[ANN][XC] >> Mandatory Update to new Wallet - The first POS X11 anonymous wallet

[dadon]

we believe in you boss, you do what u need to do, im holding.

[SpringfieldM1A]

Let me quote myself from a couple of pages back before the rush to 20ksat:

With the cat (almost) out of the bag:

-Prepare for dumps of epic proportions
-Prepare for fudders trying to bash the coin and its functionality.

Don't be phased, hold tight, don't be scared out of your precious XC. Ride this rollercoaster all the way to wherever it may take us, but it will be somewhere around the edges of our galaxy.

To the dev and his team : Thank You for your honest and hard work.

[Trezi]

The question is: how much issues are going to come? And what if there are issues after the wallet was released? People might loose their money.

[evtrmm]

DEV  YOU ARE SPREADING FUDs.

damage done!  you have to do something now!

there is NO FUD

Fact 1.  Working linux w/ anon code

Fact 2.  Anon Code needs more work to meet criteria



would you rather me be silent or FULLY TRANSPARENT?

i would rather be TRANSPARENT.

few hours ago, you said you will release a linux wallet as you promised.

then tell us now if you will release it or not.

don't keep us wait here in vain.

there is a process in s/w development, and when we hit the issue today, we have to trace through the code to find the bug, how can I release a wallet with a bug in it?

All the other shit coins do it.  LOL  Is this what they want?

[whatdidshedo]

i guess this is just a coin collection tactic.

so sad i did't double my holdings in 1 hour.

FUD IS DONE BY ORGANIZED PEOPLE THAT ARE BUYING IN IS MY OPINION AS WELL. OH WELL ANOTHER DAY IN CRYPTO NOTHING NEW.

[dadon]

The question is: how much issues are going to come? And what if there are issues after the wallet was released? People might loose their money.

that's why he is working on it??...use ur head bro

[Trezi]

The question is: how much issues are going to come? And what if there are issues after the wallet was released? People might loose their money.

that's why he is working on it??...use ur head bro

Okay, I'm quiet. :-)

[SpringfieldM1A]

The question is: how much issues are going to come? And what if there are issues after the wallet was released? People might loose their money.

If you won't sell at a loss you will not lose a dime. It's all in your head, nothing fundamentally has changed:

-The dev is still cool
-They are working on the anon wallet

People tend to join in on epic panic buys and accept all risks, but when a dump occurs the fear of loss kicks in and, strangely enough, they sell at a loss.

Buy low, sell high if you must. But with XC I'd buy in on the lows and hold.

[solid12345]

So will anon tech be proved here shortly, like within 24 hrs or are we talking another few weeks on this thing?

[sussex]

Wow, you guys are emotional.......

I never called the dev or the coin a scam, I never said it couldn't be done, I never said that you were all fools, you guys raised all of that    

I just suggested that the dev could choose his words with more care, a suggestion I still stand-by and one that you hyper-sensitive groupies can't take..... heaven help you when the code starts to get picked apart.....

[battbot]

Wow, you guys are emotional.......

I never called the dev or the coin a scam, I never said it couldn't be done, I never said that you were all fools, you guys raised all of that    

I just suggested that the dev could choose his words with more care, a suggestion I still stand-by and one that you hyper-sensitive groupies can't take..... heaven help you when the code starts to get picked apart.....

+1, I fully agree with this.  As a dev of another coin, I know how crucial it is to carefully pick your words as well as what you choose to say (and not say).

[BEECoinfan]

anybody can help with the first question?

I think we need to write some code to provide that, the block explorer shows total # of coins as well as http://www.cryptocoinrank.com/X11Coin


unfortunately I am too involved with the wallet coding at the moment to do anything else

I wouldn't worry about it to much, Just keep up the good work coding!

Pow doesn't end for a while, and anybody trying to rush just hoping for a quick flip on their coins.  Haven't seen to many Devs just stick to delivering awsome coding, that's why I first liked the coin, you were focused on getting the important stuff done!

I stick by this, People looking for a quick flip might be mad at the dev but only a day ago the price was only 1100 Sats so we are still looking at 1000% gain Since Yesterday. I can't see why people are so mad, give the guy time to work and release something working!

[maqa71]

Just accurate would be good, there was certainly an implication in your earlier post that the anon worked......

"As promised, I am providing the 1pm EST update - the Team and I are about 30 minutes from successfully sending and receiving anonymous transactions "

Yes that was expectation, and during that test we encounter an issue, which is being worked on now... the info below may not mean anything to anybody but this is actually one of the dev's debugging

(gdb) where
#0  _Alloc_hider (__dat=<optimized out>, this=0x7fffffffe270, __a=...) at /usr/include/c++/4.6/bits/basic_string.h:270
#1  basic_string (this=0x7fffffffe270) at /usr/include/c++/4.6/bits/basic_string.h:434
#2  CommandLineRPC (argc=4, argv=0x7fffffffe668) at bitcoinrpc.cpp:1361
#3  0x000000000045f983 in AppInit (argc=4, argv=0x7fffffffe668) at init.cpp:160
#4  0x00000000004192b9 in main (argc=4, argv=0x7fffffffe668) at init.cpp:185
(gdb) f
#0  _Alloc_hider (__dat=<optimized out>, this=0x7fffffffe270, __a=...) at /usr/include/c++/4.6/bits/basic_string.h:270
270             : _Alloc(__a), _M_p(__dat) { }
(gdb) where
#0  _Alloc_hider (__dat=<optimized out>, this=0x7fffffffe270, __a=...) at /usr/include/c++/4.6/bits/basic_string.h:270
#1  basic_string (this=0x7fffffffe270) at /usr/include/c++/4.6/bits/basic_string.h:434
#2  CommandLineRPC (argc=4, argv=0x7fffffffe668) at bitcoinrpc.cpp:1361
#3  0x000000000045f983 in AppInit (argc=4, argv=0x7fffffffe668) at init.cpp:160
#4  0x00000000004192b9 in main (argc=4, argv=0x7fffffffe668) at init.cpp:185
(gdb) finish
Run till exit from #0  _Alloc_hider (__dat=<optimized out>, this=0x7fffffffe270, __a=...) at /usr/include/c++/4.6/bits/basic_string.h:270
CommandLineRPC (argc=4, argv=0x7fffffffe668) at bitcoinrpc.cpp:1366
1366            while (argc > 1 && IsSwitchChar(argv[1][0]))
(gdb) where

Does this mean only a wallet or also fork  

[Ezravdb]

lol this is going great

only half an hour for wallet

[richardn1987]

lol this is going great

only half an hour for wallet

I believe it when I see it

[dadon]

Wow, you guys are emotional.......

I never called the dev or the coin a scam, I never said it couldn't be done, I never said that you were all fools, you guys raised all of that    

I just suggested that the dev could choose his words with more care, a suggestion I still stand-by and one that you hyper-sensitive groupies can't take..... heaven help you when the code starts to get picked apart.....

fair enough but the shit slinging that goes on on this site and the crypto world in general pisses me off so im quick to sling back, it's like primary school again being on this site, if i wasn't making money i would never come here...

[cyberhacker]

lol this is going great

only half an hour for wallet

I believe it when I see it

so do i!

[dadon]

well that's good the rest of the community believes so fell free  to sit on the fence, and not fill the thread with shit, if your sceptical about the dev, don't buy in we dont care about the price we want ,a working product

[regmann]

Just accurate would be good, there was certainly an implication in your earlier post that the anon worked......

"As promised, I am providing the 1pm EST update - the Team and I are about 30 minutes from successfully sending and receiving anonymous transactions "

Yes that was expectation, and during that test we encounter an issue, which is being worked on now... the info below may not mean anything to anybody but this is actually one of the dev's debugging

(gdb) where
#0  _Alloc_hider (__dat=<optimized out>, this=0x7fffffffe270, __a=...) at /usr/include/c++/4.6/bits/basic_string.h:270
#1  basic_string (this=0x7fffffffe270) at /usr/include/c++/4.6/bits/basic_string.h:434
#2  CommandLineRPC (argc=4, argv=0x7fffffffe668) at bitcoinrpc.cpp:1361
#3  0x000000000045f983 in AppInit (argc=4, argv=0x7fffffffe668) at init.cpp:160
#4  0x00000000004192b9 in main (argc=4, argv=0x7fffffffe668) at init.cpp:185
(gdb) f
#0  _Alloc_hider (__dat=<optimized out>, this=0x7fffffffe270, __a=...) at /usr/include/c++/4.6/bits/basic_string.h:270
270             : _Alloc(__a), _M_p(__dat) { }
(gdb) where
#0  _Alloc_hider (__dat=<optimized out>, this=0x7fffffffe270, __a=...) at /usr/include/c++/4.6/bits/basic_string.h:270
#1  basic_string (this=0x7fffffffe270) at /usr/include/c++/4.6/bits/basic_string.h:434
#2  CommandLineRPC (argc=4, argv=0x7fffffffe668) at bitcoinrpc.cpp:1361
#3  0x000000000045f983 in AppInit (argc=4, argv=0x7fffffffe668) at init.cpp:160
#4  0x00000000004192b9 in main (argc=4, argv=0x7fffffffe668) at init.cpp:185
(gdb) finish
Run till exit from #0  _Alloc_hider (__dat=<optimized out>, this=0x7fffffffe270, __a=...) at /usr/include/c++/4.6/bits/basic_string.h:270
CommandLineRPC (argc=4, argv=0x7fffffffe668) at bitcoinrpc.cpp:1366
1366            while (argc > 1 && IsSwitchChar(argv[1][0]))
(gdb) where

Does this mean only a wallet or also fork  

there aint no fork in that man
thats debug log

[Quantumbud]

I just wanted to extend my gratitude to all those who panic dumped a while ago,not only have you aided me in increasing my holdings but i now have more BTC to boot too.

To the Dev,ignore the window licking trollboxers and keep up the good work.