[XC][XCurrency] Decentralised Trustless Privacy Platform / Encrypted XChat / Pos

[battbot]

XC testnet blockexplorer seems to be up again, for those interested: http://coincraft.info:2750/chain/XCTestnet

[stealth923]

I know there are many XC investors who are curious of why the dev paid loljosh 0.7btc.  I have seen some posts from XC'ers asking about it and within minutes it gets deleted.  

He bought premium homegrown hydroponic marijuana, a few grams of pure cocaine and threw a party. A jealous neighbor that wasnt invited to appreciate all that delicious coke started spreading FUD from that day on.

Yes i can testify that this is true because i was at the party.

I for one really would like an honest answer from the XC dev to close this once and for all.

The answers have been so vague like he is trying to hide something. "No I didn't pay loljosh for the Xnode code". That's not what we are asking.

Did you pay loljosh 0.7btc to provide you with anything directly or in-directly associated with this coin. Yes or No. If yes, provide details.  

If it was 0.7btc to buy some beer from him, the no worries.

If it was to provide the code base for the coin to work I.e coingen. We as investors have a right To know.

Thank you and look forward to your response.

I think there is something ironic about people who are wanting a coin to hide your personal financial transactions demanding the dev show his.

Because this has a direct impact to many peoples decisions if they should invest in HIS coin. Anonymity is key for the solution. Transparency is what's required from the developer.

[hyeoam]

Charts here: http://crypto-prices.com/XC

[hoertest]

I know there are many XC investors who are curious of why the dev paid loljosh 0.7btc.  I have seen some posts from XC'ers asking about it and within minutes it gets deleted.  

He bought premium homegrown hydroponic marijuana, a few grams of pure cocaine and threw a party. A jealous neighbor that wasnt invited to appreciate all that delicious coke started spreading FUD from that day on.

Yes i can testify that this is true because i was at the party.

I for one really would like an honest answer from the XC dev to close this once and for all.

The answers have been so vague like he is trying to hide something. "No I didn't pay loljosh for the Xnode code". That's not what we are asking.

Did you pay loljosh 0.7btc to provide you with anything directly or in-directly associated with this coin. Yes or No. If yes, provide details.  

If it was 0.7btc to buy some beer from him, the no worries.

If it was to provide the code base for the coin to work I.e coingen. We as investors have a right I know.

Thank you and look forward to your response.

I don't think so, you takin your role in this game a little to important. if your not happy with whats already communicated go buy another coin. its not like you are a shareholder of a company providing liquidity here. you bought the product cause you speculate on its rise in value. nothing more.

This is already one of the most transparent and communicative coins. find a better one and invest there.

btw, i Think he bought a coin to look who he is up against, whats state of the Art. Perhaps he even took parts of it and build upon. i don't give a shit as long as the new stuff gets delivered.

This is the whole nature of speculation. if their would be a coin with all the best tech 100 % proven to be implemented, birth certificate by the dev and so on, not one single doubter. how you wanne get in cheap and early, the brave get rewarded

[Propulsion]

testnet explorer is down for me

http://coincraft.info:2750/chain/XCTestnet
and
http://192.241.217.93:2750/chain/XCTestnet

seems not to be working

maybe the chain got deleted because testing is complete for tommorows wallet release

maybe but there are many posts in darkcoin from your trolls linking to this, so please stop spamming the darkcoin thread - with a proov that can't be tested because explorer is offline ...

thanks

testexplorer seems to be up again, thanks

edit: and offline again will try my luck later again ...

If he paid or not.. who give a shit.. the technology is far beyond and a whole lot better then DRK.. DRK is still in there infant steps.. long way to be XC.

back to school, and learn read -.- whats going on with paid or not? no clue what you are talking about - but clearly nothing to do with my post ...

No need to back to school ass hole.. Just type in the wrong place.... by the way.. fuck you too if you dont support.

wow now came the **** words ... like it, very grown up ...

Great community here.  

Looks like you have a working testnet block explorer now.
What were the transaction ID's for the said "anonymous" youtube video? I'd like to affirm that the transaction really is anonymous with the actual block explorer.

[stealth923]

I know there are many XC investors who are curious of why the dev paid loljosh 0.7btc.  I have seen some posts from XC'ers asking about it and within minutes it gets deleted.  

He bought premium homegrown hydroponic marijuana, a few grams of pure cocaine and threw a party. A jealous neighbor that wasnt invited to appreciate all that delicious coke started spreading FUD from that day on.

Yes i can testify that this is true because i was at the party.

I for one really would like an honest answer from the XC dev to close this once and for all.

The answers have been so vague like he is trying to hide something. "No I didn't pay loljosh for the Xnode code". That's not what we are asking.

Did you pay loljosh 0.7btc to provide you with anything directly or in-directly associated with this coin. Yes or No. If yes, provide details.  

If it was 0.7btc to buy some beer from him, the no worries.

If it was to provide the code base for the coin to work I.e coingen. We as investors have a right I know.

Thank you and look forward to your response.

I don't think so, you takin your role in this game a little to important. if your not happy with whats already communicated go buy another coin. its not like you are a shareholder of a company providing liquidity here. you bought the product cause you speculate on its rise in value. nothing more.

This is already one of the most transparent and communicative coins. find a better one and invest there.

btw, i Think he bought a coin to look who he is up against, whats state of the Art. Perhaps he even took parts of it and build upon. i don't give a shit as long as the new stuff gets delivered.

This is the whole nature of speculation. if their would be a coin with all the best tech 100 % proven to be implemented, birth certificate by the dev and so on, not one single doubter. how you wanne get in cheap and early, the brave get rewarded

Thank you. But you are not the dev. I will wait for an honest answer from him.

[battbot]

Anon proof on testnet: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_uTgnZAFuNU&feature=youtu.be

Testnet block explorer: http://coincraft.info:2750/chain/XCTestnet

Go look all you want

[Karlheinz1]

Thank you. But you are not the dev. I will wait for an honest answer from him.

What do you think he's going to say? It's pretty obvious he paid loljosh to set the coin up to get him started. I would imagine he wanted the quickest route to getting started (though he has 2 decades of programming experience, he is likely new to crypto coding).

I think the fact that atcsecure is way further along than DRK was at this point shows this guy can code and has a solution which is fruitful. Hell it's not impossible XC tech could overtake DRK within a month as DRK is still trying to sort out the masternode forking issue.

[Teka]

Forum is nearly done...

[tr8kr]

Can we explain to the Darkcoin sith that they are not in the thread of the Lightcoin jedi , i feel more and more in a Starwars scene lol.

And, you know how the story end the good guy win at the end lol.

[Karlheinz1]

DRK still trying to resolve their forking issues - https://darkcointalk.org/threads/help-test-rc2-forking-issues.1009/

[dida]

hehehe...this will be interesting in 10 days or so..... I don't know about you but I'm happy like pig in the mud ...  

[weedsmoke420]

I have an idea for a name, brace yourselves....



XCent



Roll it around ye ole grog wash; a suitable name indeed.

[Teka]

Forum is nearly done...

\o/

All new members will be manually vetted

[JesstersDead]

Forum is nearly done...

\o/

All new members will be manually vetted

Works for me Teka. Thanks for your work on this!

[dida]

I have an idea for a name, brace yourselves....



XCent



Roll it around ye ole grog wash; a suitable name indeed.

  totally f.... up but afford is the one that counts  

[stealth923]

Thank you. But you are not the dev. I will wait for an honest answer from him.

What do you think he's going to say? It's pretty obvious he paid loljosh to set the coin up to get him started. I would imagine he wanted the quickest route to getting started (though he has 2 decades of programming experience, he is likely new to crypto coding).

I think the fact that atcsecure is way further along than DRK was at this point shows this guy can code and has a solution which is fruitful. Hell it's not impossible XC tech could overtake DRK within a month as DRK is still trying to sort out the masternode forking issue.

Again I will wait for an official response from the dev

I don't think you understand the ramifications of stating that x11coin is a coingen

[tianfuzi]

Anon proof on testnet: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_uTgnZAFuNU&feature=youtu.be

Testnet block explorer: http://coincraft.info:2750/chain/XCTestnet

Go look all you want

Good work!

[dida]

Forum is nearly done...

\o/

All new members will be manually vetted

Teka, I hope that all hard workers will be added  

[Reese212]

@mastermined

ur coins have min stake age and max stake age. each coin will have staked at least once in the max stake coin age period(again, IF I have understood correctly, cause im knew as well), but must have surpassed minimum coin stake age, which means u MUST have kept them at ur wallet, without making transcations, for that min period of time. After those specific coins have staked, they reset, w8ing to suprass min coin age again, along with ur new, minted coins. I dont think you need to have ur wallet OPENED at all times, coins age just for sitting at ur drive(at least thats what I gathered from other PoS coins as well). You just have to encrypt, lock and unlock wallet between some days(I do every day), in order to let the mature coins stake(you will see the process in ur wallet as a notification)
[/quote]

ok thanks, so all i have to do is leave the coins in the address and i get paid? do i have to leave the client open or just have the coins not leave the address? if i run a xnode i have to leave the client open all the time to mix right?
[/quote]

i GUESS that when you are an xnode then your wallet (because the wallet is the xnode) has to be opened all day Long (maybe it's also possible to leave it encrypted and still being a xnode).
but when you just want to stake then you are right, just leave them in your wallet and don't move them. i'm pretty sure that even moving coins from one of your XC-wallets to your second XC-wallet (if you have one) would reset the "timer" that indicates how Long your coins are in your wallet.

but you have to sometimes open the wallet, otherwise, if you don't open it for 1 year, then there are 3 possibilities:
1) you get all the staked coins you deserve
2) you get nearly all the coins you deserve and that "nearly" means you have lost the compound interest (yeah thats googletranslate, but english isn't my native, sorry...)
3) you only get the staked coins for the first 30 days.

can someone plz tell me which one of the three above is right?
i would advise you to open your wallet (and unlock it for staking to work) once a week, that frequency should be enough
[/quote]


can anybody tell me (and the one who originally asked) which of the above 3 opportunities is the right one? thank you