[XC][XCurrency] Decentralised Trustless Privacy Platform / Encrypted XChat / Pos

[infinitechaos]

Those who respond to my statement in a negative fashion are trolls.
I do not care for trolls and those who will show themselves once again attacking a team member.
Those that did attack Yanji and I yesterday should rethink their actions.

Please, stop. You're just digging yourself a deeper hole.

The best thing you can do right now to save face is to step away from your keyboard.

[Abrupto]

Those who respond to my statement in a negative fashion are trolls.
I do not care for trolls and those who will show themselves once again attacking a team member.
Those that did attack Yanji and I yesterday should rethink their actions.

I've said what I have to say and will leave it alone from this point forward. Cheers mate!

[biskyb33]

I think if people want to debate this further they should keep it to private messages as to not hurt their investment in this company they support.
Also crypto coins resembles stocks but you don't get voting or other legal right.. Vote with your investments and focus on moving forward or vote with your feet and begone.

^^^ +1000

[gadgetnerd]

I have said what needed to be said.You trolls can go play now.

This kind of response is exactly what we are not used to in this tread. I really think you should have a drink and relax for a while.

[Artoodeetoo]

I have said what needed to be said.You trolls can go play now.

This kind of response is exactly what we are not used to in this tread. I really think you should have a drink and relax for a while.

I'm thinking we need synechist here to sort all this out.. No doubt he will be around soon and will be able to speak to Dan... I do think this is all a bit storm in a tea cup .. Of all these coins are desperate to collaborate with us it just goes to show how sought after we are becoming...

[Mountaingoat]

Dan, you should add voicechat to XChat, that would be a good feature.

[almond]

Spot on. :-)

The only modification I'd make to your comment is that I think it makes sense for, say, nodes routing internet traffic to earn based on their quality of service, rather than on their wallet balance. This will ensure a high performance network that serves content effectively.

Large balances already earn interest through POS; we'd want to incentivise good network performance.

As I understand things,  large balances stake at exactly the same rate as small balances, so to provide an additional incentive to hold a larger balance, the reward will need to increase dynamically with the size of the balance.  It's a good tactic.

rewarding nodes for quality of service is a great idea,  I'm curious how you would measure the node's performance and quantify it ?

[KimmyF]

Arlyn, big complement from me. Took till today to realize how thin the balance is between a positive community reaction and a complete disaster is.

Still feel anger about silverkinguk words, will sleep the rest off.
hope from now own you take the lead in ALL external communication. Had my mouse pointer hovering a full sell order to many times today.

Btw, in base this collaboration sounds great but I will stay offline fron now on for as long as I can control myself

[laredo7mm]

Dan, you should add voicechat to XChat, that would be a good feature.

Its on the list.  Check out the first post in the thread.

[GameStarter]

Spot on. :-)

The only modification I'd make to your comment is that I think it makes sense for, say, nodes routing internet traffic to earn based on their quality of service, rather than on their wallet balance. This will ensure a high performance network that serves content effectively.

Large balances already earn interest through POS; we'd want to incentivise good network performance.

As I understand things,  large balances stake at exactly the same rate as small balances, so to provide an additional incentive to hold a larger balance, the reward will need to increase dynamically with the size of the balance.  It's a good tactic.

rewarding nodes for quality of service is a great idea,  I'm curious how you would measure the node's performance and quantify it ?

Probably with a speed transfert indicator?

[synechist]

Spot on. :-)

The only modification I'd make to your comment is that I think it makes sense for, say, nodes routing internet traffic to earn based on their quality of service, rather than on their wallet balance. This will ensure a high performance network that serves content effectively.

Large balances already earn interest through POS; we'd want to incentivise good network performance.

As I understand things,  large balances stake at exactly the same rate as small balances, so to provide an additional incentive to hold a larger balance, the reward will need to increase dynamically with the size of the balance.  It's a good tactic.

rewarding nodes for quality of service is a great idea,  I'm curious how you would measure the node's performance and quantify it ?

Probably with a speed transfert indicator?

First node to serve content gets the payment.

[synechist]

Arlyn, big complement from me. Took till today to realize how thin the balance is between a positive community reaction and a complete disaster is.

Still feel anger about silverkinguk words, will sleep the rest off.
hope from now own you take the lead in ALL external communication. Had my mouse pointer hovering a full sell order to many times today.

Btw, in base this collaboration sounds great but I will stay offline fron now on for as long as I can control myself

Thank you Kimmy. Much appreciated.

What's happened is a regretful turn of events but I'm confident that the underlying development will considerably improve XC's fundamentals.

[SpringfieldM1A]

I have said what needed to be said.You trolls can go play now.

Stop attacking respected XC supporters who merely voice their opinion. Some of us are here since May, and we have the right to give our opinion on decisions made by either the dev team or the foundation. If our opinion is different than yours that doesn't mean that we are trolls or fudders. Ignoring criticism by devaluating the source is a sign of immaturity.

I have kept silent until now, but I have had enough of this. I appreciate your efforts for XC, but the way you present yourself the last couple of pages is unworthy of an XC foundation member.

[silverkinguk]

My trolls statement doesn't apply to all members but to the trolls.
Please read that statement carefully as well as my previous statement to the XC community.
Ethical actions work both ways,so some in the XC community should not act like those Dark Fudders we had previously.p
Please do not forget my actions were a response to an attack on Yanji and in no way were they intended as an attack on any well respected member,but there were members posting in defense of some trolls which also was not acceptable.

[SpringfieldM1A]

My trolls statement doesn't apply to all members but to the trolls.
Please read that statement carefully.

Your definition of trolls includes a couple of respected XC members that where here since the beginning. These are people who where either unhappy about the collaboration and/or the way it was announced. I am one of them, but I chose to withdraw my statements because I felt everything had been said already. Does voicing your opinion make you a troll? even if that opinion is different from yours?

[Mountaingoat]

Dan, you should add voicechat to XChat, that would be a good feature.

Its on the list.  Check out the first post in the thread.

I didn't know that.

[the_game1224]

I have said what needed to be said.You trolls can go play now.

Stop attacking respected XC supporters who merely voice their opinion. Some of us are here since May, and we have the right to give our opinion on decisions made by either the dev team or the foundation. If our opinion is different than yours that doesn't mean that we are trolls or fudders. Ignoring criticism by devaluating the source is a sign of immaturity.

I have kept silent until now, but I have had enough of this. I appreciate your efforts for XC, but the way you present yourself the last couple of pages is unworthy of an XC foundation member.

Couldn't have said it better.

[hoertest]

guys , i don't like how he presents himself either but stop with this i have some thinking to do talk. think what? about canning your investment in a fantastic project because one of 13 foundation members comes of as kind of an ass a little.

the sensitive reaction of some in here is just as pathetic to me as silverkinguks behaviour. and no, i have no thinking to do now.... Last time i checked XC was still the best project in crypto even with a foundation member i wouldn't want to hang out with.

[dadon]

Sorry if i jumped the gun sort of, just didn't like the attack on men because most us men are good people with wives and respect women just like most women are good and respect men, the collaboration looks exciting looking forward too more details.

[SpringfieldM1A]

guys , i don't like how he presents himself either but stop with this i have some thinking to do talk. think what? about canning your investment in a fantastic project because one of 13 foundation members comes of as kind of an ass a little.

the sensitive reaction of some in here is just as pathetic to me as silverkinguks behaviour. and no, i have no thinking to do now.... Last time i checked XC was still the best project in crypto even with a foundation member i wouldn't want to hang out with.

Nothing I have said alters my belief in XC. I hold and will do so no matter what, however that doesn't change the fact that I will speak my mind should something happen that I disagree with.