sp_ (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2926
Merit: 1087
Team Black developer
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
February 03, 2015, 01:28:25 PM |
|
quark: ~5550kh (on release 31 is ~5600kh) up to 61% of modded TDP 65w (cool)
But the 50KHASH drop needs to be investigated. Not so many changes in quark. More in the other algos. Thanks for testing.
|
|
|
|
rednoW
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1510
Merit: 1003
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
February 03, 2015, 01:32:38 PM |
|
What rates are you getting in x11?
~2830 khash/s same on release 31 and 34 (as miner shows). Have no long run to test pool shown rate d = 0.02
|
|
|
|
sp_ (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2926
Merit: 1087
Team Black developer
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
February 03, 2015, 01:40:34 PM |
|
What rates are you getting in x11?
~2830 khash/s same on release 31 and 34 (as miner shows). Have no long run to test pool shown rate d = 0.02 try d=0.01 or d=0.005. Or empty diff parameter. I get a higher hashrate. but my rig has more than one card.
|
|
|
|
mig
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 6
Merit: 0
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
February 03, 2015, 02:43:12 PM |
|
yes, it works. Good in "fresh". Strange but for "quark" on compute 3.0 original ccminer 1.2 is the best, just for fun ![Wink](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/wink.gif) ccminer-rel1.5.2-cuda7-x86 is somewhat slower than ccminer-rel1.5.1-vc2013-x86 on both gtx660 and K4000, except for lyra2 and fresh, where it is the same. I still don't understand how and why K4000 gets less hashrates than gtx660. ![Huh](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/huh.gif) For the original ccminer 1.2, Nod32 reports it is a "Win32/CoinMiner.TD trojan", so I haven't tried that.
|
|
|
|
tbearhere
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3178
Merit: 1003
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
February 03, 2015, 03:10:34 PM |
|
Currently testing on fresh.suprnova.cc - looks good at first.
that is your pool is it not ocminer? ... #crysx chrysophylax hi I'll answer for him...that is his pool and he has many setup for older coins too.
|
|
|
|
rednoW
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1510
Merit: 1003
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
February 03, 2015, 03:18:33 PM |
|
try d=0.01 or d=0.005. Or empty diff parameter. I get a higher hashrate. but my rig has more than one card.
yeah, looks like a little bit more in miner ~2930. and a 5% "reject reason: Invalid job id" upd: rate is floating - now again closer to ~2850
|
|
|
|
scryptr
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1797
Merit: 1028
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
February 03, 2015, 04:05:42 PM Last edit: February 03, 2015, 10:54:16 PM by scryptr |
|
Interesting to see bitcoin (sha256) support added. No chance of profit but fun to have most of the algos supported in one miner. Of note, this doesn't seem to be a very optimal implementation. With cgminer (opencl) I was getting about 405,000 kh/s on my 2 x 750 Ti setup. With release 34 ccminer I'm down to about 345,000 kh/s. Still, it sits at the very bottom of the profitability list with either hash rate so I'm not too concerned. It burns many more times in power than it earns.
The code was added by klaus-t. Probobly a pure C port without any cuda. The code could be optimized, but it doesn't matter. Even if I manage to push the speed to 1GHASH---> not profitable. But perhaps I will try anyway... I will add some more speedup in x13,x14,x15 today. Similar to the fresh/x11 optimalizations. Divide the stream into two streams and run in paralell. Nobody mining x11 anymore? what rates are you getting? (ppol vs miner) (970 and 980 is untested so please test) Use a low difficulty on nicehash.com you can add the difficulty in the password like this: -p=d=0.02 Build v34 -- I get 5300kh/s on x11 with my GTX 960, and on quark, 9600kh/s. Very stable on Win 7 x64. What are your default Intensities in v34? My AMD 280x cards get 6.6mh/s each on x11. --scryptr
|
|
|
|
flipclip
Member
![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif)
Offline
Activity: 111
Merit: 10
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
February 03, 2015, 05:37:05 PM |
|
Nobody mining x11 anymore? what rates are you getting? (ppol vs miner) (970 and 980 is untested so please test)
Use a low difficulty
on nicehash.com you can add the difficulty in the password like this: -p=d=0.02
Last night I was running tests (v34) with nicehash and a difficulty of .01. I was seeing ~5,850 KH/s (2 750Ti's, no overclock), which was the same for the v30 release.
|
|
|
|
sp_ (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2926
Merit: 1087
Team Black developer
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
February 03, 2015, 07:20:01 PM |
|
Interesting to see bitcoin (sha256) support added. No chance of profit but fun to have most of the algos supported in one miner. Of note, this doesn't seem to be a very optimal implementation. With cgminer (opencl) I was getting about 405,000 kh/s on my 2 x 750 Ti setup. With release 34 ccminer I'm down to about 345,000 kh/s. Still, it sits at the very bottom of the profitability list with either hash rate so I'm not too concerned. It burns many more times in power than it earns.
Klaus_t implementation was pretty good, but the launchconfiguration of the kernal was way off. I submitted a 17.5% speed increase to github. (750ti)
|
|
|
|
tbearhere
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3178
Merit: 1003
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
February 03, 2015, 10:24:18 PM |
|
Interesting to see bitcoin (sha256) support added. No chance of profit but fun to have most of the algos supported in one miner. Of note, this doesn't seem to be a very optimal implementation. With cgminer (opencl) I was getting about 405,000 kh/s on my 2 x 750 Ti setup. With release 34 ccminer I'm down to about 345,000 kh/s. Still, it sits at the very bottom of the profitability list with either hash rate so I'm not too concerned. It burns many more times in power than it earns.
What does your algo command look like... -a bitcoin .......? Its nice to know that we can mine BTC.
|
|
|
|
sp_ (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2926
Merit: 1087
Team Black developer
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
February 03, 2015, 10:42:04 PM |
|
Yeah. 200mhash on the 750ti. You can solomine and wait for the jackpot. One block is 50 btc. Good luck:)
|
|
|
|
Handofmidas
Member
![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif)
Offline
Activity: 61
Merit: 10
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
February 03, 2015, 11:39:34 PM |
|
Just tried release34 for my GTX 970 @1500/7000. No change to previous releases at pools with vardiff.
However, mining at pool with low dificulty leads to hashspikes when shares are found quickly. So the hashrate is still at 8.5 MH, but occasionally spiking up to 10.9 MH, which leads to an average of about 8.8 MH. I guess this release is best for heavily overclocked GTX 980 cards mining at a pool with the lowest possible difficulty. Good luck with testing everyone.
Edit: Values for X11 algo
|
|
|
|
StuffOfInterest
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
February 04, 2015, 03:13:54 AM |
|
Interesting to see bitcoin (sha256) support added. No chance of profit but fun to have most of the algos supported in one miner. Of note, this doesn't seem to be a very optimal implementation. With cgminer (opencl) I was getting about 405,000 kh/s on my 2 x 750 Ti setup. With release 34 ccminer I'm down to about 345,000 kh/s. Still, it sits at the very bottom of the profitability list with either hash rate so I'm not too concerned. It burns many more times in power than it earns.
Klaus_t implementation was pretty good, but the launchconfiguration of the kernal was way off. I submitted a 17.5% speed increase to github. (750ti) Hah! 17.5% increase puts it right at the 405 mh/s I had with the OpenCL miner. ![Cheesy](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/cheesy.gif) If all the ASIC miners out there suddenly brick themselves we'll have a nice GPU Bitcoin miner here.
|
|
|
|
ocminer
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2688
Merit: 1240
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
February 04, 2015, 10:29:35 AM |
|
Currently testing on fresh.suprnova.cc - looks good at first.
that is your pool is it not ocminer? ... #crysx chrysophylax hi I'll answer for him...that is his pool and he has many setup for older coins too. Thats correct, thanks tbearhere, the freshcoin pool is running for a long time already, yes.
|
suprnova pools - reliable mining pools - #suprnova on freenet https://www.suprnova.cc - FOLLOW us @ Twitter ! twitter.com/SuprnovaPools
|
|
|
ltc_bilic
Member
![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif)
Offline
Activity: 130
Merit: 10
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
February 04, 2015, 10:56:36 AM |
|
lyra2re algo appears to be broken in latest release
|
|
|
|
bathrobehero
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2002
Merit: 1051
ICO? Not even once.
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
February 04, 2015, 11:19:12 AM |
|
Yeah. 200mhash on the 750ti. You can solomine and wait for the jackpot. One block is 50 btc. Good luck:)
Haha, now we only need 1,677,721,600 pieces of 750 Ti to be close to a 51% attack.
|
Not your keys, not your coins!
|
|
|
DougB62
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
February 04, 2015, 11:21:38 AM Last edit: February 04, 2015, 04:56:54 PM by DougB62 |
|
lyra2re algo appears to be broken in latest release
I noticed this as well, though I only tried it on Westhash (Nicehash). Edit - I meant to say I only tried yaamp... ![Undecided](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/undecided.gif)
|
|
|
|
PVmining
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
February 04, 2015, 12:51:00 PM |
|
Yeah. 200mhash on the 750ti. You can solomine and wait for the jackpot. One block is 50 btc. Good luck:)
Haha, now we only need 1,677,721,600 pieces of 750 Ti to be close to a 51% attack. *lol* you made my day!
|
|
|
|
sp_ (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2926
Merit: 1087
Team Black developer
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
February 04, 2015, 12:52:15 PM Last edit: February 04, 2015, 01:05:15 PM by sp_ |
|
Interesting to see bitcoin (sha256) support added. No chance of profit but fun to have most of the algos supported in one miner. Of note, this doesn't seem to be a very optimal implementation. With cgminer (opencl) I was getting about 405,000 kh/s on my 2 x 750 Ti setup. With release 34 ccminer I'm down to about 345,000 kh/s. Still, it sits at the very bottom of the profitability list with either hash rate so I'm not too concerned. It burns many more times in power than it earns.
Klaus_t implementation was pretty good, but the launchconfiguration of the kernal was way off. I submitted a 17.5% speed increase to github. (750ti) Hah! 17.5% increase puts it right at the 405 mh/s I had with the OpenCL miner. ![Cheesy](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/cheesy.gif) If all the ASIC miners out there suddenly brick themselves we'll have a nice GPU Bitcoin miner here. I think the code could use some more work. https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Non-specialized_hardware_comparisonapparently the AMD radeon 7970 can do 815 MHASH with 214watt. But I will not spend any time on it. ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) Bether to focus on algos that still give a profit.. F.eks the Spreadminer
|
|
|
|
rednoW
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1510
Merit: 1003
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
February 04, 2015, 03:42:49 PM |
|
lyra2re algo appears to be broken in latest release
I noticed this as well, though I only tried it on Westhash (Nicehash). lyra: release 34 - not working, only few khashes rate release 31 - working near ~860kh but consumes a lot of cpu release 32 - the best, ~860kh, near zero cpu consumption
|
|
|
|
|