VirosaGITS
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1302
Merit: 1068
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
December 17, 2015, 11:08:20 PM |
|
kano is the proxy restricted to only Asic Tubes
... However, as I mentioned before, I will be doing a 'ckpool' restart shortly. That will happen in 5 minutes.
Done. Tubes aren't getting work since exactly that time where you said "Done".
|
|
|
|
thesmokingman
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
December 17, 2015, 11:12:13 PM |
|
Phew! Now lets get a few bright green ones ![Grin](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/grin.gif) t So we get a valid block and almost 1ph leave the pool? Why would one pool hop here with a 5N? Hopping works well at slush, but why here. Don't get it. Stay after a block and keep hash high to get the next block faster. It's nothing new actually. That's the strange thing about it. Often in the past I've seen the hash rate drop after we find a block. I've no idea why miners leave then. My hashrate shows lower right now even though all of my miners indicate normal rates. Slowly creeping back up to normal poolside though. Edit: looks like my miners switched to my backup pool. Maybe that is why 1PH left after the block change, their miners switched to backup pools. I think this is because of the ckpool restart Kano just performed. I received an alert as well from Zach's website for low hast rate, but my miners show their normal rate. Since most of these alerts are driven by API provided by the site, when there is a restart it tends to kick out a few false alerts until the site catches back up.......please correct me if I'm wrong
|
|
|
|
kano (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4592
Merit: 1851
Linux since 1997 RedHat 4
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
December 17, 2015, 11:19:25 PM |
|
kano is the proxy restricted to only Asic Tubes
... However, as I mentioned before, I will be doing a 'ckpool' restart shortly. That will happen in 5 minutes.
Done. Tubes aren't getting work since exactly that time where you said "Done". Sorry about that. I didn't check the nonce proxy after the restart. It indeed gave up and stopped handing out work and didn't reconnect to the main ckpool. I've reset it. I'll make sure that doesn't happen in the future ... i.e. check the proxy and restart it also since it failed to reconnect.
|
|
|
|
kano (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4592
Merit: 1851
Linux since 1997 RedHat 4
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
December 17, 2015, 11:34:13 PM |
|
Phew! Now lets get a few bright green ones ![Grin](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/grin.gif) t So we get a valid block and almost 1ph leave the pool? Why would one pool hop here with a 5N? Hopping works well at slush, but why here. Don't get it. Stay after a block and keep hash high to get the next block faster. It's nothing new actually. That's the strange thing about it. Often in the past I've seen the hash rate drop after we find a block. I've no idea why miners leave then. My hashrate shows lower right now even though all of my miners indicate normal rates. Slowly creeping back up to normal poolside though. Edit: looks like my miners switched to my backup pool. Maybe that is why 1PH left after the block change, their miners switched to backup pools. I think this is because of the ckpool restart Kano just performed. I received an alert as well from Zach's website for low hast rate, but my miners show their normal rate. Since most of these alerts are driven by API provided by the site, when there is a restart it tends to kick out a few false alerts until the site catches back up.......please correct me if I'm wrong What PPOC is referring to is something I've seen in the past quite a few times. Shortly after we get a block, the hash rate drops. Yep, helipotte's observations are separate and indeed to do with the ckpool restart. Some % of miners will failover on a restart, a larger % will simply see a reconnect in cgminer ... if they happen to look at cgminer ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) ckpool also takes a while to average out the hash rate caused by failovers that then fail back very soon after.
|
|
|
|
altcointalk14
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
December 18, 2015, 02:13:04 AM |
|
Use "ckpool -P" and you dont drop to failover after pool finds a block.
|
|
|
|
clgrissom3
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1722
Merit: 1032
Carl, aka Sonny :)
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
December 18, 2015, 02:39:49 AM |
|
Use "ckpool -P" and you dont drop to failover after pool finds a block.
Explain?
|
|
|
|
|
-ck
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4214
Merit: 1644
Ruu \o/
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
December 18, 2015, 04:19:32 AM |
|
This does not make any sense whatsoever. There is nothing in the cgminer, ckpool or ckproxy code that would make you fail over after finding a block on the upstream pool.
|
Developer/maintainer for cgminer, ckpool/ckproxy, and the -ck kernel 2% Fee Solo mining at solo.ckpool.org -ck
|
|
|
wikkidtt
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
December 18, 2015, 04:57:06 AM |
|
Brought a friend over to the pool. And hopefully another very soon
|
|
|
|
SergES
Member
![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif)
Offline
Activity: 81
Merit: 10
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
December 18, 2015, 05:08:04 AM |
|
The site stratum.kano.is has a white IP? 104.194.28.194? One of the miners not understand DNS.
|
|
|
|
yslyung
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1500
Merit: 1002
Mine Mine Mine
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
December 18, 2015, 05:12:39 AM |
|
whereisblockie ?
1 no enuff & got snatched by fishpool makey me no happi !
|
|
|
|
ZACHM
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
December 18, 2015, 05:24:28 AM |
|
Noticed an unexpected transfer to my wallet. Thank you to whoever sent me the BTC! Much appreciated. ![Grin](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/grin.gif)
|
|
|
|
e46btc
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
December 18, 2015, 05:29:47 AM |
|
The site stratum.kano.is has a white IP? 104.194.28.194? One of the miners not understand DNS.
Exactly. % host stratum.kano.is stratum.kano.is has address 104.194.28.194
|
|
|
|
citronick
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1834
Merit: 1080
---- winter*juvia -----
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
December 18, 2015, 06:09:13 AM |
|
Noticed an unexpected transfer to my wallet. Thank you to whoever sent me the BTC! Much appreciated. ![Grin](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/grin.gif) Nice... btw, off-topic... how did you get "ZACH" on your BTC address? Luck? Buy? Noticed that Kano has "Kano" in his signature BTC address too! While I know its purely random this BTC numbers -- how you stumble on to yours?
|
If I provided you good and useful info or just a smile to your day, consider sending me merit points to further validate this Bitcointalk account ~ useful for future account recovery...
|
|
|
|
sorry2xs
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 924
Merit: 1000
Dark Passenger Bitcoin miner 2013,Bitcoin node
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
December 18, 2015, 06:38:38 AM |
|
there is a website that allows for vanity btc addresses ![Grin](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/grin.gif)
|
Please tip the Node 1MPWKB23NsZsXHANnFwVAWT86mL24fqAjF; KO4UX THAT NO GOOD DO GOODER BAT!!!
|
|
|
vh
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
December 18, 2015, 06:49:35 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
yslyung
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1500
Merit: 1002
Mine Mine Mine
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
December 18, 2015, 07:11:29 AM |
|
at current pool hashrate abt 5 ph
we need to hit *roughly* 1.5 blocks per 24 hrs to break even ? if my lousy math is correct.
including upcoming diff change. +17.xx% pending
if below that then it would be losing BTC even compared to high 4% fee for PPS ?
yes, long term might earn more (according to past history) but currently short term (present) need the BTC quick at current prices to pay some bills & to trade trying to cover for bad luck or *if* lucky to a little more.
just saying, maybe no blocks makes me go cukcooooooooooooo
where the chicken ? someone gimme chicken ! (future)
|
|
|
|
aarons6
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1736
Merit: 1006
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
December 18, 2015, 07:33:07 AM |
|
i would suggest not using the online one, but the link flikflak posted is the source code.. you do have to patch it for newer amd cards.. nasty has a txt at about page 100 or so that has the patch.. it takes about 2-3 days to get a nice 6 letter vanity address.
|
|
|
|
sky_g
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
December 18, 2015, 09:37:10 AM |
|
at current pool hashrate abt 5 ph
we need to hit *roughly* 1.5 blocks per 24 hrs to break even ? if my lousy math is correct.
including upcoming diff change. +17.xx% pending
if below that then it would be losing BTC even compared to high 4% fee for PPS ?
yes, long term might earn more (according to past history) but currently short term (present) need the BTC quick at current prices to pay some bills & to trade trying to cover for bad luck or *if* lucky to a little more.
just saying, maybe no blocks makes me go cukcooooooooooooo
where the chicken ? someone gimme chicken ! (future)
With PPS 4.5% fee everyday earning is around 0.056 BTC (After FEES paid). Last three days earning on CK pool is 0.05010678 so i already lost 0.1 BTC. With this rate even in long run how I can recover money with 9.5 THS. Lot of ppl says Long term wit different calculation but no one showing comparison of past payment of CK pool vs PPS say (F2POOL)
|
|
|
|
|