Bitcoin Forum
November 18, 2017, 01:12:58 AM *
News: Latest stable version of Bitcoin Core: 0.15.1  [Torrent].
 
   Home   Help Search Donate Login Register  
Pages: « 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 »
  Print  
Author Topic: Wolf's XMR/BCN/DSH CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014  (Read 478425 times)
Wolf0
Legendary
*
Online Online

Activity: 1750


Miner Developer


View Profile
May 31, 2014, 11:29:16 PM
 #21

I was trying to send a donation for your work, but I guess I need payment ID.

You don't need a payment ID.

When I tried to replicate Wolf's results, I only got about 750 hs on the 32 core instance with his miner.  Any ideas?

Hm... I may redo the test on a Digital Ocean droplet.

Code:
Donations: BTC: 1WoLFdwcfNEg64fTYsX1P25KUzzSjtEZC -- XMR: 45SLUTzk7UXYHmzJ7bFN6FPfzTusdUVAZjPRgmEDw7G3SeimWM2kCdnDQXwDBYGUWaBtZNgjYtEYA22aMQT4t8KfU3vHLHG
1510967578
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1510967578

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1510967578
Reply with quote  #2

1510967578
Report to moderator
1510967578
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1510967578

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1510967578
Reply with quote  #2

1510967578
Report to moderator
Coinlancer is Disrupting the Freelance marketplace!
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
Wolf0
Legendary
*
Online Online

Activity: 1750


Miner Developer


View Profile
June 01, 2014, 01:05:12 AM
 #22

Bump. Results of new test published.

Code:
Donations: BTC: 1WoLFdwcfNEg64fTYsX1P25KUzzSjtEZC -- XMR: 45SLUTzk7UXYHmzJ7bFN6FPfzTusdUVAZjPRgmEDw7G3SeimWM2kCdnDQXwDBYGUWaBtZNgjYtEYA22aMQT4t8KfU3vHLHG
vokain
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1736


View Profile
June 01, 2014, 01:08:52 AM
 #23

Is there a reason why you didn't edit out the furry images?

I had been up for four days straight reading and writing code - at that point I just didn't care Tongue

grateful for your pioneering work wolfie! my mining pool hashrate reflects my hashrate on a 4770k as much faster. Consistently 200H/s+ instead of often lingering in the 100s

         ▄█▄  ▄▄▄▄
          ▀ ▄██████▄
    ▄▄▄   ▄███▀▀███
  ▄█████▄ ▀█▀ ███▄ ▀▀
 ███▀  ▀██▄    ████▄   
 █▀ ▄██▄ ▀█▀ ▄██▀ ▀█▀ ▄██
  ▄██▀     ▄██▀     ▄██▀
 ██▀ ▄█▄ ▄██▀ ▄█▄  ██▀ ▄▄
      ▀███▀    ▀██▄  ▄██▀
     ▄▄ ▀██▄ ▄█▄ ▀█████▀
     ███▄▄██▀   ▀▀
      ▀██████▀
        ▀▀▀▀   ██▀

  █
  █
  █
████
  █
████
  █
████
  █
  █
  █


▄███▄    ▄███▄
███  ██▄ █▀▀▄
████████  ███▀
██▀ ▄███       
████████▄▄  ▄█▀
 ██████▀▀██▀▀
  ▀███▀▄▄   ▄
   ▀██▄██ ▄█▀
     ▀▀██▀▀
FULLY
ANONYMOUS

━━━━━
/

    ██▄▄              ▄▄██
   █▀  ▀█▄ ▄▄▄▄████▄██▀  ▀█
  █▀   ▄███▀▀▀       █▄   ▀█
 █▀   ▄███▄ ▄▄█▄▄     █▄   ▀█
██▄  ▄████████████▄▄  █▄  ▄██
  ▀▀██▀███████████████▄███▀▀
      ▀█▄█▀███████████▀▀
        ▀███▀███████▀
           ▀▀▀▀██▀▀
INSTANT
TRANSFER

━━━━
/

     ▄████▄
 ▄▄▄████████▄▄▄
▄██████████████▄
▀██▀ ▀█  ▀█ ███▀
 ██ ▀ █ ▀▄█ ███
▄██▄█▄█▄███▄███▄
▀██████████████▀
 ▀▀▀████████▀▀▀
     ▀████▀
API FOR YOUR
PROJECTS

━━━━

  █
  █
  █
████
  █
████
  █
████
  █
  █
  █
PARTNER PROGRAM
TOR MIRROR
MIX WALLET
.FAQ
ANN THREAD
TELEGRAM
Wolf0
Legendary
*
Online Online

Activity: 1750


Miner Developer


View Profile
June 01, 2014, 01:13:17 AM
 #24

Is there a reason why you didn't edit out the furry images?

I had been up for four days straight reading and writing code - at that point I just didn't care Tongue

grateful for your pioneering work wolfie! my mining pool hashrate reflects my hashrate on a 4770k as much faster. Consistently 200H/s+ instead of often lingering in the 100s

No problem. New test posted, as well.

Code:
Donations: BTC: 1WoLFdwcfNEg64fTYsX1P25KUzzSjtEZC -- XMR: 45SLUTzk7UXYHmzJ7bFN6FPfzTusdUVAZjPRgmEDw7G3SeimWM2kCdnDQXwDBYGUWaBtZNgjYtEYA22aMQT4t8KfU3vHLHG
Kyune
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 287


View Profile
June 01, 2014, 05:19:15 AM
 #25

Win64 binaries exist but require AES-NI.
If I compile from source should I be able to run it on a processor without AES-NI then?  I compiled it successfully in an Virtualbox Ubuntu 13.04 virtual machine (on a Win 7 host without AES-NI), but get:

Code:
[2014-05-31 09:46:38] Using JSON-RPC 2.0
[2014-05-31 09:46:38] 2 miner threads started, using 'cryptonight' algorithm.
Illegal instruction (core dumped)

upon starting up the miner.

Configure with --disable-aes-ni

Thank you.  That worked. 

Without AES-NI available to me on this machine, I get a slower hash rate with your miner compared to the Lucas Jones miner.  I'm sure this comes as no surprise, since you have been optimizing for AES-NI.  Inside my virtual machine, per core, I get about 11 H/s with yours, and about 18.5 H/s with Lucas Jones.


BTC:  1K4VpdQXQhgmTmq68rbWhybvoRcyNHKyVP
Wolf0
Legendary
*
Online Online

Activity: 1750


Miner Developer


View Profile
June 01, 2014, 05:30:57 AM
 #26

Win64 binaries exist but require AES-NI.
If I compile from source should I be able to run it on a processor without AES-NI then?  I compiled it successfully in an Virtualbox Ubuntu 13.04 virtual machine (on a Win 7 host without AES-NI), but get:

Code:
[2014-05-31 09:46:38] Using JSON-RPC 2.0
[2014-05-31 09:46:38] 2 miner threads started, using 'cryptonight' algorithm.
Illegal instruction (core dumped)

upon starting up the miner.

Configure with --disable-aes-ni

Thank you.  That worked. 

Without AES-NI available to me on this machine, I get a slower hash rate with your miner compared to the Lucas Jones miner.  I'm sure this comes as no surprise, since you have been optimizing for AES-NI.  Inside my virtual machine, per core, I get about 11 H/s with yours, and about 18.5 H/s with Lucas Jones.


I did do some work on the non-AES-NI implementation recently. Try running it natively.

Code:
Donations: BTC: 1WoLFdwcfNEg64fTYsX1P25KUzzSjtEZC -- XMR: 45SLUTzk7UXYHmzJ7bFN6FPfzTusdUVAZjPRgmEDw7G3SeimWM2kCdnDQXwDBYGUWaBtZNgjYtEYA22aMQT4t8KfU3vHLHG
vokain
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1736


View Profile
June 01, 2014, 05:53:01 AM
 #27

I still don't quite understand why running 3 or 7 threads on a 4 core, 8 thread CPU results in more hashes than running 1,2,4,5,6, or 8 threads

         ▄█▄  ▄▄▄▄
          ▀ ▄██████▄
    ▄▄▄   ▄███▀▀███
  ▄█████▄ ▀█▀ ███▄ ▀▀
 ███▀  ▀██▄    ████▄   
 █▀ ▄██▄ ▀█▀ ▄██▀ ▀█▀ ▄██
  ▄██▀     ▄██▀     ▄██▀
 ██▀ ▄█▄ ▄██▀ ▄█▄  ██▀ ▄▄
      ▀███▀    ▀██▄  ▄██▀
     ▄▄ ▀██▄ ▄█▄ ▀█████▀
     ███▄▄██▀   ▀▀
      ▀██████▀
        ▀▀▀▀   ██▀

  █
  █
  █
████
  █
████
  █
████
  █
  █
  █


▄███▄    ▄███▄
███  ██▄ █▀▀▄
████████  ███▀
██▀ ▄███       
████████▄▄  ▄█▀
 ██████▀▀██▀▀
  ▀███▀▄▄   ▄
   ▀██▄██ ▄█▀
     ▀▀██▀▀
FULLY
ANONYMOUS

━━━━━
/

    ██▄▄              ▄▄██
   █▀  ▀█▄ ▄▄▄▄████▄██▀  ▀█
  █▀   ▄███▀▀▀       █▄   ▀█
 █▀   ▄███▄ ▄▄█▄▄     █▄   ▀█
██▄  ▄████████████▄▄  █▄  ▄██
  ▀▀██▀███████████████▄███▀▀
      ▀█▄█▀███████████▀▀
        ▀███▀███████▀
           ▀▀▀▀██▀▀
INSTANT
TRANSFER

━━━━
/

     ▄████▄
 ▄▄▄████████▄▄▄
▄██████████████▄
▀██▀ ▀█  ▀█ ███▀
 ██ ▀ █ ▀▄█ ███
▄██▄█▄█▄███▄███▄
▀██████████████▀
 ▀▀▀████████▀▀▀
     ▀████▀
API FOR YOUR
PROJECTS

━━━━

  █
  █
  █
████
  █
████
  █
████
  █
  █
  █
PARTNER PROGRAM
TOR MIRROR
MIX WALLET
.FAQ
ANN THREAD
TELEGRAM
Wolf0
Legendary
*
Online Online

Activity: 1750


Miner Developer


View Profile
June 01, 2014, 06:07:36 AM
 #28

I still don't quite understand why running 3 or 7 threads on a 4 core, 8 thread CPU results in more hashes than running 1,2,4,5,6, or 8 threads

All the cores aren't real. Often, by using more than 4 threads on a 4 core, 8 thread CPU, you're overloading it, therefore it runs slower. Three threads allows one thread for the output - it also lets the CPU schedule the threads, because if the thread number is a multiple of the core count, the code binds threads to cores, which is a bad idea according to my testing.

Code:
Donations: BTC: 1WoLFdwcfNEg64fTYsX1P25KUzzSjtEZC -- XMR: 45SLUTzk7UXYHmzJ7bFN6FPfzTusdUVAZjPRgmEDw7G3SeimWM2kCdnDQXwDBYGUWaBtZNgjYtEYA22aMQT4t8KfU3vHLHG
QuadraQ
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 465



View Profile
June 01, 2014, 09:47:17 AM
 #29

I was trying to send a donation for your work, but I guess I need payment ID.

You don't need a payment ID.


The .NET Windows GUI Wallet I'm using for Monero begs to differ. It won't let me send anything without a payment ID. Probably a bug in the GUI.

Wolf0
Legendary
*
Online Online

Activity: 1750


Miner Developer


View Profile
June 01, 2014, 09:50:20 AM
 #30

I was trying to send a donation for your work, but I guess I need payment ID.

You don't need a payment ID.


The .NET Windows GUI Wallet I'm using for Monero begs to differ. It won't let me send anything without a payment ID. Probably a bug in the GUI.

Then use any payment ID. As long as it's the right length and all hex digits, it should accept it. Try this:

5a6f13d8a3e90f0694c20ee9900a23bfe8c0008e7ec0deadbeefcafebaadf00d

Code:
Donations: BTC: 1WoLFdwcfNEg64fTYsX1P25KUzzSjtEZC -- XMR: 45SLUTzk7UXYHmzJ7bFN6FPfzTusdUVAZjPRgmEDw7G3SeimWM2kCdnDQXwDBYGUWaBtZNgjYtEYA22aMQT4t8KfU3vHLHG
Captain-Karacho
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 21


View Profile
June 01, 2014, 09:50:47 AM
 #31

I can confirm +20% with my FX 4300 and +30% with my I7 2600k.

Thanks a lot Wolf0, good job!  Smiley
Wolf0
Legendary
*
Online Online

Activity: 1750


Miner Developer


View Profile
June 01, 2014, 09:53:02 AM
 #32

I can confirm +20% with my FX 4300 and +30% with my I7 2600k.

Thanks a lot Wolf0, good job!  Smiley

Windows, I assume. Try Linux (not in a VM) - should be loads better.

Code:
Donations: BTC: 1WoLFdwcfNEg64fTYsX1P25KUzzSjtEZC -- XMR: 45SLUTzk7UXYHmzJ7bFN6FPfzTusdUVAZjPRgmEDw7G3SeimWM2kCdnDQXwDBYGUWaBtZNgjYtEYA22aMQT4t8KfU3vHLHG
rommie7
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 4


View Profile
June 01, 2014, 05:47:45 PM
 #33

Thanks for the awesome work.
I'm trying to donate a couple of MRO but i'm getting "Invalid Send Address" when using the address in the first post and the payment id.
phzi
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 672


View Profile
June 01, 2014, 06:16:54 PM
 #34

Great performance running 3 threads on an i7 2600. Pulling ~180H/s.  More threads hurts performance, so less threads definitely does seem like more here.

2 threads has the same performance as 8 threads, and 3 threads definitely pushes the most hashrate.  Interestingly, 3 threads uses only 40% CPU... must be hitting some cache limits or something.

(Windows rig this one - most of my machines run linux, but have Core2Duos without AES-NI).
drmavis
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 70


View Profile
June 01, 2014, 06:35:07 PM
 #35

Hi,

Really great work on this. Would it be possible for you to add another crypto algorithm? I would love it if DCrypt could be added for Slimcoin mining. There is a fork of cpuminer called slimminer (that I can't get to compile on Windows) and it would be amazing if it could get integrated in this optimized cpuminer-multi. Will definitely donate.

Mike
hero18688
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 392


View Profile
June 01, 2014, 10:35:35 PM
 #36

Is Boolberry supported?
Posted from Bitcointa.lk - #Lw7H68vv8KEGiNiH

deadmanwalking
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 210


View Profile
June 02, 2014, 04:03:51 AM
 #37

Is there a reason why you didn't edit out the furry images?

I had been up for four days straight reading and writing code - at that point I just didn't care Tongue

grateful for your pioneering work wolfie! my mining pool hashrate reflects my hashrate on a 4770k as much faster. Consistently 200H/s+ instead of often lingering in the 100s

How much does 200H\s net you in a day? Thanks

171XPWLy36oDmQfMdnPYWHfQgkfRoYGjHd
vokain
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1736


View Profile
June 02, 2014, 06:08:33 AM
 #38

Is there a reason why you didn't edit out the furry images?

I had been up for four days straight reading and writing code - at that point I just didn't care Tongue

grateful for your pioneering work wolfie! my mining pool hashrate reflects my hashrate on a 4770k as much faster. Consistently 200H/s+ instead of often lingering in the 100s

How much does 200H\s net you in a day? Thanks

maybe a monero if I'm lucky

         ▄█▄  ▄▄▄▄
          ▀ ▄██████▄
    ▄▄▄   ▄███▀▀███
  ▄█████▄ ▀█▀ ███▄ ▀▀
 ███▀  ▀██▄    ████▄   
 █▀ ▄██▄ ▀█▀ ▄██▀ ▀█▀ ▄██
  ▄██▀     ▄██▀     ▄██▀
 ██▀ ▄█▄ ▄██▀ ▄█▄  ██▀ ▄▄
      ▀███▀    ▀██▄  ▄██▀
     ▄▄ ▀██▄ ▄█▄ ▀█████▀
     ███▄▄██▀   ▀▀
      ▀██████▀
        ▀▀▀▀   ██▀

  █
  █
  █
████
  █
████
  █
████
  █
  █
  █


▄███▄    ▄███▄
███  ██▄ █▀▀▄
████████  ███▀
██▀ ▄███       
████████▄▄  ▄█▀
 ██████▀▀██▀▀
  ▀███▀▄▄   ▄
   ▀██▄██ ▄█▀
     ▀▀██▀▀
FULLY
ANONYMOUS

━━━━━
/

    ██▄▄              ▄▄██
   █▀  ▀█▄ ▄▄▄▄████▄██▀  ▀█
  █▀   ▄███▀▀▀       █▄   ▀█
 █▀   ▄███▄ ▄▄█▄▄     █▄   ▀█
██▄  ▄████████████▄▄  █▄  ▄██
  ▀▀██▀███████████████▄███▀▀
      ▀█▄█▀███████████▀▀
        ▀███▀███████▀
           ▀▀▀▀██▀▀
INSTANT
TRANSFER

━━━━
/

     ▄████▄
 ▄▄▄████████▄▄▄
▄██████████████▄
▀██▀ ▀█  ▀█ ███▀
 ██ ▀ █ ▀▄█ ███
▄██▄█▄█▄███▄███▄
▀██████████████▀
 ▀▀▀████████▀▀▀
     ▀████▀
API FOR YOUR
PROJECTS

━━━━

  █
  █
  █
████
  █
████
  █
████
  █
  █
  █
PARTNER PROGRAM
TOR MIRROR
MIX WALLET
.FAQ
ANN THREAD
TELEGRAM
Wolf0
Legendary
*
Online Online

Activity: 1750


Miner Developer


View Profile
June 02, 2014, 07:04:28 AM
 #39

Is Boolberry supported?
Posted from Bitcointa.lk - #Lw7H68vv8KEGiNiH

Boolberry uses a different algorithm, so no.

Code:
Donations: BTC: 1WoLFdwcfNEg64fTYsX1P25KUzzSjtEZC -- XMR: 45SLUTzk7UXYHmzJ7bFN6FPfzTusdUVAZjPRgmEDw7G3SeimWM2kCdnDQXwDBYGUWaBtZNgjYtEYA22aMQT4t8KfU3vHLHG
obobob
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 29


View Profile
June 02, 2014, 08:30:24 AM
 #40

I'm using GCC 4.7.2 and LD 2.23 compiled.
when I make , I got a error:
gcc: error: -fuse-linker-plugin is not supported in this configuration

who can help me ?
thanks.
Pages: « 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!