CCminer(SP-MOD) Modded GPU kernels.

[joblo]

Good cards. But they draw 200-250w. The x11 kernal is not optimal. You should mine something else.

4 750ti's draw 260 watts.

4 R9 Nano's draw 400 watt while doing 11Mhz per card!..  

Is that at the wall? My fury draws more than 300 watt, the single card! And it's the same chipset.

yup ...

apparently the nano has mixed specs of the fury x and fury - but with a much lower power draw - and a much smaller size mate ...

very impressive cards ... but very expensive cards ...

#crysx

980 performance in a half length card with only one 8 pin power connector, it's only a matter of time for someone
to build a 2x-nano.

[Eliovp]

Good cards. But they draw 200-250w. The x11 kernal is not optimal. You should mine something else.

4 750ti's draw 260 watts.

4 R9 Nano's draw 400 watt while doing 11Mhz per card!..  

Is that at the wall? My fury draws more than 300 watt, the single card! And it's the same chipset.

yup ...

apparently the nano has mixed specs of the fury x and fury - but with a much lower power draw - and a much smaller size mate ...

very impressive cards ... but very expensive cards ...

#crysx

980 performance in a half length card with only one 8 pin power connector, it's only a matter of time for someone
to build a 2x-nano.

True, and push the price down :p

Or someone who builds a farm with 100 of those  Or maybe there is one in the making... 

[AzzAz]

-Faster lyra2v2(5-10%on the gtx 950 and gtx 960)
-Faster x11
1.5.77(sp-MOD) is available here: (20-dec-2015)
https://github.com/sp-hash/ccminer/releases/
The sourcecode is available here:
https://github.com/sp-hash/ccminer

Noboby tested yet?

What speeds are you getting in release 77 (lyra2v2) ? Can you compare with release 74 and 76 please. This program is supported by donations. If you want more speead, please donate  to my donation adress. A handful of people did it for release 76.

Thanks for your support.

Looks like .77 is 1-2% slower than .76 on quark, 960s. Testing further
edit: No, it's same +-1%

[pallas]

The nano has just a differently tuned Fiji chip, the same that's on the fury series. And, apart from the ram interface, it's very very similar to hawaii (290 and 390).
Stop dreaming.

[Eliovp]

The nano has just a differently tuned Fiji chip, the same that's on the fury series. And, apart from the ram interface, it's very very similar to hawaii (290 and 390).

Well, they seem to have tuned it very well. over 100 watt less on a nano vs a fury x while almost doing the exact same hash rate...  And i have both of them, so i'm 200% sure of that

Stop dreaming.

Dreams are today's answers to tomorrow's questions  

[scryptr]

The nano has just a differently tuned Fiji chip, the same that's on the fury series. And, apart from the ram interface, it's very very similar to hawaii (290 and 390).

Well, they seem to have tuned it very well. over 100 watt less on a nano vs a fury x while almost doing the exact same hash rate...  And i have both of them, so i'm 200% sure of that

Stop dreaming.

Dreams are today's answers to tomorrow's questions  

I MUST BE DREAMING--

Tomorrow's question:  Does Selena Gomez still love me?

--scryptr

[djm34]

The nano has just a differently tuned Fiji chip, the same that's on the fury series. And, apart from the ram interface, it's very very similar to hawaii (290 and 390).

Well, they seem to have tuned it very well. over 100 watt less on a nano vs a fury x while almost doing the exact same hash rate...  And i have both of them, so i'm 200% sure of that

Stop dreaming.

Dreams are today's answers to tomorrow's questions  

I MUST BE DREAMING--

Tomorrow's question:  Does Selena Gomez still love me?

--scryptr

okay...   this thread is getting a bit hijacked amd card,dream, then fantasy about some unknown actress (at least to me...)...  
lets call that Christmas spirit (not sure how it fits with amd though...)

anyway, my turn: I love you Anne !  

[chrysophylax]

The nano has just a differently tuned Fiji chip, the same that's on the fury series. And, apart from the ram interface, it's very very similar to hawaii (290 and 390).

Well, they seem to have tuned it very well. over 100 watt less on a nano vs a fury x while almost doing the exact same hash rate...  And i have both of them, so i'm 200% sure of that

Stop dreaming.

Dreams are today's answers to tomorrow's questions  

I MUST BE DREAMING--

Tomorrow's question:  Does Selena Gomez still love me?

--scryptr

okay...   this thread is getting a bit hijacked amd card,dream, then fantasy about some unknown actress (at least to me...)...  
lets call that Christmas spirit (not sure how it fits with amd though...)

anyway, my turn: I love you Anne !  

hahaha ...

yup - i agree with djm34 ... its the christmas spirits ...

and all you guys and gals drink way too much of those spirits ...

...

#crysx

[djm34]

The nano has just a differently tuned Fiji chip, the same that's on the fury series. And, apart from the ram interface, it's very very similar to hawaii (290 and 390).

Well, they seem to have tuned it very well. over 100 watt less on a nano vs a fury x while almost doing the exact same hash rate...  And i have both of them, so i'm 200% sure of that

Stop dreaming.

Dreams are today's answers to tomorrow's questions 

I MUST BE DREAMING--

Tomorrow's question:  Does Selena Gomez still love me?

--scryptr

okay...    this thread is getting a bit hijacked amd card,dream, then fantasy about some unknown actress (at least to me...)... 
lets call that Christmas spirit (not sure how it fits with amd though...)

anyway, my turn: I love you Anne ! 

hahaha ...

yup - i agree with djm34 ... its the christmas spirits ...

and all you guys and gals drink way too much of those spirits ...

...

#crysx

still sober as far as I am concerned 

[chrysophylax]

sp ...

750ti oc lp card ...

tested with ccminer-spmod77 ... build f23x64c75 ...

-------

[2015-12-21 13:55:33] accepted: 107/107 (100.00%), 5919 kH/s yes!
[2015-12-21 13:55:33] mining-ace.granitecoin.com:6010/ quark block 2682200
[2015-12-21 13:55:33] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 5930 (T= 71C F= 59% C=1163/2700)
[2015-12-21 13:55:48] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 5911 (T= 72C F= 59% C=1163/2700)
[2015-12-21 13:56:03] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 5920 (T= 72C F= 59% C=1163/2700)
[2015-12-21 13:56:18] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 5915 (T= 72C F= 59% C=1176/2700)
[2015-12-21 13:56:33] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 5922 (T= 72C F= 59% C=1163/2700)

-------

seems to be about the same - so as you mentioned earlier - it seems that the compute 5.0 cards dont have much of an increase ...

#crysx

[Velgelm]

-Faster lyra2v2(5-10%on the gtx 950 and gtx 960)
-Faster x11
1.5.77(sp-MOD) is available here: (20-dec-2015)
https://github.com/sp-hash/ccminer/releases/
The sourcecode is available here:
https://github.com/sp-hash/ccminer

Noboby tested yet?

What speeds are you getting in release 77 (lyra2v2) ? Can you compare with release 74 and 76 please. This program is supported by donations. If you want more speead, please donate  to my donation adress. A handful of people did it for release 76.

Thanks for your support.

GTX 960 OC +210 core

Lyre2REV2
74-6051
77-6363
Qubit
74-8458
77-8150
X11
74-5592
77-5400

[sp_]

Thanks for testing. lyra2v2 is up 5% on the gtx 960.

Is it worth 0.01BTC in donations guys? Your moneymaker is 5% faster. Time to support the optimizers

[serg_25]

Hi Guys. did you see that speed?

https://www.nicehash.com/index.jsp?p=news&id=53

damn... amd again can be more profitable than nvidia.
Look at X11 speed. 11.72mh with r9 280x.

P.S. wolf, is it your work on nicehash?

[Velgelm]

shit..damn...fuck...

[sp_]

x11 has never been profitable on NVIDIA. Mine Lyra2v2 or quark. The optimized AMD kernals are slow and use alot of power.

When using Xintensity of  1024 the client will report higher numbers than on the pool. (bug in the kuchur bins)

[Velgelm]

x11 has never been profitable on NVIDIA. Mine Lyra2v2 or quark. The optimized AMD kernals are slow and use alot of power.

When using Xintensity of  1024 the client will report higher numbers than on the pool. (bug in the kuchur bins)

i understood this, but with this bins difficulty on X11 , quark and lyra2rev2 will be start to the moon

[serg_25]

x11 has never been profitable on NVIDIA. Mine Lyra2v2 or quark. The optimized AMD kernals are slow and use alot of power.

When using Xintensity of  1024 the client will report higher numbers than on the pool. (bug in the kuchur bins)

You probably right.
To avoid "panic" i decided to make some calculation on "kh/s per watt" comparsion:
(750Ti vs 280x)
NVIDIA:

Code:

$speedx11 = 3.35;
$speedlyra = 5.135;
$speedquark = 6.9;
$watt = 40;

$speed* / $watt * 1000

result:
nvidia
X11 kh\s per watt 83.75
Lyra kh\s per watt 128.375
Quark kh\s per watt 172.5

AMD

Code:

$speedx11 = 11.72;
$speedlyra = 13.06;
$speedquark = 16.19;
$watt = 180;

result:
X11 kh\s per watt 65.111111111111
Lyra kh\s per watt 72.555555555556
Quark kh\s per watt 89.944444444444

Well, based on number 750 Ti is faster. Numbers can't lie.
P.S. please keep in mind that ofcourse we need to understand that it will be different money for full rig setup, but this difficult to calculate because all of us have different prices for cards (new or used one)

P.P.S. but amd also has benefit. you can mine eth with 280x.

[pallas]

...and power consumption is not the same on all algos.

[serg_25]

...and power consumption is not the same on all algos.

yep, on 750Ti. for me it starts from 38 - 43 watt based on algo.

[pallas]

...and power consumption is not the same on all algos.

yep, on 750Ti. for me it starts from 38 - 43 watt based on algo.

on 280x as well: depends on ram usage and how well the kernel is optimised (and probably other factors).
it can easily swing from 150W to 200/220W.