Unmoderated XC thread

[CryptoGretzky]

Ohhhh dear. Watching the number off hurt DRK fanboys in this thread is hilarious. Must suck being on the losing side. Well... enjoy your fall from stardom. Pretty much all the other anon coins will be way ahead of you in a couple of months, some already are. But you know that.

Enjoy life kids

Your belief is strong. I thank people who believe in XC they've been very good to me... bought all my XC's at 0.004, perhaps you did too?

If you so believe that XC will be way ahead of DRK in a couple of months, let's make a bet that is very very good for you.

In 2 months from this day, if XC has bigger market cap than DRK, I will pay you 1000 XC's. If DRK has bigger market cap, you will pay me 1000 DRK's.

Do you believe?

I'd like to double this bet as well.

Even with every single XC troll coming into the Darkcoin thread to tear it down, no one has taken this bet. That speaks volumes. Offer still stands on my end. I'm sure Illodin hasn't backed down either.

On another note, amazing how quick you guys were today trying to promote XC in the Darkcoin thread.

Good job burning that bridge XC.

If you so believe in DRK, how about in a couple of months, let's make a bet that is very very good for you.

In 2 months from this day, if DRK has bigger market cap than BTC, I will pay you 1000 DRK. If BTC has bigger market cap, you will pay me 1000 BTC.

Do you believe?

When was this ever about BTC/DRK.

XC is dumped now they are trying to save themselves by saying CACHe coin is going to save them with some proof of block chain....whatever...more buzz words....more confusing investors..now dragging in random other coins...let the XC pump and dump continue.

No... I think this is about each coin believe in themselves...

So, you are saying you don't believe in DRK then?

This bet was about XC/DRK nothing to do with BTC. Anyone with half a brain knows that DRK will not have a marketcap higher than BTC in 2 months - you make yourself look like an idiot to even try and make that comparison.

Not a single XC shill was willing to step up to the plate because they all really know its a chop shop hack solution. XC/CACHe/Loljosh coin - what ever the fuck you call it is dead now anyways.

Hey, dude, how many Evans does it take to screw in a lightbulb?

Ps: chop shop hack solution? We have better anon than you guys do lol

You have better anon? lol you must be smoking some serious crack -  at this single point in time, you transfer the ACTUAL coins to someone elses wallet and call it a mixer, no multi-sigs, nothing....XC 1.5 is not even close to a better solution....and dont even bother quoting "BUT BUT BUT in Rev 2".....pfft ill just let the market do its talking.

But but but Evan will fix the fork..

But but.. He won't mess up again..

Lol

So take the bet then??? - ill setup escrow between propulsion and illodin??

What? An evens bet that XC will grow 12x in the next two months?

How about we make it fair, that XC will grow more as a percentage than DRK over the next two months?

Ill bet you 10,000 XC on that.

What so you are saying you dont believe in XC? - right now XC is worthless so a percentage game is stupid. If you believe take up the original bet proposed by propulsion and illodin

I will accept your bet if you accept my bet as well.  Let's setup escrow.

Put up or shut up.

[Joshuar]

Ohhhh dear. Watching the number off hurt DRK fanboys in this thread is hilarious. Must suck being on the losing side. Well... enjoy your fall from stardom. Pretty much all the other anon coins will be way ahead of you in a couple of months, some already are. But you know that.

Enjoy life kids

Your belief is strong. I thank people who believe in XC they've been very good to me... bought all my XC's at 0.004, perhaps you did too?

If you so believe that XC will be way ahead of DRK in a couple of months, let's make a bet that is very very good for you.

In 2 months from this day, if XC has bigger market cap than DRK, I will pay you 1000 XC's. If DRK has bigger market cap, you will pay me 1000 DRK's.

Do you believe?

I'd like to double this bet as well.

Even with every single XC troll coming into the Darkcoin thread to tear it down, no one has taken this bet. That speaks volumes. Offer still stands on my end. I'm sure Illodin hasn't backed down either.

On another note, amazing how quick you guys were today trying to promote XC in the Darkcoin thread.

Good job burning that bridge XC.

If you so believe in DRK, how about in a couple of months, let's make a bet that is very very good for you.

In 2 months from this day, if DRK has bigger market cap than BTC, I will pay you 1000 DRK. If BTC has bigger market cap, you will pay me 1000 BTC.

Do you believe?

When was this ever about BTC/DRK.

XC is dumped now they are trying to save themselves by saying CACHe coin is going to save them with some proof of block chain....whatever...more buzz words....more confusing investors..now dragging in random other coins...let the XC pump and dump continue.

No... I think this is about each coin believe in themselves...

So, you are saying you don't believe in DRK then?

This bet was about XC/DRK nothing to do with BTC. Anyone with half a brain knows that DRK will not have a marketcap higher than BTC in 2 months - you make yourself look like an idiot to even try and make that comparison.

Not a single XC shill was willing to step up to the plate because they all really know its a chop shop hack solution. XC/CACHe/Loljosh coin - what ever the fuck you call it is dead now anyways.

Hey, dude, how many Evans does it take to screw in a lightbulb?

Ps: chop shop hack solution? We have better anon than you guys do lol

You have better anon? lol you must be smoking some serious crack -  at this single point in time, you transfer the ACTUAL coins to someone elses wallet and call it a mixer, no multi-sigs, nothing....XC 1.5 is not even close to a better solution....and dont even bother quoting "BUT BUT BUT in Rev 2".....pfft ill just let the market do its talking.

But but but Evan will fix the fork..

But but.. He won't mess up again..

Lol

So take the bet then??? - ill setup escrow between propulsion and illodin??

What? An evens bet that XC will grow 12x in the next two months?

How about we make it fair, that XC will grow more as a percentage than DRK over the next two months?

Ill bet you 10,000 XC on that.

What so you are saying you dont believe in XC? - right now XC is worthless so a percentage game is stupid. If you believe take up the original bet proposed by propulsion and illodin

I will accept your bet if you accept my bet as well.  Let's setup escrow.

Put up or shut up.

Dude, you're the one who is wrong.

1 XC is worth about $1

1 Dark is worth about $8

Since dark is worth 8x more than XC, then it has a smaller percentage of going up if it does, aka if it hits $16, it only went up 2x.

XC is worthless, so if it went up to even $5, that's 5x.

The original bet makes sense. The one you propose now doesn't, especially since XC can be pumped with a mere 200 btc or so..Dark would take a lot more than that since it has a huge marketcap.

Darkcoin,Pinkcoin, and practically any coin that doesn't have trusted masternodes that are able to steal their users coin > XC

[CryptoGretzky]

Ohhhh dear. Watching the number off hurt DRK fanboys in this thread is hilarious. Must suck being on the losing side. Well... enjoy your fall from stardom. Pretty much all the other anon coins will be way ahead of you in a couple of months, some already are. But you know that.

Enjoy life kids

Your belief is strong. I thank people who believe in XC they've been very good to me... bought all my XC's at 0.004, perhaps you did too?

If you so believe that XC will be way ahead of DRK in a couple of months, let's make a bet that is very very good for you.

In 2 months from this day, if XC has bigger market cap than DRK, I will pay you 1000 XC's. If DRK has bigger market cap, you will pay me 1000 DRK's.

Do you believe?

I'd like to double this bet as well.

Even with every single XC troll coming into the Darkcoin thread to tear it down, no one has taken this bet. That speaks volumes. Offer still stands on my end. I'm sure Illodin hasn't backed down either.

On another note, amazing how quick you guys were today trying to promote XC in the Darkcoin thread.

Good job burning that bridge XC.

If you so believe in DRK, how about in a couple of months, let's make a bet that is very very good for you.

In 2 months from this day, if DRK has bigger market cap than BTC, I will pay you 1000 DRK. If BTC has bigger market cap, you will pay me 1000 BTC.

Do you believe?

When was this ever about BTC/DRK.

XC is dumped now they are trying to save themselves by saying CACHe coin is going to save them with some proof of block chain....whatever...more buzz words....more confusing investors..now dragging in random other coins...let the XC pump and dump continue.

No... I think this is about each coin believe in themselves...

So, you are saying you don't believe in DRK then?

This bet was about XC/DRK nothing to do with BTC. Anyone with half a brain knows that DRK will not have a marketcap higher than BTC in 2 months - you make yourself look like an idiot to even try and make that comparison.

Not a single XC shill was willing to step up to the plate because they all really know its a chop shop hack solution. XC/CACHe/Loljosh coin - what ever the fuck you call it is dead now anyways.

Hey, dude, how many Evans does it take to screw in a lightbulb?

Ps: chop shop hack solution? We have better anon than you guys do lol

You have better anon? lol you must be smoking some serious crack -  at this single point in time, you transfer the ACTUAL coins to someone elses wallet and call it a mixer, no multi-sigs, nothing....XC 1.5 is not even close to a better solution....and dont even bother quoting "BUT BUT BUT in Rev 2".....pfft ill just let the market do its talking.

But but but Evan will fix the fork..

But but.. He won't mess up again..

Lol

So take the bet then??? - ill setup escrow between propulsion and illodin??

What? An evens bet that XC will grow 12x in the next two months?

How about we make it fair, that XC will grow more as a percentage than DRK over the next two months?

Ill bet you 10,000 XC on that.

What so you are saying you dont believe in XC? - right now XC is worthless so a percentage game is stupid. If you believe take up the original bet proposed by propulsion and illodin

I will accept your bet if you accept my bet as well.  Let's setup escrow.

Put up or shut up.

Dude, you're the one who is wrong.

1 XC is worth about $1

1 Dark is worth about $8

Since dark is worth 8x more than XC, then it has a smaller percentage of going up if it does, aka if it hits $16, it only went up 2x.

XC is worthless, so if it went up to even $5, that's 5x.

The original bet makes sense. The one you propose now doesn't, especially since XC can be pumped with a mere 200 btc or so..Dark would take a lot more than that since it has a huge marketcap.

Darkcoin,Pinkcoin, and practically any coin that doesn't have trusted masternodes that are able to steal their users coin > XC

Dude, accept the bet or STFU?

DRK shills throw out some ridiculous unfair bet and now complains about being unfair?

GTFO lol...

If it's only a "mere 200 btc" to pump as you say, then put up 1000 btc and do the bet....

[TsuyokuNaritai]

Dude, accept the bet or STFU?

put up 1000 btc and do the bet....

First the censored thread, then the outraged complaints about even having a non-censored thread, now they won't accept criticism unless it's backed by half a million dollars.

[CryptoGretzky]

Dude, accept the bet or STFU?

put up 1000 btc and do the bet....

First the censored thread, then the outraged complaints about even having a non-censored thread, now they won't accept criticism unless it's backed by half a million dollars.

You guys put out a bet first... So which part of put up or shut up do you not get?

[illodin]

You guys put out a bet first... So which part of put up or shut up do you not get?

The original loudmouth claimed that XC will be ahead of DRK in a couple of months, and that was the bet. Haven't seen anyone claiming DRK being ahead of BTC in such a short time frame, so stop steaming mister.

[almond]

Hey guys, what's this?

Ceci n'est pas une fourchette !

[Mwalshe89]

Ohhhh dear. Watching the number off hurt DRK fanboys in this thread is hilarious. Must suck being on the losing side. Well... enjoy your fall from stardom. Pretty much all the other anon coins will be way ahead of you in a couple of months, some already are. But you know that.

Enjoy life kids

Your belief is strong. I thank people who believe in XC they've been very good to me... bought all my XC's at 0.004, perhaps you did too?

If you so believe that XC will be way ahead of DRK in a couple of months, let's make a bet that is very very good for you.

In 2 months from this day, if XC has bigger market cap than DRK, I will pay you 1000 XC's. If DRK has bigger market cap, you will pay me 1000 DRK's.

Do you believe?

I'd like to double this bet as well.

Even with every single XC troll coming into the Darkcoin thread to tear it down, no one has taken this bet. That speaks volumes. Offer still stands on my end. I'm sure Illodin hasn't backed down either.

On another note, amazing how quick you guys were today trying to promote XC in the Darkcoin thread.

Good job burning that bridge XC.

If you so believe in DRK, how about in a couple of months, let's make a bet that is very very good for you.

In 2 months from this day, if DRK has bigger market cap than BTC, I will pay you 1000 DRK. If BTC has bigger market cap, you will pay me 1000 BTC.

Do you believe?

When was this ever about BTC/DRK.

XC is dumped now they are trying to save themselves by saying CACHe coin is going to save them with some proof of block chain....whatever...more buzz words....more confusing investors..now dragging in random other coins...let the XC pump and dump continue.

No... I think this is about each coin believe in themselves...

So, you are saying you don't believe in DRK then?

This bet was about XC/DRK nothing to do with BTC. Anyone with half a brain knows that DRK will not have a marketcap higher than BTC in 2 months - you make yourself look like an idiot to even try and make that comparison.

Not a single XC shill was willing to step up to the plate because they all really know its a chop shop hack solution. XC/CACHe/Loljosh coin - what ever the fuck you call it is dead now anyways.

Hey, dude, how many Evans does it take to screw in a lightbulb?

Ps: chop shop hack solution? We have better anon than you guys do lol

You have better anon? lol you must be smoking some serious crack -  at this single point in time, you transfer the ACTUAL coins to someone elses wallet and call it a mixer, no multi-sigs, nothing....XC 1.5 is not even close to a better solution....and dont even bother quoting "BUT BUT BUT in Rev 2".....pfft ill just let the market do its talking.

But but but Evan will fix the fork..

But but.. He won't mess up again..

Lol

So take the bet then??? - ill setup escrow between propulsion and illodin??

What? An evens bet that XC will grow 12x in the next two months?

How about we make it fair, that XC will grow more as a percentage than DRK over the next two months?

Ill bet you 10,000 XC on that.

What so you are saying you dont believe in XC? - right now XC is worthless so a percentage game is stupid. If you believe take up the original bet proposed by propulsion and illodin

I will accept your bet if you accept my bet as well.  Let's setup escrow.

Put up or shut up.

Dude, you're the one who is wrong.

1 XC is worth about $1

1 Dark is worth about $8

Since dark is worth 8x more than XC, then it has a smaller percentage of going up if it does, aka if it hits $16, it only went up 2x.

XC is worthless, so if it went up to even $5, that's 5x.

The original bet makes sense. The one you propose now doesn't, especially since XC can be pumped with a mere 200 btc or so..Dark would take a lot more than that since it has a huge marketcap.

Darkcoin,Pinkcoin, and practically any coin that doesn't have trusted masternodes that are able to steal their users coin > XC

You guys know that people can steal coins from DRK aswell? That's why there is a 10 DRK limit?

Lol

I'm gonna love watching all your arguments once Rev 2 is released.

Ps: the original bet makes no sense, it says that XC has to increase by 1200% within the next two months while DRK has to stay still.

My bet still stands. 10000XC that XC will grow more than DRK over the next two months. Meaning its a better investment.

I mean, we do have better Dev's, technology, and plans. The only thing DRK has is media exposure and a Dev who couldn't fix a lightbulb.

[AlexGR]

You guys know that people can steal coins from DRK aswell? That's why there is a 10 DRK limit?

Lol

You are confusing DRK (trustless) with XC (trusted transactions - undoing Satoshi's work). The node of DRK doesn't own your coins. It's the "lawyers office" that signs the agreement that the two parties want to change coins. It only signs the agreement.

The number 10 is used for identical inputs that increase obfuscation. If everyone puts 10 in, how can you know who put what?

http://explorer.darkcoin.io/tx/56b3b95b76995d3e4d3107cf753c8496493010f625fc04d971e9262d74e6a5a5

That's the reason, not because coins can be lost. The plan was to increase denomination pools (10 / 100 / 1000) etc - so the limit would be then 100 or 1000, depending the highest pool. However changes in spec might move away from denomination pools.

I mean, we do have better Dev's, technology, and plans. The only thing DRK has is media exposure and a Dev who couldn't fix a lightbulb.

Trusted transactions = inferior tech. Sorry. Satoshi invented trustless transactions for a reason and XC destroyed trustless transactions and marketed trusted transactions as ...innovation and superior tech.

[illodin]

Ps: the original bet makes no sense, it says that XC has to increase by 1200% within the next two months while DRK has to stay still.

It was you who made the claims of XC being ahead of DRK wasn't it?

My bet still stands. 10000XC that XC will grow more than DRK over the next two months. Meaning its a better investment.

That's a retarded bet. If I win and XC goes to zero I win 10000*nothing lol. How does that bet make any sense?

[Mwalshe89]

Ps: the original bet makes no sense, it says that XC has to increase by 1200% within the next two months while DRK has to stay still.

It was you who made the claims of XC being ahead of DRK wasn't it?

My bet still stands. 10000XC that XC will grow more than DRK over the next two months. Meaning its a better investment.

That's a retarded bet. If I win and XC goes to zero I win 10000*nothing lol. How does that bet make any sense?

Well, it should be. After rev 2 we will have better tech, better Dev's and much better plans for the future.

You guys know that people can steal coins from DRK aswell? That's why there is a 10 DRK limit?

Lol

You are confusing DRK (trustless) with XC (trusted transactions - undoing Satoshi's work). The node of DRK doesn't own your coins. It's the "lawyers office" that signs the agreement that the two parties want to change coins. It only signs the agreement.

The number 10 is used for identical inputs that increase obfuscation. If everyone puts 10 in, how can you know who put what?

http://explorer.darkcoin.io/tx/56b3b95b76995d3e4d3107cf753c8496493010f625fc04d971e9262d74e6a5a5

That's the reason, not because coins can be lost. The plan was to increase denomination pools (10 / 100 / 1000) etc - so the limit would be then 100 or 1000, depending the highest pool. However changes in spec might move away from denomination pools.

I mean, we do have better Dev's, technology, and plans. The only thing DRK has is media exposure and a Dev who couldn't fix a lightbulb.

Trusted transactions = inferior tech. Sorry. Satoshi invented trustless transactions for a reason and XC destroyed trustless transactions and marketed them as ...innovation.

Question. Once rev 2 comes out and XC is trustless, what's your arguments going to be then?

Edit: DRK coins can currently be stolen

https://darkcointalk.org/threads/rc3-hard-fork-on-june-20th.1241/

and supports the hot/cold setup for masternode operators (allowing your money to not be risked at all.).

So, until DRK fixes its fork, all DRK coins transferred through darksend are at risk. That's why the maximum darksend limit is 10, not the bullshit excuse you posted above.

[stealth923]

Ps: the original bet makes no sense, it says that XC has to increase by 1200% within the next two months while DRK has to stay still.

It was you who made the claims of XC being ahead of DRK wasn't it?

My bet still stands. 10000XC that XC will grow more than DRK over the next two months. Meaning its a better investment.

That's a retarded bet. If I win and XC goes to zero I win 10000*nothing lol. How does that bet make any sense?

Well, it should be. After rev 2 we will have better tech, better Dev's and much better plans for the future.

You guys know that people can steal coins from DRK aswell? That's why there is a 10 DRK limit?

Lol

You are confusing DRK (trustless) with XC (trusted transactions - undoing Satoshi's work). The node of DRK doesn't own your coins. It's the "lawyers office" that signs the agreement that the two parties want to change coins. It only signs the agreement.

The number 10 is used for identical inputs that increase obfuscation. If everyone puts 10 in, how can you know who put what?

http://explorer.darkcoin.io/tx/56b3b95b76995d3e4d3107cf753c8496493010f625fc04d971e9262d74e6a5a5

That's the reason, not because coins can be lost. The plan was to increase denomination pools (10 / 100 / 1000) etc - so the limit would be then 100 or 1000, depending the highest pool. However changes in spec might move away from denomination pools.

I mean, we do have better Dev's, technology, and plans. The only thing DRK has is media exposure and a Dev who couldn't fix a lightbulb.

Trusted transactions = inferior tech. Sorry. Satoshi invented trustless transactions for a reason and XC destroyed trustless transactions and marketed them as ...innovation.

Question. Once rev 2 comes out and XC is trustless, what's your arguments going to be then?

Edit: DRK coins can currently be stolen

https://darkcointalk.org/threads/rc3-hard-fork-on-june-20th.1241/

and supports the hot/cold setup for masternode operators (allowing your money to not be risked at all.).

So, until DRK fixes its fork, all DRK coins transferred through darksend are at risk. That's why the maximum darksend limit is 10, not the bullshit excuse you posted above.

LOL im crying laughing at how stupid this guy is.....hahahaha - now i definitely know you have no idea of the relation between darksend and masternodes.

[Mwalshe89]

Ps: the original bet makes no sense, it says that XC has to increase by 1200% within the next two months while DRK has to stay still.

It was you who made the claims of XC being ahead of DRK wasn't it?

My bet still stands. 10000XC that XC will grow more than DRK over the next two months. Meaning its a better investment.

That's a retarded bet. If I win and XC goes to zero I win 10000*nothing lol. How does that bet make any sense?

Well, it should be. After rev 2 we will have better tech, better Dev's and much better plans for the future.

You guys know that people can steal coins from DRK aswell? That's why there is a 10 DRK limit?

Lol

You are confusing DRK (trustless) with XC (trusted transactions - undoing Satoshi's work). The node of DRK doesn't own your coins. It's the "lawyers office" that signs the agreement that the two parties want to change coins. It only signs the agreement.

The number 10 is used for identical inputs that increase obfuscation. If everyone puts 10 in, how can you know who put what?

http://explorer.darkcoin.io/tx/56b3b95b76995d3e4d3107cf753c8496493010f625fc04d971e9262d74e6a5a5

That's the reason, not because coins can be lost. The plan was to increase denomination pools (10 / 100 / 1000) etc - so the limit would be then 100 or 1000, depending the highest pool. However changes in spec might move away from denomination pools.

I mean, we do have better Dev's, technology, and plans. The only thing DRK has is media exposure and a Dev who couldn't fix a lightbulb.

Trusted transactions = inferior tech. Sorry. Satoshi invented trustless transactions for a reason and XC destroyed trustless transactions and marketed them as ...innovation.

Question. Once rev 2 comes out and XC is trustless, what's your arguments going to be then?

Edit: DRK coins can currently be stolen

https://darkcointalk.org/threads/rc3-hard-fork-on-june-20th.1241/

and supports the hot/cold setup for masternode operators (allowing your money to not be risked at all.).

So, until DRK fixes its fork, all DRK coins transferred through darksend are at risk. That's why the maximum darksend limit is 10, not the bullshit excuse you posted above.

LOL im crying laughing at how stupid this guy is.....hahahaha

I'm crying laughing at watching how blind you are to the obvious

I mean, there are shills, and then there are you guys.

I'm counting down the minutes until Rev 2 is released and I can ask you guys to name a single advantage DRK has over XC, while ill be able to name quite a few in the opposite direction.

Should be fun.

[stealth923]

Ps: the original bet makes no sense, it says that XC has to increase by 1200% within the next two months while DRK has to stay still.

It was you who made the claims of XC being ahead of DRK wasn't it?

My bet still stands. 10000XC that XC will grow more than DRK over the next two months. Meaning its a better investment.

That's a retarded bet. If I win and XC goes to zero I win 10000*nothing lol. How does that bet make any sense?

Well, it should be. After rev 2 we will have better tech, better Dev's and much better plans for the future.

You guys know that people can steal coins from DRK aswell? That's why there is a 10 DRK limit?

Lol

You are confusing DRK (trustless) with XC (trusted transactions - undoing Satoshi's work). The node of DRK doesn't own your coins. It's the "lawyers office" that signs the agreement that the two parties want to change coins. It only signs the agreement.

The number 10 is used for identical inputs that increase obfuscation. If everyone puts 10 in, how can you know who put what?

http://explorer.darkcoin.io/tx/56b3b95b76995d3e4d3107cf753c8496493010f625fc04d971e9262d74e6a5a5

That's the reason, not because coins can be lost. The plan was to increase denomination pools (10 / 100 / 1000) etc - so the limit would be then 100 or 1000, depending the highest pool. However changes in spec might move away from denomination pools.

I mean, we do have better Dev's, technology, and plans. The only thing DRK has is media exposure and a Dev who couldn't fix a lightbulb.

Trusted transactions = inferior tech. Sorry. Satoshi invented trustless transactions for a reason and XC destroyed trustless transactions and marketed them as ...innovation.

Question. Once rev 2 comes out and XC is trustless, what's your arguments going to be then?

Edit: DRK coins can currently be stolen

https://darkcointalk.org/threads/rc3-hard-fork-on-june-20th.1241/

and supports the hot/cold setup for masternode operators (allowing your money to not be risked at all.).

So, until DRK fixes its fork, all DRK coins transferred through darksend are at risk. That's why the maximum darksend limit is 10, not the bullshit excuse you posted above.

LOL im crying laughing at how stupid this guy is.....hahahaha

I'm crying laughing at watching how blind you are to the obvious

I mean, there are shills, and then there are you guys.

I'm counting down the minutes until Rev 2 is released and I can ask you guys to name a single advantage DRK has over XC, while ill be able to name quite a few in the opposite direction.

Should be fun.

What you dont realise is we are just having fun with you - no one cares about XCacheJosh Coin anymore...you can release anything you want, it will just be tumbleweeds, all thats left are a few core shills who are holding on tight to the grave. And you are one of them

[Mwalshe89]

Ps: the original bet makes no sense, it says that XC has to increase by 1200% within the next two months while DRK has to stay still.

It was you who made the claims of XC being ahead of DRK wasn't it?

My bet still stands. 10000XC that XC will grow more than DRK over the next two months. Meaning its a better investment.

That's a retarded bet. If I win and XC goes to zero I win 10000*nothing lol. How does that bet make any sense?

Well, it should be. After rev 2 we will have better tech, better Dev's and much better plans for the future.

You guys know that people can steal coins from DRK aswell? That's why there is a 10 DRK limit?

Lol

You are confusing DRK (trustless) with XC (trusted transactions - undoing Satoshi's work). The node of DRK doesn't own your coins. It's the "lawyers office" that signs the agreement that the two parties want to change coins. It only signs the agreement.

The number 10 is used for identical inputs that increase obfuscation. If everyone puts 10 in, how can you know who put what?

http://explorer.darkcoin.io/tx/56b3b95b76995d3e4d3107cf753c8496493010f625fc04d971e9262d74e6a5a5

That's the reason, not because coins can be lost. The plan was to increase denomination pools (10 / 100 / 1000) etc - so the limit would be then 100 or 1000, depending the highest pool. However changes in spec might move away from denomination pools.

I mean, we do have better Dev's, technology, and plans. The only thing DRK has is media exposure and a Dev who couldn't fix a lightbulb.

Trusted transactions = inferior tech. Sorry. Satoshi invented trustless transactions for a reason and XC destroyed trustless transactions and marketed them as ...innovation.

Question. Once rev 2 comes out and XC is trustless, what's your arguments going to be then?

Edit: DRK coins can currently be stolen

https://darkcointalk.org/threads/rc3-hard-fork-on-june-20th.1241/

and supports the hot/cold setup for masternode operators (allowing your money to not be risked at all.).

So, until DRK fixes its fork, all DRK coins transferred through darksend are at risk. That's why the maximum darksend limit is 10, not the bullshit excuse you posted above.

LOL im crying laughing at how stupid this guy is.....hahahaha

I'm crying laughing at watching how blind you are to the obvious

I mean, there are shills, and then there are you guys.

I'm counting down the minutes until Rev 2 is released and I can ask you guys to name a single advantage DRK has over XC, while ill be able to name quite a few in the opposite direction.

Should be fun.

What you dont realise is we are just having fun with you - no one cares about XCacheJosh Coin anymore...you can release anything you want, it will just be tumbleweeds, all thats left are a few core shills who are holding on tight to the grave. And you are one of them

Lol. Brush off the obvious.

Ill ask again, once rev 2 is released, and XC has better technology across the board, has a better Dev, and has much bigger plans for the future, and a team that can back it up.

What will DRK have apart from first movers advantage?

You don't think XCs price will spike like DRKs did when people realise there is a MUCH better alternative?

Seriously. This is like saying google was a small company that would go nowhere while holding yahoo shares.

Also, DRKs position isn't set in cement, the altcoins market is constantly changing, if you think all because it did anonymous first DRK will still be around in two years then your blinder than Steve wonder

[stealth923]

Ps: the original bet makes no sense, it says that XC has to increase by 1200% within the next two months while DRK has to stay still.

It was you who made the claims of XC being ahead of DRK wasn't it?

My bet still stands. 10000XC that XC will grow more than DRK over the next two months. Meaning its a better investment.

That's a retarded bet. If I win and XC goes to zero I win 10000*nothing lol. How does that bet make any sense?

Well, it should be. After rev 2 we will have better tech, better Dev's and much better plans for the future.

You guys know that people can steal coins from DRK aswell? That's why there is a 10 DRK limit?

Lol

You are confusing DRK (trustless) with XC (trusted transactions - undoing Satoshi's work). The node of DRK doesn't own your coins. It's the "lawyers office" that signs the agreement that the two parties want to change coins. It only signs the agreement.

The number 10 is used for identical inputs that increase obfuscation. If everyone puts 10 in, how can you know who put what?

http://explorer.darkcoin.io/tx/56b3b95b76995d3e4d3107cf753c8496493010f625fc04d971e9262d74e6a5a5

That's the reason, not because coins can be lost. The plan was to increase denomination pools (10 / 100 / 1000) etc - so the limit would be then 100 or 1000, depending the highest pool. However changes in spec might move away from denomination pools.

I mean, we do have better Dev's, technology, and plans. The only thing DRK has is media exposure and a Dev who couldn't fix a lightbulb.

Trusted transactions = inferior tech. Sorry. Satoshi invented trustless transactions for a reason and XC destroyed trustless transactions and marketed them as ...innovation.

Question. Once rev 2 comes out and XC is trustless, what's your arguments going to be then?

Edit: DRK coins can currently be stolen

https://darkcointalk.org/threads/rc3-hard-fork-on-june-20th.1241/

and supports the hot/cold setup for masternode operators (allowing your money to not be risked at all.).

So, until DRK fixes its fork, all DRK coins transferred through darksend are at risk. That's why the maximum darksend limit is 10, not the bullshit excuse you posted above.

LOL im crying laughing at how stupid this guy is.....hahahaha

I'm crying laughing at watching how blind you are to the obvious

I mean, there are shills, and then there are you guys.

I'm counting down the minutes until Rev 2 is released and I can ask you guys to name a single advantage DRK has over XC, while ill be able to name quite a few in the opposite direction.

Should be fun.

What you dont realise is we are just having fun with you - no one cares about XCacheJosh Coin anymore...you can release anything you want, it will just be tumbleweeds, all thats left are a few core shills who are holding on tight to the grave. And you are one of them

Lol. Brush off the obvious.

Ill ask again, once rev 2 is released, and XC has better technology across the board, has a better Dev, and has much bigger plans for the future, and a team that can back it up.

What will DRK have apart from first movers advantage?

You don't think XCs price will spike like DRKs did when people realise there is a MUCH better alternative?

Seriously. This is like saying google was a small company that would go nowhere while holding yahoo shares.

Also, DRKs position isn't set in cement, the altcoins market is constantly changing, if you think all because it did anonymous first it's going to still be around in two years then your blinder than Steve wonder

So narrow minded - you can keep your technology that you "hope" will be superior. Monero has better anonymity, look how far its gotten, not far. Why - because it doesnt have the whole package. Technology is a small piece of the pie.

XC's reputation is a pump & dump and thats where it will stay, the market confirms this. The damage it has done to investors by confusing everyone with XCache and how the Dev did not address the FUD around loljosh has put the nail in the coffin. Let alone you claim it to be 100% anonymous by offering 1btc reward for a few hours and claim its uncrackable. No one takes the coin seriously. Chaeplin proved a hard-link and the dev just brushed it aside - good way for an investor to feel comfortable.

Not to mention the copy paste from Fedora, and how the dev cannot use github, do you think investors are stupid. They would take one look and know its another copy/clone CINNI/CLOAK/RAZR basket. Dont fool yourself! Denial is a bitch.

[Mwalshe89]

So narrow minded - you can keep your technology that you "hope" will be superior. Monero has better anonymity, look how far its gotten, not far. Why - because it doesnt have the whole package. Technology is a small piece of the pie.

Wrong. Monero hasn't taken off because it still currently still in alpha testing and has a fundamental flaw with blockchain bloating. Until they fix this it has no long term future

XC's reputation is a pump & dump and thats where it will stay, the market confirms this. The damage it has done to investors by confusing everyone with XCache and how the Dev did not address the FUD around loljosh has put the nail in the coffin. Let alone you claim it to be 100% anonymous by offering 1btc reward for a few hours and claim its uncrackable. No one takes the coin seriously. Chaeplin proved a hard-link and the dev just brushed it aside - good way for an investor to feel comfortable.

Firstly, if we assume Chaeplin actually proved a hard link, which is highly debatable, Chaeplin said after Rev 2 his method would not be possible.

Chaeplin also said that the method he used is allot more easy to exploit in DRK, and wouldn't even be covered until RC4.

Not to mention the copy paste from Fedora, and how the dev cannot use github, do you think investors are stupid. They would take one look and know its another copy/clone CINNI/CLOAK/RAZR basket. Dont fool yourself! Denial is a bitch.

This was proven as baseless FUD when the peer review was done by a number of high profile members of the community who have no attachment to XC.



So, there's all those pretty poor arguments out the window. Anymore?

As far as I can see, it's you guys in denial.

Ill ask again, how long do you think DRK can stay as a market leader once Rev 2 is released and its competitor has MUCH better technology across the board, a MUCH better Dev, and MUCH better plans for the future?

[illodin]

After rev 2 we will have better tech, better Dev's and much better plans for the future.

Ill ask again, how long do you think DRK can stay as a market leader once Rev 2 is released and its competitor has MUCH better technology across the board, a MUCH better Dev, and MUCH better plans for the future?

"MUCH better" is highly debatable imo, when you consider the following timeline:

- XC thought that transferring the actual coins to xnodes was a good idea
- when the trust issue was repeatedly pointed out, it was decided that a "dynamic trust model" would be implemented to fix the issue
- when the flaws in that model were pointed out, it was decided that it's better to follow what DRK did, and implement multisigs so the nodes couldn't steal the coins

It looks to me like XC is following DRK's lead and not the other way around. This can be 100% confirmed after XC announces plans to add collateral.

[illodin]

Ps: the original bet makes no sense, it says that XC has to increase by 1200% within the next two months while DRK has to stay still.

My bet still stands. 10000XC that XC will grow more than DRK over the next two months. Meaning its a better investment.

That's a retarded bet. If I win and XC goes to zero I win 10000*nothing lol. How does that bet make any sense?

[Mwalshe89]

After rev 2 we will have better tech, better Dev's and much better plans for the future.

Ill ask again, how long do you think DRK can stay as a market leader once Rev 2 is released and its competitor has MUCH better technology across the board, a MUCH better Dev, and MUCH better plans for the future?

"MUCH better" is highly debatable imo, when you consider the following timeline:

- XC thought that transferring the actual coins to xnodes was a good idea
- when the trust issue was repeatedly pointed out, it was decided that a "dynamic trust model" would be implemented to fix the issue
- when the flaws in that model were pointed out, it was decided that it's better to follow what DRK did, and implement multisigs so the nodes couldn't steal the coins

It looks to me like XC is following DRK's lead and not the other way around. This can be 100% confirmed after XC announces plans to add collateral.

I donno. I don't see DRK racing to implement anonymous messaging, staking mobile wallet APPs or PoBC.

And those are just the features that have been leaked.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=575013.0