Scientific proof that God exists?

[BADecker]

Would you like to explain how to scientificly measure your ''evidence'' because im a bit lost, thanks.

To translate, because he's that brainwashed BADecker has rewritten the definition of a scientist so it fits his religion better, kind of like how religious people try to re-write history and everything else in order to make the world try and fit in their respective religions, why do you think that they always try to wipe out other cultures' and beliefs? Too bad for him the real world doesn't ever work like that, otherwise why would all these other religions and beliefe systems exist in the first place if his was so perfect?

It gets better than that.   On more than probably 1-2 dozen occasions now,  I've had to remind BadDecker that i believe in God.

And on more than probably 1-2 dozen occasions now, BadDecker has responded to my criticism of his reasoning by basically saying I'm wrong because I don't believe in God.

It goes like this:

Him:  "Blah blah blah, BS evidence, therefore God."

Me:  "Um no, because blah blah."

Him:  "You wouldn't understand, because science blah blah."

Me:  "Still, no, not even close."

Him:  "Hey, it's your choice not to believe in God and blah blah."

Me:   "Um...I believe in God, remember?

Him:  "Well, that's a start!  And blah blah, BS evidence, therefore God."

Me:   "Um, again, no, because blah blah."

Him:  "You wouldn't understand, because science blah blah."

Me:    "No.  It's impossible.  I've told you this.  Everyone has told you this."

Him:   "Hey, it's your choice not to believe in God!  Blah blah."

Me:     "' "

Oh, you're simply upset that someone found the proof that God exists before you did. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=737322.msg10718395#msg10718395



EDIT: In addition to being able to stay on topic better.

[1714613880]

1714613880

[1714613880]

1714613880

[1714613880]

1714613880

[Decksperiment]

Yeah you above me, Vod, Oyo, whatever your catholic title is.. notice catholics have the best reputation for paedofeelya and distractions from the truth, BADicker? No wonder you hide your personal information from the public.. Prove you are not OYO or VOD, BADicker?

Did'nt think so, since truth is not a part of your vocabulary, neither is evidence, whay do you only answer yourself using your alias accounts?

[XinXan]

Would you like to explain how to scientificly measure your ''evidence'' because im a bit lost, thanks.

To translate, because he's that brainwashed BADecker has rewritten the definition of a scientist so it fits his religion better, kind of like how religious people try to re-write history and everything else in order to make the world try and fit in their respective religions, why do you think that they always try to wipe out other cultures' and beliefs? Too bad for him the real world doesn't ever work like that, otherwise why would all these other religions and beliefe systems exist in the first place if his was so perfect?

It gets better than that.   On more than probably 1-2 dozen occasions now,  I've had to remind BadDecker that i believe in God.

And on more than probably 1-2 dozen occasions now, BadDecker has responded to my criticism of his reasoning by basically saying I'm wrong because I don't believe in God.

It goes like this:

Him:  "Blah blah blah, BS evidence, therefore God."

Me:  "Um no, because blah blah."

Him:  "You wouldn't understand, because science blah blah."

Me:  "Still, no, not even close."

Him:  "Hey, it's your choice not to believe in God and blah blah."

Me:   "Um...I believe in God, remember?

Him:  "Well, that's a start!  And blah blah, BS evidence, therefore God."

Me:   "Um, again, no, because blah blah."

Him:  "You wouldn't understand, because science blah blah."

Me:    "No.  It's impossible.  I've told you this.  Everyone has told you this."

Him:   "Hey, it's your choice not to believe in God!  Blah blah."

Me:     "' "

Oh, you're simply upset that someone found the proof that God exists before you did. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=737322.msg10718395#msg10718395



EDIT: In addition to being able to stay on topic better.

Why are you ignoring when im asking for scientific proof?

[the joint]

Would you like to explain how to scientificly measure your ''evidence'' because im a bit lost, thanks.

To translate, because he's that brainwashed BADecker has rewritten the definition of a scientist so it fits his religion better, kind of like how religious people try to re-write history and everything else in order to make the world try and fit in their respective religions, why do you think that they always try to wipe out other cultures' and beliefs? Too bad for him the real world doesn't ever work like that, otherwise why would all these other religions and beliefe systems exist in the first place if his was so perfect?

It gets better than that.   On more than probably 1-2 dozen occasions now,  I've had to remind BadDecker that i believe in God.

And on more than probably 1-2 dozen occasions now, BadDecker has responded to my criticism of his reasoning by basically saying I'm wrong because I don't believe in God.

It goes like this:

Him:  "Blah blah blah, BS evidence, therefore God."

Me:  "Um no, because blah blah."

Him:  "You wouldn't understand, because science blah blah."

Me:  "Still, no, not even close."

Him:  "Hey, it's your choice not to believe in God and blah blah."

Me:   "Um...I believe in God, remember?

Him:  "Well, that's a start!  And blah blah, BS evidence, therefore God."

Me:   "Um, again, no, because blah blah."

Him:  "You wouldn't understand, because science blah blah."

Me:    "No.  It's impossible.  I've told you this.  Everyone has told you this."

Him:   "Hey, it's your choice not to believe in God!  Blah blah."

Me:     "' "

Oh, you're simply upset that someone found the proof that God exists before you did. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=737322.msg10718395#msg10718395



EDIT: In addition to being able to stay on topic better.

And yet, on page #218, you say this:

In the first place, the stuff written at https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=737322.msg10718395#msg10718395 isn't really the evidence. It only points at the evidence.

No, I'm not upset.  I'm amazed that you are saying "proof" = "stuff [that] isn't really the evidence [and] only points at the evidence."

[BADecker]

In the first place, the stuff written at https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=737322.msg10718395#msg10718395 isn't really the evidence. It only points at the evidence.

No, I'm not upset.  I'm amazed that you are saying "proof" = "stuff [that] isn't really the evidence [and] only points at the evidence."

I'm not really surprised that you stop at only being amazed. That post was really meant only for you. I probably should have PMed, so that other readers don't get mixed up.

[Decksperiment]

The rest of us know you two are replacing vod and oyo, nothing more, carry on...

[bl4kjaguar]

Would you like to explain how to scientificly measure your ''evidence'' because im a bit lost, thanks.

To translate, because he's that brainwashed BADecker has rewritten the definition of a scientist so it fits his religion better, kind of like how religious people try to re-write history and everything else in order to make the world try and fit in their respective religions, why do you think that they always try to wipe out other cultures' and beliefs? Too bad for him the real world doesn't ever work like that, otherwise why would all these other religions and beliefe systems exist in the first place if his was so perfect?

It gets better than that.   On more than probably 1-2 dozen occasions now,  I've had to remind BadDecker that i believe in God.

And on more than probably 1-2 dozen occasions now, BadDecker has responded to my criticism of his reasoning by basically saying I'm wrong because I don't believe in God.

It goes like this:

Him:  "Blah blah blah, BS evidence, therefore God."

Me:  "Um no, because blah blah."

Him:  "You wouldn't understand, because science blah blah."

Me:  "Still, no, not even close."

Him:  "Hey, it's your choice not to believe in God and blah blah."

Me:   "Um...I believe in God, remember?

Him:  "Well, that's a start!  And blah blah, BS evidence, therefore God."

Me:   "Um, again, no, because blah blah."

Him:  "You wouldn't understand, because science blah blah."

Me:    "No.  It's impossible.  I've told you this.  Everyone has told you this."

Him:   "Hey, it's your choice not to believe in God!  Blah blah."

Me:     "' "

Oh, you're simply upset that someone found the proof that God exists before you did. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=737322.msg10718395#msg10718395



EDIT: In addition to being able to stay on topic better.

Why are you ignoring when im asking for scientific proof?

You are ignoring the evidence I posted in response to you, Sir.
You are distracting self and others from the Truth about man and God.

Check out the purple plates; they have a measurable effect!
Can you find a simpler explanation for the Eisenbeiss case?
How can life be explained without the G.O.D. concept?
The world's most famous atheist was converted upon his understanding of G.O.D. as it relates to life.

Check out Deepak Chopra Essential DVD Collection to understand G.O.D. and spiritual law.

[BADecker]

Would you like to explain how to scientificly measure your ''evidence'' because im a bit lost, thanks.

To translate, because he's that brainwashed BADecker has rewritten the definition of a scientist so it fits his religion better, kind of like how religious people try to re-write history and everything else in order to make the world try and fit in their respective religions, why do you think that they always try to wipe out other cultures' and beliefs? Too bad for him the real world doesn't ever work like that, otherwise why would all these other religions and beliefe systems exist in the first place if his was so perfect?

It gets better than that.   On more than probably 1-2 dozen occasions now,  I've had to remind BadDecker that i believe in God.

And on more than probably 1-2 dozen occasions now, BadDecker has responded to my criticism of his reasoning by basically saying I'm wrong because I don't believe in God.

It goes like this:

Him:  "Blah blah blah, BS evidence, therefore God."

Me:  "Um no, because blah blah."

Him:  "You wouldn't understand, because science blah blah."

Me:  "Still, no, not even close."

Him:  "Hey, it's your choice not to believe in God and blah blah."

Me:   "Um...I believe in God, remember?

Him:  "Well, that's a start!  And blah blah, BS evidence, therefore God."

Me:   "Um, again, no, because blah blah."

Him:  "You wouldn't understand, because science blah blah."

Me:    "No.  It's impossible.  I've told you this.  Everyone has told you this."

Him:   "Hey, it's your choice not to believe in God!  Blah blah."

Me:     "' "

Oh, you're simply upset that someone found the proof that God exists before you did. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=737322.msg10718395#msg10718395



EDIT: In addition to being able to stay on topic better.

Why are you ignoring when im asking for scientific proof?

Sorry. I simply missed your post. The proof can be found at https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=737322.msg10718395#msg10718395. In addition, the OP's first post in this thread is more.

[Buffer Overflow]

Sorry. I simply missed your post. The proof can be found at https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=737322.msg10718395#msg10718395. In addition, the OP's first post in this thread is more.

LOL, you can't even keep the story straight. One minute it's proof, next it's just evidence, 10 minutes later it's not evidence just points to some.
Keep the comedy gold flowing BADecker.

[BADecker]

Sorry. I simply missed your post. The proof can be found at https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=737322.msg10718395#msg10718395. In addition, the OP's first post in this thread is more.

LOL, you can't even keep the story straight. One minute it's proof, next it's just evidence, 10 minutes later it's not evidence just points to some.
Keep the comedy gold flowing BADecker.

I wouldn't expect you to get on-topic at this stage of the game, if ever. But if you did really happen to, you just might express something of importance, like the proof for God that is found in the evidences listed at https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=737322.msg10718395#msg10718395.

[Decksperiment]

Speak about the tree's BADecker, no? In that case you deny god's creature's, and his light.. You actually deny ALL evidence provided by god based on what you are saying to us, that god is everything, and no thing can exist if HE takes the breath away, do tree's breath?

[BADecker]

Speak about the tree's BADecker, no? In that case you deny god's creature's, and his light.. You actually deny ALL evidence provided by god based on what ou are saying to us, that god is everything, and no thing can exist if HE takes the breath away, do tree's breath?

There you go. Off topic again. Kinda funny, though.

 

[Decksperiment]

It's NOT off topic, your bible is off topic, in that it has no evidence, tree's are alive, and alive, according to you, by the grace of your god, shame you cant grace us with an explanation of why your god, if he is all so powerfull, would bend you over and tan yer fuckin arse wi the evidence, a Sequioa tree.. oh, I forgot, you cant be bent over if your going up and down it, just to get a 'FEEL' for god's stubble..

The TREE's help us breath, not god. All plants help us breath, not god, you pray to god I stop this, but he continue's to prove I am more worthy of the evidence by giving me more, to smack yer arse with.

By your definition of god to the members here, The tree's are god's creature's. Your only problem, is the tree's prove the bible timeline as complete and utter shit, and hence you refuse your god, by denying your god, why should we even bother here? The only folks talking to you after denying such evidence, is YOU and your alias's, for no SANE man would talk to you after ignoring the Sequoia Tree.

Edit: The Sequoia tree, and Pinus Longavea, are PHYSICAL, and hence SCIENTIFIC proof that the bible and/or it's timeline, is a catholic scam, why? because the only one stupid enough to deny THIS evidence, are stupid enough to be you, or agree with you.

You dont speak of the truth when it ACTUALLY matter's, and hence, you are a false prophet.. a Liar.  Your own book warns us about you.

[coric]

It's NOT off topic, your bible is off topic, in that it has no evidence, tree's are alive, and alive, according to you, by the grace of your god, shame you cant grace us with an explanation of why your god, if he is all so powerfull, would bend you over and tan yer fuckin arse wi the evidence, a Sequioa tree.. oh, I forgot, you cant be bent over if your going up and down it, just to get a 'FEEL' for god's stubble..

The TREE's help us breath, not god. All plants help us breath, not god, you pray to god I stop this, but he continue's to prove I am more worthy of the evidence by giving me more, to smack yer arse with.

By your definition of god to the members here, The tree's are god's creature's. Your only problem, is the tree's prove the bible timeline as complete and utter shit, and hence you refuse your god, by denying your god, why should we even bother here? The only folks talking to you after denying such evidence, is YOU and your alias's, for no SANE man would talk to you after ignoring the Sequoia Tree.

Edit: The Sequoia tree, and Pinus Longavea, are PHYSICAL, and hence SCIENTIFIC proof that the bible and/or it's timeline, is a catholic scam, why? because the only one stupid enough to deny THIS evidence, are stupid enough to be you, or agree with you.

You dont speak of the truth when it ACTUALLY matter's, and hence, you are a false prophet.. a Liar.  Your own book warns us about you.

It is not a catholic scam. Catholics are no longer stuck in the medieval mindset, they have accepted geological time, evolution in the form of theistic evolution (see Teilhard de Chardin), and it was a catholic priest, Lemaitre, who first formulated the Big Bang theory. There's quite some shit going on in the catholic church, and the current pope Francis has a lot of work trying to clean it up, but denying obvious reality like evolution, cosmology and the age of the earth is no longer their thing.

BADecker's form of Christianity is a different kind, something only espoused by some weird fundamentalists. Like Jehova Witnesses, Adventists; on the other side the Wahhabists and Salafist of Saudi Arabia and ISIS; but most common and powerful are the "evangelicals" of the USA, which I guess his cult is part of. Likely he is ashamed of saying the name of his cult, since he avoided it so far.

[Vod]

You dont speak of the truth when it ACTUALLY matter's, and hence, you are a false prophet.. a Liar.  Your own book warns us about you.

It's funny to read dicksperiment, a proven liar, call other people liars.   

[Decksperiment]

It's NOT off topic, your bible is off topic, in that it has no evidence, tree's are alive, and alive, according to you, by the grace of your god, shame you cant grace us with an explanation of why your god, if he is all so powerfull, would bend you over and tan yer fuckin arse wi the evidence, a Sequioa tree.. oh, I forgot, you cant be bent over if your going up and down it, just to get a 'FEEL' for god's stubble..

The TREE's help us breath, not god. All plants help us breath, not god, you pray to god I stop this, but he continue's to prove I am more worthy of the evidence by giving me more, to smack yer arse with.

By your definition of god to the members here, The tree's are god's creature's. Your only problem, is the tree's prove the bible timeline as complete and utter shit, and hence you refuse your god, by denying your god, why should we even bother here? The only folks talking to you after denying such evidence, is YOU and your alias's, for no SANE man would talk to you after ignoring the Sequoia Tree.

Edit: The Sequoia tree, and Pinus Longavea, are PHYSICAL, and hence SCIENTIFIC proof that the bible and/or it's timeline, is a catholic scam, why? because the only one stupid enough to deny THIS evidence, are stupid enough to be you, or agree with you.

You dont speak of the truth when it ACTUALLY matter's, and hence, you are a false prophet.. a Liar.  Your own book warns us about you.

It is not a catholic scam. Catholics are no longer stuck in the medieval mindset, they have accepted geological time, evolution in the form of theistic evolution (see Teilhard de Chardin), and it was a catholic priest, Lemaitre, who first formulated the Big Bang theory. There's quite some shit going on in the catholic church, and the current pope Francis has a lot of work trying to clean it up, but denying obvious reality like evolution, cosmology and the age of the earth is no longer their thing.

BADecker's form of Christianity is a different kind, something only espoused by some weird fundamentalists. Like Jehova Witnesses, Adventists; on the other side the Wahhabists and Salafist of Saudi Arabia and ISIS; but most common and powerful are the "evangelicals" of the USA, which I guess his cult is part of. Likely he is ashamed of saying the name of his cult, since he avoided it so far.

Ok, I'll say I was wrong to say catholic, but here in scotland, the catholic's in ireland are well known for paedofeelya, even the church tried to cover it up.. anyway, apologies to the catholics.. I'll say bible scam.

My form of proof is a sequoia, and a 5064 year old pinus longavea that clearly survived the biblical flood, it is still alive today, and probably will be when the bible's last pages are used to wipe our arse with cause they wiped all tree's off the face of the earth so w forget this MASSIVE peice of un-deniable evidence.

I think the only way to find scientific proof in this case is to take it to the same level as dreams. Can we scientifically prove we dream? No, although we can record rem sleep, so in effect, recording rem sleep proves we dream or not, depending on how deep a sleep we are in.. this is akin to my waking up to a thought of the audio application, called Sequoia.. incidently, when I needed evidence myself the most, if BADecker's claim that god does everything through us is true, then clearly, according to this assumption, god answered my prayer. This should be classed as evidence for the existance of god, but since he and a lot of other people think I talk shit, then god can never be proved, for the method I have just written is being ignored. Meaning god CANT exist in the mindset of man, only FAITH in the HOPE he is charitable to show exist's does. Like he did when I remembered the tree.

[the joint]

You dont speak of the truth when it ACTUALLY matter's, and hence, you are a false prophet.. a Liar.  Your own book warns us about you.

It's funny to read dicksperiment, a proven liar, call other people liars.   

Yeah, you and I are supposedly the same, now.  Who knew?  BTW, if you're my left hand, thank you for all the wonderful moments we've shared together.

[Joshuar]

It's NOT off topic, your bible is off topic, in that it has no evidence, tree's are alive, and alive, according to you, by the grace of your god, shame you cant grace us with an explanation of why your god, if he is all so powerfull, would bend you over and tan yer fuckin arse wi the evidence, a Sequioa tree.. oh, I forgot, you cant be bent over if your going up and down it, just to get a 'FEEL' for god's stubble..

The TREE's help us breath, not god. All plants help us breath, not god, you pray to god I stop this, but he continue's to prove I am more worthy of the evidence by giving me more, to smack yer arse with.

By your definition of god to the members here, The tree's are god's creature's. Your only problem, is the tree's prove the bible timeline as complete and utter shit, and hence you refuse your god, by denying your god, why should we even bother here? The only folks talking to you after denying such evidence, is YOU and your alias's, for no SANE man would talk to you after ignoring the Sequoia Tree.

Edit: The Sequoia tree, and Pinus Longavea, are PHYSICAL, and hence SCIENTIFIC proof that the bible and/or it's timeline, is a catholic scam, why? because the only one stupid enough to deny THIS evidence, are stupid enough to be you, or agree with you.

You dont speak of the truth when it ACTUALLY matter's, and hence, you are a false prophet.. a Liar.  Your own book warns us about you.

It is not a catholic scam. Catholics are no longer stuck in the medieval mindset, they have accepted geological time, evolution in the form of theistic evolution (see Teilhard de Chardin), and it was a catholic priest, Lemaitre, who first formulated the Big Bang theory. There's quite some shit going on in the catholic church, and the current pope Francis has a lot of work trying to clean it up, but denying obvious reality like evolution, cosmology and the age of the earth is no longer their thing.

BADecker's form of Christianity is a different kind, something only espoused by some weird fundamentalists. Like Jehova Witnesses, Adventists; on the other side the Wahhabists and Salafist of Saudi Arabia and ISIS; but most common and powerful are the "evangelicals" of the USA, which I guess his cult is part of. Likely he is ashamed of saying the name of his cult, since he avoided it so far.

Correct, I'd say the majority of Catholics believe in evolution and the like. Why not believe? Most of the old beliefs that Catholics had before modernizing, has been there since the middle ages as you've said(Such as the earth being flat, or evolution not having happened/still happening, or that earth was the center of the universe), those beliefs are obviously false and has been refuted. Fundamentalists need to know the history of their beliefs, because frankly, most of what they believe in was developed during a time when humanity had little edcuation.

[bl4kjaguar]

A wealth of scientific information is found in the Phoenix Journals; this quoting is from
SCIENCE OF THE COSMOS TRANSFORMATION OF MAN
PLEIADES CONNECTION VOL. VIII

CHAPTER 1
REC #2 GERMAIN
WEDNESDAY, AUGUST 28, 1991

DISCUSSION

This is a crucial turning point in our efforts to lead you to a full comprehension of your own personal identity as an extension of the God-Identity. These upcoming units of discussions will be referring to the science of the recognition of the Truth of the Cosmos.

[...]

God is with you constantly--ALWAYS. You must not believe you must GO somewhere OR DO some ritual--you have to simply go within into the quiet where God is located--not out there somewhere where nothing IS. As long as you look for God (out there) you will never find HIM. You most certainly CANNOT EXPECT TO FIND GOD THROUGH ANOTHER. The "OTHER" can only recognize that which is his. As you then become "a cosmic being" who recognizes and acts in unity with The One Cosmic Being, you will BE that One and will knowingly be able to say, "I and My Father are ONE."

That stage is the goal of ALL mankind, for every living thing on earth is perpetually seeking God whether it knows it or not. Every living thing is perpetually turning toward the visible light which God invisibly centers no matter whether that thing is man, flower, tree, wave-current or atom. All are living things and all are light, for naught IS but light. Light is the ONE THING, the ONE INTELLIGENCE, the ONE POWER in the universe. Those searchers for God who have conceived the ONE BEING as having wrath and anger have cruelly retarded the human race in its search for the God of Light and Love which Messengers of all time have described, but this barbaric race of humans has never been able to comprehend their meaning.

The greatest contribution any human can make for human race transcendency is to give a dynamic description of God which will withstand the tests demanded by laboratory methods and standards. The final JOURNALS of this series will fulfill that requirement and give to the world a concept of God which is so undebatably true that an atheistic person or nation would be wholly impossible in a normal society.

This new series of lessons will give a complete roadmap from static space to dynamic motion and back again to static space. Such a teaching must be scientifically based, for one must first know God's methods and processes before one can intellectually comprehend God. Even then, one will not know the spiritual God until he has been enabled to BECOME God by completely severing his physical self from his Cosmic Self, for an intellectual comprehension is still bounded by body-awareness while Cosmic comprehension is not.

[...]
MODERN SCIENCE IS TRAGIC

The ultimately supreme need of the human race at this stage of unfolding is the discovery of the existence and identity of a comprehensible God by methods and processes which will meet the requirements and standards demanded in the laboratories of science as well as within the heart and consciousness of man. The tragedy of modern science is that it has already made this supreme discovery but is not aware of it.

[BADecker]

A wealth of scientific information is found in the Phoenix Journals; this quoting is from
SCIENCE OF THE COSMOS TRANSFORMATION OF MAN
PLEIADES CONNECTION VOL. VIII

CHAPTER 1
REC #2 GERMAIN
WEDNESDAY, AUGUST 28, 1991

DISCUSSION

This is a crucial turning point in our efforts to lead you to a full comprehension of your own personal identity as an extension of the God-Identity. These upcoming units of discussions will be referring to the science of the recognition of the Truth of the Cosmos.

[...]

God is with you constantly--ALWAYS. You must not believe you must GO somewhere OR DO some ritual--you have to simply go within into the quiet where God is located--not out there somewhere where nothing IS. As long as you look for God (out there) you will never find HIM. You most certainly CANNOT EXPECT TO FIND GOD THROUGH ANOTHER. The "OTHER" can only recognize that which is his. As you then become "a cosmic being" who recognizes and acts in unity with The One Cosmic Being, you will BE that One and will knowingly be able to say, "I and My Father are ONE."

That stage is the goal of ALL mankind, for every living thing on earth is perpetually seeking God whether it knows it or not. Every living thing is perpetually turning toward the visible light which God invisibly centers no matter whether that thing is man, flower, tree, wave-current or atom. All are living things and all are light, for naught IS but light. Light is the ONE THING, the ONE INTELLIGENCE, the ONE POWER in the universe. Those searchers for God who have conceived the ONE BEING as having wrath and anger have cruelly retarded the human race in its search for the God of Light and Love which Messengers of all time have described, but this barbaric race of humans has never been able to comprehend their meaning.

The greatest contribution any human can make for human race transcendency is to give a dynamic description of God which will withstand the tests demanded by laboratory methods and standards. The final JOURNALS of this series will fulfill that requirement and give to the world a concept of God which is so undebatably true that an atheistic person or nation would be wholly impossible in a normal society.

This new series of lessons will give a complete roadmap from static space to dynamic motion and back again to static space. Such a teaching must be scientifically based, for one must first know God's methods and processes before one can intellectually comprehend God. Even then, one will not know the spiritual God until he has been enabled to BECOME God by completely severing his physical self from his Cosmic Self, for an intellectual comprehension is still bounded by body-awareness while Cosmic comprehension is not.

[...]
MODERN SCIENCE IS TRAGIC

The ultimately supreme need of the human race at this stage of unfolding is the discovery of the existence and identity of a comprehensible God by methods and processes which will meet the requirements and standards demanded in the laboratories of science as well as within the heart and consciousness of man. The tragedy of modern science is that it has already made this supreme discovery but is not aware of it.

Since you don't have any proofs or even evidences listed here for the existence of God, your stuff is propaganda. Take a look at the universe full of evidences for God as explained at https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=737322.msg10718395#msg10718395. Check out OP's evidence for God found in the first post of the thread. Then see if you can even say your evidences that prove God exists.