|
jakecrow
|
 |
May 31, 2014, 05:13:26 PM |
|
Question 1: Supposing there is time lag, if, say, you can shutdown your pc or disconnect your internet connection at the exact point when you, as a node/mixer, receive the money (but these hadn't the opportunity to be forwarded further), don't you get to keep the money even if you can't hack the encryption? If the money from someone else arrive at my address it's over if I am not "forced" to re-forward them.
Question 2: If the transfer is instantaneous then what prevents a timing analysis of the blockchain in which address A was reduced by 10.423 XCs and address B had a sum of +10.423 one or two blocks later.
Would also like to hear about these. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
"Your bitcoin is secured in a way that is physically impossible for others to access, no matter for what reason, no matter how good the excuse, no matter a majority of miners, no matter what." -- Greg Maxwell
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
megges
|
|
May 31, 2014, 05:18:15 PM |
|
Question 1: Supposing there is time lag, if, say, you can shutdown your pc or disconnect your internet connection at the exact point when you, as a node/mixer, receive the money (but these hadn't the opportunity to be forwarded further), don't you get to keep the money even if you can't hack the encryption? If the money from someone else arrive at my address it's over if I am not "forced" to re-forward them.
Question 2: If the transfer is instantaneous then what prevents a timing analysis of the blockchain in which address A was reduced by 10.423 XCs and address B had a sum of +10.423 one or two blocks later.
Would also like to hear about these. here the answer from atcsecure for question 1:
this must be fud - that can't be true, if it is, it will be so easyto patch the wallet and comment out the sending, in conclusion i'll recieve the coins from the one whos mixing but i will not send them to the destination and keep them -> easy stealing ...
the protocol will handle this, it won't be "Easy stealing" and yes there are bugs ,this is a test release |
tip me!  XtSrWch1U3BsTBFBHj7acTTzxFo1fy5BMa |
|
|
|
CryptoGretzky
|
|
May 31, 2014, 05:19:24 PM |
|
Question 1: Supposing there is time lag, if, say, you can shutdown your pc or disconnect your internet connection at the exact point when you, as a node/mixer, receive the money (but these hadn't the opportunity to be forwarded further), don't you get to keep the money even if you can't hack the encryption? If the money from someone else arrive at my address it's over if I am not "forced" to re-forward them.
Question 2: If the transfer is instantaneous then what prevents a timing analysis of the blockchain in which address A was reduced by 10.423 XCs and address B had a sum of +10.423 one or two blocks later.
Would also like to hear about these. This is how I understand it: 1. It's multi-path, not a single point failure. If you have one xnode that's down, doesn't matter, other xnode also has it. 2. It's probably only instantaneous now because well it's on testnet with max 5 users during the test. |
|
|
|
|
|
JesstersDead
Full Member
 Offline
Activity: 154
Merit: 100
I forgot where I put my wallet.dat
|
|
May 31, 2014, 05:29:47 PM |
|
Okay, I really like that one. |
Cryptsy.com - USD markets coming soon. Go validate your account now!
|
|
|
milkyway
Member
Offline
Activity: 103
Merit: 10
|
|
May 31, 2014, 05:30:54 PM |
|
This really suits the image of the coin. The background and the shadowy features around the letters gives the "anonymous" feel. +1 |
>>> multiwallet | POS 5% Annual [Anon NanoWallet™ technology] | encrypted communication | Inwallet trading <<<
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bl4ckw00d
|
|
May 31, 2014, 05:32:49 PM |
|
+1 That's a winner right there. |
|
|
|
|
bardacuda
|
|
May 31, 2014, 05:33:11 PM |
|
This is ripped off from the xavier chambers logo that was posted earlier though. Did anyone get permission to use it? |
The future will rely on AI. SingularityNET lets anyone create, monetize, and use AI at scale. From the creators of Sophia the Robot. |
|
|
|
Thrash
|
|
May 31, 2014, 05:36:04 PM |
|
This is ripped off from the xavier chambers logo that was posted earlier though. Did anyone get permission to use it? We cannot use a logo that is lifted from an existing one if we want to be taken seriously. We need a fresh, unique and 100% ours logo. It is extremely important to not base the XC logo on an existing design. |
|
|
|
|
|
wobbzz
|
|
May 31, 2014, 05:37:14 PM |
|
|
z2z me @ zs18642322h0h7hzjknejehavx0srwmungl8uj0t3vsxd7jwzr2kdhrcj38setn7ujd500fqn99y52
|
|
|
|
|
|
heartastack
|
|
May 31, 2014, 05:39:24 PM |
|
Someone should put a watermark radar detector in the background
|
|
|
|
|
|
roede94105
|
|
May 31, 2014, 05:41:01 PM |
|
Any news on the testnet block explorer?
|
|
|
|
|
|
wobbzz
|
|
May 31, 2014, 05:41:07 PM |
|
This is ripped off from the xavier chambers logo that was posted earlier though. Did anyone get permission to use it? We cannot use a logo that is lifted from an existing one if we want to be taken seriously. We need a fresh, unique and 100% ours logo. It is extremely important to not base the XC logo on an existing design. I would argue that it's not wrong to implement characteristics of other designs into a new design as the new logo poster has done. Lots of people produce products with similar designs. (Look at cars/trucks/vans...) I'd say as long as a certain percentage has changed then it shouldn't be an issue. |
z2z me @ zs18642322h0h7hzjknejehavx0srwmungl8uj0t3vsxd7jwzr2kdhrcj38setn7ujd500fqn99y52
|
|
|
|
atcsecure
|
|
May 31, 2014, 05:42:47 PM |
|
To help improve staking, I've split up the balance in the premine wallet as thetime to age for coins maybe too large and the net weight goes up and down. I would guess it should even itself over time, as more coins split and stake. It is much better for the coin to get a lot of small blocks instead of large ones.
XHciahhy7rgusYeSqi359TdJNUvT4S2QKc
XGgekbiLd5HAnv2iLrA7iZeNrWnDGJ8hbS
XS4QLi6VpQQo79HLkoFBj5YZkn6p6TuLKG
ATCSECURE
|
Join the revolution - XC - Decentralized Trustless Multi-Node Private Transactions
|
|
|
|
wobbzz
|
|
May 31, 2014, 05:43:47 PM |
|
I'd like to see what it would look like if the two arches were brought out to the left and right a bit so that they do not overlap in the center. You would have a larger earth and I think it would still look good. And less like the chambers logo. |
z2z me @ zs18642322h0h7hzjknejehavx0srwmungl8uj0t3vsxd7jwzr2kdhrcj38setn7ujd500fqn99y52
|
|
|
|
bardacuda
|
|
May 31, 2014, 05:44:17 PM |
|
This is ripped off from the xavier chambers logo that was posted earlier though. Did anyone get permission to use it? We cannot use a logo that is lifted from an existing one if we want to be taken seriously. We need a fresh, unique and 100% ours logo. It is extremely important to not base the XC logo on an existing design. I would argue that it's not wrong to implement characteristics of other designs into a new design as the new logo poster has done. Lots of people produce products with similar designs. (Look at cars/trucks/vans...) I'd say as long as a certain percentage has changed then it shouldn't be an issue. I would agree but this has more than just 'characteristics' of that other logo. It's a lawsuit and FUDstorm waiting to happen if it became the official XC logo.  |
The future will rely on AI. SingularityNET lets anyone create, monetize, and use AI at scale. From the creators of Sophia the Robot. |
|
|
|
wobbzz
|
|
May 31, 2014, 05:44:54 PM |
|
To help improve staking, I've split up the balance in the premine wallet as thetime to age for coins maybe too large and the net weight goes up and down. I would guess it should even itself over time, as more coins split and stake. It is much better for the coin to get a lot of small blocks instead of large ones.
XHciahhy7rgusYeSqi359TdJNUvT4S2QKc
XGgekbiLd5HAnv2iLrA7iZeNrWnDGJ8hbS
XS4QLi6VpQQo79HLkoFBj5YZkn6p6TuLKG
ATCSECURE
Thanks for the update and explanation! |
z2z me @ zs18642322h0h7hzjknejehavx0srwmungl8uj0t3vsxd7jwzr2kdhrcj38setn7ujd500fqn99y52
|
|
|
|
wobbzz
|
|
May 31, 2014, 05:45:47 PM |
|
This is ripped off from the xavier chambers logo that was posted earlier though. Did anyone get permission to use it? We cannot use a logo that is lifted from an existing one if we want to be taken seriously. We need a fresh, unique and 100% ours logo. It is extremely important to not base the XC logo on an existing design. I would argue that it's not wrong to implement characteristics of other designs into a new design as the new logo poster has done. Lots of people produce products with similar designs. (Look at cars/trucks/vans...) I'd say as long as a certain percentage has changed then it shouldn't be an issue. I would agree but this has more than just 'characteristics' of that other logo. It's a lawsuit and FUDstorm waiting to happen if it became the official XC logo. I agree that we need to avoid FUD and suits. That's why I suggested non-overlapping arches. Edit: And maybe get rid of the slash in the bottom of the C? |
z2z me @ zs18642322h0h7hzjknejehavx0srwmungl8uj0t3vsxd7jwzr2kdhrcj38setn7ujd500fqn99y52
|
|
|
|
