travex
Member
Offline
Activity: 158
Merit: 10
|
|
April 26, 2011, 04:42:47 AM |
|
Version 1.2 with Long pool supported, thx mate, great work so far
|
|
|
|
eleuthria
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1750
Merit: 1007
|
|
April 26, 2011, 04:44:56 AM |
|
Another amazing release, went from 421-422 mHash/sec to 423-424 mHash/sec on my 5870s (Aggression 13, Vectors, 128 Worksize, BFI_INT, using 975/300 @ 0.950v).
Just a suggestion, update your original post with the changelog/updates so we can find out what's new without searching through the various replies within the thread.
|
RIP BTC Guild, April 2011 - June 2015
|
|
|
demonofelru
|
|
April 26, 2011, 05:37:01 AM |
|
It seems to commonly reject the the generation immediately after a LP new block is that normal?
|
Names do not matter; however, if you insist...id...
|
|
|
allinvain
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3080
Merit: 1080
|
|
April 26, 2011, 05:40:27 AM |
|
It seems to commonly reject the the generation immediately after a LP new block is that normal?
Hmm, that's odd. This is not happening for me. I've also noticed that 1.2 produces far fewer rejected results - the ratio of accepted to rejected is much lower now.
|
|
|
|
demonofelru
|
|
April 26, 2011, 05:42:22 AM |
|
It seems to commonly reject the the generation immediately after a LP new block is that normal?
Hmm, that's odd. This is not happening for me. I've also noticed that 1.2 produces far fewer rejected results - the ratio of accepted to rejected is much lower now. I guess it could just be a coincidence but literally every one of my rejected ones came immediately following a LP new block.
|
Names do not matter; however, if you insist...id...
|
|
|
allinvain
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3080
Merit: 1080
|
|
April 26, 2011, 05:45:18 AM |
|
It seems to commonly reject the the generation immediately after a LP new block is that normal?
Hmm, that's odd. This is not happening for me. I've also noticed that 1.2 produces far fewer rejected results - the ratio of accepted to rejected is much lower now. I guess it could just be a coincidence but literally every one of my rejected ones came immediately following a LP new block. Can you post some screenshots maybe? Also what arguments are you passing to the miner? paste them here...perhaps there is something wrong with usage?
|
|
|
|
luffy
|
|
April 26, 2011, 05:49:53 AM |
|
great software! for sure the guys worth a donation keep up the good work! now the net force is reaching 1Th/s!!!!!
|
|
|
|
demonofelru
|
|
April 26, 2011, 05:56:03 AM |
|
I actually looked again and there was 1 that wasn't immediately following the LP but still only one. Sorry had to do it in RDP. here is my batch script start /DC:\bitcoin\phoenix phoenix.exe -u http://xxxx:xxxx@www.bitcoinpool.com:8334/ DEVICE=1 BFI_INT AGGRESSION=12 -k poclbm
|
Names do not matter; however, if you insist...id...
|
|
|
allinvain
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3080
Merit: 1080
|
|
April 26, 2011, 06:03:05 AM |
|
I actually looked again and there was 1 that wasn't immediately following the LP but still only one. Sorry had to do it in RDP. here is my batch script start /DC:\bitcoin\phoenix phoenix.exe -u http://xxxx:xxxx@www.bitcoinpool.com:8334/ DEVICE=1 BFI_INT AGGRESSION=12 -k poclbm That is odd indeed. Perhaps this is a bug with LP support. I'm wish slush's pool and I just remembered that he doesn't use LP so I never noticed this issue. Sorry for the misinformation. When I replied to your post the first time I forgot about slush's lack of LP support. I'm curious why you haven't enabled the VECTORS variable? Does that setting slow mining down? Also what card are you running and at what speed? Overclocked? I think this may be an issue with LP support and not something hardware/configuration related.
|
|
|
|
demonofelru
|
|
April 26, 2011, 06:34:08 AM |
|
Yeah vectors seemed to slow my hashes down on a 6950 with shaders unlocked vcore 1.15 core 935 mem 500
|
Names do not matter; however, if you insist...id...
|
|
|
alexmat
|
|
April 26, 2011, 07:04:11 AM |
|
poclbm: 5870 @ 900/900 => 344Mh/s phoenix: 5870 @ 900/300 => 375Mh/s Very nice
|
|
|
|
OUTSIDE
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 56
Merit: 0
|
|
April 26, 2011, 07:05:34 AM |
|
Incredible!
My 5850's does now 325-330MH/s (before 295-300) and the 6970 does now 420-425MH/s!!! (before 380)
Thx for all!
ByE!
|
|
|
|
jkminkov
|
|
April 26, 2011, 07:09:11 AM |
|
Im getting a ton of "work queue empty, minder is idle" messages
im on a 5970 flags are -k poclbm DEVICE=0 VECTORS AGGRESSION=14 BFI_INT
VECTORS AGGRESSION=10 -v FASTLOOP BFI_INT WORKSIZE=128 idle messages gone when I dropped AGGRESSION to 10
|
.:31211457:. 100 dollars in one place talking - Dudes, hooray, Bitcoin against us just one, but we are growing in numbers!
|
|
|
martok
|
|
April 26, 2011, 07:42:47 AM |
|
Hi,
Any way to track the source (git/svn)?
Also, quick feature request. Could you add a feature similar to poclbm --rate 30. So rather than displaying a screen progress, every 30 seconds it timestamps a progress message. That way I can do phoenix.py > logfile and get something sensible.
Excellent software btw.
|
|
|
|
anatolikostis
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2026
Merit: 1005
|
|
April 26, 2011, 07:46:54 AM |
|
Incredible!
My 5850's does now 325-330MH/s (before 295-300) and the 6970 does now 420-425MH/s!!! (before 380)
syntax - "vectors=on" or just "vectors"? overclock - @850/1100 or higher?
|
|
|
|
CFSworks
Member
Offline
Activity: 63
Merit: 10
|
|
April 26, 2011, 07:50:51 AM Last edit: April 26, 2011, 08:05:53 AM by CFSworks |
|
syntax - "vectors=on" or just "vectors"?
I made the options parser very lenient on syntax. Take your pick of any of the following: VECTORS=on VECTORS=true VECTORS=yes VECTORS=t VECTORS=y VECTORS VeCtORs=TRuE ...anything else will disable it. Same goes for BFI_INT. Any way to track the source (git/svn)?
There's SVN here, but we might occasionally commit untested and horribly broken things there, so use it at your own risk. Also, quick feature request. Could you add a feature similar to poclbm --rate 30. So rather than displaying a screen progress, every 30 seconds it timestamps a progress message. That way I can do phoenix.py > logfile and get something sensible.
I like the idea; how about if we added an option to log to a file directly from Phoenix? (And logging to - disables console output and logs directly to stdout instead.) Something like: phoenix.py -l mining.log Not sure what the best way to specify the rate is, though.
|
|
|
|
tiberiandusk
|
|
April 26, 2011, 08:29:18 AM |
|
went from 334 Mhash/s to 388 Mhash/s. Overclocked some more and I'm getting 409 Mhash/s with mem at 300 and core at 975 on my 5870. temp is 76-77c with fan at 75%. This is fantastic! Great work!
|
|
|
|
kindle
Member
Offline
Activity: 84
Merit: 10
|
|
April 26, 2011, 08:29:40 AM |
|
I like the idea; how about if we added an option to log to a file directly from Phoenix? (And logging to - disables console output and logs directly to stdout instead.) Something like: phoenix.py -l mining.log Not sure what the best way to specify the rate is, though.
Hi I think logging to file is a great Idea. Monitoring it from the web would be a breeze!!
|
|
|
|
CFSworks
Member
Offline
Activity: 63
Merit: 10
|
|
April 26, 2011, 09:21:30 AM |
|
Hi I think logging to file is a great Idea. Monitoring it from the web would be a breeze!!
There's also Multiminer, which jedi95 and I use for our cluster's status page. Multiminer's already quite usable and Phoenix already has builtin support for it; all you would have to do is download and set up Multiminer, connect your Phoenix clients to it with an mmp:// URL, and write a .rpy script that would display info on your miners. (I'd release ours, but the code is in desperate need of cleanup, and I'd have to okay it with jedi95 first.) I'll post clearer instructions on how to do that when I fully test and release Multiminer 1.4, which has support for long polling.
|
|
|
|
Kick
|
|
April 26, 2011, 10:49:43 AM |
|
Can't seem to get this to work. When i extract the zip i get a folder and phoenix.exe
when i tried running the exe, the cmd window goes up then disappears.
I tried xp sp2 and vista sp2 compatibility mode
ran as admin
im on win7 x64
11.4 preview catalyst.
6950 unlocked and 5870 on the rig.
|
|
|
|
|