Bitcoin Forum
June 28, 2025, 06:41:21 AM *
News: Pizza day contest voting
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 ... 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 [135] 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 ... 1240 »
  Print  
Author Topic: CCminer(SP-MOD) Modded GPU kernels.  (Read 2347857 times)
hashbrown9000
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 427
Merit: 250


View Profile
May 04, 2015, 02:42:34 AM
 #2681

scryptr, thanks for that script.  can any instances of nicehash be replaced with westhash for those of us from the U.S.  And is this script an all-in-one solution, i.e. it will start the miner and then run on auto-pilot?

Pinkcoin:
ETH:
VTC:
BTC:
DragonSlayer
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 181
Merit: 100



View Profile
May 04, 2015, 02:45:57 AM
 #2682

Nicely done, I am getting 10,300 kh/s with x11 on gtx980.  I am not using -g, as it still not work in conjunction with -d.

CapnBDL
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1064
Merit: 500


MOBU


View Profile WWW
May 04, 2015, 02:51:00 AM
Last edit: May 04, 2015, 03:29:54 AM by CapnBDL
 #2683

scryptr,

Not sure what context that 'concurrent' falls into but... So, to mine just x11 coins, then, I take it that the sp (latest, of course) will give me the better hashrate? Will it mine LTC? Also, would you mind giving me a correct .bat file for the best hash /w my 750Ti?    Thank you very much for the help!

Edit: did a reread & believe I understand the concurrent remark. Sorry. Not sure if it (sp) will mine just any scrypt tho. I've always thought it was for x11 only. I STILL don't know the correct syntax for my .bat tho. Ive got it OCed already. Help?

Thanks!

           ▄██▄
████▄    ▄██████▄    ▄████
██████▄ ▀████████▀ ▄██████
▐███████▄ ▀████▀ ▄███████▌
▐█████████▄ ▀▀ ▄█████████▌
 ████ ▀█████▄▄█████▀ ████
 ████ ▄ ▀████████▀ ▄ ████
 ▐███ ██▄ ▀████▀ ▄██ ███▌
 ▐███ ████▄ ▀▀ ▄████ ███▌
  ███ ██████▄▄██████ ███
  ███ ██████████████ ███
  ▐██ ██████████████ ██▌
  ▐██ ██████████████ ██▌
   ██ ██████████████ ██
       ▀██████████▀
         ▀██████▀
           ▀██▀
.M O B U.███████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████
   The Investment Bank of the Future  
The Security Token Protocol and Licensed Security Token Exchange
█▀




█▄
Facebook Medium
Whitepaper ANN
LinkedIn    Reddit
▀█




▄█

         ▄▄▄█████▄▄▄
      ▄███████████████▄
    ▄███████████████████▄
   ███████████████████████
  ████ ▀███████▀    ▀██████
 █████▌  ▀▀███        ▄█████
▐██████▄             ▐██████▌
▐█████▄               ██████▌
▐███████▄            ███████▌
 ███████▄          ▄████████
  ████████       ▄█████████
   █████▀   ▄▄▄███████████
    ▀███████████████████▀
      ▀███████████████▀
         ▀▀▀█████▀▀▀

         ▄▄▄█████▄▄▄
      ▄███████████████▄
    ▄███████████████████▄
   ███████████████████████
  █████▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀█████
 █████     ▄▄          █████
▐█████     ████▄▄      █████▌
▐█████     ████████    █████▌
▐█████     ████▀▀      █████▌
 █████     ▀▀          █████
  █████▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄█████
   ███████████████████████
    ▀███████████████████▀
      ▀███████████████▀
         ▀▀▀█████▀▀▀

         ▄▄▄█████▄▄▄
      ▄███████████████▄
    ▄███████████████████▄
   ███████████████████████
  ████████████████▀▀▀ ▐████
 ███████████▀▀▀  ▄█▀  ██████
▐█████▀▀▀      ▄█▀    ██████▌
▐███▄▄▄    ▄▄██▀     ███████▌
▐████████ ███▀       ███████▌
 ████████▌█          ███████
  ████████ ▄▄██▄    ███████
   ███████████████▄ ██████
    ▀███████████████████▀
      ▀███████████████▀
         ▀▀▀█████▀▀▀
scryptr
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1798
Merit: 1028



View Profile WWW
May 04, 2015, 03:29:26 AM
 #2684

scryptr, thanks for that script.  can any instances of nicehash be replaced with westhash for those of us from the U.S.  And is this script an all-in-one solution, i.e. it will start the miner and then run on auto-pilot?

It is all-in-one.  You could directly replace the NiceHash URLs and api with WestHash equivalents.

My apologies to Skunk, it is currently a hack-n-slash job, removing code no longer necessary for different mining programs and the defunct TMB site.  I can still see portions that need removal, but that function as-is. 

The script finally mined for me today.  It didn't switch, though, when Yaamp started paying more for Quark.  The script kept running, but the miner was killed and did not reboot properly.  It definitely needs work.  I flopped it out there like a flea circus side-show.

--scryptr

SCRYPTR'S NOTEBOOK: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5035515.msg46035530#msg46035530
GITHUB: "github.com/scryptr"  MERIT is appreciated, also.  Thanks!
hashbrown9000
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 427
Merit: 250


View Profile
May 04, 2015, 03:32:47 AM
 #2685


Pinkcoin:
ETH:
VTC:
BTC:
scryptr
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1798
Merit: 1028



View Profile WWW
May 04, 2015, 03:41:54 AM
Last edit: May 04, 2015, 03:55:00 AM by scryptr
 #2686

scryptr,

Not sure what context that 'concurrent' falls into but... So, to mine just x11 coins, then, I take it that the sp (latest, of course) will give me the better hashrate? Will it mine LTC? Also, would you mind giving me a correct .bat file for the best hash /w my 750Ti?    Thank you very much for the help!

Edit: did a reread & believe I understand the concurrent remark. Sorry. Not sure if it (sp) will mine just any scrypt tho. I've always thought it was for x11 only. I STILL don't know the correct syntax for my .bat tho. Ive got it OCed already. Help?

Thanks!

X11 COMMAND LINE--

Windows batch file format:

":loop

ccminer.exe -a x11 -i 20.5 -o stratum+tcp:// URL:PORT -u USERNAME.WORKER -p PASSWORD -b 0.0.0.0:4068

goto loop"

Linux BASH scrypt, or single command line:

"./ccminer -a x11 -i 20.5 -o stratum+tcp:// URL:PORT -u USERNAME.WORKER -p PASSWORD -b 0.0.0.0:4068"

The "-i 20.5" is the "intensity" setting.  It is a performance flag.  The "-b 0.0.0.0:4068" is an optional API flag, if you want to monitor your performance with software like CCmonitor, etc.  Currently, the "gputhreads", or "-g" switch is also being developed.  Read at least the last 10 pages of this thread to learn about it, it is another performance option, and just about ready for stable use.       --scryptr

SCRYPTR'S NOTEBOOK: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5035515.msg46035530#msg46035530
GITHUB: "github.com/scryptr"  MERIT is appreciated, also.  Thanks!
sp_ (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2926
Merit: 1087

Team Black developer


View Profile
May 04, 2015, 07:09:44 AM
Last edit: May 04, 2015, 07:34:37 AM by sp_
 #2687

scryptr,
Not sure what context that 'concurrent' falls into but... So, to mine just x11 coins, then, I take it that the sp (latest, of course) will give me the better hashrate? Will it mine LTC? Also, would you mind giving me a correct .bat file for the best hash /w my 750Ti?    Thank you very much for the help!
Edit: did a reread & believe I understand the concurrent remark. Sorry. Not sure if it (sp) will mine just any scrypt tho. I've always thought it was for x11 only. I STILL don't know the correct syntax for my .bat tho. Ive got it OCed already. Help?
Thanks!

Don't mine scrypt, mine quark.

ccminer -a quark -o stratum+tcp://yaamp.com:4033 -u <your LTC adress> -p xx

Yaamp is currently paying around 0.4BTC for 1 GHASH of quark


1 750ti OC does 6.5 MHASH in the quark algo

You earn:
0.0065*0.4=0,0026 (btc per day) (0,4355 LTC Per day.) ($0.64 / day)


SCRYPT pays 0.1840 BTC/GHASH

A 750ti is earning as much as a  15MHASH Scrypt ASIC miner with the current prices. (and use 50watt in the wall) (3.33 watt per MHASH (converted to scrypt MHASH))

A used 750ti can be bought for around $100 second hand.

Team Black Miner (ETHB3 ETH ETC VTC KAWPOW FIROPOW EVRPROGPOW MEOWPOW + dual mining + tripple mining.. https://github.com/sp-hash/TeamBlackMiner
chrysophylax
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3094
Merit: 1093


--- ChainWorks Industries ---


View Profile WWW
May 04, 2015, 07:44:18 AM
 #2688

scryptr,
Not sure what context that 'concurrent' falls into but... So, to mine just x11 coins, then, I take it that the sp (latest, of course) will give me the better hashrate? Will it mine LTC? Also, would you mind giving me a correct .bat file for the best hash /w my 750Ti?    Thank you very much for the help!
Edit: did a reread & believe I understand the concurrent remark. Sorry. Not sure if it (sp) will mine just any scrypt tho. I've always thought it was for x11 only. I STILL don't know the correct syntax for my .bat tho. Ive got it OCed already. Help?
Thanks!

Don't mine scrypt, mine quark.

ccminer -a quark -o stratum+tcp://yaamp.com:4033 -u <your LTC adress> -p xx

Yaamp is currently paying around 0.4BTC for 1 GHASH of quark


1 750ti OC does 6.5 MHASH in the quark algo

You earn:
0.0065*0.4=0,0026 (btc per day) (0,4355 LTC Per day.) ($0.64 / day)


SCRYPT pays 0.1840 BTC/GHASH

A 750ti is earning as much as a  15MHASH Scrypt ASIC miner with the current prices. (and use 50watt in the wall) (3.33 watt per MHASH (converted to scrypt MHASH))

A used 750ti can be bought for around $100 second hand.

sp - for some unknown reason - the latest git clone is not compiling ...

it just freezes and sits at the same specific place during compile ...

compilation has not changed for any other compiles that have been made before - just this one ...

where it freezes is below ...

-------

ptxas info    : Function properties for _Z25titan_scrypt_core_kernelAILi1EL12MemoryAccess1EEvPKjii
    0 bytes stack frame, 0 bytes spill stores, 0 bytes spill loads
ptxas info    : Used 25 registers, 336 bytes cmem[0]
ptxas info    : Compiling entry function '_Z25titan_scrypt_core_kernelBILi1EL12MemoryAccess1EEvPjii' for 'sm_50'
ptxas info    : Function properties for _Z25titan_scrypt_core_kernelBILi1EL12MemoryAccess1EEvPjii
    0 bytes stack frame, 0 bytes spill stores, 0 bytes spill loads
ptxas info    : Used 28 registers, 336 bytes cmem[0]
scrypt/titan_kernel.cu: In member function ‘virtual bool TitanKernel::run_kernel(dim3, dim3, int, int, cudaStream_t, uint32_t*, uint32_t*, unsigned int, unsigned int, bool, bool, int)’:
scrypt/titan_kernel.cu:682:27: warning: comparison between signed and unsigned integer expressions [-Wsign-compare]
  if (N != prev_N[thr_id]) {
                           ^
ptxas info    : 0 bytes gmem, 480 bytes cmem[3]
ptxas info    : Compiling entry function '_Z24x11_luffa512_gpu_hash_64jjPmPj' for 'sm_50'
ptxas info    : Function properties for _Z24x11_luffa512_gpu_hash_64jjPmPj
    0 bytes stack frame, 0 bytes spill stores, 0 bytes spill loads
ptxas info    : Used 80 registers, 344 bytes cmem[0]
ptxas info    : Overriding global maxrregcount 128 with entry-specific value 64 computed using thread count
ptxas info    : Overriding global maxrregcount 128 with entry-specific value 64 computed using thread count
ptxas info    : 0 bytes gmem, 1152 bytes cmem[3]
ptxas info    : Compiling entry function '_Z26x11_shavite512_gpu_hash_64jjPm' for 'sm_50'
ptxas info    : Function properties for _Z26x11_shavite512_gpu_hash_64jjPm
    32 bytes stack frame, 28 bytes spill stores, 28 bytes spill loads
ptxas info    : Used 64 registers, 4096 bytes smem, 336 bytes cmem[0]
ptxas info    : Compiling entry function '_Z26x11_shavite512_gpu_hash_80jjPv' for 'sm_50'
ptxas info    : Function properties for _Z26x11_shavite512_gpu_hash_80jjPv
    128 bytes stack frame, 132 bytes spill stores, 132 bytes spill loads
ptxas info    : Used 64 registers, 4096 bytes smem, 336 bytes cmem[0]

-------

that last line is where it sits and doesnt move ...

any ideas? ...

edit - when ctrl-c stops the compile - this is what is displayed ...

-------

ptxas info    : Used 64 registers, 4096 bytes smem, 336 bytes cmem[0]
^Cnvcc error   : 'cicc' died due to signal 2
make[2]: *** [yescrypt/cuda_yescrypt.o] Error 2
make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Interrupt
make: *** [all] Interrupt

-------

im stumped ...

#crysx

sp_ (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2926
Merit: 1087

Team Black developer


View Profile
May 04, 2015, 07:48:04 AM
Last edit: May 04, 2015, 07:58:34 AM by sp_
 #2689

Did you get the last commit (makefile)?

scryptr buildt it yesterday on linux.

Please do a full clean and get the latest sourcecode and try again.

Team Black Miner (ETHB3 ETH ETC VTC KAWPOW FIROPOW EVRPROGPOW MEOWPOW + dual mining + tripple mining.. https://github.com/sp-hash/TeamBlackMiner
chrysophylax
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3094
Merit: 1093


--- ChainWorks Industries ---


View Profile WWW
May 04, 2015, 08:17:04 AM
 #2690

Did you get the last commit (makefile)?

scryptr buildt it yesterday on linux.

Please do a full clean and get the latest sourcecode and try again.

my compile script does exactly that ...

1 - deletes the current compile directory completely ...
2 - git clone
3 - cd into ccminer directory and 'builds' the ccminer file ...
4 - mv the newly compiled ccminer file to the miner directory and renames it to ccminer-sph-xxx ( xxx being whatever i want it to be ) ...
5 - mv the current ccminer file to ccminer-orig ...
6 - copies the newly made ccminer-sph-xxx to ccminer ...
7 - changes ownership of the miner directory ( as all the above is done as root ) ...
8 - reboots ...

when the machine restarts - it runs the new ccminer and the settings in the miner script ...

this is fine for all compiles except the latest ones ... since the commit when you added neoscrypt ...

now it just stops and freezes at part 3 of the compile / install sequence ...

ive tried it manually also with your 'standard' build.sh file and its still locks up in the same place - the yescrypt part you see in above ...

ive also found that since neoscrypt has been added - BEFORE all this happened ( and forgot to mention ) the 'build.sh' would not even start the compile unless fedora had installed the static c++ libraries ( which it never needed prior to this ) ...

so i added them in the install ...

yum -y install libstdc++-static.x86_64 ...

the compile started and continued up until now ... the compile just simply stalls at the same place everytime ...

possibly scryptr has and idea? ... or djm maybe? ... anyone? ...

im now lost as to why this wont compile sp ...

#crysx

sp_ (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2926
Merit: 1087

Team Black developer


View Profile
May 04, 2015, 10:34:51 AM
 #2691

I think a solution will be to exlude all the scrypt code with a #define in the project.

#define includescrypt 1


Team Black Miner (ETHB3 ETH ETC VTC KAWPOW FIROPOW EVRPROGPOW MEOWPOW + dual mining + tripple mining.. https://github.com/sp-hash/TeamBlackMiner
djm34
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1400
Merit: 1050


View Profile WWW
May 04, 2015, 11:04:57 AM
 #2692

Did you get the last commit (makefile)?

scryptr buildt it yesterday on linux.

Please do a full clean and get the latest sourcecode and try again.

my compile script does exactly that ...

1 - deletes the current compile directory completely ...
2 - git clone
3 - cd into ccminer directory and 'builds' the ccminer file ...
4 - mv the newly compiled ccminer file to the miner directory and renames it to ccminer-sph-xxx ( xxx being whatever i want it to be ) ...
5 - mv the current ccminer file to ccminer-orig ...
6 - copies the newly made ccminer-sph-xxx to ccminer ...
7 - changes ownership of the miner directory ( as all the above is done as root ) ...
8 - reboots ...

when the machine restarts - it runs the new ccminer and the settings in the miner script ...

this is fine for all compiles except the latest ones ... since the commit when you added neoscrypt ...

now it just stops and freezes at part 3 of the compile / install sequence ...

ive tried it manually also with your 'standard' build.sh file and its still locks up in the same place - the yescrypt part you see in above ...

ive also found that since neoscrypt has been added - BEFORE all this happened ( and forgot to mention ) the 'build.sh' would not even start the compile unless fedora had installed the static c++ libraries ( which it never needed prior to this ) ...

so i added them in the install ...

yum -y install libstdc++-static.x86_64 ...

the compile started and continued up until now ... the compile just simply stalls at the same place everytime ...

possibly scryptr has and idea? ... or djm maybe? ... anyone? ...

im now lost as to why this wont compile sp ...

#crysx
the compilation doesn't stop on yescrypt but on shavite (as usual), the compilation of shavite always takes time

djm34 facebook page
BTC: 1NENYmxwZGHsKFmyjTc5WferTn5VTFb7Ze
Pledge for neoscrypt ccminer to that address: 16UoC4DmTz2pvhFvcfTQrzkPTrXkWijzXw
Handofmidas
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 61
Merit: 10


View Profile
May 04, 2015, 11:12:30 AM
 #2693

Hi just tried release49 for X11 and getting occasionally a few booooos due to low difficulty shares. Cards not overclocked.

chrysophylax
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3094
Merit: 1093


--- ChainWorks Industries ---


View Profile WWW
May 04, 2015, 03:51:08 PM
 #2694

Did you get the last commit (makefile)?

scryptr buildt it yesterday on linux.

Please do a full clean and get the latest sourcecode and try again.

my compile script does exactly that ...

1 - deletes the current compile directory completely ...
2 - git clone
3 - cd into ccminer directory and 'builds' the ccminer file ...
4 - mv the newly compiled ccminer file to the miner directory and renames it to ccminer-sph-xxx ( xxx being whatever i want it to be ) ...
5 - mv the current ccminer file to ccminer-orig ...
6 - copies the newly made ccminer-sph-xxx to ccminer ...
7 - changes ownership of the miner directory ( as all the above is done as root ) ...
8 - reboots ...

when the machine restarts - it runs the new ccminer and the settings in the miner script ...

this is fine for all compiles except the latest ones ... since the commit when you added neoscrypt ...

now it just stops and freezes at part 3 of the compile / install sequence ...

ive tried it manually also with your 'standard' build.sh file and its still locks up in the same place - the yescrypt part you see in above ...

ive also found that since neoscrypt has been added - BEFORE all this happened ( and forgot to mention ) the 'build.sh' would not even start the compile unless fedora had installed the static c++ libraries ( which it never needed prior to this ) ...

so i added them in the install ...

yum -y install libstdc++-static.x86_64 ...

the compile started and continued up until now ... the compile just simply stalls at the same place everytime ...

possibly scryptr has and idea? ... or djm maybe? ... anyone? ...

im now lost as to why this wont compile sp ...

#crysx
the compilation doesn't stop on yescrypt but on shavite (as usual), the compilation of shavite always takes time

djm34 - its not that it takes a long time ... to test this i have left it ...

it is now more than 6 hours ( only due to the fact im not in the office at the moment and i CAN leave it ) and its still in the same position it was when i left it ...

impossible for a compilation to take that sort of time ...

how has everyone else compiled this version? ... i have had no issues with the previous versions ...

frustrated with it now :| ...

#crysx

chrysophylax
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3094
Merit: 1093


--- ChainWorks Industries ---


View Profile WWW
May 04, 2015, 03:52:30 PM
 #2695

I think a solution will be to exlude all the scrypt code with a #define in the project.

#define includescrypt 1



maybe - but that that doesnt actually resolve the issue ...

i can replicate this EVERY time - so its an inherent issue ...

im stumped ...

#crysx

sp_ (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2926
Merit: 1087

Team Black developer


View Profile
May 04, 2015, 04:59:41 PM
 #2696

Are you running the latest drivers?

I just submitted a 117% faster blake coin.

from 230MHASH to 515MHASH on the 750ti.


Team Black Miner (ETHB3 ETH ETC VTC KAWPOW FIROPOW EVRPROGPOW MEOWPOW + dual mining + tripple mining.. https://github.com/sp-hash/TeamBlackMiner
sp_ (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2926
Merit: 1087

Team Black developer


View Profile
May 04, 2015, 05:33:36 PM
 #2697

Submitted a fix for skein and blake. (at yaamp.com)
The hashrate should now be improved on the pool and the duplicate shares messages should be gone.

Team Black Miner (ETHB3 ETH ETC VTC KAWPOW FIROPOW EVRPROGPOW MEOWPOW + dual mining + tripple mining.. https://github.com/sp-hash/TeamBlackMiner
scryptr
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1798
Merit: 1028



View Profile WWW
May 04, 2015, 07:19:35 PM
 #2698

COMMIT 778 and 779--

Both commits built readily with "BASH build.sh" and the default makefile.am.  I notice that SP_ already has commit 780 on GitHub.

For Lyra2, I am getting 820kh/s per 750ti, and 4.8 mh/s for my 6x750ti FTW rig.  Quark is a little slower, though, building up to 38Mh/s for the 750ti rig, and slower than the previous 38.6Mh/s on the same rig.       --scryptr

SCRYPTR'S NOTEBOOK: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5035515.msg46035530#msg46035530
GITHUB: "github.com/scryptr"  MERIT is appreciated, also.  Thanks!
antonio8
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1400
Merit: 1000


View Profile
May 04, 2015, 07:34:15 PM
 #2699

COMMIT 778 and 779--

Both commits built readily with "BASH build.sh" and the default makefile.am.  I notice that SP_ already has commit 780 on GitHub.

For Lyra2, I am getting 820kh/s per 750ti, and 4.8 mh/s for my 6x750ti FTW rig.  Quark is a little slower, though, building up to 38Mh/s for the 750ti rig, and slower than the previous 38.6Mh/s on the same rig.       --scryptr

scryptr

You overclock a lot on the 750ti's for that hash on lyra2.

If you are going to leave your BTC on an exchange please send it to this address instead 1GH3ub3UUHbU5qDJW5u3E9jZ96ZEmzaXtG, I will at least use the money better than someone who steals it from the exchange. Thanks Wink
scryptr
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1798
Merit: 1028



View Profile WWW
May 04, 2015, 07:48:55 PM
 #2700

COMMIT 778 and 779--

Both commits built readily with "BASH build.sh" and the default makefile.am.  I notice that SP_ already has commit 780 on GitHub.

For Lyra2, I am getting 820kh/s per 750ti, and 4.8 mh/s for my 6x750ti FTW rig.  Quark is a little slower, though, building up to 38Mh/s for the 750ti rig, and slower than the previous 38.6Mh/s on the same rig.       --scryptr

scryptr

You overclock a lot on the 750ti's for that hash on lyra2.

This is a Linux rig, and although I have tried, I haven't mastered overclocking via Linux.  I use an "intensity" setting of "-i 16.5" in the command line.   My 750ti SSC cards on Win 7 x64 get about 725kh/s on Lyra2, non-overclocked.  With overclocking, they can get 780kh/s, but it is not stable.  SP_ improved Lyra2 hash rate with today's builds.       --scryptr

SCRYPTR'S NOTEBOOK: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5035515.msg46035530#msg46035530
GITHUB: "github.com/scryptr"  MERIT is appreciated, also.  Thanks!
Pages: « 1 ... 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 [135] 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 ... 1240 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!