|
HardwarePal
|
 |
June 18, 2014, 09:31:21 AM |
|
Thanks edited previous post sorry Wolf
|
|
|
|
|
|
azhago
|
|
June 18, 2014, 05:28:30 PM |
|
mining with this miner on minergate doesn't work (not on merge mining of course)
|
|
|
|
|
bitspender
|
|
June 18, 2014, 05:50:51 PM |
|
I have this miner running on multiple servers.
However, i have one server (exatcly the same) that does NOT show any threads or hashes.
Any idea how comes?
|
|
|
|
|
|
AceCobra1
|
|
June 18, 2014, 06:11:06 PM |
|
Just a quick check and I am getting roughly 220 KH/s with my QA82 ES Xeon processor with 12 GB of RAM... would more RAM make any difference?
|
|
|
|
|
|
bitspender
|
|
June 18, 2014, 06:40:26 PM |
|
Another question, i'm running multiple VPS.
When i use on Ubuntu, i get around 100 H/s
On the same hardware, but running windows image, i get 280 ??
|
|
|
|
|
|
Alpinist
|
|
June 18, 2014, 07:37:46 PM |
|
Can I run this miner to merge mine on Minergate?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Alpinist
|
|
June 18, 2014, 09:23:06 PM |
|
What .bat should I write to merge mine on MinerGate?
Did somebody do that?
|
|
|
|
|
|
AceCobra1
|
|
June 18, 2014, 09:43:43 PM |
|
Just a quick check and I am getting roughly 220 KH/s with my QA82 ES Xeon processor with 12 GB of RAM... would more RAM make any difference?
No, but try a different number of threads. Can I run this miner to merge mine on Minergate?
Yes. Another question, i'm running multiple VPS.
When i use on Ubuntu, i get around 100 H/s
On the same hardware, but running windows image, i get 280 ??
You're probably forgetting hugepages. Mining with 9 threads for some reason produces 284 hash compared to say 16.... why would that be the case? Take it hyperthreading makes no difference? Also, in your front page, you said the Amazon EC2 manages 1.2KH/s.... which CPUs would those be ?!?! |
|
|
|
|
|
AceCobra1
|
|
June 18, 2014, 09:55:30 PM |
|
Just a quick check and I am getting roughly 220 KH/s with my QA82 ES Xeon processor with 12 GB of RAM... would more RAM make any difference?
No, but try a different number of threads. Can I run this miner to merge mine on Minergate?
Yes. Another question, i'm running multiple VPS.
When i use on Ubuntu, i get around 100 H/s
On the same hardware, but running windows image, i get 280 ??
You're probably forgetting hugepages. Mining with 9 threads for some reason produces 284 hash compared to say 16.... why would that be the case? Take it hyperthreading makes no difference? Also, in your front page, you said the Amazon EC2 manages 1.2KH/s.... which CPUs would those be ?!?! Hyperthreading is pretty much useless here. Yep, and those are dual Xeons that cost $6500+ each. Crazy - Any ideas what type of speed I should be expecting from the E5 2650 ES ? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
bitspender
|
|
June 19, 2014, 07:31:10 AM |
|
Just a quick check and I am getting roughly 220 KH/s with my QA82 ES Xeon processor with 12 GB of RAM... would more RAM make any difference?
No, but try a different number of threads. Can I run this miner to merge mine on Minergate?
Yes. Another question, i'm running multiple VPS.
When i use on Ubuntu, i get around 100 H/s
On the same hardware, but running windows image, i get 280 ??
You're probably forgetting hugepages. You mean?? |
|
|
|
|
|
bitspender
|
|
June 19, 2014, 07:36:42 AM |
|
Look, all the same builds, all the same servers. Yet huge difference in hashrate??  |
|
|
|
|
|
bitspender
|
|
June 19, 2014, 07:41:01 AM |
|
Look, all the same builds, all the same servers. Yet huge difference in hashrate?? I asked if you followed the instructions for hugepage setup on linux - you haven't given me a reply. Yes i did follow those instructions |
|
|
|
|
|
bitspender
|
|
June 19, 2014, 07:52:33 AM |
|
Allright thank you for the reply.
I'll see what i can do, sometimes rebuilding with other CFLAGS seems to help, so i'll search what suits the best
|
|
|
|
|
|
AceCobra1
|
|
June 19, 2014, 12:13:55 PM |
|
Is this bat file about right or is it too simple:
minerd -a cryptonight -o stratum+tcp://monero.crypto-pool.fr:6666 -u ADDRESS -p x -t 8
Are there any furthur codes I can put in to get any extra performance? I am only hashing around 250 - 280 on a E5-2650 ES QA82 which I thought is rather disappointing considering one of the guys on here is hashing over 400 on a E3-1230!
|
|
|
|
|
|
equipoise
|
|
June 19, 2014, 12:17:46 PM |
|
^It seems the Wolf's miner is faster on linux.
|
|
|
|
xxnirvana69xx
Newbie
 Offline
Activity: 52
Merit: 0
|
|
June 19, 2014, 01:53:17 PM |
|
^It seems the Wolf's miner is faster on linux.
Yep! Went from 305H/s on Win7x64 to 440H/s on Ubuntu64. |
|
|
|
|
|
AceCobra1
|
|
June 19, 2014, 02:27:32 PM |
|
^It seems the Wolf's miner is faster on linux.
Yep! Went from 305H/s on Win7x64 to 440H/s on Ubuntu64. Just looking at youtube videos on how to install Ubuntu - is it complicated to run the software on it or is it just like windows? Whats GPU mining like on it? Is it more stable etc. ? |
|
|
|
|
|
pepi
|
|
June 19, 2014, 02:39:43 PM |
|
^It seems the Wolf's miner is faster on linux.
Yep! Went from 305H/s on Win7x64 to 440H/s on Ubuntu64. Just looking at youtube videos on how to install Ubuntu - is it complicated to run the software on it or is it just like windows? Whats GPU mining like on it? Is it more stable etc. ? There is no GPU mining under Linux for XMR/BCN/MNT |
|
|
|
|
|
tc61
|
|
June 20, 2014, 02:30:40 AM |
|
When writing the batch file to start the miner, how do you specify the number of core, like if I wanted to only use 2.
Thx
|
|
|
|
|
|
