Bitcoin Forum
July 17, 2018, 04:30:45 PM *
News: Latest stable version of Bitcoin Core: 0.16.1  [Torrent]. (New!)
 
   Home   Help Search Donate Login Register  
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 [8] 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 »
  Print  
Author Topic: Wolf's XMR/BCN/DSH CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014  (Read 543695 times)
xxnirvana69xx
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 52
Merit: 0


View Profile
June 10, 2014, 07:41:40 PM
 #141

Linux:



VS


Windows:


Thanks for not helping ;-)
The World's Betting Exchange

Bet with play money. Win real Bitcoin. 5BTC Prize Fund for World Cup 2018.

Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
1531845045
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1531845045

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1531845045
Reply with quote  #2

1531845045
Report to moderator
Wolf0
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1834
Merit: 1002


Miner Developer


View Profile
June 10, 2014, 08:07:13 PM
 #142

Linux:



VS


Windows:


Thanks for not helping ;-)

No, seriously - he's not joking. Linux gives WAY faster speeds, but it can't be virtualized - it has to be native.

Code:
Donations: BTC: 1WoLFdwcfNEg64fTYsX1P25KUzzSjtEZC -- XMR: 45SLUTzk7UXYHmzJ7bFN6FPfzTusdUVAZjPRgmEDw7G3SeimWM2kCdnDQXwDBYGUWaBtZNgjYtEYA22aMQT4t8KfU3vHLHG
xxnirvana69xx
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 52
Merit: 0


View Profile
June 10, 2014, 08:10:06 PM
 #143

Well I was just curious in an actual speed difference. I don't want to install Ubuntu tonight for a 50h/s increase.
Wolf0
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1834
Merit: 1002


Miner Developer


View Profile
June 10, 2014, 08:16:02 PM
 #144

Well I was just curious in an actual speed difference. I don't want to install Ubuntu tonight for a 50h/s increase.

We're talking up to 40% - 50%.

Code:
Donations: BTC: 1WoLFdwcfNEg64fTYsX1P25KUzzSjtEZC -- XMR: 45SLUTzk7UXYHmzJ7bFN6FPfzTusdUVAZjPRgmEDw7G3SeimWM2kCdnDQXwDBYGUWaBtZNgjYtEYA22aMQT4t8KfU3vHLHG
DooLocsta
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 10
Merit: 0


View Profile
June 10, 2014, 08:33:24 PM
 #145

How can I make sure I am getting the AES-NI configured correct in Windows?  This is currently all I have access to but as soon as I start the miner I see it detects a new block then crashes.  Thanks.
Wolf0
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1834
Merit: 1002


Miner Developer


View Profile
June 10, 2014, 08:35:27 PM
 #146

How can I make sure I am getting the AES-NI configured correct in Windows?  This is currently all I have access to but as soon as I start the miner I see it detects a new block then crashes.  Thanks.

There's no configuration - if it crashes, your CPU doesn't have it.

Code:
Donations: BTC: 1WoLFdwcfNEg64fTYsX1P25KUzzSjtEZC -- XMR: 45SLUTzk7UXYHmzJ7bFN6FPfzTusdUVAZjPRgmEDw7G3SeimWM2kCdnDQXwDBYGUWaBtZNgjYtEYA22aMQT4t8KfU3vHLHG
c18machine
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 59
Merit: 0


View Profile
June 10, 2014, 08:36:47 PM
 #147

Wolf u must be getting paid by xmr team, why dont you just release an wild keccak miner?

yes, cryptonight is not only XMR/MRO as your topic title suggests
smooth
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1834
Merit: 1047



View Profile
June 10, 2014, 08:43:00 PM
 #148

Wolf u must be getting paid by xmr team, why dont you just release an wild keccak miner?

He's not getting paid by XMR as far as I know.

Perhaps he just isn't interested in putting a lot of work into WK because WK is a tiny little niche thing that hasn't gotten much traction yet.

c18machine
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 59
Merit: 0


View Profile
June 10, 2014, 08:49:54 PM
 #149

Wolf u must be getting paid by xmr team, why dont you just release an wild keccak miner?

He's not getting paid by XMR as far as I know.

Perhaps he just isn't interested in putting a lot of work into WK because WK is a tiny little niche thing that hasn't gotten much traction yet.



as far as u know right, cause cryptonote is anonymous.
Wolf0
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1834
Merit: 1002


Miner Developer


View Profile
June 10, 2014, 10:52:25 PM
 #150

Wolf u must be getting paid by xmr team, why dont you just release an wild keccak miner?

yes, cryptonight is not only XMR/MRO as your topic title suggests

I'm not getting paid by the XMR team, and I'm not really interested in optimizing BBR's butchered version of keccak. Besides, it's written in C++; I hate it and it hates me.

Code:
Donations: BTC: 1WoLFdwcfNEg64fTYsX1P25KUzzSjtEZC -- XMR: 45SLUTzk7UXYHmzJ7bFN6FPfzTusdUVAZjPRgmEDw7G3SeimWM2kCdnDQXwDBYGUWaBtZNgjYtEYA22aMQT4t8KfU3vHLHG
c18machine
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 59
Merit: 0


View Profile
June 10, 2014, 10:57:24 PM
 #151

Wolf u must be getting paid by xmr team, why dont you just release an wild keccak miner?

yes, cryptonight is not only XMR/MRO as your topic title suggests

I'm not getting paid by the XMR team, and I'm not really interested in optimizing BBR's butchered version of keccak. Besides, it's written in C++; I hate it and it hates me.

ofc you rather get a cheap imitation get known.
Wolf0
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1834
Merit: 1002


Miner Developer


View Profile
June 10, 2014, 11:09:39 PM
 #152

Wolf u must be getting paid by xmr team, why dont you just release an wild keccak miner?

yes, cryptonight is not only XMR/MRO as your topic title suggests

I'm not getting paid by the XMR team, and I'm not really interested in optimizing BBR's butchered version of keccak. Besides, it's written in C++; I hate it and it hates me.

ofc you rather get a cheap imitation get known.

Last I checked, BBR is the cheap imitation - BCN is the original, and my miner works with it.

Code:
Donations: BTC: 1WoLFdwcfNEg64fTYsX1P25KUzzSjtEZC -- XMR: 45SLUTzk7UXYHmzJ7bFN6FPfzTusdUVAZjPRgmEDw7G3SeimWM2kCdnDQXwDBYGUWaBtZNgjYtEYA22aMQT4t8KfU3vHLHG
c18machine
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 59
Merit: 0


View Profile
June 10, 2014, 11:13:41 PM
 #153

Just wait for the news.

and maybe thats why BBR has the same algo   Shocked
Wolf0
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1834
Merit: 1002


Miner Developer


View Profile
June 10, 2014, 11:51:02 PM
 #154

Just wait for the news.

and maybe thats why BBR has the same algo   Shocked

BBR uses wild keccak - BCN and XMR use CryptoNight.

Code:
Donations: BTC: 1WoLFdwcfNEg64fTYsX1P25KUzzSjtEZC -- XMR: 45SLUTzk7UXYHmzJ7bFN6FPfzTusdUVAZjPRgmEDw7G3SeimWM2kCdnDQXwDBYGUWaBtZNgjYtEYA22aMQT4t8KfU3vHLHG
c18machine
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 59
Merit: 0


View Profile
June 10, 2014, 11:54:20 PM
 #155

Just wait for the news.

and maybe thats why BBR has the same algo   Shocked

BBR uses wild keccak - BCN and XMR use CryptoNight.

oh wait, u didnt even notice i was being sarcastic.
Wolf0
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1834
Merit: 1002


Miner Developer


View Profile
June 11, 2014, 12:30:31 AM
 #156

Just wait for the news.

and maybe thats why BBR has the same algo   Shocked

BBR uses wild keccak - BCN and XMR use CryptoNight.

oh wait, u didnt even notice i was being sarcastic.

Doesn't come through very well in text.

Code:
Donations: BTC: 1WoLFdwcfNEg64fTYsX1P25KUzzSjtEZC -- XMR: 45SLUTzk7UXYHmzJ7bFN6FPfzTusdUVAZjPRgmEDw7G3SeimWM2kCdnDQXwDBYGUWaBtZNgjYtEYA22aMQT4t8KfU3vHLHG
marada
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 441
Merit: 250


View Profile
June 11, 2014, 03:20:14 AM
 #157

I am attempting to compile this miner at two linux distros and have no luck. Need an advice.
Mint 13 + gcc 4.8 + libboost 1.55 and Mint 17

At Mint 13 I had to install additionaly autoconf 2.69 (stock is 2.68).

I changed also the line #3308 of configure file by removing -V and -qversion and leaving just --version as gcc didn't support it.

The miner seems to compile but doesn't work at all.
Even the benchmark needs URL and the miner is just quiet if I try to use at the pool. CPU is half-loaded.

Code:
./minerd -a cryptonight --benchmark
[2014-06-11 05:10:37] I go faster as root.
[2014-06-11 05:10:37] Using JSON-RPC 2.0
[2014-06-11 05:10:37] 5 miner threads started, using 'cryptonight' algorithm.
[2014-06-11 05:10:37] HTTP request failed: No URL set!
[2014-06-11 05:10:37] ...retry after 10 seconds

I have found numerous errors in config.log

At Mint 17 the resoult is very similar.

https://www.dropbox.com/s/c5870shk2xaeglr/config.log
Wolf0
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1834
Merit: 1002


Miner Developer


View Profile
June 11, 2014, 03:21:42 AM
 #158

I am attempting to compile this miner at two linux distros and have no luck. Need an advice.
Mint 13 + gcc 4.8 + libboost 1.55 and Mint 17

At Mint 13 I had to install additionaly autoconf 2.69 (stock 2.68).

I changed also the line #3308 of configure file by removing -V and -qversion and leaving just --version as gcc didn't support it.

The miner seems to compile but doesn't work at all.
Even the benchmark needs URL and the miner is just quied if I try to use at the pool. CPU is half-loaded.

Code:
./minerd -a cryptonight --benchmark
[2014-06-11 05:10:37] I go faster as root.
[2014-06-11 05:10:37] Using JSON-RPC 2.0
[2014-06-11 05:10:37] 5 miner threads started, using 'cryptonight' algorithm.
[2014-06-11 05:10:37] HTTP request failed: No URL set!
[2014-06-11 05:10:37] ...retry after 10 seconds

I have found numerous errors in config.log

At Mint 17 the resoult is very similar.

https://www.dropbox.com/s/c5870shk2xaeglr/config.log

You apparently didn't read the OP. Run it at the pool and wait - no more per-thread output. You will see hashrate when you find a share. Try stratum+tcp://mro.extremepool.org:5555 - they have a low share diff.

Code:
Donations: BTC: 1WoLFdwcfNEg64fTYsX1P25KUzzSjtEZC -- XMR: 45SLUTzk7UXYHmzJ7bFN6FPfzTusdUVAZjPRgmEDw7G3SeimWM2kCdnDQXwDBYGUWaBtZNgjYtEYA22aMQT4t8KfU3vHLHG
marada
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 441
Merit: 250


View Profile
June 11, 2014, 03:24:38 AM
 #159

The CPU is not really loaded, quite unusual.

After a time and vm.nr_hugepages I realized it is working. May I need to work out a better CPU utilization.
xxnirvana69xx
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 52
Merit: 0


View Profile
June 11, 2014, 05:13:12 AM
 #160

Well I was just curious in an actual speed difference. I don't want to install Ubuntu tonight for a 50h/s increase.

We're talking up to 40% - 50%.

Spent forever trying to get gcc sorted out and it looks like i was doing better in windows...

[2014-06-11 01:11:52] accepted: 2/2 (100.00%), 283.70 H/s at diff 25000.1 (yay!!!)
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 [8] 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!