[ANN] ccminer 2.3 - opensource - GPL (tpruvot)

[richx]

+3-5% hashrate on my 1070, with the same power limit.
275-285Mh. can anyone tell me how to overclocking to get 320M or so? thanks!
https://i.imgsafe.org/5465e3d3d8.jpg

[rednoW]

+3-5% hashrate on my 1070, with the same power limit.
275-285Mh. can anyone tell me how to overclocking to get 320M or so? thanks!

320m requires high power limit => high voltage and high consumpion (190watt). You need a card with good cooling like Palit gamerock or jetstream. And economicaly it is not worth it.
Better to go with 120-130 watt and 280-300 mhs

[pallas]

+3-5% hashrate on my 1070, with the same power limit.
275-285Mh. can anyone tell me how to overclocking to get 320M or so? thanks!

320m requires high power limit => high voltage and high consumpion (190watt). You need a card with good cooling like Palit gamerock or jetstream. And economicaly it is not worth it.
Better to go with 120-130 watt and 280-300 mhs

Does the Palit have good cooling system? Ball bearing fans? I thought it was a cheap brand.

[richx]

+3-5% hashrate on my 1070, with the same power limit.
275-285Mh. can anyone tell me how to overclocking to get 320M or so? thanks!

320m requires high power limit => high voltage and high consumpion (190watt). You need a card with good cooling like Palit gamerock or jetstream. And economicaly it is not worth it.
Better to go with 120-130 watt and 280-300 mhs

my card is evga 1070 SC and FTW with good cooling.
GPU-Z screenshot:
https://i.imgsafe.org/5465e3d3d8.jpg

[_javi_]

+3-5% hashrate on my 1070, with the same power limit.
275-285Mh. can anyone tell me how to overclocking to get 320M or so? thanks!

320m requires high power limit => high voltage and high consumpion (190watt). You need a card with good cooling like Palit gamerock or jetstream. And economicaly it is not worth it.
Better to go with 120-130 watt and 280-300 mhs

100% agreed.

those hashrates are for showing off 

and it seems the Palits are triple width cards with huUUuge radiators. Ugly looking, but best efficiency.

Gigabyte G1 and MSi here, 140w/80% (nvidia-smi) and 280-290 mhs

[rednoW]

Does the Palit have good cooling system? Ball bearing fans? I thought it was a cheap brand.

copper plate to contact with gpu, 5 heat pipes, cooling for vrm and gpu, huge radiator. Best cooling system on gtx1070 market. Fans are sleeve bearings ... will see how long they will survive ))

[myagui]

Does the Palit have good cooling system? Ball bearing fans? I thought it was a cheap brand.

copper plate to contact with gpu, 5 heat pipes, cooling for vrm and gpu, huge radiator. Best cooling system on gtx1070 market. Fans are sleeve bearings ... will see how long they will survive ))

Personally I prefer the EVGA Hybrids. Really cool and quiet. A bit expensive though.

[scryptr]

YESCRYPT POO)L IS DOWN--

For a couple of hours, my miners cannot connect.  Graph statistics on YIIMP indicate a pool failure of some sort.       --

EDIT:  WOOOOPS!  Pool is responding again.       --scryptr

[Epsylon3]

yep, not the first time this wallet locks :/

[ioglnx]

Wow the new version gives me for each card now 400MH/s on Lbry at just 80% TDP before it was 112TDP and 360MH/s.
Good work man. MY first 10 lbry will dedicated for you

[tbearhere]

Is the difficulty d=256 really needed for lbry bat file?  thx

Not at all tbearhere. I've become used to always setting fixed difficulty, and adjust as necessary for my hashrate, but dynamic/vardiff works just fine also. If you don't set a particular diff, it will just keep adjusting itself to maintain a reasonable rate of shares per minute.

If using fixed diff, based on my personal experiences, I would suggest something in the region of d=128 for <250MH/s, d=256 for <500MH/s, and d=512 for 500MH/s upwards. I have not tested above 1GH/s for a single rig/miner though.

Thanks myagui.... just woundering if that build really needed it.  I haven't used difficulty setting in my bat files for a long time. 

[tbearhere]

I gave almost the same amount of money to him as sp and wolf, in donations. You?

Who me? in usd $400 usd so far.

but I'm sure there are some guys seriously considering recently the payment of 0.1btc (and 3.33% fee) for SP-MOD
- and now won't donate a single satoshi for something what is:
a) better
b) coherent with whole bitcoin idea (i.e. opensource model)

Sad

Yes I know jk_14.....       .1 btc is a little high.... if he dropped it to .05btc he may get 4x as many people to contribute.

[Nikolaj]

I gave almost the same amount of money to him as sp and wolf, in donations. You?

Who me? in usd $400 usd so far.

Hi

Obviously not, the other guy

[Nikolaj]

Wow the new version gives me for each card now 400MH/s on Lbry at just 80% TDP before it was 112TDP and 360MH/s.
Good work man. MY first 10 lbry will dedicated for you

What model of 1080?

[go6ooo1212]

This is my 1080 mixed rig ( 1 * Palit GR Prem + 3* Palit GR +2 *MSI GamingX):

[BasementRot]

I only get 277MHs per GTX 1070 MSI gaming z with unlocked wattage and stock voltage. Nvidia-settings reports live core clock of 2070-2080mhz.

I'm using Cuda 8, Nvidia 367.27 and Ubuntu 16.

Which of those 3 things is causing me to get a lower hashrate than other people here?

[bit815792215]

I only get 277MHs per GTX 1070 MSI gaming z with unlocked wattage and stock voltage. Nvidia-settings reports live core clock of 2070-2080mhz.

I'm using Cuda 8, Nvidia 367.27 and Ubuntu 16.

Which of those 3 things is causing me to get a lower hashrate than other people here?

You need to use Nvidia inspector. Go to p2 clock settings and set mem clock to 500, then go to p5 clock settings and set mem clock to 500, then turn memclock all the way down on p0. The people claiming 300+ mh are running one gpu on the miner. When you use more than one or two gpus on the miner the hashrate decreases for this algo on ccminer. My 1070 will crash above 2050 core clock. You might be able to get the same speed using -i 22 and lower your consumption if you turn down the tdp in the ccminer just released.

[BasementRot]

With memory under-clocked I get 281MHs, even with only 1 card. At mem -500 Nvidia auto adjust my core clock to ~2090mhz which is pretty high. There is no way I could get 300+?

Is cuda 8 bad? I noticed the screenshot above the guy is using cuda 7.5.

Or maybe Nvidia 367.27 drivers are slower? I use them because overclocking in linux didn't work with some recent ones I tried.

[Amph]

there is any increment with the last driver over .54 with this version?

[bensam1231]

Epsylon check your PMs dude.

With memory under-clocked I get 281MHs, even with only 1 card. At mem -500 Nvidia auto adjust my core clock to ~2090mhz which is pretty high. There is no way I could get 300+?

Is cuda 8 bad? I noticed the screenshot above the guy is using cuda 7.5.

Or maybe Nvidia 367.27 drivers are slower? I use them because overclocking in linux didn't work with some recent ones I tried.

Newer isn't always better. Sometimes it is, but often times it's not. Kernels need to be retuned to new versions of Cuda and most developers don't do that. Even when they take the time to do it, it doesn't always end up faster.