|
holyprofit
|
 |
October 23, 2014, 12:22:24 AM |
|
Sorry to ask a question that could cause fear uncertainty and doubt but I have asked this question a few times and been ignored.
If we can buy into the blocknet using XC , does that mean that those XC could or would get dumped into the market and the price of XC will crash?
This is a really important question for us. We need an answer.
None of the coins used are going to be dumped. Thanks again. I did miss this in the FAQ, so apologies. I think I can live with the way you guys are doing it.  Thanks for asking that - I had the same question so good to have it answered. |
|
|
|
|
|
flashbit
|
|
October 23, 2014, 12:50:07 AM |
|
Anyone know if there is any plans to get XC / Bittrex on BitcoinWisdom?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
atcsecure
|
|
October 23, 2014, 12:58:48 AM |
|
Are there any specific plans or goals for software release(s) before the 29th that will inspire investor and user confidence? It seems like we may of moved from XChat development on traditional systems to mobile development? I realize you are very busy with the upcoming release of BlockNet infrastructure. Thanks.
XChat development continues, in fact just posted the stable branch for all 3 platforms for mainnet - further testing of xchat for the latest code [08i] continues but that is being moved off mainnet |
Join the revolution - XC - Decentralized Trustless Multi-Node Private Transactions
|
|
|
|
atcsecure
|
|
October 23, 2014, 12:59:58 AM |
|
Are there any specific plans or goals for software release(s) before the 29th that will inspire investor and user confidence? It seems like we may of moved from XChat development on traditional systems to mobile development? I realize you are very busy with the upcoming release of BlockNet infrastructure. Thanks.
A stable release of XChat across all platforms. Good answer. That would be huge in my opinion and would silence some of the overall doubt. I think this would be a very important milestone for xc. I hope the team feels the same and is able to deliver. Thanks again. [EDIT] I'm assuming "all platforms" means Windows, Linux, and Mac Yes - Just posted the links |
Join the revolution - XC - Decentralized Trustless Multi-Node Private Transactions
|
|
|
|
|
|
battbot
|
|
October 23, 2014, 01:01:49 AM |
|
Sweet! Can't wait to try the mobile wallet! Thanks for all the hard work Dan, you're the man!! |
|
|
|
|
|
flashbit
|
|
October 23, 2014, 01:01:56 AM |
|
Anyone know if there is any plans to get XC / Bittrex on BitcoinWisdom?
Sent them a PM requesting the addition. |
|
|
|
|
|
buy-black
|
|
October 23, 2014, 01:12:02 AM |
|
Still having problems with the wallet crashing. I realized I had problems with my wallet when started crashing with versions: 2.49.08e, and then 2.490.8iW Finally 2.49.08iW crashed repeatedly so I erased the entire directory in AppData\Roaming\XCurrency and let it sync but it crashed many time while downloading the data. I noticed that the whole time the outbound traffic was about 200 KB/s My BC wallet also crashed... After xc downloaded the whole chain I put my old wallet and the coins and transactions where there, but I saw that the last staking transactions were unconfirmed with following dates; August 19th Sep 6th Sep 16th Oct 3rd. I did not notice this staking problem until today since I was not paying attention to my wallet. So then I realized that Dan mentioned the stable version is 2.49.07 which is now on the main site. I tried this version and after a half of day of running correctly it crashed. I noticed that this version did not have the large outgoing data rate and seem to behave properly. I suspect that the wallet crashes when it is trying to stake since it runs a few hours before it crashes. So I fired up my other machine and let xc version v0.9.2.47h_RC3.XCurrency-2.47 catch up since I do not recall having problems with this wallet. After it finished the sync I let it run the entire day and it never crashed but..... now in this wallet I am missing 97 coins?? I ran -rescan and also walletrepair and the coins never showed up to this older wallet on my second machine running the old client v0.9.2.47h_RC3.XCurrency-2.47 I wrote this in the hope that it will help Dan identify the problem. I do believe that a working wallet is a priority and right now I dont have one. P.S. I forgot to mention that I am behind two routers and have my ports forwarded correctly buy I have not been able to mix coins ever. P.S. no 2: While I wrote this note I just noticed a new release... I will test it now. Thanks Dan P.S no 3... I guess it is not a new release, it is the stable version from the main site, which I ran yesterday and it crashed..sad  |
BC + XC + DRK
|
|
|
|
atcsecure
|
|
October 23, 2014, 01:21:39 AM |
|
Still having problems with the wallet crashing.
I realized I had problems with my wallet when started crashing with versions:
2.49.08e, and then 2.490.8iW
Finally 2.49.08iW crashed repeatedly so I erased the entire directory in AppData\Roaming\XCurrency and let it sync but it crashed many time while downloading the data.
I noticed that the whole time the outbound traffic was about 200 KB/s
My BC wallet also crashed...
After xc downloaded the whole chain I put my old wallet and the coins and transactions where there, but I saw that the last staking transactions were unconfirmed with following dates;
August 19th
Sep 6th
Sep 16th
Oct 3rd.
I did not notice this staking problem until today since I was not paying attention to my wallet.
So then I realized that Dan mentioned the stable version is 2.49.07 which is now on the main site. I tried this version and after a half of day of running correctly it crashed. I noticed that this version did not have the large outgoing data rate and seem to behave properly. I suspect that the wallet crashes when it is trying to stake since it runs a few hours before it crashes.
So I fired up my other machine and let xc version v0.9.2.47h_RC3.XCurrency-2.47 catch up since I do not recall having problems with this wallet. After it finished the sync I let it run the entire day and it never crashed but..... now in this wallet I am missing 97 coins?? I ran -rescan and also walletrepair and the coins never showed up to this older wallet on my second machine running the old client v0.9.2.47h_RC3.XCurrency-2.47
I wrote this in the hope that it will help Dan identify the problem. I do believe that a working wallet is a priority and right now I dont have one.
P.S. I forgot to mention that I am behind two routers and have my ports forwarded correctly buy I have not been able so mix coins ever.
P.S. no 2: While I wrote this note I just noticed a new release... I will test it now.
Thanks Dan
I have identified the root cause and it is a memory leak in the bitcoin P2P code itself which plagues ALL altcoins based off bitcoin .07 and .08. However with that being said, XC is pushing the limits of that code, basically to the point of breaking it due to the amount of traffic going over in the latest test releases version 2.49.08 - has been stable for me, if you continue to have issues please let me know |
Join the revolution - XC - Decentralized Trustless Multi-Node Private Transactions
|
|
|
|
atcsecure
|
|
October 23, 2014, 01:24:09 AM |
|
P.S no 3... I guess it is not a new release, it is the stable version from the main site, which I ran yesterday and it crashed..sad could you send me the debug.log cut from the crash so I can review? as this release doesn't crash on any of my development systems. It could be something else, send me the debug log [the end of it should contain some debug data about the crash] |
Join the revolution - XC - Decentralized Trustless Multi-Node Private Transactions
|
|
|
|
buy-black
|
|
October 23, 2014, 01:24:30 AM
Last edit: October 23, 2014, 01:34:53 AM by buy-black |
|
Still having problems with the wallet crashing.
I realized I had problems with my wallet when started crashing with versions:
2.49.08e, and then 2.490.8iW
Finally 2.49.08iW crashed repeatedly so I erased the entire directory in AppData\Roaming\XCurrency and let it sync but it crashed many time while downloading the data.
I noticed that the whole time the outbound traffic was about 200 KB/s
My BC wallet also crashed...
After xc downloaded the whole chain I put my old wallet and the coins and transactions where there, but I saw that the last staking transactions were unconfirmed with following dates;
August 19th
Sep 6th
Sep 16th
Oct 3rd.
I did not notice this staking problem until today since I was not paying attention to my wallet.
So then I realized that Dan mentioned the stable version is 2.49.08 which is now on the main site. I tried this version and after a half of day of running correctly it crashed. I noticed that this version did not have the large outgoing data rate and seem to behave properly. I suspect that the wallet crashes when it is trying to stake since it runs a few hours before it crashes.
So I fired up my other machine and let xc version v0.9.2.47h_RC3.XCurrency-2.47 catch up since I do not recall having problems with this wallet. After it finished the sync I let it run the entire day and it never crashed but..... now in this wallet I am missing 97 coins?? I ran -rescan and also walletrepair and the coins never showed up to this older wallet on my second machine running the old client v0.9.2.47h_RC3.XCurrency-2.47
I wrote this in the hope that it will help Dan identify the problem. I do believe that a working wallet is a priority and right now I dont have one.
P.S. I forgot to mention that I am behind two routers and have my ports forwarded correctly buy I have not been able so mix coins ever.
P.S. no 2: While I wrote this note I just noticed a new release... I will test it now.
Thanks Dan
I have identified the root cause and it is a memory leak in the bitcoin P2P code itself which plagues ALL altcoins based off bitcoin .07 and .08. However with that being said, XC is pushing the limits of that code, basically to the point of breaking it due to the amount of traffic going over in the latest test releases version 2.49.08 - has been stable for me, if you continue to have issues please let me know I confirm that 2.49.08 does not have the large outgoing data rate but it crashed on me yesterday. I will run it again tonight and see if it is still running in 8 hours. Thanks |
BC + XC + DRK
|
|
|
|
buy-black
|
|
October 23, 2014, 01:25:24 AM |
|
P.S no 3... I guess it is not a new release, it is the stable version from the main site, which I ran yesterday and it crashed..sad could you send me the debug.log cut from the crash so I can review? as this release doesn't crash on any of my development systems. It could be something else, send me the debug log [the end of it should contain some debug data about the crash] ok, I will look into it now. |
BC + XC + DRK
|
|
|
|
buy-black
|
|
October 23, 2014, 01:27:05 AM |
|
P.S no 3... I guess it is not a new release, it is the stable version from the main site, which I ran yesterday and it crashed..sad could you send me the debug.log cut from the crash so I can review? as this release doesn't crash on any of my development systems. It could be something else, send me the debug log [the end of it should contain some debug data about the crash] ok, I will look into it now. What email should I send it to? |
BC + XC + DRK
|
|
|
|
buy-black
|
|
October 23, 2014, 02:22:34 AM |
|
P.S no 3... I guess it is not a new release, it is the stable version from the main site, which I ran yesterday and it crashed..sad could you send me the debug.log cut from the crash so I can review? as this release doesn't crash on any of my development systems. It could be something else, send me the debug log [the end of it should contain some debug data about the crash] ok, I will look into it now. What email should I send it to? Ok debug sent. |
BC + XC + DRK
|
|
|
|
WayForward
|
|
October 23, 2014, 03:56:26 AM |
|
I am not a linux guru, but is it possible to run the tor/tails client environment and then pull from github the latest linux wallets on it ? So technically we can update our our torstick desktops ?
|
|
|
|
|
|
reebokasss
|
|
October 23, 2014, 06:30:55 AM |
|
i think 100k now will be psichological line.. hope to see some big rise on 29th of october
|
|
|
|
Este Nuno
Legendary
 Offline
Activity: 826
Merit: 1000
amarha
|
|
October 23, 2014, 08:14:37 AM
Last edit: October 23, 2014, 09:29:25 AM by Este Nuno |
|
I got a little bit more information regarding the first two points we were discussing yesterday: every SuperNET node becomes one via libjl777, I made a reference implementation of a SuperNET node:
jl777 [03:33]
//
// main.c
// libtest
//
// Created by jl777 on 8/13/14.
// Copyright (c) 2014 jl777. MIT License.
//
#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <unistd.h>
#include <memory.h>
#include "SuperNET.h"
...code...
jl777 [03:35]
The SuperNET_start call and the broadcast/narrowcast are how it is integrated into a coin
jl777 [03:35]
BTCD has done this already
jl777 [03:35]
also every SuperNET node is a "server" and a private node, both
The issue here is that jl777 and the other BTCD devs have all been working on implementing libjl777 which I think is analogous to Xbridge in this case and BTCD is just the first reference implementation. But the idea behind libjl777 is that it's supposed to be implemented in to every coin in superNET. Right now that's BBR, VRC, BITS, NXT, BTCD (all equal memebers but providing different technology or assets). Each developer of coins in superNET will eventually add libjl777, but for now the attention is focused on getting it in to BTCD first. Crypto_Zoidberg the lead dev for BBR only just started talking with jl777 about integration last week, so it's probably going to be a little while. But every coin is supposed to be equal, even though it may seem like BTCD is special, it's only really special in the sense that it has a bunch of people working full time and testing at the moment making it the first implementation of superNET. And of course in the same way that XC is meant to provide its mixers BTCD provides teleport. But BTCD isn't a necessary condition for someone to use superNET. The majority of people might end up using BTCD as their 'gateway' to superNET in a similar way that XC people would presumably hope that people will be using XC as a their coin of choice when using Blocknet. Also, from what I can understand everyone person running superNET is equal and node and there's no particular server(other than each node being a "server" in the p2p sense) so I unless I'm missing something I would expect that to qualify as true p2p considering there are no central servers. Personally, I don't think you need to justify Blocknet anyway based on those contrasting points you were using. A good idea is a good idea. And a new implementation of the same concept with a different network of coins should be sufficient in my opinion. |
|
|
|
|
|
TheGer
|
|
October 23, 2014, 09:06:43 AM |
|
There was a 50k block transferred to Bittrex a cpl days ago. You can plainly see 1-2k coins being placed for sale over and over once they are sold the cycle repeats. Once this guy dumps all his coins it will stabilize. If he's dumping to hurt the coin then he must be butthurt that it is not staying down very long. It always manages to push itself back up to between 90-100k before he tries it again. We may see this continue for a day or 2 I haven't been keeping track of how many thousands of coins are being sold. There appear to be more than enough willing buyers though so that bodes well. *** On a side not to Blocknet why don't you poll the community and see what the best method they think is for fundraising(ie. what will instill the best confidence among investors thus bringing in the most funds). Options could be posted in this thread and then polled(using website poll feature) after a day or 2 of ideas being fronted. i think 100k now will be psichological line.. hope to see some big rise on 29th of october
|
|
|
|
|
|
hoertest
|
|
October 23, 2014, 09:35:04 AM |
|
There was a 50k block transferred to Bittrex a cpl days ago. You can plainly see 1-2k coins being placed for sale over and over once they are sold the cycle repeats. Once this guy dumps all his coins it will stabilize. If he's dumping to hurt the coin then he must be butthurt that it is not staying down very long. It always manages to push itself back up to between 90-100k before he tries it again. We may see this continue for a day or 2 I haven't been keeping track of how many thousands of coins are being sold. There appear to be more than enough willing buyers though so that bodes well. *** On a side not to Blocknet why don't you poll the community and see what the best method they think is for fundraising(ie. what will instill the best confidence among investors thus bringing in the most funds). Options could be posted in this thread and then polled(using website poll feature) after a day or 2 of ideas being fronted. i think 100k now will be psichological line.. hope to see some big rise on 29th of october
Cab you see if they came from mintpal directly? |
|
|
|
|
|
