CCminer(SP-MOD) Modded GPU kernels.

[jpouza]

I just sendt another one check your junk email folder. It might have been placed there.

rename the file to .7z and depack with 7zip. then rename the spreadminer1.x to spreadminer1.exe and copy it to the miner folder.

Received just the first email...nothing yet...

[jpouza]

I just sendt another one check your junk email folder. It might have been placed there.

rename the file to .7z and depack with 7zip. then rename the spreadminer1.x to spreadminer1.exe and copy it to the miner folder.

Received just the first email...nothing yet...

Almost 1MH/s total improvement, went from 19,9MH/s to 20,7MH/s Total.

My score is lower than yours, do I need to setup some intensity parameter or update driver?


imag

980 185MHz+ Core
970 210MHz+ Core

Delta fan at medium rotation and using just one of the two radiator fans.

Cheers

[sp_]

I have Memory clocks +200. You should set them to +400Mhz if stable.
There is also a -x parameter, that you can use to tweak. -x 12 is good on the 750ti but poor on the 980. Perhaps run 2 instances if you have mixed rigs with 750ti and 970/980

[jpouza]

I have Memory clocks +200. You should set them to +400Mhz if stable.

hum, I will adjust, thanks again sp_!

[jpouza]

I have Memory clocks +200. You should set them to +400Mhz if stable.

hum, I will adjust, thanks again sp_!

No benefits from memory clock, zero gain...strange.

What's your driver version?

[sp_]

No benefits from memory clock, zero gain...strange.
What's your driver version?

Same here. I was mistaking. I use +200MHz on the gpu. My driver is the latest (22-jan-2015)

[jpouza]

No benefits from memory clock, zero gain...strange.
What's your driver version?

Same here. I was mistaking. I use +200MHz on the gpu. My driver is the latest (22-jan-2015)

I will update the driver.

tks

[Dotcommie]

I have Memory clocks +200. You should set them to +400Mhz if stable.

hum, I will adjust, thanks again sp_!

No benefits from memory clock, zero gain...strange.

What's your driver version?

I see you're still using Afterburner... How do you get memclocks to actually stay?  Mine has never let me overclock the memory.  If I used EVGA Precision I remember I could, but I switched when it wouldn't let me use multiple cards. Afterburner just seems weird to me.  I upgraded to the new driver last night but it still thought it was the old one so I restarted it and got about 60 more khash per 970.  I also got about 40khash more by not using the -x parameter.  Not sure why, but setting any value in -x seemed to always be worse than the default.  Anyways, my 970s are just over 4050 now but it seems GPU0 is 40 less which I'm guessing is due to heat even though they're really well ventilated.  Oh well, progress is progress  

*edit* Wow, it appears overclocking core has quite the accelerating affect on spread.  I increased it to +50 from +25 and it gave 90khash on the hotter one and 80 on the colder one.

[sp_]

I see you're still using Afterburner... How do you get memclocks to actually stay?  Mine has never let me overclock the memory.  If I used EVGA Precision I remember I could, but I switched when it wouldn't let me use multiple cards. Afterburner just seems weird to me.  I upgraded to the new driver last night but it still thought it was the old one so I restarted it and got about 60 more khash per 970.  I also got about 40khash more by not using the -x parameter.  Not sure why, but setting any value in -x seemed to always be worse than the default.  Anyways, my 970s are just over 4050 now but it seems GPU0 is 40 less which I'm guessing is due to heat even though they're really well ventilated.  Oh well, progress is progress  

If you use the -x parameter in my version you can double the value since I support more -x (intensity).
Default for compute 52 is -x 15
Default for compute 50 is -x 12

[djm34]

I have Memory clocks +200. You should set them to +400Mhz if stable.

hum, I will adjust, thanks again sp_!

No benefits from memory clock, zero gain...strange.

What's your driver version?

I see you're still using Afterburner... How do you get memclocks to actually stay?  Mine has never let me overclock the memory.  If I used EVGA Precision I remember I could, but I switched when it wouldn't let me use multiple cards. Afterburner just seems weird to me.  I upgraded to the new driver last night but it still thought it was the old one so I restarted it and got about 60 more khash per 970.  I also got about 40khash more by not using the -x parameter.  Not sure why, but setting any value in -x seemed to always be worse than the default.  Anyways, my 970s are just over 4050 now but it seems GPU0 is 40 less which I'm guessing is due to heat even though they're really well ventilated.  Oh well, progress is progress  

you need to use nvidiainspector and tweak the p2 state

[Dotcommie]

I see you're still using Afterburner... How do you get memclocks to actually stay?  Mine has never let me overclock the memory.  If I used EVGA Precision I remember I could, but I switched when it wouldn't let me use multiple cards. Afterburner just seems weird to me.  I upgraded to the new driver last night but it still thought it was the old one so I restarted it and got about 60 more khash per 970.  I also got about 40khash more by not using the -x parameter.  Not sure why, but setting any value in -x seemed to always be worse than the default.  Anyways, my 970s are just over 4050 now but it seems GPU0 is 40 less which I'm guessing is due to heat even though they're really well ventilated.  Oh well, progress is progress  

If you use the -x parameter in my version you can double the value since I support more -x (intensity).
Default for compute 52 is -x 15
Default for compute 50 is -x 12

double as in -x 30?  I was using -x 20 before and it was slower than not using -x

[sp_]

double as in -x 30?  I was using -x 20 before and it was slower than not using -x

you have to try. If the old supported -x 20, this version will support -x 40 or more.

Try -x 20, -x 21, -x 22, x 23 up to 50 or until it crashes.....

[Dotcommie]

double as in -x 30?  I was using -x 20 before and it was slower than not using -x

you have to try. If the old supported -x 20, this version will support -x 40 or more.

Try -x 20, -x 21, -x 22, x 23 up to 50 or until it crashes.....

Well it looks like at least the 750s crash at 23 and 22 doesn't give much improvement so I went back to 21 on them for stability.  Will have to find out the limits of the 970s later. Thanks!

[chrysophylax]

Sending out the spreadminer v1.0 now.

I am missing 3 email adresses. If you have donated 0.1. Send me a pm with your email adress.

I didn't receive nothing....

Sent you PM again with e-mail adress...

same ...

#crysx

[jpouza]

Using -x 32

980 at 185+ Core
970 at 210+ Core


subirimagenes

[sp_]

-x 32 is good on the 980 card, but not so good on the 970 card.  (100khash lower than with -x 12)

[Dotcommie]

-x 32 is good on the 980 card, but not so good on the 970 card.  (100khash lower than with -x 12)

x 22 seems to be best for my G1 970s and I get about the same as jpouza.  Haven't tried x 32 but I doubt that would run on mine.  Everything is already really laggy.

[antonio8]

I am running factory stock OC 750ti and I get the best with -x 15. I could probably get more but I am also cpu mining with the cpu set to start/low with 3 of 6 cores.

[chrysophylax]

I am running factory stock OC 750ti and I get the best with -x 15. I could probably get more but I am also cpu mining with the cpu set to start/low with 3 of 6 cores.

i cant get this windows version to run under linux - no matter what i do ...

im still going to donate more as i appreciate the work that you have done anyway - but i would really appreciate if i could have one that will work under linux sp ...

#crysx

[antonio8]

Sorry don't know how to embed pics but anyone find blocks yet?

I am 0 for 3. http://s3.postimg.org/nrdjpvxkj/Rejected_blocks.png

EDIT: My first rejected block shows no yay or boo but the wallet did not accept it.