[ANN][BURST] Burst | Efficient HDD Mining | New 1.2.3 Fork block 92000

[coinits]

SO, It seems that MiningHere is the ONLY pool right now offering a link to verify the latest transactions. Maybe it is time to remove it, to avoid attacks from you! ;-) lol

Elmit, one of the numerous things you've totally avoided explaining - why is it that on the best of your pools payouts, is it a maximum of 66% of the block reward? Is your pool fee set to 33% of earnings?

Have a nice day!

No reply to you and co as long the link is not working on other pools!

ooooh you have link ooooooohhh want a hero cookie?

You have stolen coins and not reimbursed. Fuck off slime ball. You are starting to look like the Josh Garza of BURST!

   
   
Re: [ANN][BURST] Burst | Efficient HDD Mining | New 1.2.3 Fork block 92000
Today at 04:13:13 AM
   
Reply with quote  #20563
Quote from: Elmit on Today at 03:50:41 AM
Quote from: haitch on Today at 03:15:19 AM

Looking at his pools payouts vs burst.ninja who he loves to disparage/slander.....

Burst.Ninja Time up: 7 months. Payouts: 26.9M burst
Mininghere Time Up: 6 months. Payouts: 1.67M burst


Well, we mined on ninja and all the names it had before, but I got tired of hearing "it is down", so I setup MiningHere by myself.
I mined with some friends (6) only for myself there for several months. I had no missing transaction, so I gave it a shot to let others mine as well. At the moment 262 people are actively mining there. Other pool say to that number "Miners responded". To get a new "inactive miner" is easy, just use the reward assignment to a new wallet, and you got more miners.

Now, haitach and co attacks me of not paying out, but look at the blockchain, we do! We do have a link to transaction, a WORKING link. No other pool does!!!
Maybe I miss that link to find there.

I recommend to proof first with other pools that they pay out, before attacking me again. Otherwise I might also disable the link to be "equal".

Elmit, hey - if you're going to slam me, please at least speel (sic) my nick right Sad H. A. I. T.C. H.

And this was the last message I sent to you over on BurstForum, where 100% of the claimed latest payments were missing from the block chain, 20 hours after the claimed payments.

You too can use your working link to the block explorer to verify - it's how I found you weren't paying out properly.

And now we're at 100% of payments are missing - either massive incompetence, or flagrant theft. Which is it ?

Recent Payments (None of which are on the blockchain)
S3FP-PN5T-94Q7-DPGG4 14.24 06/04 20:21:07
MXY2-YN9Q-K5W9-8RXN6 19.94 06/04 20:20:58
VE7E-J6AB-K6BZ-A3VFY 8.17 06/04 20:20:43
JYVY-CT2V-2KTL-G6PPE 3.48 06/04 20:20:43
TCQT-KCZX-32VA-F3CLG 2.31 06/04 20:20:43
MV3V-4NZ8-F2CC-2YPWQ 6.62 06/04 20:20:43
CBC3-FYXQ-H28R-3T9KE 23.96 06/04 20:20:43
V4VJ-RQY5-6Q2G-5FH7W 3.31 06/04 20:20:43
8MH7-DTJ7-W9F2-DXJMC 12.36 06/04 20:20:43
GSLH-ZAP4-N9XD-D4FUE 4.27 06/04 20:20:43
T4CK-T76F-JL7R-CDBF7 20.37 06/04 20:20:43
7C85-VNSQ-ZNSU-CB6RW 57.07 06/04 20:20:43
7BFS-N72Q-4UHP-AU9QW 5.64 06/04 20:20:43
B7DQ-ZZQC-EASC-3LKGW 10.22 06/04 20:20:43
763A-L4UU-DPX8-BTP8L 2.27 06/04 20:20:43
83VN-2LG8-JVMS-EK5NK 12.12 06/04 20:20:43
U7HB-E7WB-TS2Z-BY2TN 8.73 06/04 20:20:43
MBXC-R4MD-3HYP-FWBGN 14.25 06/04 20:20:43
9WVJ-KVA4-4X6X-3ENE8 8.59 06/04 20:20:43
LQ7A-NMQD-4YYV-EEXJE 23.28 06/04 20:20:43
WYEH-T7PX-LYUU-6CKTM 3.99 06/04 20:20:43
4HL5-88LL-TN8T-7ENKR 9.41 06/04 20:20:43
YH9N-7K2K-VQWD-4QEYJ 30.90 06/04 20:20:43
6SHJ-PZUU-YNYE-64MQJ 3.04 06/04 20:20:43
WWS6-TWZ8-DCZ2-9KRJH 15.32 06/04 20:20:43
QTYN-GLWC-DCDJ-F935F 33.97 06/04 20:20:43
SKN8-QLRP-TS69-CB37J 5.39 06/04 20:20:43
WYR7-W4F8-DDQ5-36ZJ2 24.77 06/04 20:20:43
3ZDR-WLV6-CYKM-8WBPP 5.98 06/04 20:20:43
9G7P-KG6C-RP26-GXKVE 6.63 06/04 20:20:43
7DNH-FEQS-7DN7-AJG3S 7.02 06/04 20:20:43
QPCW-KHT3-KZRW-C38UT 87.84 06/04 20:20:43
CEZA-AM5L-82DA-5UDKG 7.38 06/04 20:20:43
4LBT-AJRV-KQXZ-B8NKX 41.44 06/04 20:20:43
RNUG-8KU3-TAZ6-3HJSK 10.53 06/04 20:20:43
KX4U-K4YQ-GP92-H6NEU 3.68 06/04 20:20:43
F6BQ-YGLR-NTYA-AEL3R 7.03 06/04 20:20:43
YCHZ-Y8ZG-K9YD-92PH3 5.08 06/04 20:20:43
WXMB-2GSS-AY3U-DS8QG 7.93 06/04 20:20:43
8GYK-F86A-C9ZW-6NLVT 3.52 06/04 20:20:43
MNSU-XRD5-KUZ4-EMUQT 10.37 06/04 20:20:43
6QQF-X6ZV-RN57-3TQBT 43.88 06/04 20:20:43
NJFY-HEYV-64U5-AKC5Q 46.32 06/04 20:20:43
U7UZ-6ZCL-KDK4-7APQ2 5.72 06/04 20:20:43
F3F5-2ETW-Q8DY-FSTDK 5.86 06/04 20:20:43
B8GU-SAY2-54YQ-C396J 4.69 06/04 20:20:43
K9P7-TT4W-WP5X-4UXCY 5.63 06/04 20:20:43
CMCE-JWKJ-RMR5-HBRNV 4.60 06/04 20:20:43
H6CQ-Y8WB-KDAL-7GYX2 42.82 06/04 20:20:43
UJF5-WG63-MBRW-DGER2 12.56 06/04 20:20:43

And then after that there was:

Looking at current Payouts from his pool:

G5Y2-DF78-Q27R-EBGUK 274.42 09/04 15:32:21 <- On Blockchain - but only for 24.99
H3ZB-FKZC-8C86-33GK5 60.68 09/04 15:32:21 < -On Blockchain
MN5M-X6HT-ELEW-4T25B 44.11 09/04 15:32:13 < -On Blockchain
K5CW-YNUE-XKCS-6HY42 26.16 09/04 15:32:04 < -On Blockchain

[riskyfire]

Bonus payout received from @Crowetic Burst.Ninja Pool.
http://burstcoin.eu/transaction/7128691327432333507

Thanks very much!

[bensam1231]

Why does it always seem like when a new wallet version comes out, the block finding on the network always seems to get really wonky until everyone is on the same version. Since 1.2.3 it seems like my profits have went down significantly, the number of blocks I've found has also went down significantly (like 1/4 of what it was). It happened with 1.2.2 as well.

It seems to favor the older wallet as well.

[vaxman]

PetaByte will payout in May, because I had to move, ...
Nothing get lost, just delayed.

Elmit, how about COMMUNICATING this ? Before it happens.

I see, the 2.7 Petabyte assets bought for ~416k Burst (~165 USD on March 17th, ~124 USD today) are not that much, I'll get over it.

But with all the fuss _you_ were making about that ByteEnterprise Asset  this doesn't look proper.

The stats pages you announced on https://burstforum.com/index.php?threads/petabyte.236/page-3 :
http://home.elmit.biz/BURST/getAccountTransactions.php
http://home.elmit.biz/BURST/getAssetAccounts.php
http://home.elmit.biz/BURST/getAssetTransfers.php

don't work. There is no transparency, I cannot check anything about your asset's performance.

And if you spend time on this site to post a pool comparison and engage in, aehem, whatever that was, you could at least read and answer your Burst message inbox. I can not even communicate with you, you ignore me.

Should I see myself as an investor, "business partner", client of yours ?
Then I'm disappointed, up to the point where I want my 416k Burst back - sale offer is up, don't talk, act.
And don't forget the payout for the 5 weeks I held it.

[new-to-burst]

Hi!

I´m mining on the burst.ninja pool with around ~15TB. But on the pool website are only showm 4-6TB
What could be the reason?

Thanks!

Blago's miner actually sends your mining capacity to the pool so that should be accurate.

With other miners, the pool has to estimate your capacity which it does by using the last 500 blocks' worth of your best deadlines.
It's not brilliant but it should eventually settle on something in the right ball park...

I´m mining with differnt ip addresses

Maybe this could be the problem?

Miner 1 ~ 4TB
Miner 2 ~ 2TB
Miner 3 ~ xTB

[FakeAccount]

Why does it always seem like when a new wallet version comes out, the block finding on the network always seems to get really wonky until everyone is on the same version. Since 1.2.3 it seems like my profits have went down significantly, the number of blocks I've found has also went down significantly (like 1/4 of what it was). It happened with 1.2.2 as well.

It seems to favor the older wallet as well.

yep. I've experienced same thing several times already.

[Elmit]

PetaByte will payout in May, because I had to move, ...
Nothing get lost, just delayed.

Elmit, how about COMMUNICATING this ? Before it happens.

I see, the 2.7 Petabyte assets bought for ~416k Burst (~165 USD on March 17th, ~124 USD today) are not that much, I'll get over it.

But with all the fuss _you_ were making about that ByteEnterprise Asset  this doesn't look proper.
The stats pages you announced on https://burstforum.com/index.php?threads/petabyte.236/page-3 :
http://home.elmit.biz/BURST/getAccountTransactions.php
http://home.elmit.biz/BURST/getAssetAccounts.php
http://home.elmit.biz/BURST/getAssetTransfers.php

don't work. There is no transparency, I cannot check anything about your asset's performance.

And if you spend time on this site to post a pool comparison and engage in, aehem, whatever that was, you could at least read and answer your Burst message inbox. I can not even communicate with you, you ignore me.

Should I see myself as an investor, "business partner", client of yours ?
Then I'm disappointed, up to the point where I want my 416k Burst back - sale offer is up, don't talk, act.

I am sorry to disappoint you, but not only I had to move, I lost also my private home page, where this statistics have been on due a hard disk failure. I have also to re-program the entire accounting again. Fortunately I backed up my keys, so nothing got lost. I could also not login to many sites, including here.
I do my best to get it up again soon.

Regarding pool comparison, I am checking my - and other - pools all the time and and had really a good time to see that all is working fine. And I really learned a lot of the other assets, which I will most likely not follow. I learned about statistics, how to see it and how it is advertised, ... short a lots I learned.

I see an investor also a business partner, but sure not as a client.

You can sell your asset anytime to anybody you like. That is what the asset exchange page is for. There is no buy-back option, since also the shop does not give me this for the hard disks.

[Pinecone]

I am using Blago's miner and just hopped over to burst.ninja to try after being on the V2 pool for months.  I have been noticing some of my "sent DL's" are not coming back as "confirmed DL's" .  And they are usually the best deadlines that are not coming back confirmed.  Randomly every few blocks this is happening and its not because of a quick block change as there is a fair amount of time after the last sent (minutes sometimes) before the next block begins.

Any thoughts?

[vaxman]

PetaByte will payout in May, because I had to move, ...
Nothing get lost, just delayed.

Elmit, how about COMMUNICATING this ? Before it happens.

…

I am sorry to disappoint you, but not only I had to move, I lost also my private home page, where this statistics have been on due a hard disk failure. I have also to re-program the entire accounting again. Fortunately I backed up my keys, so nothing got lost. I could also not login to many sites, including here.
I do my best to get it up again soon.

…

You can sell your asset anytime to anybody you like. That is what the asset exchange page is for. There is no buy-back option, since also the shop does not give me this for the hard disks.

Finally,

"I am sorry to disappoint you, but.."
"I do my best to get it up again soon"

But the "but" is what makes this a "not my fault" type of guy talk.
You make it seem a natural disaster that you had to move, lost a disk and code.
Nothing of this could have been prevented or planned for. Or even communicated.

I'm not surprised, not one word that I'd like to hear in an investor-relations setting.
This asset is unmarketable against this background.

I think I just lost 165 quid.

But hey, someone someday ordered a pizza for what later became a few million dollars.
So I might be in good company - although I'd have preferred pizza.

I hope your operations are up and running smoothly soon ! Good luck!

[riskyfire]

I am using Blago's miner and just hopped over to burst.ninja to try after being on the V2 pool for months.  I have been noticing some of my "sent DL's" are not coming back as "confirmed DL's" .  And they are usually the best deadlines that are not coming back confirmed.  Randomly every few blocks this is happening and its not because of a quick block change as there is a fair amount of time after the last sent (minutes sometimes) before the next block begins.

Any thoughts?

Hi,

Check the burst.ninja website at the bottom left hand side you'll see all the submitted deadlines, scroll down and see if yours is included.
Are your missing deadlines making it to this list? It could just be a reporting problem.

[skymax]

I have one question for the experts:

What of these ARM boards (see http://www.bigboardlist.com ) can be optimal/good for mining Burst with POC and next POC2 algo ?
(ps: with Linux as OS)

[crowetic]

PetaByte will payout in May, because I had to move, ...
Nothing get lost, just delayed.

Elmit, how about COMMUNICATING this ? Before it happens.

I see, the 2.7 Petabyte assets bought for ~416k Burst (~165 USD on March 17th, ~124 USD today) are not that much, I'll get over it.

But with all the fuss _you_ were making about that ByteEnterprise Asset  this doesn't look proper.
The stats pages you announced on https://burstforum.com/index.php?threads/petabyte.236/page-3 :
http://home.elmit.biz/BURST/getAccountTransactions.php
http://home.elmit.biz/BURST/getAssetAccounts.php
http://home.elmit.biz/BURST/getAssetTransfers.php

don't work. There is no transparency, I cannot check anything about your asset's performance.

And if you spend time on this site to post a pool comparison and engage in, aehem, whatever that was, you could at least read and answer your Burst message inbox. I can not even communicate with you, you ignore me.

Should I see myself as an investor, "business partner", client of yours ?
Then I'm disappointed, up to the point where I want my 416k Burst back - sale offer is up, don't talk, act.

I am sorry to disappoint you, but not only I had to move, I lost also my private home page, where this statistics have been on due a hard disk failure. I have also to re-program the entire accounting again. Fortunately I backed up my keys, so nothing got lost. I could also not login to many sites, including here.
I do my best to get it up again soon.

Regarding pool comparison, I am checking my - and other - pools all the time and and had really a good time to see that all is working fine. And I really learned a lot of the other assets, which I will most likely not follow. I learned about statistics, how to see it and how it is advertised, ... short a lots I learned.

I see an investor also a business partner, but sure not as a client.

You can sell your asset anytime to anybody you like. That is what the asset exchange page is for. There is no buy-back option, since also the shop does not give me this for the hard disks.

so basically, what ELMIT is saying here is this...


"You're screwed, if you can't sell the asset on the exchange, you can't do anything. I will not even buy my own asset back because I know how much crap it is made of."


FYI to anyone holding any of ByteEnterprises' assets. IF AT ANY TIME  you don't want to hold the asset anymore, I'll buy it back from you at the price you paid for it. Any day, any hour, any time. I have such confidence in my company and the assets we're setting up, and my ability to make these assets continue to grow, that I would consider it a bargain to buy back any of my assets at the original sales price.

This is how you run a company, elmit, this is how you support your investors and speak to your clients.

Any time there is an issue I post an announcement. Any time anyone has a question I answer it DIRECTLY, or find someone who can in the case of development issues (since I don't do like you do, and pretend I'm a developer.) I pay a competent team (extremely competent, sometimes they make me feel stupid. lol.) to help me with my projects, because I know that projects the size I want to accomplish, take MORE THAN ONE PERSON, let alone one clear idiot as yourself.

I'm frankly tired of your scammy assets, scammy pool, and general shit attitude and question dodging of the LONG STANDING COMMUNITY MEMBERS OF BURST.

You are unwanted here, and frankly if I had the power, I would BAN YOU FROM EVERYTHING REGARDING BURST. All people like you do for a community is tarnish its reputation, and cause people to lose trust in it.

Companies like yours should be burned to the ground.

I run a company worthy of respect, not because I don't do anything, but because I work hard for my clients, I value my investors, and I am transparent with everything that I do. IF there is a problem, I tell you, if there ever were to be a HUGE problem that was unrecoverable, I would compensate everyone for it and stop it.

In my opinion, your pool AND NOW YOUR ASSET AS WELL, are complete garbage, and you should pay people what they're owed and STOP THEM.

But I know that you won't, and it is really shitty to know that.

THE COMMUNITY NEEDS TO BAND TOGETHER AND STOP SUPPORTING SCAMMERS IN THE CRYPTO COMMUNITY!

Thank you for your time, BURST community.

[catbref]

I am using Blago's miner and just hopped over to burst.ninja to try after being on the V2 pool for months.  I have been noticing some of my "sent DL's" are not coming back as "confirmed DL's" .  And they are usually the best deadlines that are not coming back confirmed.  Randomly every few blocks this is happening and its not because of a quick block change as there is a fair amount of time after the last sent (minutes sometimes) before the next block begins.

Any thoughts?

Also you might need to adjust some config settings for burst.ninja compared to V2 pool. There's a sample Blago config file either in this (HUGE) thread or somewhere on http://burstforum.com

From memory, one of them is "UseFastRcv" which must be set to false.

[catbref]

Hi!

I´m mining on the burst.ninja pool with around ~15TB. But on the pool website are only showm 4-6TB
What could be the reason?

Thanks!

Blago's miner actually sends your mining capacity to the pool so that should be accurate.

With other miners, the pool has to estimate your capacity which it does by using the last 500 blocks' worth of your best deadlines.
It's not brilliant but it should eventually settle on something in the right ball park...

I´m mining with differnt ip addresses

Maybe this could be the problem?

Miner 1 ~ 4TB
Miner 2 ~ 2TB
Miner 3 ~ xTB

As long as all your miners use the same Burst address for their plot files then it might be okay. Hard to say without more details like Burst address, miner capacities, miner software used, etc.

[Pinecone]

I am using Blago's miner and just hopped over to burst.ninja to try after being on the V2 pool for months.  I have been noticing some of my "sent DL's" are not coming back as "confirmed DL's" .  And they are usually the best deadlines that are not coming back confirmed.  Randomly every few blocks this is happening and its not because of a quick block change as there is a fair amount of time after the last sent (minutes sometimes) before the next block begins.

Any thoughts?

Also you might need to adjust some config settings for burst.ninja compared to V2 pool. There's a sample Blago config file either in this (HUGE) thread or somewhere on http://burstforum.com

From memory, one of them is "UseFastRcv" which must be set to false.

It was exactly this Cat.  Right after I posted I messed with my config some and when I changed UseFastRcv to false all of my sents are being confirmed for the last few hours.  This will help the pool as much as me now as my good deadlines will be counted.

Maybe on the burst.ninja webpage putting a little click link near the set reward assignment area for a page of FAQ's or a quick and dirty "how to configure popular miners to work with burst.ninja" page would help some?  I know its some work but having the most efficient miners helps the entire pool.

[crowetic]

I am using Blago's miner and just hopped over to burst.ninja to try after being on the V2 pool for months.  I have been noticing some of my "sent DL's" are not coming back as "confirmed DL's" .  And they are usually the best deadlines that are not coming back confirmed.  Randomly every few blocks this is happening and its not because of a quick block change as there is a fair amount of time after the last sent (minutes sometimes) before the next block begins.

Any thoughts?

Also you might need to adjust some config settings for burst.ninja compared to V2 pool. There's a sample Blago config file either in this (HUGE) thread or somewhere on http://burstforum.com

From memory, one of them is "UseFastRcv" which must be set to false.

It was exactly this Cat.  Right after I posted I messed with my config some and when I changed UseFastRcv to false all of my sents are being confirmed for the last few hours.  This will help the pool as much as me now as my good deadlines will be counted.

Maybe on the burst.ninja webpage putting a little click link near the set reward assignment area for a page of FAQ's or a quick and dirty "how to configure popular miners to work with burst.ninja" page would help some?  I know its some work but having the most efficient miners helps the entire pool.

I was just thinking a link to some miner configuration stats and samples would be a great idea, Cat.

[callmejack]

I have one question for the experts:

What of these ARM boards (see http://www.bigboardlist.com ) can be optimal/good for mining Burst with POC and next POC2 algo ?
(ps: with Linux as OS)

i have done several tests with the banana pi in combination with a port multiplier.
the biggest issue with most embedded systems is the memory bandwidth.
i did no real optimizations to the miner for the platform and the effective performance seemed to be enough to mine up to 8tb within blocktime on port multiplied slow drives.

cheap port multiplier you only get directly from china (<30$) but there wont be any specs to check if they are compatible. (eg: http://www.ebay.com/itm/1-To-5-SATA-2-0-Port-Multiplier-Card-3Gbps-SATAII-Riser-card-/281143606093?pt=LH_DefaultDomain_0&hash=item417576fb4d)

for me the most time intense part for this test setup was to compile a custom kernel with port multiplier features activated.
the banana pi driver support is one of the worst things that exist.
therefore give the cubieboard a try and report your performance ;-)  (http://www.ebay.com/itm/Cubieboard-1GB-ARM-Development-Board-Kit-Allwinner-A10-Cortex-A8-Linux-Mini-PC-/221310780538?pt=LH_DefaultDomain_0&hash=item338726847a)

the only question when designing a rig is the effective costs per "minable" sata port.
lately the banana pi with one 8tb hdd attached looks best if you want to go embedded and only grow up to 36 drives.
if you plan to grow bigger have a look at new or used sas/sata jbod systems.



 


 

[smic]

After 3 months to stop I m glady to announce New Burst mining pool.

Please leave http://burst8pool.dtdns.net:88

-------------------------------------------------

Address is http://8pool.ga

-------------------------------------------------

Features:

-port 80, 8124

-pool host on super efficient servers cloud on Amazon.com in Frankfurt, DE, EU

-front end based on classic Uray´s source

-NO deadline limit

-DNS provided by CloudFare

-chat on line no registration required in Facebook style

-NO FEE for first month after 1.5%

-Burst pool address: BURST-U7MK-G82Y-DX3J-778YX

-any suggestion are been accepted follow me on Twittter @info8pool

Happy Bursting!

[Elmit]

I got some questions regarding the numbers at http://burstcoin.eu/pools

Pool                Total Payouts        Balance
DevPool v2       303,427.70 Burst    490,668 Burst
cryptoport.io US    6,258.00 Burst        25,952 Burst
burst.ninja       282,005.05 Burst    22,057 Burst
cryptomining.farm    188,800.73 Burst    254,103 Burst
burstcoin.it        12,551.68 Burst    694 Burst
tompool.org        19,634.51 Burst    0 Burst
PooLTo.Be            19,413.62 Burst    0 Burst
MiningHere.com    18,030.75 Burst    1 Burst
Blago Pool         66,169.51 Burst    2 Burst

As you can see, it mentions the total payout of that day, and the remaining balance. Whereby the total payout is static to that day and the Balance is updated.

Pools payout a portion and keep a portion for the coming rounds, which results in the balance.
For my feelings, the balance should never exceed the total payouts, assuming that you have always payouts.
If the pool pays out 50% at the time a block was rewarded and 50% later, then the balance could be max 50% of the total payouts.
If it is not paid out in the following rounds, then the miner might have been gone and would not get the other half.

If the pool gets close to zero, then my feeling says, that this could cause a possible missing payout. The pool might have missed to calculate the transaction fee and the pool fee. That could cause the pool having no Bursts to pay out.

As said, the balance is updated, that could change a little bit, but if the balance is constantly higher than the payout, then the pool is not paying their miners all they deserve.

What is your opinion on that?

[haitch]

I got some questions regarding the numbers at http://burstcoin.eu/pools

Pool                Total Payouts        Balance
DevPool v2       303,427.70 Burst    490,668 Burst
cryptoport.io US    6,258.00 Burst        25,952 Burst
burst.ninja       282,005.05 Burst    22,057 Burst
cryptomining.farm    188,800.73 Burst    254,103 Burst
burstcoin.it        12,551.68 Burst    694 Burst
tompool.org        19,634.51 Burst    0 Burst
PooLTo.Be            19,413.62 Burst    0 Burst
MiningHere.com    18,030.75 Burst    1 Burst
Blago Pool         66,169.51 Burst    2 Burst

....

If the pool gets close to zero, then my feeling says, that this could cause a possible missing payout. The pool might have missed to calculate the transaction fee and the pool fee. That could cause the pool having no Bursts to pay out.

....

What is your opinion on that?

My opinion:

1) I wonder if you're trying to justify your pool ripping off your miners.

2) I wonder how the pool with the second highest number of miners has the second lowest payout. If you have more miners than burst.ninja, but ninja is paying out 290K+ Burst/day, and you're paying out 18K/Day, with more miners - where is the rest of the Burst going? Your personal account ? You have 1000% the miners of burstcoin.it, but pay 150% Something is very wrong with your pool. But then, we've been telling you this for months and either 1) you're incompetent and you do nothing but continue to rip off your miners unintentionally, or 2) You're actively ripping off your miners and enriching yourself at their expense.

3) Nice move on disabling showing how much you paid out to your miners, it was a good attempt at hiding your thefts. Unfortunately, you didn't take into consideration that we can still look at the timestamps of payments to miners, and figure out who got paid, and who didn't. We can also look at how much you're paying out per payment cycle, and see that you're still only paying your miners (at worst) 2.5% of pool earnings to (at best) 66% of pool earnings, and keeping the rest.

Those were my opinions and thoughts.

H.

Edited to fix the typo that so offended Elmit.