CCminer(SP-MOD) Modded GPU kernels.

[sp_]

Weird people are complaining about SP asking for money for a miner he makes.

0.1 BTC is less than I make in 1 hour at my work. Cuda Programming is just a hobby,.
I am the only one who give out free optimalizations. DJM34 hasn't released anything in over 6 months. Tvpruvot is on holiday. and Klaus_t is celebrating x-mas. Pallas is busy With private amd kernals.
Faster kernals meens more Money for the miner.
Faster opensource kernals meens less Money for the the biggest farms. (the hashrate is spread among he smaller miners)

0.1 BTC for a 25% increase is a giveaway.

I now have a discount on  my 120% faster pentablake miner. It can be Yours for a 0.1 BTC donation. (Joincoin)

pm for details..

[Namsbreh]

Weird people are complaining about SP asking for money for a miner he makes.

I think u have hit the nail on the head there.  Way I see it, some people are complaining because SP does not make the miners, he just optimizes them.  Taking somebody else's work and improving it.  I don't think there would be any complaints if SP gave back some (a small percentage) of his donations to the original author of said miner.

That said, there is nothing stopping us users from donating to both the miner creater and the miner optimizer?!

Happy new year folks!

[djm34]

Weird people are complaining about SP asking for money for a miner he makes.

0.1 BTC is less than I make in 1 hour at my work. Cuda Programming is just a hobby,.
I am the only one who give out free optimalizations. DJM34 hasn't released anything in over 6 months. Tvpruvot is on holiday. and Klaus_t is celebrating x-mas. Pallas is busy With private amd kernals.

... and you and you... having nothing new but still trying to sell the same stuff...
ok 0.1btc is less than what you make in an hour, why are you acting like a beggar all the time ? 

[sp_]

I just gave you 5% in the quark algo and 5% in the lyra2v2 on the gtx 950 and gtx 960. These algos where the most profitable..

Totally free.

Opensource.

A x-mas gift to the NVIDIA maxwell miners.

[sp_]

That said, there is nothing stopping us users from donating to both the miner creater and the miner optimizer?!

People donate when they earn more Money. DJM34 has made faster kernals but he doesn't share them. So what is the point.
If he share his faster kernals, People will donate. I will too.. His work on the lyra2v2 kernals has already been payed for by the lyra2v2 team. (vertcoin)

[sp_]

I just gave you 5% in the quark algo and 5% in the lyra2v2 on the gtx 950 and gtx 960. These algos where the most profitable..
Totally free.
Opensource.
A x-mas gift to the NVIDIA maxwell miners.

Speaking of Quark, yours needs some attention. I know you can do better than 5%.

My private kernal does 8.2 mhash on the 750ti

[pallas]

DJM34 hasn't released anything in over 6 months. Tvpruvot is on holiday. and Klaus_t is celebrating x-mas. Pallas is busy With private amd kernals.

Well, actually I'm too busy to develop anything new. I promised I'd have a look at neoscrypt on cuda 7.5 and I will, meanwhile my hybrid "trick" works even if you don't want to call it a "solution" :-D

[bensam1231]

No one has released anything new in close to six months or so it seems. Everything that has been talked about here is old hat or the same epeen wars. Where you talk about how fast your super optimized miner is you only sell to a handful of really rich individuals.

Biggest improvement has come from Nicehash returning dividends with their paid bounty program, but that only applies to AMD.

I joined the Nvidia mining community because it was more open and forthright then AMD mining. That seems to have died out and turned back into the same shit as the AMD community. Nothing improves or changes. I still end up going back and mining Neoscrypt with ancient miners (that are definitely outdated). Donating doesn't do anything. There aren't any fund drives or anything either (or a way for me as a miner to buy a kernel). Everything has completely stagnated, which is what happened about six months before I had to stop mining with AMD hardware.

I'm sure that's not the case for big mining farms who employee developers.

Altcoin mining definitely needs a marketplace for selling kernels and miners.

[hashbrown9000]

@impulse2000 what does your bat file look like for myr-gr algo? does the pool-side hashrate agree with your local hashrate? 
i'm still only able to get 10% of local hashrate to show at the pool , even using --diff 0.039xxxx

[sambiohazard]

Once again if anyone is interested in optimizing blake-256/blakecoin algo to AMD levels or better than it is now. You can discuss the bounty.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1290358.msg13370963#msg13370963

[sp_]

I added 70% to the blakecoin hashrate around 10 releases ago. release 77 Should do around 4ghash on the 980ti. 1.2 ghash onthe gtx 950

[sp_]

The increaed speed was added in release 64. (70% faster)

https://github.com/sp-hash/ccminer/releases?after=1.5.68

[sambiohazard]

The increaed speed was added in release 64. (70% faster)

https://github.com/sp-hash/ccminer/releases?after=1.5.68

Thanks for that but how does it compare to AMD hashrates? Will it be competitive on 970 & 750ti?

[sp_]

I joined the Nvidia mining community because it was more open and forthright then AMD mining. That seems to have died out and turned back into the same shit as the AMD community. Nothing improves or changes. I still end up going back and mining Neoscrypt with ancient miners (that are definitely outdated). Donating doesn't do anything. There aren't any fund drives or anything either (or a way for me as a miner to buy a kernel). Everything has completely stagnated, which is what happened about six months before I had to stop mining with AMD hardware.

In 6 months my fork has 350 commits and 14 releases. Almost all the algos have been optimized (up to 70% faster)

https://github.com/sp-hash/ccminer/releases

[sp_]

6.4GH/s - 6.9GH/s on a AMD Radeon R9 295X2
3.3GH/s - 3.5GH/s on a AMD Radeon R9 290X
2.9GH/s - 3.1GH/s on a AMD Radeon R9 290
2.6GH/s - 2.8GH/s on a AMD Radeon R9 280X
2.2GH/s - 2.4GH/s on a AMD Radeon R9 280
1.2GH/s - 1.5GH/s on a AMD Radeon R9 270
4.8GH/s - 5.1GH/s on a AMD ATI Radeon 7990
2.2GH/s - 2.8GH/s on a AMD ATI Radeon 7970
2.1GH/s - 2.4GH/s on a AMD ATI Radeon 7950
2.6GH/s - 2.9GH/s on a AMD ATI Radeon 6990
1.4GH/s - 1.5GH/s on a AMD ATI Radeon 6970
1.4GH/s on a AMD ATI Radeon 6950
900MH/s on a AMD ATI Radeon 6870
800MH/s on a AMD ATI Radeon 6850
1.3GH/s on a AMD ATI Radeon 5870
1.1GH/s on a AMD ATI Radeon 5850
1.6GH/s on a ZTEX USB-FPGA 1.15y Quad Spartan-6 LX150 Development Board
1.5GH/s on a Enterpoint Cairnsmore 1 Quad Spartan-6 LX150 Development Board
960MH/s on a Lancelot Dual Spartan-6 LX150 Development Board
360MH/s on a ZTEX USB-FPGA 1.15x Spartan-6 LX150 Development Board

[sambiohazard]

Thanks for the info, very much competitive i would say, still just contact decred devs to discuss the bounty if there are any further optimization possible. This is to all devs.

Also can anyone give me hashrates for 970 & 750ti. TIA.

[scryptr]

6.4GH/s - 6.9GH/s on a AMD Radeon R9 295X2
3.3GH/s - 3.5GH/s on a AMD Radeon R9 290X
2.9GH/s - 3.1GH/s on a AMD Radeon R9 290
2.6GH/s - 2.8GH/s on a AMD Radeon R9 280X
2.2GH/s - 2.4GH/s on a AMD Radeon R9 280
1.2GH/s - 1.5GH/s on a AMD Radeon R9 270
4.8GH/s - 5.1GH/s on a AMD ATI Radeon 7990
2.2GH/s - 2.8GH/s on a AMD ATI Radeon 7970
2.1GH/s - 2.4GH/s on a AMD ATI Radeon 7950
2.6GH/s - 2.9GH/s on a AMD ATI Radeon 6990
1.4GH/s - 1.5GH/s on a AMD ATI Radeon 6970
1.4GH/s on a AMD ATI Radeon 6950
900MH/s on a AMD ATI Radeon 6870
800MH/s on a AMD ATI Radeon 6850
1.3GH/s on a AMD ATI Radeon 5870
1.1GH/s on a AMD ATI Radeon 5850
1.6GH/s on a ZTEX USB-FPGA 1.15y Quad Spartan-6 LX150 Development Board
1.5GH/s on a Enterpoint Cairnsmore 1 Quad Spartan-6 LX150 Development Board
960MH/s on a Lancelot Dual Spartan-6 LX150 Development Board
360MH/s on a ZTEX USB-FPGA 1.15x Spartan-6 LX150 Development Board

TRYING TO GUESS--

Which algo are you posting data for?  Blake?       --scryptr

[djm34]

6.4GH/s - 6.9GH/s on a AMD Radeon R9 295X2
3.3GH/s - 3.5GH/s on a AMD Radeon R9 290X
2.9GH/s - 3.1GH/s on a AMD Radeon R9 290
2.6GH/s - 2.8GH/s on a AMD Radeon R9 280X
2.2GH/s - 2.4GH/s on a AMD Radeon R9 280
1.2GH/s - 1.5GH/s on a AMD Radeon R9 270
4.8GH/s - 5.1GH/s on a AMD ATI Radeon 7990
2.2GH/s - 2.8GH/s on a AMD ATI Radeon 7970
2.1GH/s - 2.4GH/s on a AMD ATI Radeon 7950
2.6GH/s - 2.9GH/s on a AMD ATI Radeon 6990
1.4GH/s - 1.5GH/s on a AMD ATI Radeon 6970
1.4GH/s on a AMD ATI Radeon 6950
900MH/s on a AMD ATI Radeon 6870
800MH/s on a AMD ATI Radeon 6850
1.3GH/s on a AMD ATI Radeon 5870
1.1GH/s on a AMD ATI Radeon 5850
1.6GH/s on a ZTEX USB-FPGA 1.15y Quad Spartan-6 LX150 Development Board
1.5GH/s on a Enterpoint Cairnsmore 1 Quad Spartan-6 LX150 Development Board
960MH/s on a Lancelot Dual Spartan-6 LX150 Development Board
360MH/s on a ZTEX USB-FPGA 1.15x Spartan-6 LX150 Development Board

TRYING TO GUESS--

Which algo are you posting data for?       --scryptr

those at 5%

[djm34]

No one has released anything new in close to six months or so it seems. Everything that has been talked about here is old hat or the same epeen wars. Where you talk about how fast your super optimized miner is you only sell to a handful of really rich individuals.

Biggest improvement has come from Nicehash returning dividends with their paid bounty program, but that only applies to AMD.

I joined the Nvidia mining community because it was more open and forthright then AMD mining. That seems to have died out and turned back into the same shit as the AMD community. Nothing improves or changes. I still end up going back and mining Neoscrypt with ancient miners (that are definitely outdated). Donating doesn't do anything.

How would you know ? you never donated for neoscrypt, you just started mining it after I decided to release the source publicly.
Such an hypocrite 

[sambiohazard]

@scryptr its for blake-256 ie blakecoin algo.