
October 13, 2014, 01:18:35 PM |
|
wait how big was that wall? I missed it
2.3 BTC @ 0.00276 when I wanted to buy into it. I missed it too. Congrats to whoever was able to buy at that price |
|
|
|
coins101
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1456
Merit: 1000
|
|
October 13, 2014, 01:21:57 PM |
|
Devs - are these minor issues, business as usual?  block timing out of sequence blocks with the same time stamp -----  -----  They seem to be within the boundaries of acceptability. Just wondering, just in case. (not posted here in any particular order) |
|
|
|
|
triplef
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 338
Merit: 100
https://eloncity.io/
|
|
October 13, 2014, 01:52:49 PM |
|
and say i missed that too.....
|
|
|
|
|
bigj
|
|
October 13, 2014, 02:06:59 PM |
|
and say i missed that too.....
Come on, coins are still cheap. |
|
|
|
|
|
bigj
|
|
October 13, 2014, 03:07:13 PM |
|
would have bought it too  i feel a litlle bit the same like in bitcoin. 0027 is take all you can but 0.003 no thanks ?  It's 0.0028x still... :-) |
|
|
|
|
pandacoin
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1554
Merit: 1000
|
|
October 13, 2014, 03:08:15 PM |
|
2.85mBTC is cheap, even 3.5mBTC is cheap. I think we have a good time to buy more.
|
|
|
|
|
wachtwoord
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2324
Merit: 1125
|
|
October 13, 2014, 04:15:14 PM |
|
2.85mBTC is cheap, even 3.5mBTC is cheap. I think we have a good time to buy more.
May be so, but I'm weighted sufficiently in Monero. I just wanted more to average down more. |
|
|
|
|
nioc
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1624
Merit: 1008
|
|
October 13, 2014, 04:18:16 PM |
|
Devs - are these minor issues, business as usual? block timing out of sequence blocks with the same time stamp ----- ----- They seem to be within the boundaries of acceptability. Just wondering, just in case. (not posted here in any particular order) As I understand it the time stamps are from the miners. Being that every miners' clock is not in sync causes this. It has no effect on the network. Did I pass the test? |
|
|
|
|
PestoQuinty
Member
Offline
Activity: 106
Merit: 10
|
|
October 13, 2014, 04:30:03 PM |
|
Devs - are these minor issues, business as usual? block timing out of sequence blocks with the same time stamp ----- ----- They seem to be within the boundaries of acceptability. Just wondering, just in case. (not posted here in any particular order) As I understand it the time stamps are from the miners. Being that every miners' clock is not in sync causes this. It has no effect on the network. Did I pass the test? Give him some harder questions dude. |
|
|
|
|
ingiltere
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2968
Merit: 1478
Rollbit.com Crypto Futures
|
|
October 13, 2014, 04:59:08 PM |
|
Are there any work in progress XMR in-use services except Crypto Kingdom?
|
| R |
▀▀▀▀▀▀▀██████▄▄
████████████████
▀▀▀▀█████▀▀▀█████
████████▌███▐████
▄▄▄▄█████▄▄▄█████
████████████████
▄▄▄▄▄▄▄██████▀▀ | LLBIT | │ | CRYPTO
FUTURES | | | | | | | │ | 1,000x
LEVERAGE | │ | COMPETITIVE
FEES | │ | INSTANT
EXECUTION | │ | .
TRADE NOW |
|
|
|
smooth
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2968
Merit: 1198
|
|
October 13, 2014, 05:00:14 PM
Last edit: October 13, 2014, 05:13:25 PM by smooth |
|
As I understand it the time stamps are from the miners. Being that every miners' clock is not in sync causes this. It has no effect on the network.
Did I pass the test?
Correct. Also, the time stamps come from pools (in the case of pool mining) and given that most of the mining is currently on pools, if one or two pools have the their clocks set wrong, there will consistently be blocks with incorrect timestamps. This is normal and harmless. Although not required, if you are running a pool, it is probably better to enable NTP and avoid this issue. |
|
|
|
|
NewLiberty
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1204
Merit: 1002
Gresham's Lawyer
|
|
October 13, 2014, 05:11:12 PM |
|
Are there any work in progress XMR in-use services except Crypto Kingdom?
There are many in fact, I'm privy to a few. But pre-announcements are not always helpful to completion of offerings. You'll have to wait for specifics on works-in-progress (at least for my efforts), but maybe someone else wants to talk about theirs? |
|
|
|
|
CoinHeavy
|
|
October 13, 2014, 08:24:48 PM |
|
Could someone please point me in the direction of instructions for how to perform the equivalent of the below for monero? bitcoin-cli getblock
bitcoin-cli getrawtransaction
The line below doesn't seem to return the commands I would expect. Thanks. |
|
|
|
|
monero (OP)
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 54
Merit: 134
|
|
October 13, 2014, 10:08:28 PM |
|
Monero Monday Missives
October 13th, 2014
Hello, and welcome to our fourteenth Monero Monday Missive!
Major Updates
1. The database effort is ongoing, and is currently playing a little bit of catch-up back-porting features and fixes we added to the current codebase.
2. The GUI, too, is progressing at a slightly reduced pace. We hope to update the preview binaries in the next week or two.
3. We are working hard on solving the static build issues to tag and release updated binaries. If you require any of the more recent features it is compile-only at this stage.
4. We are happy to announce that per-kb fees is going to be deployed to testnet over the next couple of days. Barring any major complications, we expect positive testing results, and are hopeful that mainnet can move over to per-kb fees within the next two weeks.
5. A few other things undergoing testing are: parallel support for MSVC 2013 as a build environment, minor tweaks and improvements to the new mnemonic system whereby English words now match on the first 3 letters and not the first 4, asynchronous DNS checkpointing, and support for long / blob hash checkpointing on both the file and DNS side.
Dev Diary
Build: initial work has started on reworking the CMake environment so that it is consistent and extensible. This will reduce build issues further down the line.
Core: per-kb fees are done, and are being deployed to testnet. If you are mining on testnet you don't have to update to that fork/branch, as we want to see more real-world results with both fixed-fee and per-kb miners.
Core: documentation continues, with Doxygen comments now added to the serialisation functions
Core: DNS checkpointing is now asynchronous, and doesn't prevent blocks from being received (in testing)
Core: file and DNS checkpoints now also support blob hash (longhash) checkpointing (in testing)
Wallet: mnemonic lists now support a variable trim length (instead of the previous fixed trim length). English is 3, the rest are 4, and the old English wordlist doesn't really conform to the trim length rule (in testing)
Until next week!
- updated by fluffypony
|
|
|
|
|
myagui
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1154
Merit: 1001
|
|
October 13, 2014, 10:28:43 PM |
|
Monero Monday Massives
Great stuff guys. Missed perhaps a reference to the quick deployment of the FUDbuster technology.  |
|
|
|
NewLiberty
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1204
Merit: 1002
Gresham's Lawyer
|
|
October 14, 2014, 02:21:03 AM |
|
Monero Monday Missives
October 13th, 2014
Hello, and welcome to our fourteenth Monero Monday Missive!
Major Updates
5. A few other things undergoing testing are: parallel support for MSVC 2013 as a build environment, minor tweaks and improvements to the new mnemonic system whereby English words now match on the first 3 letters and not the first 4, asynchronous DNS checkpointing, and support for long / blob hash checkpointing on both the file and DNS side.
Dev Diary
Core: DNS checkpointing is now asynchronous, and doesn't prevent blocks from being received (in testing)
Core: file and DNS checkpoints now also support blob hash (longhash) checkpointing (in testing)
- updated by fluffypony
Monero Monday Massives
Great stuff guys. Missed perhaps a reference to the quick deployment of the FUDbuster technology. They're in there too. |
|
|
|
sammy007
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1904
Merit: 1003
|
|
October 14, 2014, 08:03:38 AM |
|
Guys, it seems some suspicious russian proprietary miner kachur is very popular already. I'd like to say that this mining software seems SCAM. I banned several miners after I found duplicate share vulnerability and all miners spotted in logs with attempt to submit duplicate share were using this software. Stay away from not trusted developers, there is no even BCT thread for this miner.
If you are trusted person, we can test this miner in isolation, I'll run test pool and can give you early binaries, because after vulnerability fix they probably deleted duplicate submission functionality.
|
|
|
|
|
superresistant
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2128
Merit: 1120
|
|
October 14, 2014, 08:09:32 AM |
|
Guys, it seems some suspicious russian proprietary miner kachur is very popular already. I'd like to say that this mining software seems SCAM. I banned several miners after I found duplicate share vulnerability and all miners spotted in logs with attempt to submit duplicate share were using this software. Stay away from not trusted developers, there is no even BCT thread for this miner.
If you are trusted person, we can test this miner in isolation, I'll run test pool and can give you early binaries, because after vulnerability fix they probably deleted duplicate submission functionality.
I tried this before. The miner indeed send fake shares resulting in a temporary ban from the pool. Didn't try the last version though. I would be more worry about the possibility of a malware in the software. What if this miner become the vector for a future attack ? |
|
|
|
|
|
