Bitcoin Forum
October 20, 2018, 07:53:21 AM *
News: Make sure you are not using versions of Bitcoin Core other than 0.17.0 [Torrent], 0.16.3, 0.15.2, or 0.14.3. More info.
 
   Home   Help Search Donate Login Register  
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 »
  Print  
Author Topic: Wolf's XMR/BCN/DSH CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014  (Read 545491 times)
Litrbooh
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 252
Merit: 10


View Profile
June 09, 2014, 07:31:16 PM
 #81

Wolf0
Why i have with cpuminer-multi-wolf-06-09-2014 on i7-3770 only 130-150h/s, but with cpuminer-multi-wolf-05-29-2014 - 200h\s?
What could be the problem?

Win7 64bit
1540022001
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1540022001

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1540022001
Reply with quote  #2

1540022001
Report to moderator
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
1540022001
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1540022001

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1540022001
Reply with quote  #2

1540022001
Report to moderator
raperinoa
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 168
Merit: 0


View Profile
June 09, 2014, 10:11:37 PM
 #82

hi wolfie, ty so much for your miner Grin and flurry! nor fury  Cheesy

im testing with i74702MQ and yeah prolly drop -5% or zero different than 5-30-2014 Cry
xxnirvana69xx
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 52
Merit: 0


View Profile
June 10, 2014, 12:27:46 AM
 #83

All of my tests were done on an AMD FX-8320 @ 4.2GHz, 8GB 1833, Win7x64, ran @ -t 7. The average is from when lightly using the computer as normal and the peak, where it spends most of its time, when left alone. Now if only I can figure out how to compile it on windows myself lol.

5/29
   Peak – 322
   Average – 270
5/30
   Peak – 312
   Average – 265
Experimental
   Peak – 328
   Average – 275
6/8
   Peak – 331
   Average – 315
Agamemnus
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 270
Merit: 100



View Profile
June 10, 2014, 01:59:47 AM
 #84

I'd give all kinds of naughty favours for win64 binaries. With AES preferred for i7-4930k Wink Wink *nudge* *nudge*

I'll compile them soon.

I tried out the 9th of June on Win 7 64-bit and it gives a 3-4% reduction on an i5-2500k but maybe a 1% increase on an i7-4930k.

Can hugepages even be done on Windows?

drmavis
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 69
Merit: 10


View Profile
June 10, 2014, 02:05:00 AM
 #85

Yeah hugepages can be done - the YAM miners by yvg1900 (for MMC, PTS, etc.) use hugepages and are the fastest CPU miners for the coins it mines.
obobob
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 38
Merit: 0


View Profile
June 10, 2014, 03:25:14 AM
 #86

I'm using GCC 4.8.2 and LD 2.23.52 compiled.
when I make , I got a error:

cpu-miner.c: In function 'miner_thread':
cpu-miner.c:1065:88: error: 'MADV_HUGEPAGE' undeclared (first use in this function)
   madvise(persistentctx, sizeof(struct cryptonight_ctx), MADV_RANDOM | MADV_WILLNEED | MADV_HUGEPAGE);

who can help me ?
thanks.
Agamemnus
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 270
Merit: 100



View Profile
June 10, 2014, 03:25:59 AM
 #87

Nice!

Avast antivirus just started registering this minerd.exe as dangerous Sad

obobob
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 38
Merit: 0


View Profile
June 10, 2014, 03:47:01 AM
 #88

I'm using GCC 4.8.2 and LD 2.23.52 compiled.
when I make , I got a error:

cpu-miner.c: In function 'miner_thread':
cpu-miner.c:1065:88: error: 'MADV_HUGEPAGE' undeclared (first use in this function)
   madvise(persistentctx, sizeof(struct cryptonight_ctx), MADV_RANDOM | MADV_WILLNEED | MADV_HUGEPAGE);

who can help me ?
thanks.

What distro? It probably doesn't include hugepages.

Nice!

Avast antivirus just started registering this minerd.exe as dangerous Sad

AV companies do that to boost the number of malware they "found" so they look good on paper. The miner is used by malware to mine on people's computers, but instead of just tagging the actual malware, they add the miner as well.

CentOS6.3 x64
Litrbooh
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 252
Merit: 10


View Profile
June 10, 2014, 04:49:28 AM
 #89

Not 100% sure. Since most Win users can't compile their own binaries, I'd have to revert every commit, one by one, and build a Win64 binary for each >.<
I always thought that the binary one for a particular type of Windows. Why did they each compile?
obobob
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 38
Merit: 0


View Profile
June 10, 2014, 04:59:01 AM
 #90

I'm using GCC 4.8.2 and LD 2.23.52 compiled.
when I make , I got a error:

cpu-miner.c: In function 'miner_thread':
cpu-miner.c:1065:88: error: 'MADV_HUGEPAGE' undeclared (first use in this function)
   madvise(persistentctx, sizeof(struct cryptonight_ctx), MADV_RANDOM | MADV_WILLNEED | MADV_HUGEPAGE);

who can help me ?
thanks.

What distro? It probably doesn't include hugepages.

Nice!

Avast antivirus just started registering this minerd.exe as dangerous Sad

AV companies do that to boost the number of malware they "found" so they look good on paper. The miner is used by malware to mine on people's computers, but instead of just tagging the actual malware, they add the miner as well.

CentOS6.3 x64

Second report I've gotten of CentOS not working... I think the first was fixed by updating glibc.


many thanks!
I will try...
chris190
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1060
Merit: 1000



View Profile
June 10, 2014, 12:01:34 PM
 #91

I'd give all kinds of naughty favours for win64 binaries. With AES preferred for i7-4930k Wink Wink *nudge* *nudge*

I'll compile them soon.

I tried out the 9th of June on Win 7 64-bit and it gives a 3-4% reduction on an i5-2500k but maybe a 1% increase on an i7-4930k.

Can hugepages even be done on Windows?

What speed you get with an i7 4930k?

There is a difference with a i7 3930K?

I'm curious to find out the speed of the new processor i7 4970k! Grin About 400/500 h/s?  Shocked Cool

Wink

                  ▄▄
                 ████▄
                 ██████▄
                 ███ ▀███▄
         ▄████▄▄ ███   ▀███▄
       ▄████████████▄    ▀███▄
     ▄███▀ ███▀▀▀██████▄▄  ███
   ▄███▀  ███    ███ ▀▀███████
 ▄███▀    ███    ███     ▀███
████▄▄▄▄▄███▄▄▄▄  ▀  ▄▄▄▄███▄▄▄▄▄▄▄
█████████████████   █████████████████
  ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀███▀▀▀▀  ▄  ▀▀▀▀███▀▀▀▀▀████
        ███▄     ███    ███    ▄███▀
       ███████▄▄ ███    ███  ▄███▀
       ███  ▀▀██████▄▄▄███ ▄███▀
       ▀███▄    ▀████████████▀
         ▀███▄   ███ ▀▀████▀
           ▀███▄ ███
             ▀██████
               ▀████
                 ▀▀
4NEW
███
███  █
███  █  █
███  █  █
███  █  █
███  █  █
███  █  █
███  █  █
███  █  █
███  █
███
THE WORLD'S FIRST TANGIBLE WASTE TO ENERGY BLOCKCHAIN
✥     ANN Thread     ✥     Whitepaper     ✥     Facebook     ✥     Twitter     ✥     Telegram     ✥

        ███
    █  ███
█  █  ███
█  █  ███
█  █  ███
█  █  ███
█  █  ███
█  █  ███
█  █  ███
    █  ███
        ███

                                ███
                                ███
                                ███
                        ███  ███
                        ███  ███
                ███  ███  ███
                ███  ███  ███
        ███  ███  ███  ███
███  ███  ███  ███  ███
███  ███  ███  ███  ███
Agamemnus
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 270
Merit: 100



View Profile
June 10, 2014, 01:20:51 PM
 #92

I'd give all kinds of naughty favours for win64 binaries. With AES preferred for i7-4930k Wink Wink *nudge* *nudge*

I'll compile them soon.

I tried out the 9th of June on Win 7 64-bit and it gives a 3-4% reduction on an i5-2500k but maybe a 1% increase on an i7-4930k.

Can hugepages even be done on Windows?

What speed you get with an i7 4930k?

There is a difference with a i7 3930K?

I'm curious to find out the speed of the new processor i7 4970k! Grin About 400/500 h/s?  Shocked Cool

Wink

It's only about 250 my dear friend, I'm using Windows 7, the real speeds are in Linux. Sad

xxnirvana69xx
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 52
Merit: 0


View Profile
June 10, 2014, 03:34:35 PM
 #93

What are the speed differences in Linux from Windows? Might try Ubuntu again if the speed increase is worth it.
chris190
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1060
Merit: 1000



View Profile
June 10, 2014, 04:19:24 PM
 #94

I'd give all kinds of naughty favours for win64 binaries. With AES preferred for i7-4930k Wink Wink *nudge* *nudge*

I'll compile them soon.

I tried out the 9th of June on Win 7 64-bit and it gives a 3-4% reduction on an i5-2500k but maybe a 1% increase on an i7-4930k.

Can hugepages even be done on Windows?

What speed you get with an i7 4930k?

There is a difference with a i7 3930K?

I'm curious to find out the speed of the new processor i7 4970k! Grin About 400/500 h/s?  Shocked Cool

Wink

It's only about 250 my dear friend, I'm using Windows 7, the real speeds are in Linux. Sad

thanks!

And what's the difference?

                  ▄▄
                 ████▄
                 ██████▄
                 ███ ▀███▄
         ▄████▄▄ ███   ▀███▄
       ▄████████████▄    ▀███▄
     ▄███▀ ███▀▀▀██████▄▄  ███
   ▄███▀  ███    ███ ▀▀███████
 ▄███▀    ███    ███     ▀███
████▄▄▄▄▄███▄▄▄▄  ▀  ▄▄▄▄███▄▄▄▄▄▄▄
█████████████████   █████████████████
  ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀███▀▀▀▀  ▄  ▀▀▀▀███▀▀▀▀▀████
        ███▄     ███    ███    ▄███▀
       ███████▄▄ ███    ███  ▄███▀
       ███  ▀▀██████▄▄▄███ ▄███▀
       ▀███▄    ▀████████████▀
         ▀███▄   ███ ▀▀████▀
           ▀███▄ ███
             ▀██████
               ▀████
                 ▀▀
4NEW
███
███  █
███  █  █
███  █  █
███  █  █
███  █  █
███  █  █
███  █  █
███  █  █
███  █
███
THE WORLD'S FIRST TANGIBLE WASTE TO ENERGY BLOCKCHAIN
✥     ANN Thread     ✥     Whitepaper     ✥     Facebook     ✥     Twitter     ✥     Telegram     ✥

        ███
    █  ███
█  █  ███
█  █  ███
█  █  ███
█  █  ███
█  █  ███
█  █  ███
█  █  ███
    █  ███
        ███

                                ███
                                ███
                                ███
                        ███  ███
                        ███  ███
                ███  ███  ███
                ███  ███  ███
        ███  ███  ███  ███
███  ███  ███  ███  ███
███  ███  ███  ███  ███
5w00p
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 644
Merit: 502



View Profile
June 10, 2014, 06:53:35 PM
 #95

Linux:



VS


Windows:
xxnirvana69xx
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 52
Merit: 0


View Profile
June 10, 2014, 07:41:40 PM
 #96


Thanks for not helping ;-)
xxnirvana69xx
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 52
Merit: 0


View Profile
June 10, 2014, 08:10:06 PM
 #97

Well I was just curious in an actual speed difference. I don't want to install Ubuntu tonight for a 50h/s increase.
DooLocsta
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 10
Merit: 0


View Profile
June 10, 2014, 08:33:24 PM
 #98

How can I make sure I am getting the AES-NI configured correct in Windows?  This is currently all I have access to but as soon as I start the miner I see it detects a new block then crashes.  Thanks.
c18machine
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 59
Merit: 0


View Profile
June 10, 2014, 08:36:47 PM
 #99

Wolf u must be getting paid by xmr team, why dont you just release an wild keccak miner?

yes, cryptonight is not only XMR/MRO as your topic title suggests
smooth
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1932
Merit: 1056



View Profile
June 10, 2014, 08:43:00 PM
 #100

Wolf u must be getting paid by xmr team, why dont you just release an wild keccak miner?

He's not getting paid by XMR as far as I know.

Perhaps he just isn't interested in putting a lot of work into WK because WK is a tiny little niche thing that hasn't gotten much traction yet.

Pages: « 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!