CCminer(SP-MOD) Modded GPU kernels.

[rednoW]

Rednow, can you try the latest version please. What is the hashrate in neoscrypt

Sorry, not today, far from computer ((

[kahir]

can I get info on cards like 970 980 980ti Hashrate on quark using the new releases

I'm getting 10.4 M/hash on GTX 960 

[Strannik-74]

can I get info on cards like 970 980 980ti Hashrate on quark using the new releases

I'm getting 10.4 M/hash on GTX 960 

sp_.69 Quark
-750Ti - 6.6MH/s
-970 - 18Mh/s

[dominuspro]

can I get info on cards like 970 980 980ti Hashrate on quark using the new releases

I'm getting 10.4 M/hash on GTX 960 

Check my post:

clocks:
980 G1 gaming: 1450
970 G1 gaming: 1560
970 ASUS strix oc: 1440
960 mini cheap something: 1411

[sp_]

edit..
private kernal for sale.
50% faster on the gtx 750ti
85% faster on the gtx 970.
PM for info

Which algo?

Pentablake
80MHASH gtx 970 (OC)
30MHASH gtx 750ti (OC)

Limited edition sale



with my modded kernal your gtx 970 will be much faster than the Titanx!:

from the cryptominingblog: (penta (ccMiner 1.5.45 SP-MOD) )

If you look at the numbers in sp-mod 45, you see that many of the algorithms are much faster in release 69.
All the work I have done for small donations makes it faster.
But the miner community get spoiled because I release a new version every week. (To Djm34: 50khash * 20 = 1MHASH   )


Pentablake has been pretty much untuched since the beginning of my mod (1 year ago) So It was easy to make it 85% faster.
I have sold 4 copies now, the 5th will cost 0.3BTC (donation to my BTC adress)

Support the developers, and get a carrot back.

I have sold 5 copies of the pentablake miner, so will not sell anymore. But I have already improved the hashrate, so the pentablake owners will recieve another version with more hash. (+5Mhash on the gtx 970)

[sp_]

can I get info on cards like 970 980 980ti Hashrate on quark using the new releases
I'm getting 10.4 M/hash on GTX 960  

sp_.69 Quark
-750Ti - 6.6MH/s
-970 - 18Mh/s

I can overclock my windforce gtx970 to mine at 19MHASH. When the 980ti reference cards came out they mined at 19,9MHASH (sp-mod 45). So just by clever cooling by gigabyte(windforce G1 gaming oc) and clever coding I have almost transformed the 970 to a 980ti.

[coins101]

I've followed a link recommending stopping here for a miner for Spreadcoin (spr)?

Any help or directions welcome.

I'm running windows 7 with AMD R9 290 Trix cards. I know the OP says, Nvidia- I'm just following a link.

Don't mind booting up to linux if there is a particular flavor that works with a specific SPR miner.

Cheers,

[kahir]

can I get info on cards like 970 980 980ti Hashrate on quark using the new releases
I'm getting 10.4 M/hash on GTX 960  

sp_.69 Quark
-750Ti - 6.6MH/s
-970 - 18Mh/s

I can overclock my windforce gtx970 to mine at 19MHASH. When the 980ti reference cards came out they mined at 19,9MHASH (sp-mod 45). So just by clever cooling by gigabyte(windforce G1 gaming oc) and clever coding I have almost transformed the 970 to a 980ti.

thanks guys ..

well looking at those numbers looks like 970 is the best buck for hash

[badgoes]

hi

one question about compiling in win 7 with cuda 6.5

this messages are in the compiling log from vs 2013 community

1>C:/compile/ccminer-windows/bitcredit/bitcredit.cu(50): warning : variable "Htarg" was declared but never referenced
     1>C:/compile/ccminer-windows/bitcredit/bitcredit.cu(51): warning : variable "coef" was declared but never referenced
     1>C:/compile/ccminer-windows/bitcredit/bitcredit.cu(68): warning : variable "endianmid" was declared but never referenced
     1>C:/compile/ccminer-windows/bitcredit/bitcredit.cu(73): warning : variable "nloop" was declared but never referenced
     1>C:/compile/ccminer-windows/bitcredit/bitcredit.cu(50): warning : variable "Htarg" was declared but never referenced
     1>C:/compile/ccminer-windows/bitcredit/bitcredit.cu(51): warning : variable "coef" was declared but never referenced
     1>C:/compile/ccminer-windows/bitcredit/bitcredit.cu(68): warning : variable "endianmid" was declared but never referenced
     1>C:/compile/ccminer-windows/bitcredit/bitcredit.cu(73): warning : variable "nloop" was declared but never referenced
     1>C:/compile/ccminer-windows/bitcredit/bitcredit.cu(50): warning : variable "Htarg" was declared but never referenced
     1>C:/compile/ccminer-windows/bitcredit/bitcredit.cu(51): warning : variable "coef" was declared but never referenced
     1>C:/compile/ccminer-windows/bitcredit/bitcredit.cu(68): warning : variable "endianmid" was declared but never referenced
     1>C:/compile/ccminer-windows/bitcredit/bitcredit.cu(73): warning : variable "nloop" was declared but never referenced
         ptxas info    : 0 bytes gmem
     1>C:/compile/ccminer-windows/bitcredit/bitcredit.cu(50): warning : variable "Htarg" was declared but never referenced
     1>C:/compile/ccminer-windows/bitcredit/bitcredit.cu(51): warning : variable "coef" was declared but never referenced
     1>C:/compile/ccminer-windows/bitcredit/bitcredit.cu(68): warning : variable "endianmid" was declared but never referenced
     1>C:/compile/ccminer-windows/bitcredit/bitcredit.cu(73): warning : variable "nloop" was declared but never referenced

ist that normal

thanks for answer

[pallas]

Just out of curiosity, what coin worth mining is using pentablake?

[Vita1ico]

Just out of curiosity, what coin worth mining is using pentablake?

+
Also interesting ...))

[go6ooo1212]

Just out of curiosity, what coin worth mining is using pentablake?

Yeah , I've missed that also...

[Slava_K]

JoinCoin... 8 algos. yesterday i mine 130MH 3 hours - 1 block. Mine in solo...

[t-nelson]

hi

one question about compiling in win 7 with cuda 6.5

this messages are in the compiling log from vs 2013 community

1>C:/compile/ccminer-windows/bitcredit/bitcredit.cu(50): warning : variable "Htarg" was declared but never referenced
     1>C:/compile/ccminer-windows/bitcredit/bitcredit.cu(51): warning : variable "coef" was declared but never referenced
     1>C:/compile/ccminer-windows/bitcredit/bitcredit.cu(68): warning : variable "endianmid" was declared but never referenced
     1>C:/compile/ccminer-windows/bitcredit/bitcredit.cu(73): warning : variable "nloop" was declared but never referenced
     1>C:/compile/ccminer-windows/bitcredit/bitcredit.cu(50): warning : variable "Htarg" was declared but never referenced
     1>C:/compile/ccminer-windows/bitcredit/bitcredit.cu(51): warning : variable "coef" was declared but never referenced
     1>C:/compile/ccminer-windows/bitcredit/bitcredit.cu(68): warning : variable "endianmid" was declared but never referenced
     1>C:/compile/ccminer-windows/bitcredit/bitcredit.cu(73): warning : variable "nloop" was declared but never referenced
     1>C:/compile/ccminer-windows/bitcredit/bitcredit.cu(50): warning : variable "Htarg" was declared but never referenced
     1>C:/compile/ccminer-windows/bitcredit/bitcredit.cu(51): warning : variable "coef" was declared but never referenced
     1>C:/compile/ccminer-windows/bitcredit/bitcredit.cu(68): warning : variable "endianmid" was declared but never referenced
     1>C:/compile/ccminer-windows/bitcredit/bitcredit.cu(73): warning : variable "nloop" was declared but never referenced
         ptxas info    : 0 bytes gmem
     1>C:/compile/ccminer-windows/bitcredit/bitcredit.cu(50): warning : variable "Htarg" was declared but never referenced
     1>C:/compile/ccminer-windows/bitcredit/bitcredit.cu(51): warning : variable "coef" was declared but never referenced
     1>C:/compile/ccminer-windows/bitcredit/bitcredit.cu(68): warning : variable "endianmid" was declared but never referenced
     1>C:/compile/ccminer-windows/bitcredit/bitcredit.cu(73): warning : variable "nloop" was declared but never referenced

ist that normal

thanks for answer

C&P FTW, I suspect.

Unused variable warnings are innocuous either way.

[badgoes]

hi

one question about compiling in win 7 with cuda 6.5

this messages are in the compiling log from vs 2013 community

1>C:/compile/ccminer-windows/bitcredit/bitcredit.cu(50): warning : variable "Htarg" was declared but never referenced
     1>C:/compile/ccminer-windows/bitcredit/bitcredit.cu(51): warning : variable "coef" was declared but never referenced
     1>C:/compile/ccminer-windows/bitcredit/bitcredit.cu(68): warning : variable "endianmid" was declared but never referenced
     1>C:/compile/ccminer-windows/bitcredit/bitcredit.cu(73): warning : variable "nloop" was declared but never referenced
     1>C:/compile/ccminer-windows/bitcredit/bitcredit.cu(50): warning : variable "Htarg" was declared but never referenced
     1>C:/compile/ccminer-windows/bitcredit/bitcredit.cu(51): warning : variable "coef" was declared but never referenced
     1>C:/compile/ccminer-windows/bitcredit/bitcredit.cu(68): warning : variable "endianmid" was declared but never referenced
     1>C:/compile/ccminer-windows/bitcredit/bitcredit.cu(73): warning : variable "nloop" was declared but never referenced
     1>C:/compile/ccminer-windows/bitcredit/bitcredit.cu(50): warning : variable "Htarg" was declared but never referenced
     1>C:/compile/ccminer-windows/bitcredit/bitcredit.cu(51): warning : variable "coef" was declared but never referenced
     1>C:/compile/ccminer-windows/bitcredit/bitcredit.cu(68): warning : variable "endianmid" was declared but never referenced
     1>C:/compile/ccminer-windows/bitcredit/bitcredit.cu(73): warning : variable "nloop" was declared but never referenced
         ptxas info    : 0 bytes gmem
     1>C:/compile/ccminer-windows/bitcredit/bitcredit.cu(50): warning : variable "Htarg" was declared but never referenced
     1>C:/compile/ccminer-windows/bitcredit/bitcredit.cu(51): warning : variable "coef" was declared but never referenced
     1>C:/compile/ccminer-windows/bitcredit/bitcredit.cu(68): warning : variable "endianmid" was declared but never referenced
     1>C:/compile/ccminer-windows/bitcredit/bitcredit.cu(73): warning : variable "nloop" was declared but never referenced

ist that normal

thanks for answer

C&P FTW, I suspect.

Unused variable warnings are innocuous either way.

i asked because i getting out of the new release only 9100 on lyra2v2 with djm version i was over 10k

[t-nelson]

hi

one question about compiling in win 7 with cuda 6.5

this messages are in the compiling log from vs 2013 community

1>C:/compile/ccminer-windows/bitcredit/bitcredit.cu(50): warning : variable "Htarg" was declared but never referenced
     1>C:/compile/ccminer-windows/bitcredit/bitcredit.cu(51): warning : variable "coef" was declared but never referenced
     1>C:/compile/ccminer-windows/bitcredit/bitcredit.cu(68): warning : variable "endianmid" was declared but never referenced
     1>C:/compile/ccminer-windows/bitcredit/bitcredit.cu(73): warning : variable "nloop" was declared but never referenced
     1>C:/compile/ccminer-windows/bitcredit/bitcredit.cu(50): warning : variable "Htarg" was declared but never referenced
     1>C:/compile/ccminer-windows/bitcredit/bitcredit.cu(51): warning : variable "coef" was declared but never referenced
     1>C:/compile/ccminer-windows/bitcredit/bitcredit.cu(68): warning : variable "endianmid" was declared but never referenced
     1>C:/compile/ccminer-windows/bitcredit/bitcredit.cu(73): warning : variable "nloop" was declared but never referenced
     1>C:/compile/ccminer-windows/bitcredit/bitcredit.cu(50): warning : variable "Htarg" was declared but never referenced
     1>C:/compile/ccminer-windows/bitcredit/bitcredit.cu(51): warning : variable "coef" was declared but never referenced
     1>C:/compile/ccminer-windows/bitcredit/bitcredit.cu(68): warning : variable "endianmid" was declared but never referenced
     1>C:/compile/ccminer-windows/bitcredit/bitcredit.cu(73): warning : variable "nloop" was declared but never referenced
         ptxas info    : 0 bytes gmem
     1>C:/compile/ccminer-windows/bitcredit/bitcredit.cu(50): warning : variable "Htarg" was declared but never referenced
     1>C:/compile/ccminer-windows/bitcredit/bitcredit.cu(51): warning : variable "coef" was declared but never referenced
     1>C:/compile/ccminer-windows/bitcredit/bitcredit.cu(68): warning : variable "endianmid" was declared but never referenced
     1>C:/compile/ccminer-windows/bitcredit/bitcredit.cu(73): warning : variable "nloop" was declared but never referenced

ist that normal

thanks for answer

C&P FTW, I suspect.

Unused variable warnings are innocuous either way.

i asked because i getting out of the new release only 9100 on lyra2v2 with djm version i was over 10k

Could be launch params changes in a recent commit.

[bensam1231]

Oh yeah? The whole thing stopping this is a license agreement the majority of developers don't even respect as they take the code from open source miners and use it in their private ones anyway? ...

bensam, if "private miner" is not published, than it is not violating open source license. As soon it is published in any way, than source code should be published as well. Nobody is breaking rules here sending closed binaries over private channels. BTW, I'm also for optimized miner with fee, but devs already declared it's too much hassle doing it from scratch.

I think you don't understand the license if you think you can profit off someones work as long as it's not 'public'. It still counts, its just not enforceable in anyway unless someone who receives the miner initiates it. When they talk about 'private work' that means you don't share it with anyone, not you don't share it with anyone publicly. Open licensing mainly refers to profiting off other peoples work though. That still happens even if it's not public, developers with private miners who sell them are already violating the open license, but this obviously isn't their area of forte, the only reason it's come up recently is because people are looking to use it as a excuse.

As I mentioned already, it's pretty easy to include more people with a fee schedule and this is a non-issue as this sort of stuff happens all the time in the mining community. No one is going to sue anyone else, nothing is going to happen, especially if you include all the main parties that created the work... That's mainly where I think people starting to poopoo on this. If DJM doesn't get any bit of the L2V2 fees, even though he developed most of the work for the initial miner. All of that could easily be programmed in, it's just someones address, or it could divy it up on the receiving end of the payments, which would probably be easiest.

Just out of curiosity, what coin worth mining is using pentablake?

Pretty sure there aren't any. People just seeing possible income and not taking into account if they start mining on a low difficulty coin with a lot of power, it'll just crash things.

[sp_]

Pretty sure there aren't any. People just seeing possible income and not taking into account if they start mining on a low difficulty coin with a lot of power, it'll just crash things.

like the sya coin?

[flipclip]

Pretty sure there aren't any. People just seeing possible income and not taking into account if they start mining on a low difficulty coin with a lot of power, it'll just crash things.

like the sya coin?

sia?

[sp_]

Pretty sure there aren't any. People just seeing possible income and not taking into account if they start mining on a low difficulty coin with a lot of power, it'll just crash things.

like the sya coin?

sia?

Yah.Mining the shitcoins can be very profitable...