[XC][XCurrency] Decentralised Trustless Privacy Platform / Encrypted XChat / Pos

[G-Bert]

Hi all

I'd like to confirm the news just posted here.

The XC and Qibuck devs are partnering to develop a feature that'll allow nodes to earn money.

A few details:

- We will make an official announcement about this on Friday.

- It's a particularly exciting feature that I'm not sure anyone else has thought of yet.

- The reason for the partnership is that by sharing resources we reduce both development time and costs, and in this case we will not disadvantage XC's market position in any way (more info as to why will follow).

- Silverkinguk (Samuel) is part of the XC team and so if he announces something it can be trusted.

- This is not the undisclosed PR-related development that I mentioned yesterday.



P.S. I've been aware of this development, but was not aware that it would be announced now. My apologies for the confusion.

That just makes the team sound incompetent. Why are we collaborating with QiBuck? XC supposed to be the best coin out there, all tech developed supposed to be original. By collaborating with other coins, we put ourselves with those coins in the same category. Do we really want to be known to associate with QIBuck? If they fail, XC’s reputation fail with it. Do we really want to take that risk? The same thing goes with Dan reviewing other coin. If Dan gave a good review and those coins turns out to be a scam or P&D. What that will do to Dan’s reputation? There are so many scams and shit coins out there, why are we not distance ourselves from them? On top of that, that guy dropped in here announce the news before the XC team can announce it first.

I love the XC team, but this is very sad.

This was my initial reaction,  but the other coin also has an open Dev team.  I'm feeling a little better after looking into things a little more.  Regarding dans code reviews,  if they end up being pump and dumps it's irrelevant,  all he did was review their code,  not their ethics.

@ bisky.  Irony noted lol. 

[1714611935]

1714611935

[1714611935]

1714611935

[akula999]

[statement]

You have clearly not watched the video (from 33m onward) or done some research. If you did you would not say what you just did! PERIOD

I listened and guess what - my opinion didn't change about this collaboration. I see nothing positive about this. Especially about QBK; not a smart coin, no future.
Monero/XMR would have been a smarter choice.

[cyberhacker]

That just makes the team sound incompetent. Why are we collaborating with QiBuck? XC supposed to be the best coin out there, all tech developed supposed to be original. By collaborating with other coins, we put ourselves with those coins in the same category. Do we really want to be known to associate with QIBuck? If they fail, XC’s reputation fail with it. Do we really want to take that risk? The same thing goes with Dan reviewing other coin. If Dan gave a good review and those coins turns out to be a scam or P&D. What that will do to Dan’s reputation? There are so many scams and shit coins out there, why are we not distance ourselves from them? On top of that, that guy dropped in here announce the news before the XC team can announce it first.

I love the XC team, but this is very sad.

YOU speak out my points.

please, do not collaborate with other coins.

if xc have to, please collaborate with coins with some quality  

two lessons will be learnt

the first one  i almost forgot the name, the coin from jasinlee

now you will see this one. clearly this coin has no idea of naming and branding.


XC is greatest coin, i am still holding. but this kind of collaborating is not we want.  sorry

[SushiChef]

as far as I gathered they are going to work on a shared wallet.. nothing more nothing less.... Oh.. the wallet makes you money... WOOOOT

Dan: I will make up on my word!

[silverkinguk]

Qibuck is a quality coin engineered with a different concept called 'Asset Backed'.
It is an investment coin and Dan was aware that Qibuck was being worked on even before Qibuck was launched.I had many chats with him on collaboration with this coin.

[akula999]

Qibuck is a quality coin engineered with a different concept called 'Asset Backed'.
It is an investment coin and Dan was aware that Qibuck was being worked on even before Qibuck was launched.I had many chats with him on collaboration with this coin.

How is it asset backed? The QBK ANN page is vague and the numbers don't add up. From what I can tell, QBK needs constant investors to keep it alive and it would require reinvestment in other coins for a "hopeful" future payoff. What would happen if the investment strategy fails? Will some people not get paid? Also how will the coin maintain constant payouts to investors?
I played with the numbers on ANN, it doesn't make sense and is not a smart decision for XC to follow such a negative coin.

[silverkinguk]

Investments are made in the coin as well as investments in general.
We have some assets that were donated to the coin even before launch.
The main income comes from trading,mining and various projects we fund.
This coin rewards holders and pays a share of revenues generated each month onwards.
Over time more assets will be acquired,the team is doing very well.
The money given to holders is a bonus and not a promise of returns.

[cyberhacker]

i think we lost a great opportunity to overtake other coin's momentum.

just cuz this claimed collaboration.

don't know what you are thinking about.

no doubt. dan is the best dev i have ever seen. but to the marketing strategy, i am lost with these collaborations.

 

[akula999]

Investments are made in the coin as well as investments in general.
We have some assets that were donated to the coin even before launch.
The main income comes from trading,mining and various projects we fund.
This coin rewards holders and pays a share of revenues generated each month onwards.
Over time more assets will be acquired,the team is doing very well.
The money given to holders is a bonus and not a promise of returns.

What exactly are those assets? Do you have a balance sheet you can share with the group to prove these "assets" exist and can fund monthly payouts?
Donated coins run out, mining difficulties fluctuate, miner issues can happen, trading go negative, these are all serious blows to the QBK coin. Even if one fails, the rest of the coin tumbles like dominos.
What assets will you be acquiring over time ? Can we see a future business plan ?

XC has a real future. Collaborating with QBK is a negative blow to the coin and the community. I think QBK needs XC just to exist. I also think this can be a marketing rue to increase the value of the QBK coin so that it can be dumped later on.

[CryptoGretzky]

From all the supporters FUDding and whining, I must have missed the post where all the details of this "collaboration" was published.  

WTH are you guys all whining about anyway?   FFS, let the team tell us the details of this "collaboration", then you can decide if this is worth fudding about.   Are you guys all Pookie's alt accounts or something?!?!?

EVERY SINGLE TIME there's supposedly some good news, you have a whole bunch of fudders come and turn it into negatives.   WTF dudes.

[biskyb33]

Hi all

I'd like to confirm the news just posted here.

The XC and Qibuck devs are partnering to develop a feature that'll allow nodes to earn money.

A few details:

- It's a particularly exciting feature that I'm not sure anyone else has thought of yet.

- The reason for the partnership is that by sharing resources we reduce both development time and costs, and in this case we will not disadvantage XC's market position in any way (more info as to why will follow).

- Silverkinguk (Samuel) is part of the XC team and so if he announces something it can be trusted.

That just makes the team sound incompetent. Why are we collaborating with QiBuck? XC supposed to be the best coin out there, all tech developed supposed to be original. By collaborating with other coins, we put ourselves with those coins in the same category. Do we really want to be known to associate with QIBuck? If they fail, XC’s reputation fail with it. Do we really want to take that risk? The same thing goes with Dan reviewing other coin. If Dan gave a good review and those coins turns out to be a scam or P&D. What that will do to Dan’s reputation? There are so many scams and shit coins out there, why are we not distance ourselves from them? On top of that, that guy dropped in here announce the news before the XC team can announce it first.

I love the XC team, but this is very sad.

i hate to admit this publicly, but there have been moments when i think xc is just another racket (wish i could read source code) ...but then i try to consider all of the factors. the factor that settles me back in is always how hard and diligent this team works. maybe they occassionally expend energy where i think it is far from productive (namely the hiatus with mamm coin ) but then they're back to business. what all factors they have to take into consideration when formulating their agenda i know is beyond me. these things are not within my control, this is not my brainchild.

1) i am certain it is in the teams best interest not to be associated with scam coins and that they are quite aware of that fact. and i'm certain they know the difference so therefore scamcoins will be avoided as best they see fit.

2) i don't think that if QiBuck fails, it will reflect poorly on xc. all i see happening in a scenario like that is the QiBuck supporters finding a home here.

3)correct me if i'm wrong, but dan is only reviewing coins who are utilizing xc's rev1 sourcecode? therefore he will receive recognition and be considered the grandfather of them all. a reputation that commands automatic respect. it's called name recognition. again, i only see those investors keeping a closer eye on xc because of his review (when they ask themselves who the #@$! is dan?!) and will be one of the first flood of new investors here.

there. i said it.

[cyberhacker]

From all the supporters FUDding and whining, I must have missed the post where all the details of this "collaboration" was published.  

WTH are you guys all whining about anyway?   FFS, let the team tell us the details of this "collaboration", then you can decide if this is worth fudding about.   Are you guys all Pookie's alt accounts or something?!?!?

seriously?  i am fuding?  look at this "collaboration".   can you imagine APPLE collaborate with some kind of hawker?

maybe i am wrong about it.  but certainly i am disappointed.

[CryptoGretzky]

From all the supporters FUDding and whining, I must have missed the post where all the details of this "collaboration" was published.  

WTH are you guys all whining about anyway?   FFS, let the team tell us the details of this "collaboration", then you can decide if this is worth fudding about.   Are you guys all Pookie's alt accounts or something?!?!?

seriously?  i am fuding?  look at this "collaboration".   can you imagine APPLE collaborate with some kind of hawker?

maybe i am wrong about it.  but certainly i am disappointed.

Ok, please do tell us all the details of this collaboration.   If you have a game with terrible game play in the AppStore, is that Apple's fault?!?!    You don't even know HOW the collaboration is.   I sure don't.   Please do let us know....

[silverkinguk]

Akula for future assets I don't have a crystal ball,though for now you can see what Qibuck Coin has spent sofar on assets on the Public Ledger: https://poloniex.com/ledgers/qbk

[akula999]

Hi all

I'd like to confirm the news just posted here.

The XC and Qibuck devs are partnering to develop a feature that'll allow nodes to earn money.

A few details:

- It's a particularly exciting feature that I'm not sure anyone else has thought of yet.

- The reason for the partnership is that by sharing resources we reduce both development time and costs, and in this case we will not disadvantage XC's market position in any way (more info as to why will follow).

- Silverkinguk (Samuel) is part of the XC team and so if he announces something it can be trusted.

That just makes the team sound incompetent. Why are we collaborating with QiBuck? XC supposed to be the best coin out there, all tech developed supposed to be original. By collaborating with other coins, we put ourselves with those coins in the same category. Do we really want to be known to associate with QIBuck? If they fail, XC’s reputation fail with it. Do we really want to take that risk? The same thing goes with Dan reviewing other coin. If Dan gave a good review and those coins turns out to be a scam or P&D. What that will do to Dan’s reputation? There are so many scams and shit coins out there, why are we not distance ourselves from them? On top of that, that guy dropped in here announce the news before the XC team can announce it first.

I love the XC team, but this is very sad.

i hate to admit this publicly, but there have been moments when i think xc is just another racket (wish i could read source code) ...but then i try to consider all of the factors. the factor that settles me back in is always how hard and diligent this team works. maybe they occassionally expend energy where i think it is far from productive (namely the hiatus with mamm coin ) but then they're back to business. what all factors they have to take into consideration when formulating their agenda i know is beyond me. these things are not within my control, this is not my brainchild.

1) i am certain it is in the teams best interest not to be associated with scam coins and that they are quite aware of that fact. and i'm certain they know the difference so therefore scamcoins will be avoided as best they see fit.

2) i don't think that if QiBuck fails, it will reflect poorly on xc. all i see happening in a scenario like that is the QiBuck supporters finding a home here.

3)correct me if i'm wrong, but dan is only reviewing coins who are utilizing xc's rev1 sourcecode? therefore he will receive recognition and be considered the grandfather of them all. a reputation that commands automatic respect. it's called name recognition. again, i only see those investors keeping a closer eye on xc because of his review (when they ask themselves who the #@$! is dan?!) and will be one of the first flood of new investors here.

there. i said it.

If QBK fails, then that will weigh negatively on XC. Example, GM owned Pontiac. Pontiac did horribly and now guess what, Pontiac as a car brand is gone. GM Stock took a hit. Daimler merged with Chrysler, we all know what happened there - bad move.
Sometimes collaboration/merging is not a smart move. Especially with a coin like QBK which can't sustain itself.

[CryptoGretzky]

Hi all

I'd like to confirm the news just posted here.

The XC and Qibuck devs are partnering to develop a feature that'll allow nodes to earn money.

A few details:

- It's a particularly exciting feature that I'm not sure anyone else has thought of yet.

- The reason for the partnership is that by sharing resources we reduce both development time and costs, and in this case we will not disadvantage XC's market position in any way (more info as to why will follow).

- Silverkinguk (Samuel) is part of the XC team and so if he announces something it can be trusted.

That just makes the team sound incompetent. Why are we collaborating with QiBuck? XC supposed to be the best coin out there, all tech developed supposed to be original. By collaborating with other coins, we put ourselves with those coins in the same category. Do we really want to be known to associate with QIBuck? If they fail, XC’s reputation fail with it. Do we really want to take that risk? The same thing goes with Dan reviewing other coin. If Dan gave a good review and those coins turns out to be a scam or P&D. What that will do to Dan’s reputation? There are so many scams and shit coins out there, why are we not distance ourselves from them? On top of that, that guy dropped in here announce the news before the XC team can announce it first.

I love the XC team, but this is very sad.

i hate to admit this publicly, but there have been moments when i think xc is just another racket (wish i could read source code) ...but then i try to consider all of the factors. the factor that settles me back in is always how hard and diligent this team works. maybe they occassionally expend energy where i think it is far from productive (namely the hiatus with mamm coin ) but then they're back to business. what all factors they have to take into consideration when formulating their agenda i know is beyond me. these things are not within my control, this is not my brainchild.

1) i am certain it is in the teams best interest not to be associated with scam coins and that they are quite aware of that fact. and i'm certain they know the difference so therefore scamcoins will be avoided as best they see fit.

2) i don't think that if QiBuck fails, it will reflect poorly on xc. all i see happening in a scenario like that is the QiBuck supporters finding a home here.

3)correct me if i'm wrong, but dan is only reviewing coins who are utilizing xc's rev1 sourcecode? therefore he will receive recognition and be considered the grandfather of them all. a reputation that commands automatic respect. it's called name recognition. again, i only see those investors keeping a closer eye on xc because of his review (when they ask themselves who the #@$! is dan?!) and will be one of the first flood of new investors here.

there. i said it.

If QBK fails, then that will weigh negatively on XC. Example, GM owned Pontiac. Pontiac did horribly and now guess what, Pontiac as a car brand is gone. GM Stock took a hit. Daimler merged with Chrysler, we all know what happened there - bad move.
Sometimes collaboration/merging is not a smart move. Especially with a coin like QBK which can't sustain itself.

IF Pontiac was a subsidiary of GM, then sure....

QBK is not co-created nor owned by Dan nor XC.

[policymaker]

Node will bring you XC from anon transcations(subject to change till launch)
Node will bring you XC from staking(somewhat less than 1 XC per week per 1000coins)
Node will bring you more XC through fundamentally new crypto techniques such as new collaboration described.

XC's leading tech, focused team and effective PR might lead to XC=100$ in the next couple of years





profit





But seriously, the team has proved that each and every time we learn about something new, there are like 10 things that are being worked on in the background, in relation or not to the announced/leaked news. So, we hear something about "other coin", or "assets" and stuff, and we fear about the short term price and the negative things. We don't have insider info, thus we cannot estimate the importance of new announcement. Wait till you see the bigger picture(launch), then decide for yourself whether you want to be here for the long ride.

[akula999]

Akula for future assets I don't have a crystal ball,though for now you can see what Qibuck Coin has spent sofar on assets on the Public Ledger: https://poloniex.com/ledgers/qbk

All of this was from your ICO and will run out quickly unless you get others to invest. it will be a never ending problem with your coin. No real future and no real tech.

[biskyb33]

i think we lost a great opportunity to overtake other coin's momentum.

just cuz this claimed collaboration.

don't know what you are thinking about.

no doubt. dan is the best dev i have ever seen. but to the marketing strategy, i am lost with these collaborations.

 

i can't find that info right now, but i'm pretty sure i saw that QiBuck only had a $36,000 market cap? if that's true ...if we're infants, they're just little tiny embryos who certainly aren't sucking the lifeline dry.

[silverkinguk]

Akula this coin has a lot of backing,we don't just rely on the ICO money,we rely on team expertise.
We have experienced investors and traders backing this coin on the team.