[XC][XCurrency] Decentralised Trustless Privacy Platform / Encrypted XChat / Pos

[URSAY]

Dan reviewing other coin's code is the best marketing strategy XC could have.

All of the other coin's investor's see their coin's code was reviewed by a guy named Dan, and so they look him up...

This leads them to XC... and because they are already invested in a coin that Dan is reviewing they are more likely to invest in XC.



This is a VERY high yield marketing strategy, and money cannot buy better leads than this.

yeah no.  I see a dev reviewing shitcoins and I see a developer who isn't excited enough about his own project to funnel all of his energy there.

Throw in the fact that the coins are competing - I see a developer who doesn't understand the term conflict of interest.

So no.  That's not what everyone sees.

I see a revolutionary coin and a revolutionary approach to the community. The tech is great and still under heavy development -> so be patient.
The approach to the crypto community is revolutionary in the sense that we as a community take on this financial privacy centered innovation together.
The world has been in conflict ever since the current elite has existed. It has always been a method http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Divide_and_rule to separate the people and getting them not to accomplish their goals and see the real problems.

This is exactly how most people view crypto as well at the moment; they support one team and all the rest is bad. You dont realize this is the revolution the world has been waiting for, for a long time! It's so damn early in the game you actually get to question the development of coins. It's like facebook when they where still programming it. There are no losers in this scene, since everyone here is already aware of these developments.

I understand it's hard to look at this with a new set of eyes, it's a whole new paradigm. (you've learned to view the world in conflict)
Let developers learn and cooperate with each others.
Most coins will fail, but not the lessons they bring the community. We are evolving at a rate that is unlike anything else!
A lot of coins will serve very specific niches of the market. I trust XC with their "odd approach" to make the same kind of gutt based decisions as the team has done until now. I have faith that the coins that cooperate from the view of sharing strengths will boost each other and get this community to an entire new level

There are 2 sides to every coin.  Should I provide the opposing view?

[Youghoor]

Nice "little" buy wall at 120840 on Trex right now. 

EDIT: "BIG"

Driv3n  is that yours? LOL

Haha nope thats not mine but I might add to it soon.

Order book is looking nicer than it has in a while.

Money moving in from CANN 

the money stays to a coin which is good.

[synechist]

Dan reviewing other coin's code is the best marketing strategy XC could have.

All of the other coin's investor's see their coin's code was reviewed by a guy named Dan, and so they look him up...

This leads them to XC... and because they are already invested in a coin that Dan is reviewing they are more likely to invest in XC.



This is a VERY high yield marketing strategy, and money cannot buy better leads than this.

yeah no.  I see a dev reviewing shitcoins and I see a developer who isn't excited enough about his own project to funnel all of his energy there.

Throw in the fact that the coins are competing - I see a developer who doesn't understand the term conflict of interest.

So no.  That's not what everyone sees.

I see a revolutionary coin and a revolutionary approach to the community. The tech is great and still under heavy development -> so be patient.
The approach to the crypto community is revolutionary in the sense that we as a community take on this financial privacy centered innovation together.
The world has been in conflict ever since the current elite has existed. It has always been a method http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Divide_and_rule to separate the people and getting them not to accomplish their goals and see the real problems.

This is exactly how most people view crypto as well at the moment; they support one team and all the rest is bad. You dont realize this is the revolution the world has been waiting for, for a long time! It's so damn early in the game you actually get to question the development of coins. It's like facebook when they where still programming it. There are no losers in this scene, since everyone here is already aware of these developments.

I understand it's hard to look at this with a new set of eyes, it's a whole new paradigm. (you've learned to view the world in conflict)
Let developers learn and cooperate with each others.
Most coins will fail, but not the lessons they bring the community. We are evolving at a rate that is unlike anything else!
A lot of coins will serve very specific niches of the market. I trust XC with their "odd approach" to make the same kind of gutt based decisions as the team has done until now. I have faith that the coins that cooperate from the view of sharing strengths will boost each other and get this community to an entire new level

There are 2 sides to every coin.  Should I provide the opposing view?

No. This conversation has been had, at length, twice.

[URSAY]

Dan reviewing other coin's code is the best marketing strategy XC could have.

All of the other coin's investor's see their coin's code was reviewed by a guy named Dan, and so they look him up...

This leads them to XC... and because they are already invested in a coin that Dan is reviewing they are more likely to invest in XC.



This is a VERY high yield marketing strategy, and money cannot buy better leads than this.

yeah no.  I see a dev reviewing shitcoins and I see a developer who isn't excited enough about his own project to funnel all of his energy there.

Throw in the fact that the coins are competing - I see a developer who doesn't understand the term conflict of interest.

So no.  That's not what everyone sees.

I see a revolutionary coin and a revolutionary approach to the community. The tech is great and still under heavy development -> so be patient.
The approach to the crypto community is revolutionary in the sense that we as a community take on this financial privacy centered innovation together.
The world has been in conflict ever since the current elite has existed. It has always been a method http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Divide_and_rule to separate the people and getting them not to accomplish their goals and see the real problems.

This is exactly how most people view crypto as well at the moment; they support one team and all the rest is bad. You dont realize this is the revolution the world has been waiting for, for a long time! It's so damn early in the game you actually get to question the development of coins. It's like facebook when they where still programming it. There are no losers in this scene, since everyone here is already aware of these developments.

I understand it's hard to look at this with a new set of eyes, it's a whole new paradigm. (you've learned to view the world in conflict)
Let developers learn and cooperate with each others.
Most coins will fail, but not the lessons they bring the community. We are evolving at a rate that is unlike anything else!
A lot of coins will serve very specific niches of the market. I trust XC with their "odd approach" to make the same kind of gutt based decisions as the team has done until now. I have faith that the coins that cooperate from the view of sharing strengths will boost each other and get this community to an entire new level

There are 2 sides to every coin.  Should I provide the opposing view?

No. This conversation has been had, at length, twice.

The conversation that I'm considering posting goes far beyond code reviews.

[pookielax31]

Please post 

[wooder]

Dan reviewing other coin's code is the best marketing strategy XC could have.

All of the other coin's investor's see their coin's code was reviewed by a guy named Dan, and so they look him up...

This leads them to XC... and because they are already invested in a coin that Dan is reviewing they are more likely to invest in XC.



This is a VERY high yield marketing strategy, and money cannot buy better leads than this.

yeah no.  I see a dev reviewing shitcoins and I see a developer who isn't excited enough about his own project to funnel all of his energy there.

Throw in the fact that the coins are competing - I see a developer who doesn't understand the term conflict of interest.

So no.  That's not what everyone sees.

I see a revolutionary coin and a revolutionary approach to the community. The tech is great and still under heavy development -> so be patient.
The approach to the crypto community is revolutionary in the sense that we as a community take on this financial privacy centered innovation together.
The world has been in conflict ever since the current elite has existed. It has always been a method http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Divide_and_rule to separate the people and getting them not to accomplish their goals and see the real problems.

This is exactly how most people view crypto as well at the moment; they support one team and all the rest is bad. You dont realize this is the revolution the world has been waiting for, for a long time! It's so damn early in the game you actually get to question the development of coins. It's like facebook when they where still programming it. There are no losers in this scene, since everyone here is already aware of these developments.

I understand it's hard to look at this with a new set of eyes, it's a whole new paradigm. (you've learned to view the world in conflict)
Let developers learn and cooperate with each others.
Most coins will fail, but not the lessons they bring the community. We are evolving at a rate that is unlike anything else!
A lot of coins will serve very specific niches of the market. I trust XC with their "odd approach" to make the same kind of gutt based decisions as the team has done until now. I have faith that the coins that cooperate from the view of sharing strengths will boost each other and get this community to an entire new level

There are 2 sides to every coin.  Should I provide the opposing view?

No. This conversation has been had, at length, twice.

The conversation that I'm considering posting goes far beyond code reviews.

Please post it!

[vytasz7]

where can i find more info about xc ?

[synechist]

where can i find more info about xc ?

Right here, I presume. Or here.

What do you want to know? Ask away.

[The-C-Word]

Dan reviewing other coin's code is the best marketing strategy XC could have.

All of the other coin's investor's see their coin's code was reviewed by a guy named Dan, and so they look him up...

This leads them to XC... and because they are already invested in a coin that Dan is reviewing they are more likely to invest in XC.



This is a VERY high yield marketing strategy, and money cannot buy better leads than this.

yeah no.  I see a dev reviewing shitcoins and I see a developer who isn't excited enough about his own project to funnel all of his energy there.

Throw in the fact that the coins are competing - I see a developer who doesn't understand the term conflict of interest.

So no.  That's not what everyone sees.

I see a revolutionary coin and a revolutionary approach to the community. The tech is great and still under heavy development -> so be patient.
The approach to the crypto community is revolutionary in the sense that we as a community take on this financial privacy centered innovation together.
The world has been in conflict ever since the current elite has existed. It has always been a method http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Divide_and_rule to separate the people and getting them not to accomplish their goals and see the real problems.

This is exactly how most people view crypto as well at the moment; they support one team and all the rest is bad. You dont realize this is the revolution the world has been waiting for, for a long time! It's so damn early in the game you actually get to question the development of coins. It's like facebook when they where still programming it. There are no losers in this scene, since everyone here is already aware of these developments.

I understand it's hard to look at this with a new set of eyes, it's a whole new paradigm. (you've learned to view the world in conflict)
Let developers learn and cooperate with each others.
Most coins will fail, but not the lessons they bring the community. We are evolving at a rate that is unlike anything else!
A lot of coins will serve very specific niches of the market. I trust XC with their "odd approach" to make the same kind of gutt based decisions as the team has done until now. I have faith that the coins that cooperate from the view of sharing strengths will boost each other and get this community to an entire new level

There are 2 sides to every coin.  Should I provide the opposing view?

No. This conversation has been had, at length, twice.

The conversation that I'm considering posting goes far beyond code reviews.

Let's hear it.

[MiningMinion]

where can i find more info about xc ?

Right here, I presume. Or here.

What do you want to know? Ask away.

website is good too

http://xc-official.com/

[synechist]

where can i find more info about xc ?

Right here, I presume. Or here.

What do you want to know? Ask away.

website is good too

http://xc-official.com/

The website is rather out of date at the moment, excepting the news section.

[IMJim]

I FINALLY broke the 1000 XC mark:-)

Is it worth it to setup as a node rather than just regular staking?  Is it now pretty easy to setup?

[synechist]

I FINALLY broke the 1000 XC mark:-)

Is it worth it to setup as a node rather than just regular staking?  Is it now pretty easy to setup?

Congratulations!

Mixer nodes will stake if transaction volume is low (which it is at the moment). So you could set up a node and just let it run. You'd either stake or get tx fees.

It's incredibly easy. Just install it and run it. :-)

Best to make four payments of 250XC to four separate addresses in it.

[prospect]

I FINALLY broke the 1000 XC mark:-)

Is it worth it to setup as a node rather than just regular staking?  Is it now pretty easy to setup?

Congratulations!

Mixer nodes will stake if transaction volume is low (which it is at the moment). So you could set up a node and just let it run. You'd either stake or get tx fees.

It's incredibly easy. Just install it and run it. :-)

Best to make four payments of 250XC to four separate addresses in it.

How long does it take before you can stake? Maybe i should move my funds. Holding this one for long term now.

[synechist]

I FINALLY broke the 1000 XC mark:-)

Is it worth it to setup as a node rather than just regular staking?  Is it now pretty easy to setup?

Congratulations!

Mixer nodes will stake if transaction volume is low (which it is at the moment). So you could set up a node and just let it run. You'd either stake or get tx fees.

It's incredibly easy. Just install it and run it. :-)

Best to make four payments of 250XC to four separate addresses in it.

How long does it take before you can stake? Maybe i should move my funds. Holding this one for long term now.

A couple of weeks normally, after which you'll get stakes pretty frequently.

[wooder]

I FINALLY broke the 1000 XC mark:-)

Is it worth it to setup as a node rather than just regular staking?  Is it now pretty easy to setup?

Congratulations!

Mixer nodes will stake if transaction volume is low (which it is at the moment). So you could set up a node and just let it run. You'd either stake or get tx fees.

It's incredibly easy. Just install it and run it. :-)

Best to make four payments of 250XC to four separate addresses in it.

How long does it take before you can stake? Maybe i should move my funds. Holding this one for long term now.

A couple of weeks normally, after which you'll get stakes pretty frequently.

When will the news get released?
As it seems we are testing new lows currently, and maybe good news could at least stop the downtrend

[addergebroed]

well, wasn't I a bright spark buying at 26! 

I've bought even higher... no worries, XC will get to such heights again. Can't say such thing about other alts, but XC is just rock solid. To compensate I bought even more XC now with the low prices 

[IMJim]

I FINALLY broke the 1000 XC mark:-)

Is it worth it to setup as a node rather than just regular staking?  Is it now pretty easy to setup?

Congratulations!

Mixer nodes will stake if transaction volume is low (which it is at the moment). So you could set up a node and just let it run. You'd either stake or get tx fees.

It's incredibly easy. Just install it and run it. :-)

Best to make four payments of 250XC to four separate addresses in it.

Cool man, thanks for the reply.

I know things have changed much with this node stuff and I have not been able to keep up!  Can you point me to the latest instructions on setting this up bud?

If I have a bit more than 1k, should I still move it all into one wallet for the node, still splitting it up into 4 chunks to different addies?  If I acquire more XC, is it wise to just keep adding them to the node wallet?


EDIT - Yeah I tried to find instructions on setting up the node, but could not.  Website says instructions to be uploaded soon.  Will wait to hear back from you.

[G-Bert]

well, wasn't I a bright spark buying at 26! 

I've bought even higher... no worries, XC will get to such heights again. Can't say such thing about other alts, but XC is just rock solid. To compensate I bought even more XC now with the low prices 

I posted this in the wrong thread haha! (I've deleted the post now)

I don't regret buying XC! I've bought XC between 12 & 16 so its not too bad. (though I can't see my mintpal history and think i bought my first lot there so could have paid higher)

Either way... No Regrets, patiently waiting on news!!

[battbot]

Someone has been placing large bids today... 13 BTC earlier at 120k (filled), and now another 10 BTC at 113k.