[ANN][XC] >> Mandatory Update to new Wallet - The first POS X11 anonymous wallet

[chesthing]

Why people are crazy about Anoncoin

People don't want the government or anyone else knowing what they are buying, selling or transferring around. They want true virtual cash.

[tat123]

Why people are crazy about Anoncoin

A month ago it was 100% POS. Multipool.

Now its Anon.

Next comes the colored coins.

Then... all three combined, plus whatever tickles investors, or has a WOW factor. A wallet that makes bacon in the morning? mmmmm... bacon!

[mojun7982]

understood
thanks friends

[rickyross]

I made a logo while we wait...

http://minecube.co.uk/images/host/x11coin.png

A bit X-Men-ish I know, but the X kind of lends its self to going slap bang in the middle

Hope the debugging going well dev

Love the Logo, but the "11" could use some work. Otherwise, I wouldn't change anything.

[mojun7982]

Why people are crazy about Anoncoin

People don't want the government or anyone else knowing what they are buying, selling or transferring around. They want true virtual cash.

I think that Chinese officials will love it

[cyberhacker]

hurry up!

we have chance to beat DRK!

[TheGift73]

I made a logo while we wait...



A bit X-Men-ish I know, but the X kind of lends its self to going slap bang in the middle

Hope the debugging going well dev

Like it. If you could get this into the logo, it would be pretty cool as well

Code:

010110000011000100110001

[rickyross]

Why people are crazy about Anoncoin

A month ago it was 100% POS. Multipool.

Now its Anon.

Next comes the colored coins.

Then... all three combined, plus whatever tickles investors, or has a WOW factor. A wallet that makes bacon in the morning? mmmmm... bacon!

Whatever works, right?

But I think Anon feature is very important to the crypto community, as much as it is for the rest of the world..

[CryptoClub]

That "Sr. Member" thing underneath his name is saving the dev's ass right now lol

Agreed. It is a hell of a lot better than some newbie named after some new scam coin they are making.

I'd prefer a real name, like Evan Duffield at Darkcoin - someone who has really staked his real name and reputation behind his coin. I think that's the single biggest reason behind DRK's success. It's not just about its anononymity features. It's about trust in Evan himself and they way in which he has made himself truly accountable and responsible -- in a way hardly anyone else has in this forum.

I think we're approaching the beginning of the end of the age of anonymous devs with discardable/changeable bitcointalk login names. People are sick of being burned by an endless parade of nameless, unaccountable devs - often the same devs with different login names.

+1

[Thrash]

Like it. If you could get this into the logo, it would be pretty cool as well

Code:

010110000011000100110001

Nice - X11

[battbot]

I wonder how it would effect dark if XC trumped them by releasing an anon wallet first.

[cyberhacker]

I wonder how it would effect dark if XC trumped them by releasing an anon wallet first.

it will take over the momentum form DRK.

but who knows when the dev is going to release the linux one.

[TheGift73]

I wonder how it would effect dark if XC trumped them by releasing an anon wallet first.

it will take over the momentum form DRK.

but who knows when the dev is going to release the linux one.

Possibly, but having the dev give his real name would defiantly be a major boost.

That said, I can understand why he/she wouldn't want to. After all anonymity is what we are after for the wallet so we should respect their right to it as well.

[provenceday]

will wait for the next update from dev team.

[cyberhacker]

will wait for the next update from dev team.

DON'T you think we are stupid enough to wait for something vaguely expressed here?

i hope the dev is working ass off hard to release the promised linux wallet.

[Coin_Viking]

Why people are crazy about Anoncoin

People don't want the government or anyone else knowing what they are buying, selling or transferring around. They want true virtual cash.

This is very true, though only effective if the anon crypto-currency doesnt leave the system.. as soon as you buy something, esp a physical good.. it kinda has to ship to your addr. As such, there will be a paper trail. Same with exchanging crypto to USD for example.. it gets wired to your bank etc. Perhaps the resourceful individual can get around these constrainsts but for the meantime, tech protects privacy and is well and good, but true, absolute anonymity is an illusion.

[sumgye]

I wonder how it would effect dark if XC trumped them by releasing an anon wallet first.

it will take over the momentum form DRK.

but who knows when the dev is going to release the linux one.

Possibly, but having the dev give his real name would defiantly be a major boost.

That said, I can understand why he/she wouldn't want to. After all anonymity is what we are after for the wallet so we should respect their right to it as well.

It does seem counter-intuitive for the dev to release his personal info when the push is anonymity

Assuming that he can pull it off, and I seriously doubt he's not working hard toward exactly that, his reputation in this forum should be enough to instill confidence in this coin. I'm just sorry that I ddin't mine more when it was slow and uncertain. I had my day 1 mined coins sitting on bittrex at the 'safe' price of 0.0001 and forgot about them. Kicking myself. Haha!

[cyberhacker]

I wonder how it would effect dark if XC trumped them by releasing an anon wallet first.

it will take over the momentum form DRK.

but who knows when the dev is going to release the linux one.

Possibly, but having the dev give his real name would defiantly be a major boost.

That said, I can understand why he/she wouldn't want to. After all anonymity is what we are after for the wallet so we should respect their right to it as well.

It does seem counter-intuitive for the dev to release his personal info when the push is anonymity

Assuming that he can pull it off, and I seriously doubt he's not working hard toward exactly that, his reputation in this forum should be enough to instill confidence in this coin. I'm just sorry that I ddin't mine more when it was slow and uncertain. I had my day 1 mined coins sitting on bittrex at the 'safe' price of 0.0001 and forgot about them. Kicking myself. Haha!

this is hilarious, few words from dev, of course as vague as possible except the "promise",  turn the trend up and down.

this is totally bad for a legit dev.

if dev want to update ppl, he should give out some evidence.

[jly77]

I wonder how it would effect dark if XC trumped them by releasing an anon wallet first.

it will take over the momentum form DRK.

but who knows when the dev is going to release the linux one.

Possibly, but having the dev give his real name would defiantly be a major boost.

That said, I can understand why he/she wouldn't want to. After all anonymity is what we are after for the wallet so we should respect their right to it as well.

It does seem counter-intuitive for the dev to release his personal info when the push is anonymity

Assuming that he can pull it off, and I seriously doubt he's not working hard toward exactly that, his reputation in this forum should be enough to instill confidence in this coin. I'm just sorry that I ddin't mine more when it was slow and uncertain. I had my day 1 mined coins sitting on bittrex at the 'safe' price of 0.0001 and forgot about them. Kicking myself. Haha!

this is hilarious, few words from dev, of course as vague as possible except the "promise",  turn the trend up and down.

this is totally bad for a legit dev.

if dev want to update ppl, he should give out some evidence.

If he talks too much, some others will doubt he is not working hard. I personally keep all my minded coins and wait.

[cyberhacker]

I wonder how it would effect dark if XC trumped them by releasing an anon wallet first.

it will take over the momentum form DRK.

but who knows when the dev is going to release the linux one.

Possibly, but having the dev give his real name would defiantly be a major boost.

That said, I can understand why he/she wouldn't want to. After all anonymity is what we are after for the wallet so we should respect their right to it as well.

It does seem counter-intuitive for the dev to release his personal info when the push is anonymity

Assuming that he can pull it off, and I seriously doubt he's not working hard toward exactly that, his reputation in this forum should be enough to instill confidence in this coin. I'm just sorry that I ddin't mine more when it was slow and uncertain. I had my day 1 mined coins sitting on bittrex at the 'safe' price of 0.0001 and forgot about them. Kicking myself. Haha!

this is hilarious, few words from dev, of course as vague as possible except the "promise",  turn the trend up and down.

this is totally bad for a legit dev.

if dev want to update ppl, he should give out some evidence.

If he talks too much, some others will doubt he is not working hard. I personally keep all my minded coins and wait.

i do think he is talking too much without any evidence!