Bitcoin Forum
May 24, 2024, 11:49:56 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 ... 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 [317] 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 ... 2248 »
  Print  
Author Topic: KanoPool since 2014 🐈 - PPLNS and Solo 0.5% fee - Worldwide - 2436 blocks  (Read 5350580 times)
This is a self-moderated topic. If you do not want to be moderated by the person who started this topic, create a new topic. (50 posts by 3+ users deleted.)
VirosaGITS
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1302
Merit: 1068



View Profile
December 17, 2015, 11:08:20 PM
 #6321

kano is the proxy restricted to only Asic Tubes
...
However, as I mentioned before, I will be doing a 'ckpool' restart shortly.
That will happen in 5 minutes.
Done.

Tubes aren't getting work since exactly that time where you said "Done".


                      ▄▄█████▄▄
                    ▐████████████▄
                   ▄█▀▀▀▀▀▀▀██████▌
             █▄  ▄█▀           ▀▀█
              ▀▀▀███▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄   █▄   ▄

               ▄▀▀         ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀██▀▀▀
         ▄▄▄▄▄█▄▄ ▄▀▀▄ ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄█▄▄▄▄
         ████▒▒███    ████▒▒████▌
    ▀█▄ ▀
███████▄ ███▒▒███      ██▒▒█████       ▀█▄
 ███████ ▀█▒▒████     ▄█▒▒█████▀         ▀█ ▄  ▄▄
  ██████  ▌▀▀█████▄▄▄███████▀▀            ███▄███▌
 █████████  █████▀▀█▀▀██████▌             ██████▀
 ▀█████████ ███▄  ███   ▐███▌ ▄██       ▄█████▀
     ▀▀    ▀▀███████████████▄▄████▄▄▄▄█▀▀▀▀▀
               ▀▀▀███▀▀▀      ██████▄
                               ▀▀▀▀▀

▄█████████████████████████████▄
███████████████████████████████
███████████████████████████████
███████████████████████████████
█████████▀▀█████████▀▀█████████
███████ ▄▀▀         ▀▀▄ ███████
██████                   ██████
█████▌     ▄▄     ▄▄     ▐█████
█████     ████   ████     █████
█████      ▀▀     ▀▀      █████
█████▄   ▀▄▄▄     ▄▄▄▀   ▄█████
████████▄▄▄█████████▄▄▄████████
███████████████████████████████
███████████████████████████████
███████████████████████████████
 ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
thesmokingman
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 212
Merit: 100



View Profile
December 17, 2015, 11:12:13 PM
 #6322

Phew! Now lets get a few bright green ones  Grin
t

So we get a valid block and almost 1ph leave the pool? Why would one pool hop here with a 5N? Hopping works well at slush, but why here. Don't get it.

Stay after a block and keep hash high to get the next block faster.
It's nothing new actually.
That's the strange thing about it.
Often in the past I've seen the hash rate drop after we find a block.
I've no idea why miners leave then.

My hashrate shows lower right now even though all of my miners indicate normal rates.  Slowly creeping back up to normal poolside though.

Edit:  looks like my miners switched to my backup pool.  Maybe that is why 1PH left after the block change, their miners switched to backup pools.

I think this is because of the ckpool restart Kano just performed. I received an alert as well from Zach's website for low hast rate, but my miners show their normal rate.

Since most of these alerts are driven by API provided by the site, when there is a restart it tends to kick out a few false alerts until the site catches back up.......please correct me if I'm wrong

PIMP your AMD & Nvidia Farm. Finally a Multi-Miner Linux 16.04 Distro with Web Monitoring and On the Fly Algo-Switching. My PIMP AMD/Nvidia FARM: https://miner.farm/farmer/554/farmstatus
kano (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 4508
Merit: 1819


Linux since 1997 RedHat 4


View Profile
December 17, 2015, 11:19:25 PM
 #6323

kano is the proxy restricted to only Asic Tubes
...
However, as I mentioned before, I will be doing a 'ckpool' restart shortly.
That will happen in 5 minutes.
Done.

Tubes aren't getting work since exactly that time where you said "Done".
Sorry about that.
I didn't check the nonce proxy after the restart.
It indeed gave up and stopped handing out work and didn't reconnect to the main ckpool.
I've reset it.

I'll make sure that doesn't happen in the future ... i.e. check the proxy and restart it also since it failed to reconnect.

Pool: https://kano.is - low 0.5% fee PPLNS 3 Days - Most reliable Solo with ONLY 0.5% fee   Bitcointalk thread: Forum
Discord support invite at https://kano.is/ Majority developer of the ckpool code - k for kano
The ONLY active original developer of cgminer. Original master git: https://github.com/kanoi/cgminer
kano (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 4508
Merit: 1819


Linux since 1997 RedHat 4


View Profile
December 17, 2015, 11:34:13 PM
 #6324

Phew! Now lets get a few bright green ones  Grin
t

So we get a valid block and almost 1ph leave the pool? Why would one pool hop here with a 5N? Hopping works well at slush, but why here. Don't get it.

Stay after a block and keep hash high to get the next block faster.
It's nothing new actually.
That's the strange thing about it.
Often in the past I've seen the hash rate drop after we find a block.
I've no idea why miners leave then.

My hashrate shows lower right now even though all of my miners indicate normal rates.  Slowly creeping back up to normal poolside though.

Edit:  looks like my miners switched to my backup pool.  Maybe that is why 1PH left after the block change, their miners switched to backup pools.

I think this is because of the ckpool restart Kano just performed. I received an alert as well from Zach's website for low hast rate, but my miners show their normal rate.

Since most of these alerts are driven by API provided by the site, when there is a restart it tends to kick out a few false alerts until the site catches back up.......please correct me if I'm wrong
What PPOC is referring to is something I've seen in the past quite a few times.
Shortly after we get a block, the hash rate drops.

Yep, helipotte's observations are separate and indeed to do with the ckpool restart.
Some % of miners will failover on a restart, a larger % will simply see a reconnect in cgminer ... if they happen to look at cgminer Smiley

ckpool also takes a while to average out the hash rate caused by failovers that then fail back very soon after.

Pool: https://kano.is - low 0.5% fee PPLNS 3 Days - Most reliable Solo with ONLY 0.5% fee   Bitcointalk thread: Forum
Discord support invite at https://kano.is/ Majority developer of the ckpool code - k for kano
The ONLY active original developer of cgminer. Original master git: https://github.com/kanoi/cgminer
altcointalk14
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 751
Merit: 251


View Profile
December 18, 2015, 02:13:04 AM
 #6325

Use "ckpool -P" and you dont drop to failover after pool finds a block.
clgrissom3
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1722
Merit: 1032


Carl, aka Sonny :)


View Profile
December 18, 2015, 02:39:49 AM
 #6326

Use "ckpool -P" and you dont drop to failover after pool finds a block.

Explain?
altcointalk14
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 751
Merit: 251


View Profile
December 18, 2015, 03:52:12 AM
 #6327

If for some reason your miners failover to backup pool after pool block found, try stratum thru stratum pasthru mode -P (not -p)

That is what I use and mine have never failed over to backup pool

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=790323.msg8907589
-ck
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 4116
Merit: 1635


Ruu \o/


View Profile WWW
December 18, 2015, 04:19:32 AM
 #6328

If for some reason your miners failover to backup pool after pool block found, try stratum thru stratum pasthru mode -P (not -p)

That is what I use and mine have never failed over to backup pool

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=790323.msg8907589
This does not make any sense whatsoever. There is nothing in the cgminer, ckpool  or ckproxy code that would make you fail over after finding a block on the upstream pool.

Developer/maintainer for cgminer, ckpool/ckproxy, and the -ck kernel
2% Fee Solo mining at solo.ckpool.org
-ck
wikkidtt
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 201
Merit: 100


View Profile WWW
December 18, 2015, 04:57:06 AM
 #6329

Brought a friend over to the pool. And hopefully another very soon
SergES
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 81
Merit: 10


View Profile
December 18, 2015, 05:08:04 AM
 #6330

The site stratum.kano.is has a white IP? 104.194.28.194? One of the miners not understand DNS.
yslyung
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1500
Merit: 1002


Mine Mine Mine


View Profile
December 18, 2015, 05:12:39 AM
 #6331

whereisblockie ?

1 no enuff & got snatched by fishpool makey me no happi !
ZACHM
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 777
Merit: 1003



View Profile
December 18, 2015, 05:24:28 AM
 #6332

Noticed an unexpected transfer to my wallet.
Thank you to whoever sent me the BTC!
Much appreciated.  Grin
e46btc
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 157
Merit: 103


View Profile
December 18, 2015, 05:29:47 AM
 #6333

The site stratum.kano.is has a white IP? 104.194.28.194? One of the miners not understand DNS.
Exactly.

Code:
% host stratum.kano.is
stratum.kano.is has address 104.194.28.194

https://txid.io https://double-spending.com - Automatic BTC double-spending tool.  Legacy, Segwit and Bech32 supported.
https://dgb256.online - Digibyte mining pool , https://combine.dgb256.online - DGB mining payouts consolidation service.
https://sha256.io , https://solomining.io - DGB, BTC, BCH SOLO pools, Instant payouts, AsicBoost supported
citronick
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1834
Merit: 1080


---- winter*juvia -----


View Profile
December 18, 2015, 06:09:13 AM
 #6334

Noticed an unexpected transfer to my wallet.
Thank you to whoever sent me the BTC!
Much appreciated.  Grin

Nice... btw, off-topic... how did you get "ZACH" on your BTC address? Luck? Buy?
Noticed that Kano has "Kano" in his signature BTC address too!
While I know its purely random this BTC numbers -- how you stumble on to yours?

If I provided you good and useful info or just a smile to your day, consider sending me merit points to further validate this Bitcointalk account ~ useful for future account recovery...
flikflak
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 408
Merit: 259


View Profile
December 18, 2015, 06:15:43 AM
 #6335

@citronick

Have a look here @ Vanitygen: Vanity bitcoin address generator
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=25804.0
sorry2xs
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 924
Merit: 1000


Dark Passenger Bitcoin miner 2013,Bitcoin node


View Profile
December 18, 2015, 06:38:38 AM
 #6336

there is a website that allows for vanity btc addresses  Grin

Please tip the Node 1MPWKB23NsZsXHANnFwVAWT86mL24fqAjF; KO4UX
THAT NO GOOD DO GOODER BAT!!!
vh
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 699
Merit: 666


View Profile
December 18, 2015, 06:49:35 AM
 #6337

@citronick

Have a look here @ Vanitygen: Vanity bitcoin address generator
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=25804.0

Look carefully and don't miss the disclaimer:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=795023.0

yslyung
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1500
Merit: 1002


Mine Mine Mine


View Profile
December 18, 2015, 07:11:29 AM
 #6338

at current pool hashrate abt 5 ph

we need to hit *roughly* 1.5 blocks per 24 hrs to break even ? if my lousy math is correct.

including upcoming diff change. +17.xx% pending

if below that then it would be losing BTC even compared to high 4% fee for PPS ?

yes, long term might earn more (according to past history) but currently short term (present) need the BTC quick at current prices to pay some bills & to trade trying to cover for bad luck or *if* lucky to a little more.

just saying, maybe no blocks makes me go cukcooooooooooooo

where the chicken ? someone gimme chicken ! (future)
aarons6
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1736
Merit: 1006


View Profile
December 18, 2015, 07:33:07 AM
 #6339

@citronick

Have a look here @ Vanitygen: Vanity bitcoin address generator
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=25804.0

Look carefully and don't miss the disclaimer:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=795023.0

i would suggest not using the online one, but the link flikflak posted is the source code..
you do have to patch it for newer amd cards.. nasty has a txt at about page 100 or so that has the patch..

it takes about 2-3 days to get a nice 6 letter vanity address.


sky_g
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 167
Merit: 100


View Profile
December 18, 2015, 09:37:10 AM
 #6340

at current pool hashrate abt 5 ph

we need to hit *roughly* 1.5 blocks per 24 hrs to break even ? if my lousy math is correct.

including upcoming diff change. +17.xx% pending

if below that then it would be losing BTC even compared to high 4% fee for PPS ?

yes, long term might earn more (according to past history) but currently short term (present) need the BTC quick at current prices to pay some bills & to trade trying to cover for bad luck or *if* lucky to a little more.

just saying, maybe no blocks makes me go cukcooooooooooooo

where the chicken ? someone gimme chicken ! (future)

With PPS 4.5% fee everyday earning is around 0.056 BTC (After FEES paid). Last three days earning on CK pool is 0.05010678 so i already lost 0.1 BTC.
With this rate even in long run how I can recover money with 9.5 THS.

Lot of ppl says Long term wit different calculation but no one showing comparison of past payment of CK pool vs PPS say (F2POOL)
Pages: « 1 ... 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 [317] 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 ... 2248 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!