GAW / Josh Garza discussion Paycoin XPY xpy.io ION ionomy. ALWAYS MAKE MONEY :)

[coinmaster222]

Now buying at 0.01299000

[1715616137]

1715616137

[cryptofunk]

What this is a surprise changed his mind and flipped the script on other things.

Actually, when put like that, so true!

<upvote>

Remember the 20.00 floor or the highest paying non expiring miners or no pre-mining(this worked out really well for them) I could go on here. Heres your sign  

You want to know how to raise the floor on XPY sell all of it walk away. Until GAW holds there promises and stops selling unicorn meat or shoveling doggie do.

HT can't even see that they are where they are because of all the lies, now the CEO goes back on his word once more and they can't seem to see how much this will hurt perception even more.

Also, this paragraph:

Notwithstanding any scheduling conflicts, as I am in the midst on finalizing my remarks (to be delivered at the Miami conference), and time permitting in general (because my chief responsibility is to perform my duties as a CEO), I look forward to our debate.

To me, it sounds like a prelude to canceling the Miami convention appearance to take care of his duties... the announcement will say something like "it would jeopardize a big deal I'm working on, wait till you see what we have in store for you, you won't believe it.. To the moon!!"

Why else would they re-schedule the Q&A on top of the conference?!

Oh, and where's that $20 repurchase program announcement that was posted by mistake?

[suchmoon]

So does this win the prize for shortest debate ever? Congratulations TheMage I guess

https://litecointalk.org/index.php?topic=24169.msg242723#msg242723

Online Alienesb
Jr. Member
**
Posts: 26

Re: My public response to Josh Garza
« Reply #37 on: Today at 03:38:38 AM »
This is silly now. Mage wins by default, let's move on with our lives.

[NotAPonzi]

Most popular topic on here I would say?

[kekek]

[drasted]

I was just about to post the same thing. Ersus seems like a pretty special guy
"If someone can see it, even if they aren't meant to, then it's public"

Most people there seem to be pretty unimpressed with this move though.

[Honeycutt22]

I was just about to post the same thing. Ersus seems like a pretty special guy
"If someone can see it, even if they aren't meant to, then it's public"

Most people there seem to be pretty unimpressed with this move though.

Yea Josh has lost most of his people lately.. Just too many failures and lies... Even some of the most loyal have left.

[MinermanNC]

Well I gotta give Homero some credit....at least he knows that he's too stupid for a LIVE debate.

https://hashtalk.org/topic/28616/response-to-andrew-re-debate

There is no way that was written by Garza.  Sounds like a lawyer'd response to my ears.  lame.

Agree. And it took them two days to come up with this, so you can imagine the pace of the "debate"

lol ain't no way Josh wrote that, its bogus.. a prepared statement. (by someone else) Must be nice to have trained people at your disposal like that..... he's gotta be doing something right    lol

Trained?

the same people who "realised" after a failed attempt that it would be illegal to make the proposed pay floor?

the same people who didn't read a simple TOS on the site they were using for credit card payments?

The same people "who went over the maths" and it all make sense and it perfectly doable?
trained at what?

Trained at bowing to his every wish and command, whether it be right or wrong,,,, Don't take a "word" out of my post or anyone elses for that matter and make a spectacle out it either please... that's so un cool and tacky  

how about 2 instead.

trained people?

that's better, but your still missing the point.. as in Trained like a dog or monkey,,,,, he ask you to jump and you will say how high...... NOT as in, Trained like a skilled certified server technician or code writer or a PR pro, as you seem to insist on implying that in what I said, for some unknown reason? lol

EDIT: For the record his current staff is a joke... NOT trained

[NotAPonzi]

So did they use the premined coins for paybase credit card sales?

[alienesb]

So does this win the prize for shortest debate ever? Congratulations TheMage I guess

https://litecointalk.org/index.php?topic=24169.msg242723#msg242723

Online Alienesb
Jr. Member
**
Posts: 26

Re: My public response to Josh Garza
« Reply #37 on: Today at 03:38:38 AM »
This is silly now. Mage wins by default, let's move on with our lives.

Hey I know that guy

[suchmoon]

So did they use the premined coins for paybase credit card sales?

Likely. Don't be lazy, read a dozen or so most recent pages

[ZiG]

And... that's how we prove they're using pre-mined coins to fulfill their PayBase orders...

The blockchain never lies.

So basically you're saying those coins never visited any exchange? Could it be possible that one of those 740 or 370 addresses was an exchange deposit address? I know it's unlikely because it looks to be a fairly neat halving pattern, so it would be an extremely odd coincidence that e.g. a Hashpoint customer moved 740 coins to an exchange then GAW purchased 370 coins and the exchange just happened to send them out from the same deposit wallet. Am I thinking about this right?

The split to almost equal parts to the same address are staking transactions.

Yes, they were staking with their pre-mined coins while they were/are dispersing them.  At least it was only 5%... they didn't use a prime350 code at that time... I guess I should of said thankfully, but I'm not going to.

EDIT:  But it doesn't change the outcome of the excavation.  The tx ID supplied for the purchase of coins via PayBase credit card came from pre-mine.

Ok, I'm going to pretend now that I understand this. Looks like a smoking gun as those coins never left GAW's possession.

Based on what I see and how I understand it:  Yes.  These coins that were purchased through PayBase with a credit card did not come from an exchange but instead came from the pre-mined coins that were still in GAW's possession.

I'll let someone else disprove me if they'd like.  Unlike "gawd", I'm not infallible.

EDIT:

This is EXACTLY what the SEC and other financial authorities would like to hear...:

"...We will move the market ourselves ..." ...

VERY NICE shot in the leg, Retard ...I mean Homero...  

Clear case of Documented Market Manipulation...

ZiG

[NotAPonzi]

So did they use the premined coins for paybase credit card sales?

Likely. Don't be lazy, read a dozen or so most recent pages

Will do

[bitpop]

Confirmed they are still using stripe

Current API key is pk_live_OP28cVFiWFoNZ6MweSwwER6x

https://q.stripe.com/?event=checkout.outer.open&rf=&sc=&key=pk_live_OP28cVFiWFoNZ6MweSwwER6x&lsid=NA&cid=NA&distinct_id=xxx&h=1080&w=1920&i=xxx

I'm sure they're load balancing many accounts

Code:

<script src="https://checkout.stripe.com/checkout.js" type="text/javascript"></script><script type="text/javascript">stripeKey = 'pk_live_OP28cVFiWFoNZ6MweSwwER6x'</script><script type="text/javascript">cartToken = 'a33d71894ac5d4d9e4aae1d966406c644c2af316'
;(function() {
  function riskifiedBeaconLoad() {
    var store_domain = 'paybase.com'
    var session_id = cartToken
    var url = ('https:' == document.location.protocol ? 'https://' : 'http://')
      + "beacon.riskified.com?shop=" + store_domain + "&sid=" + session_id
    var s = document.createElement('script')
    s.type = 'text/javascript'
    s.async = true
    s.src = url
    var x = document.getElementsByTagName('script')[0]
    x.parentNode.insertBefore(s, x)
  }
  if (window.attachEvent)
    window.attachEvent('onload', riskifiedBeaconLoad)
  else
    window.addEventListener('load', riskifiedBeaconLoad, false)
})()</script>

[jibble]

that's better, but your still missing the point.. as in Trained like a dog or monkey,,,,, he ask you to jump and you will say how high...... NOT as in, Trained like a skilled certified server technician or code writer or a PR pro, as you seem to insist on implying that in what I said, for some unknown reason? lol

EDIT: For the record his current staff is a joke... NOT trained

i see what you are saying, I merged everything together into one giant blob , lawyer was there, after that trained was mentioned. my bad

[MinermanNC]

that's better, but your still missing the point.. as in Trained like a dog or monkey,,,,, he ask you to jump and you will say how high...... NOT as in, Trained like a skilled certified server technician or code writer or a PR pro, as you seem to insist on implying that in what I said, for some unknown reason? lol

EDIT: For the record his current staff is a joke... NOT trained

i see what you are saying, I merged everything together into one giant blob , lawyer was there, after that trained was mentioned. my bad

lol ya its cool,,, I know exactly what you mean 

but understand, I do agree with everything you said, non the less lol 

[cloverme]

This is EXACTLY what the SEC and other financial authorities would like to hear...:

"...We will move the market ourselves ..." ...

VERY NICE shot in the leg, Retard ...I mean Homero...  

Clear case of Documented Market Manipulation...

ZiG

The SEC might not care about a virtual market though. I'm not defending GAW, but the law is trailing so far behind, PayCoin might as well be the equivalent of in-game gold in an RPG, baseball cards, coupons, or bottlecaps.  They might not really care about a new virtual currency... They might get a slap on the wrist for being a money transmitter, if they didn't have that license with FINCEN. If GAW created the market and a virtual currency, that's not much different than selling parker brothers monopoly money on ebay.

There's a thread somewhere around here about reporting them as a ponzi, that would probably carry the most weight and get the most attention from the feds to be taken seriously.

[Mr Felt]

This is EXACTLY what the SEC and other financial authorities would like to hear...:

"...We will move the market ourselves ..." ...

VERY NICE shot in the leg, Retard ...I mean Homero...  

Clear case of Documented Market Manipulation...

ZiG

The SEC might not care about a virtual market though. I'm not defending GAW, but the law is trailing so far behind, PayCoin might as well be the equivalent of in-game gold in an RPG, baseball cards, coupons, or bottlecaps.  They might not really care about a new virtual currency... They might get a slap on the wrist for being a money transmitter, if they didn't have that license with FINCEN. If GAW created the market and a virtual currency, that's not much different than selling parker brothers monopoly money on ebay.

There's a thread somewhere around here about reporting them as a ponzi, that would probably carry the most weight and get the most attention from the feds to be taken seriously.

FinCEN doesn't issue licenses for MSBs, states do (most of them anyway). FinCEN requires MSBs to register with them and to file various reports when certain transactions occur per the Bank Secrecy Act. CFTC may care about market manipulation generally.

[CryptoGoat]

https://i.imgur.com/0reTOCH.png

I was just about to post the same thing. Ersus seems like a pretty special guy
"If someone can see it, even if they aren't meant to, then it's public"

Most people there seem to be pretty unimpressed with this move though.

I could not help myself, I was still in good standing at HT so I thought I would stir the pot a bit in regards to the big mans cowardly exit from his live debate with theMage.

Long time lurker, no dogs in the fight. Sold off a long time a go.

According to my pal over at HT you all should watch out cause the NSA is tracking you!

Dumb ass

[WaffleMaster]

Oh, Homero backpedaled on a debate he challenged TheMage to?