Bitcoin Forum
March 18, 2019, 05:18:36 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 0.17.1 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 ... 788 789 790 791 792 793 794 795 796 797 798 799 800 801 802 803 804 805 806 807 808 809 810 811 812 813 814 815 816 817 818 819 820 821 822 823 824 825 826 827 828 829 830 831 832 833 834 835 836 837 [838] 839 840 841 842 843 844 845 846 847 848 849 850 851 852 853 854 855 856 857 858 859 860 861 862 863 864 865 866 867 868 869 870 871 872 873 874 875 876 877 878 879 880 881 882 883 884 885 886 887 888 ... 2037 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [XMR] Monero - A secure, private, untraceable cryptocurrency  (Read 4546991 times)
medusa13
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 710
Merit: 500

hello world


View Profile
November 07, 2014, 06:42:02 PM
 #16741

Check out binary options on polo's XMR price:

BTCBINS

It works great and the support is good.

Maybe it can help move the market a bit.



Very cool, hope this brings some more action to the game !! are ristos options still aviable? i have never seen an updated version since we crashed.

XMR Monero
1552929516
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1552929516

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1552929516
Reply with quote  #2

1552929516
Report to moderator
1552929516
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1552929516

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1552929516
Reply with quote  #2

1552929516
Report to moderator
1552929516
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1552929516

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1552929516
Reply with quote  #2

1552929516
Report to moderator
Some PGP public keys you should import: theymos, Wladimir, Gregory, Pieter
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
1552929516
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1552929516

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1552929516
Reply with quote  #2

1552929516
Report to moderator
1552929516
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1552929516

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1552929516
Reply with quote  #2

1552929516
Report to moderator
1552929516
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1552929516

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1552929516
Reply with quote  #2

1552929516
Report to moderator
smooth
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2058
Merit: 1077



View Profile
November 07, 2014, 07:55:56 PM
 #16742

Quote from: monero
We are not going to enforce a block-point hard fork, but we would appreciate it if major pools could upgrade by Monday.

For now please test the Linux version for non-critical nodes (large pools and exchanges please hold off!) if you are able to do so and help us out with any feedback.

Which is best strategy to make upgrade?

The first comment (quote from monero) was about the per-kb fees that is in master, the second (quote from me) about the database branch, which is not in master.

The recommended strategy is to plan to deploy the per-kb Monday but only test the database branch experimentally on non-critical nodes.
equipoise
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 791
Merit: 1000


Monero (XMR) - secure, private, untraceable


View Profile WWW
November 07, 2014, 07:58:17 PM
 #16743

Quote from: monero
We are not going to enforce a block-point hard fork, but we would appreciate it if major pools could upgrade by Monday.
Which is best strategy to make upgrade?

a. About per-kb fee (2)* - compile it in Linux as usual. For Windows and FreeBSD wait for the CMake thing (3)* to be ready (if you don't want to lose a week of your time to just compile it).

For now please test the Linux version for non-critical nodes (large pools and exchanges please hold off!) if you are able to do so and help us out with any feedback.
Which is best strategy to make upgrade?

b. About the database (1)* -  for non-critical nodes see a). If you are an exchange or a large pool then DON'T DO IT!

*See Monday-ish Monero Missives - November 2nd, 2014
Disclaimer: Not tested. Try it on your own risk. Backup your wallet first.

About me | zRMicroArray - phase 2 - Gene Expression Analysis software | [Weed Like to Talk - Bulgaria] Start a wave of cannabis seminars in Europe | Monero weighted average price stats: moneroprice.i2p
BTC: 1KoCX7TWKVGwqmmFw3CKyUSrKRSStueZar | NMC: NKhYEYpe1Le9MwHrwKsdSm5617J4toVar9 | XMR (Tip me a beer OpenAlias Monero address): tip.changetheworldwork.com
[XMR] Monero - A secure, private, untraceable cryptocurrency: 4AyRmUcxzefB5quumzK3HNE4zmCiGc8vhG6fE1oJpGVyVZF7fvDgSpt3MzgLfQ6Q1719xQhmfkM9Z2u NXgDMqYhjJVmc6KX
mmortal03
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1750
Merit: 1005


View Profile
November 07, 2014, 08:33:34 PM
 #16744

Two questions:

1.) Will the command_server functionality on the development branch be merged into master and rolled out with 0.8.8.5?

2.) If not, has any or all of the following fixes been incorporated into the development branch?: the spam attack patch; block 202612 attack patch; block 202612 attack mitigation and fork fix (via a whole new block blob hash checkpointing system)

Either one of these items would help move things forward on the Monero Client .NET GUI.

Reason being is that, at the moment, we can't use the test version of Monero Client .NET because it requires the command_server functionality in the daemon to properly function. Unfortunately, the latest available bitmonerod.exe binary from the development branch that has this also doesn't have the aforementioned patches incorporated into it, meaning that we can't use it anymore.

On the other hand, the most recent version of Monero Client .NET that does NOT require the binary from the development branch also contains a number of bugs (that have since been fixed in the test version) that make it annoying to use.
nakaone
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 742
Merit: 500


View Profile
November 08, 2014, 12:09:20 AM
 #16745

maybe a proposal due to the heaty debate on monero/speculation

xcp/counterparty was for maybe two or three months as hard to use as monero is now - they released a web wallet which did not work that well at the beginning but included several new users, even at this point of time some function only work in counterpartyd and not in the webwallet.

I think it would be more clever to even release a wallet which is not fully functional than to release a wallet with is functional and a distant future.
onetwentyfive
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 98
Merit: 10


View Profile
November 08, 2014, 10:27:31 AM
 #16746

Total curiosity question, just because i love knowing stuff..

Just transferred 64xmr and i noticed when i did a refresh the first transaction that showed up, before showing all my transfers in the purple text, was 3 transactions received: 1 for .6, 1 for 6, and 1 for 10.. for a total of 16.6xmr received and then all the purple text showing the transfers going out.. my final balance is correct, nothing extra received

see screengrab if necessary:

http://imgur.com/c7P6tmE

so i guess my question is now obvious, why is that? where did that 16.6xmr come from? is it part of my transfer? and why 16.6 when i sent 64?

ok so i guess that's 4 questions

i know i wen't a little overboard with the redacting, but once i started i couldn't stop!

Thanks,
Febo
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1722
Merit: 1077



View Profile
November 08, 2014, 10:40:54 AM
 #16747

Total curiosity question, just because i love knowing stuff..

Just transferred 64xmr and i noticed when i did a refresh the first transaction that showed up, before showing all my transfers in the purple text, was 3 transactions received: 1 for .6, 1 for 6, and 1 for 10.. for a total of 16.6xmr received and then all the purple text showing the transfers going out.. my final balance is correct, nothing extra received

see screengrab if necessary:

http://imgur.com/c7P6tmE

so i guess my question is now obvious, why is that? where did that 16.6xmr come from? is it part of my transfer? and why 16.6 when i sent 64?

ok so i guess that's 4 questions

i know i wen't a little overboard with the redacting, but once i started i couldn't stop!

Thanks,

i think goes this way, you send out more, in lot as it came in, then the rest comes back. i guess have something with anonymity or just how Cryptonote works.

Iam sure someone will correct me if i am wrong or explain in more crypto understandable language.

.BitDice.               ▄▄███▄▄
           ▄▄██▀▀ ▄ ▀▀██▄▄
      ▄▄█ ▀▀  ▄▄█████▄▄  ▀▀ █▄▄
  ▄▄██▀▀     ▀▀ █████ ▀▀     ▀▀██▄▄
██▀▀ ▄▄██▀      ▀███▀      ▀██▄▄ ▀▀██
██  ████▄▄       ███       ▄▄████  ██
██  █▀▀████▄▄  ▄█████▄  ▄▄████▀▀█  ██
██  ▀     ▀▀▀███████████▀▀▀     ▀  ██
             ███████████
██  ▄     ▄▄▄███████████▄▄▄     ▄  ██
██  █▄▄████▀▀  ▀█████▀  ▀▀████▄▄█  ██
██  ████▀▀       ███       ▀▀████  ██
██▄▄ ▀▀██▄      ▄███▄      ▄██▀▀ ▄▄██
  ▀▀██▄▄     ▄▄ █████ ▄▄     ▄▄██▀▀
      ▀▀█ ▄▄  ▀▀█████▀▀  ▄▄ █▀▀
           ▀▀██▄▄ ▀ ▄▄██▀▀
               ▀▀███▀▀
        ▄▄███████▄▄
     ▄███████████████▄
    ████▀▀       ▀▀████
   ████▀           ▀████
   ████             ████
   ████ ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄ ████
▄█████████████████████████▄
██████████▀▀▀▀▀▀▀██████████
████                   ████
████                   ████
████                   ████
████                   ████
████                   ████
████▄                 ▄████
████████▄▄▄     ▄▄▄████████
  ▀▀▀█████████████████▀▀▀
        ▀▀▀█████▀▀▀
▄▄████████████████████████████████▄▄
██████████████████████████████████████
█████                            █████
█████                            █████
█████                            █████
█████                            █████
█████                     ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄
█████                   ▄█▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀█▄
█████                   ██          ██
█████                   ██          ██
█████                   ██          ██
██████████████████▀▀███ ██          ██
 ████████████████▄  ▄██ ██          ██
   ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀ ██          ██
             ██████████ ██          ██
           ▄███████████ ██████▀▀██████
          █████████████  ▀████▄▄████▀
[/]
smooth
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2058
Merit: 1077



View Profile
November 08, 2014, 11:45:12 AM
 #16748

Total curiosity question, just because i love knowing stuff..

Just transferred 64xmr and i noticed when i did a refresh the first transaction that showed up, before showing all my transfers in the purple text, was 3 transactions received: 1 for .6, 1 for 6, and 1 for 10.. for a total of 16.6xmr received and then all the purple text showing the transfers going out.. my final balance is correct, nothing extra received

see screengrab if necessary:

http://imgur.com/c7P6tmE

so i guess my question is now obvious, why is that? where did that 16.6xmr come from? is it part of my transfer? and why 16.6 when i sent 64?

ok so i guess that's 4 questions

i know i wen't a little overboard with the redacting, but once i started i couldn't stop!

Thanks,

That's your change. In order to send 64, the wallet used one or more outputs adding up to 80.6 (maybe a bit more with fee), of which 64 (60+4) went to the recipient and 16.6 (10+6+0.6) came back to you. Bitcoin works the same way and you can see these change transactions if you look on a chain explorer, but usually wallets don't normally show the low level details the way simplewallet does.



generalizethis
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1666
Merit: 1023


Facts are more efficient than fud


View Profile WWW
November 08, 2014, 01:25:31 PM
 #16749

Total curiosity question, just because i love knowing stuff..

Just transferred 64xmr and i noticed when i did a refresh the first transaction that showed up, before showing all my transfers in the purple text, was 3 transactions received: 1 for .6, 1 for 6, and 1 for 10.. for a total of 16.6xmr received and then all the purple text showing the transfers going out.. my final balance is correct, nothing extra received

see screengrab if necessary:

http://imgur.com/c7P6tmE

so i guess my question is now obvious, why is that? where did that 16.6xmr come from? is it part of my transfer? and why 16.6 when i sent 64?

ok so i guess that's 4 questions

i know i wen't a little overboard with the redacting, but once i started i couldn't stop!

Thanks,


That's your change. In order to send 64, the wallet used one or more outputs adding up to 80.6 (maybe a bit more with fee), of which 64 (60+4) went to the recipient and 16.6 (10+6+0.6) came back to you. Bitcoin works the same way and you can see these change transactions if you look on a chain explorer, but usually wallets don't normally show the low level details the way simplewallet does.





Hate to go full-noob on you, but what function does that serve?

binaryFate
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1372
Merit: 1001


Still wild and free


View Profile
November 08, 2014, 01:30:58 PM
 #16750

Total curiosity question, just because i love knowing stuff..

Just transferred 64xmr and i noticed when i did a refresh the first transaction that showed up, before showing all my transfers in the purple text, was 3 transactions received: 1 for .6, 1 for 6, and 1 for 10.. for a total of 16.6xmr received and then all the purple text showing the transfers going out.. my final balance is correct, nothing extra received

see screengrab if necessary:

http://imgur.com/c7P6tmE

so i guess my question is now obvious, why is that? where did that 16.6xmr come from? is it part of my transfer? and why 16.6 when i sent 64?

ok so i guess that's 4 questions

i know i wen't a little overboard with the redacting, but once i started i couldn't stop!

Thanks,


That's your change. In order to send 64, the wallet used one or more outputs adding up to 80.6 (maybe a bit more with fee), of which 64 (60+4) went to the recipient and 16.6 (10+6+0.6) came back to you. Bitcoin works the same way and you can see these change transactions if you look on a chain explorer, but usually wallets don't normally show the low level details the way simplewallet does.





Hate to go full-noob on you, but what function does that serve?

It's more than just a function served, it's the fundamental way how Bitcoin (and Monero, and all other cryptos) are designed. We don't send and receive amounts, but atomic inputs and outputs. Inputs can only be "spent" entirely, so the only way to "spend" a target amount is too spend one or several inputs entirely, and send the change back to yourself.


Monero's privacy and therefore fungibility are MUCH stronger than Bitcoin's. 
This makes Monero a better candidate to deserve the term "digital cash".
generalizethis
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1666
Merit: 1023


Facts are more efficient than fud


View Profile WWW
November 08, 2014, 02:34:27 PM
 #16751

Total curiosity question, just because i love knowing stuff..

Just transferred 64xmr and i noticed when i did a refresh the first transaction that showed up, before showing all my transfers in the purple text, was 3 transactions received: 1 for .6, 1 for 6, and 1 for 10.. for a total of 16.6xmr received and then all the purple text showing the transfers going out.. my final balance is correct, nothing extra received

see screengrab if necessary:

http://imgur.com/c7P6tmE

so i guess my question is now obvious, why is that? where did that 16.6xmr come from? is it part of my transfer? and why 16.6 when i sent 64?

ok so i guess that's 4 questions

i know i wen't a little overboard with the redacting, but once i started i couldn't stop!

Thanks,


That's your change. In order to send 64, the wallet used one or more outputs adding up to 80.6 (maybe a bit more with fee), of which 64 (60+4) went to the recipient and 16.6 (10+6+0.6) came back to you. Bitcoin works the same way and you can see these change transactions if you look on a chain explorer, but usually wallets don't normally show the low level details the way simplewallet does.





Hate to go full-noob on you, but what function does that serve?

It's more than just a function served, it's the fundamental way how Bitcoin (and Monero, and all other cryptos) are designed. We don't send and receive amounts, but atomic inputs and outputs. Inputs can only be "spent" entirely, so the only way to "spend" a target amount is too spend one or several inputs entirely, and send the change back to yourself.



So it's a ledger system using an atomic units rather than symbolic ones? Worried about my word choice here   Undecided

generalizethis
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1666
Merit: 1023


Facts are more efficient than fud


View Profile WWW
November 08, 2014, 02:35:08 PM
 #16752

Total curiosity question, just because i love knowing stuff..

Just transferred 64xmr and i noticed when i did a refresh the first transaction that showed up, before showing all my transfers in the purple text, was 3 transactions received: 1 for .6, 1 for 6, and 1 for 10.. for a total of 16.6xmr received and then all the purple text showing the transfers going out.. my final balance is correct, nothing extra received

see screengrab if necessary:

http://imgur.com/c7P6tmE

so i guess my question is now obvious, why is that? where did that 16.6xmr come from? is it part of my transfer? and why 16.6 when i sent 64?

ok so i guess that's 4 questions

i know i wen't a little overboard with the redacting, but once i started i couldn't stop!

Thanks,


That's your change. In order to send 64, the wallet used one or more outputs adding up to 80.6 (maybe a bit more with fee), of which 64 (60+4) went to the recipient and 16.6 (10+6+0.6) came back to you. Bitcoin works the same way and you can see these change transactions if you look on a chain explorer, but usually wallets don't normally show the low level details the way simplewallet does.





Hate to go full-noob on you, but what function does that serve?

It's more than just a function served, it's the fundamental way how Bitcoin (and Monero, and all other cryptos) are designed. We don't send and receive amounts, but atomic inputs and outputs. Inputs can only be "spent" entirely, so the only way to "spend" a target amount is too spend one or several inputs entirely, and send the change back to yourself.



So it's a ledger system using an atomic unit rather than a symbolic one? Worried about my word choice here   Undecided

binaryFate
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1372
Merit: 1001


Still wild and free


View Profile
November 08, 2014, 02:43:27 PM
 #16753


So it's a ledger system using an atomic units rather than symbolic ones? Worried about my word choice here   Undecided

Kind of, but the atomic units are not atomic units of accounts (like satoshis = 0.00000001 BTC), but atomic outputs whose amounts vary.

If you send 1.5 BTC to a given address X, this address will have one "input" of 1.5 BTC that can later be spent. Later, if the owner of address X wants to send 1 BTC to another address Y, he must destroy entirely the 1.5 input, and create two new outputs: 1 BTC to Y, and 0.5 BTC back to himself.

It's similar to cash actually: to pay 4.5$ you either group several coin of different value to reach 4.5, or you pay with 5$ and the merchant give you 0.5$ back. Except with bitcoin (and monero, and all others) it is not coin and notes but outputs between addresses, and the values of them is not always the same as with coins.

Monero's privacy and therefore fungibility are MUCH stronger than Bitcoin's. 
This makes Monero a better candidate to deserve the term "digital cash".
onetwentyfive
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 98
Merit: 10


View Profile
November 08, 2014, 08:23:20 PM
 #16754

Total curiosity question, just because i love knowing stuff..

Just transferred 64xmr and i noticed when i did a refresh the first transaction that showed up, before showing all my transfers in the purple text, was 3 transactions received: 1 for .6, 1 for 6, and 1 for 10.. for a total of 16.6xmr received and then all the purple text showing the transfers going out.. my final balance is correct, nothing extra received

see screengrab if necessary:

http://imgur.com/c7P6tmE

so i guess my question is now obvious, why is that? where did that 16.6xmr come from? is it part of my transfer? and why 16.6 when i sent 64?

ok so i guess that's 4 questions

i know i wen't a little overboard with the redacting, but once i started i couldn't stop!

Thanks,

That's your change. In order to send 64, the wallet used one or more outputs adding up to 80.6 (maybe a bit more with fee), of which 64 (60+4) went to the recipient and 16.6 (10+6+0.6) came back to you. Bitcoin works the same way and you can see these change transactions if you look on a chain explorer, but usually wallets don't normally show the low level details the way simplewallet does.

Makes sense, thanks!

You learn something new every day...
smooth
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2058
Merit: 1077



View Profile
November 08, 2014, 08:42:42 PM
 #16755

Total curiosity question, just because i love knowing stuff..

Just transferred 64xmr and i noticed when i did a refresh the first transaction that showed up, before showing all my transfers in the purple text, was 3 transactions received: 1 for .6, 1 for 6, and 1 for 10.. for a total of 16.6xmr received and then all the purple text showing the transfers going out.. my final balance is correct, nothing extra received

see screengrab if necessary:

http://imgur.com/c7P6tmE

so i guess my question is now obvious, why is that? where did that 16.6xmr come from? is it part of my transfer? and why 16.6 when i sent 64?

ok so i guess that's 4 questions

i know i wen't a little overboard with the redacting, but once i started i couldn't stop!

Thanks,


That's your change. In order to send 64, the wallet used one or more outputs adding up to 80.6 (maybe a bit more with fee), of which 64 (60+4) went to the recipient and 16.6 (10+6+0.6) came back to you. Bitcoin works the same way and you can see these change transactions if you look on a chain explorer, but usually wallets don't normally show the low level details the way simplewallet does.





Hate to go full-noob on you, but what function does that serve?

Simple answer is that in the Bitcoin system (from which Monero derives this aspect of its design), an output can only be used once after which it is "spent" and can never be used again. So if you have just an output of 100, and you want to spend 10, you have no choice but to spend the entire 100. To do that, 10 is sent to the intended recipient and 90 goes back to you.

generalizethis
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1666
Merit: 1023


Facts are more efficient than fud


View Profile WWW
November 09, 2014, 01:53:03 AM
 #16756


Thanks Smooth and BinaryFate. This is fascinating, but I don't want to hog up the thread with questions. Where would i go to find out more about the way crypto-currency functions at the atomic level? Or at the very least, a thorough explanation of the mining, wallet, and transaction process from A to Z.  


onemorebtc
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 266
Merit: 250


View Profile
November 09, 2014, 01:57:46 AM
 #16757


Thanks Smooth and BinaryFate. This is fascinating, but I don't want to hog up the thread with questions. Where would i go to find out more about the way crypto-currency functions at the atomic level? Or at the very least, a thorough explanation of the mining, wallet, and transaction process from A to Z. 



Cryptonote Whitepaper:
https://cryptonote.org/whitepaper.pdf

Review:
http://monero.cc/downloads/whitepaper_review.pdf

(those are linked in the first post)

and of course: bitcoins whitepaper by satoshi: https://bitcoin.org/bitcoin.pdf

transfer 3 onemorebtc.k1024.de 1
BanditryAndLoot
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 70
Merit: 10

Activity: 350


View Profile
November 09, 2014, 01:59:08 AM
 #16758

Is this wat's being talked about with atomic exchanges and cross chain transactions? So rather than communicating through a custom-built exchange API and trading numbers they make up for other numbers they make up, you're always exchanging the real thing for the real thing?

How would that be implemented with this codebase?

And it's only at the end of fall, that we discover it was naught but the wind that knew when one particular leaf was to fall from one particular tree, only to land in one distinct spot .. to be left for an eternity, and waste its time in a wait sublime. C0A2A1C4
akula999
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 509
Merit: 500


View Profile
November 09, 2014, 02:11:25 AM
 #16759

Hey Guys, question. I'm interested in running a monero pool. Ive been playing around with node-cryptonote-pool in ubuntu and I set it up. I'd like to now see if I can get it working in a windows computer. Can the pool run on a Windows 7 Pro pc? (reason I ask is that my windows 7 pc is faster and newer).

Bitcoin: 1FzZehkiwfeeUmfmBrym8VvXX7gUj3miHe
XMR: 4AqrzGPfEKeZrVXyPDNXUrNeKZZGNYiXMDoY49PvdffKNTRg6xp2Qz74SZ72gT5F9HH8Vaic99ndRg6 UBGcVijaNStQjwwf
sammy007
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1624
Merit: 1001



View Profile
November 09, 2014, 09:13:16 AM
 #16760

Hey Guys, question. I'm interested in running a monero pool. Ive been playing around with node-cryptonote-pool in ubuntu and I set it up. I'd like to now see if I can get it working in a windows computer. Can the pool run on a Windows 7 Pro pc? (reason I ask is that my windows 7 pc is faster and newer).

Don't think so, this is not plain JS code, you have to compile extensions like https://github.com/zone117x/node-multi-hashing. Not sure it will compile by default without tweaks. I guess you wanna run it for soloing? Then better install a VM or rent some cheap VPS with enough amount of RAM.
Pages: « 1 ... 788 789 790 791 792 793 794 795 796 797 798 799 800 801 802 803 804 805 806 807 808 809 810 811 812 813 814 815 816 817 818 819 820 821 822 823 824 825 826 827 828 829 830 831 832 833 834 835 836 837 [838] 839 840 841 842 843 844 845 846 847 848 849 850 851 852 853 854 855 856 857 858 859 860 861 862 863 864 865 866 867 868 869 870 871 872 873 874 875 876 877 878 879 880 881 882 883 884 885 886 887 888 ... 2037 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!