[XMR] Monero - A secure, private, untraceable cryptocurrency

[parker928]

Oh that's right you don't have one. You contribute nothing to the project other than FUD. (Want to buy lower do you?) Carry on.

Incompetent developers, i hope you did not make one cent off monero. Why ? Because you suck a**.

I'd be willing to donate 5k xmr to a reputable team of 2-3 new devs to work on the gui and json...

If you are in the monero-dev channel on IRC you will actually see that a lot of work is being done. Give me a proper reason to flame the devs?

No action in monero-dev for some time now, what are you f.. talking about.. Oh,  amonth ago onishin, fr pool owner, refused to update to the latest version because the code was so fucking broken.. Anyway, I mine at 600KH/s - at a huge loss. If i stop now, the network is almost completely at the mercy of the botnet herders..

What did you do to get such a shitty trust score other than talk trash

[parker928]

Why can't people with less than -1 trust just be instantly banned?

wait I am confused

You used to be the biggest xmr troll and dark coin supporter, no question about it and you didn't try to hide it you and icebreaker both if I remember correctly

do you like monero now or something?

[wpalczynski]

I would imagine many Dark trolls will cease trolling Monero after being able to accumulate some XMR at these low levels.  After all, the only reason they were trolling in the first place is because they must have though that XMR poses some risk to their portfolios, otherwise why bother.

Why can't people with less than -1 trust just be instantly banned?

wait I am confused

You used to be the biggest xmr troll and dark coin supporter, no question about it and you didn't try to hide it you and icebreaker both if I remember correctly

do you like monero now or something?

[PestoQuinty]

No action in monero-dev for some time now, what are you f.. talking about.. Oh,  amonth ago onishin, fr pool owner, refused to update to the latest version because the code was so fucking broken.. Anyway, I mine at 600KH/s - at a huge loss. If i stop now, the network is almost completely at the mercy of the botnet herders..

You should really switch onto another coin, sell them, buy XMR from revenue. If it is on offer below your mining costs, you can cheaper buy instead of self mining XMR. Dont ask me where the miners are that can produce below your power costs, I dont know your local cost structure.
Just my 0.02 XMR opinion  

600KH/s? U have - like - 1000x R9 280X? 100kW? Can i see some pics?

Edit:
Please, are you trying to tell us that you are mining 20 XMR per hour?

[Shrikez]

Does anyone know what's going on at my favourite pool cryptonotepool.org.uk? I tried to contact the admin but to no avail, haven't seen him on IRC either.

Thanks

[liteon]

600KH/s? U have - like - 1000x R9 280X? 100kW? Can i see some pics?

Edit:
Please, are you trying to tell us that you are mining 20 XMR per hour?

I think it's 600 H/s

[mik_druid]

I've got 6 Instead of mining I'm buying It's more profitable than  EC bills. Of couse its a pity that I cant use my rig for which I paid 3000 $ and a lot of time to configure it. But new times requires a new approach

[superresistant]

 
I made a very simple Windows miner for noobs :

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=613072.msg9758820#msg9758820

You don't need to know anything, you basically click on a button.
It is for CPU + NVIDIA GPU only at the moment.

There is no virus but a false positive (minerd + ccminer). You must add an exception in your antivirus.

[PestoQuinty]

600KH/s? U have - like - 1000x R9 280X? 100kW? Can i see some pics?

Edit:
Please, are you trying to tell us that you are mining 20 XMR per hour?

I think it's 600 H/s

Mining with 600h/s is not a "huge" loss... Them trolls....

[kazuki49]

It will be interesting to see whether Bitcoin can adopt CN functionality. It would a win for privacy and freedom, but bad for my XMR investment: http://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/2oh7vq/toward_unlinkable_bitcoin_transactions_andrew/

This is the reason Monero has many chances of catching up in the future, there is no way Bitcoin will be hardforked to add ring-signatures by default, as satoshi himself said, its already set in stone (the code).

I really liked to read that discussion on reddit, thanks for sharing.

[dEBRUYNE]

It will be interesting to see whether Bitcoin can adopt CN functionality. It would a win for privacy and freedom, but bad for my XMR investment: http://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/2oh7vq/toward_unlinkable_bitcoin_transactions_andrew/

This is the reason Monero has many chances of catching up in the future, there is no way Bitcoin will be hardforked to add ring-signatures by default, as satoshi himself said, its already set in stone (the code).

I really liked to read that discussion on reddit, thanks for sharing.

Same here, there were some nice comments in it. I like this particular one from Gregory Maxwell about privacy:

Privacy is important for many applications
Do people want to do business using a currency that lets their competition see their customers and their supplies purchases? Where everyone can figure out their payroll or margins?

Likewise, for your personal life... do you want your landlord knowing when you got a raise? The grocery clerk knowing your net worth (and calling in some cat burger friends?). Your neighbours gossipping that you don't give enough to your church or that you spend too much on porn?

In the Bitcoin ecosystem itself, the lack of privacy is a grave systemic risk... Miners can distinguish transactions and discriminate in their processing, and doing so gives them a degree of control over the system which they ought not have, and wouldn't have if transactions were more private.

So, sure, there are also applications for increased transparency using Bitcoin, but you can always layer more transparency on top of a more private system... but not the other way around.

Reddit spends too much time listening folks with fairly extreme political views who view Bitcoin as a tool for advancing those views. I'm glad lots of people find Bitcoin interesting, but those things aren't my interest, and as a tool it can be used in many ways. The tool of privacy is important to everyone, to companies, to individuals, and even to the governments that represent them. Privacy can prevent crime, improve fairness and quality, and generally elevate the human condition. It's a value that everyone can support and a feature that everyone demands, even if they aren't always thinking about it.[/b]

Also, this conversation is defenitely worth mentioning:

http://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/2oh7vq/toward_unlinkable_bitcoin_transactions_andrew/cmn952n

[opcoin]

It will be interesting to see whether Bitcoin can adopt CN functionality. It would a win for privacy and freedom, but bad for my XMR investment: http://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/2oh7vq/toward_unlinkable_bitcoin_transactions_andrew/

This is the reason Monero has many chances of catching up in the future, there is no way Bitcoin will be hardforked to add ring-signatures by default, as satoshi himself said, its already set in stone (the code).

I really liked to read that discussion on reddit, thanks for sharing.

It can be implemented as side-chains.

[Globb0]

Chains?   

[jehst]

It will be interesting to see whether Bitcoin can adopt CN functionality. It would a win for privacy and freedom, but bad for my XMR investment: http://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/2oh7vq/toward_unlinkable_bitcoin_transactions_andrew/

This is the reason Monero has many chances of catching up in the future, there is no way Bitcoin will be hardforked to add ring-signatures by default, as satoshi himself said,its already set in stone (the code).

I really liked to read that discussion on reddit, thanks for sharing.

It would be pretty funny if it were the case that little of Satoshi's jumbled code remained today.

[liteon]

I have a couple of nice, short (xmr.) domains.
Would like the idea to use them. I don't need to earn, just to make something that can be good for this coin.
So, domain + hosting = I have. Idea = I don't and would like suggestion(s).
I am good in php and SQL. OK with javascript too.
I know it's not much of knowledge, but that I can offer.

we badly need some explorer, chainradar is out there but there used to be a better one called monerochain.info and it disappeared a few months ago.

something nice with charts and stats like transactions per day, hash, difficulty, etc.

May I get the output code please?

[e-coinomist]

This is the reason Monero has many chances of catching up in the future, there is no way Bitcoin will be hardforked to add ring-signatures by default, as satoshi himself said, its already set in stone (the code).

Code is technology. Err you got that memo stating "technology evolves" ?
(smallprint I am allowed to troll, too)

In risk of infuriating the orthodox bitcoin believers front I want to point onto that next hardfork of Bitcoin where they change the code to increase blocksize. Arguable that is the smallest possible change doable, and merely meant to allow more transactions carried out through the network in between a ten minute timespan. More throughput.

Until the next hardfork following up afterwards the Orthodox Church of Bitcoin might have settled between all Popes to migrate over onto POS, dropping POW mining entirely. But implementing CN I have not heard even rumors 

[kazuki49]

It will be interesting to see whether Bitcoin can adopt CN functionality. It would a win for privacy and freedom, but bad for my XMR investment: http://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/2oh7vq/toward_unlinkable_bitcoin_transactions_andrew/

This is the reason Monero has many chances of catching up in the future, there is no way Bitcoin will be hardforked to add ring-signatures by default, as satoshi himself said, its already set in stone (the code).

I really liked to read that discussion on reddit, thanks for sharing.

It can be implemented as side-chains.

fine, you stick with bitcoin with possible side-chain in the future and I stash xmr now

[Amph]

I made a very simple Windows miner for noobs :

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=613072.msg9758820#msg9758820

You don't need to know anything, you basically click on a button.
It is for CPU + NVIDIA GPU only at the moment.

There is no virus but a false positive (minerd + ccminer). You must add an exception in your antivirus.

same performance as the standard one? 270 khs(one 750ti), if i remember correclty

[robboman]

It will be interesting to see whether Bitcoin can adopt CN functionality. It would a win for privacy and freedom, but bad for my XMR investment: http://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/2oh7vq/toward_unlinkable_bitcoin_transactions_andrew/

Can BTC dev team add ring signatures without having to fork?

[SunnyIgor]

It will be interesting to see whether Bitcoin can adopt CN functionality. It would a win for privacy and freedom, but bad for my XMR investment: http://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/2oh7vq/toward_unlinkable_bitcoin_transactions_andrew/

Can BTC dev team add ring signatures without having to fork?

no