mullvads
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 42
Merit: 0
|
|
December 03, 2014, 08:12:06 PM |
|
is the Q & A happening in a few hours?
|
|
|
|
bumpershot
|
|
December 03, 2014, 08:14:24 PM |
|
I was under the impression that Amazon denied having anything to do with paycoin, and threatened to sue if Josh even implied that they did.
Actually, the Amazon thing is the least problematic of the "what ifs". If there's some sort of debit card proxy that works with existing payment systems and allows instantaneous conversion, it doesn't matter that much if Amazon takes it directly.
|
|
|
|
jimmothy
|
|
December 03, 2014, 08:17:25 PM |
|
I was under the impression that Amazon denied having anything to do with paycoin, and threatened to sue if Josh even implied that they did.
Actually, the Amazon thing is the least problematic of the "what ifs". If there's some sort of debit card proxy that works with existing payment systems and allows instantaneous conversion, it doesn't matter that much if Amazon takes it directly. So what you're saying is that if I create a payment processor I am allowed to claim partnerships with any and every company that accepts fiat?
|
|
|
|
corygto
|
|
December 03, 2014, 08:19:14 PM |
|
Hahaha one of the biggest GAW shills (Daffy) has already posted the PDF on Hashtalk.
|
|
|
|
bumpershot
|
|
December 03, 2014, 08:20:19 PM |
|
So what you're saying is that if I create a payment processor I am allowed to claim partnerships with any and every company that accepts fiat?
I was talking about ways the entire system could fail. I put the Amazon thing there because it speaks to legitimacy, but it's not necessarily fatal. There was nothing implied about what entities are allowed to make whatever claims.
|
|
|
|
bitpop
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2912
Merit: 1060
|
|
December 03, 2014, 08:24:58 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
theboarderdude
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 13
Merit: 0
|
|
December 03, 2014, 08:27:04 PM |
|
So you're trying to get GAW on a possible technicality. Damn, someone's getting desperate. As far as the signal jamming goes, You do realize that you're shooting yourself in the foot? If somehow you do manage to succeed in the lawsuit, I fully expect you do be the full focus of a counter-suit for the exact same reason. Amazon- ever heard of an NDA?
|
|
|
|
bitpop
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2912
Merit: 1060
|
|
December 03, 2014, 08:27:50 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
bitpop
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2912
Merit: 1060
|
|
December 03, 2014, 08:28:37 PM |
|
So you're trying to get GAW on a possible technicality. Damn, someone's getting desperate. As far as the signal jamming goes, You do realize that you're shooting yourself in the foot? If somehow you do manage to succeed in the lawsuit, I fully expect you do be the full focus of a counter-suit for the exact same reason. Amazon- ever heard of an NDA? Ok duffy or are you rootdude?
|
|
|
|
bumpershot
|
|
December 03, 2014, 08:30:49 PM |
|
Is the point of this to force GAW to disclose details of their operations? The "likely transmitting stray radio emissions" thing is kind of strange otherwise. I can see it if it's a way to impose transparency, but I don't see your standing. Did you find someone who lives next to the "data center" and can't get a cell signal?
|
|
|
|
|
bitpop
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2912
Merit: 1060
|
|
December 03, 2014, 08:32:29 PM |
|
Is the point of this to force GAW to disclose details of their operations? The "likely transmitting stray radio emissions" thing is kind of strange otherwise. I can see it if it's a way to impose transparency, but I don't see your standing. Did you find someone who lives next to the "data center" and can't get a cell signal? It's affecting his ham radio
|
|
|
|
bumpershot
|
|
December 03, 2014, 08:34:24 PM |
|
It's affecting his ham radio
GAW, destroyer of shortwave.
|
|
|
|
theboarderdude
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 13
Merit: 0
|
|
December 03, 2014, 08:34:48 PM |
|
Neither It hurts your case that you're only going after GAW. there are several(if not dozens) of other mining DC's in the US, and going after just one shows you're mad at that company, and just want revenge.
|
|
|
|
bitpop
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2912
Merit: 1060
|
|
December 03, 2014, 08:36:42 PM |
|
Neither It hurts your case that you're only going after GAW. there are several(if not dozens) of other mining DC's in the US, and going after just one shows you're mad at that company, and just want revenge. Fine close all cloud miners, they're all scams. Cryptsy is about to launch their own scam. Now fuck off shill.
|
|
|
|
jimmothy
|
|
December 03, 2014, 08:36:56 PM |
|
Is the point of this to force GAW to disclose details of their operations? The "likely transmitting stray radio emissions" thing is kind of strange otherwise. I can see it if it's a way to impose transparency, but I don't see your standing. Did you find someone who lives next to the "data center" and can't get a cell signal? Yea I'm not sure I see the point in that. I say just wait for GAW to be investigated for securities fraud. It's only a matter of time.
|
|
|
|
dropt
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1512
Merit: 1000
|
|
December 03, 2014, 08:37:44 PM |
|
As far as the signal jamming goes, You do realize that you're shooting yourself in the foot? If somehow you do manage to succeed in the lawsuit, I fully expect you do be the full focus of a counter-suit for the exact same reason.
This statement makes zero sense. Are you implying that after SGB raises non-conforming HW concerns that somehow GAW is going to sue SGB for non-conforming HW? Amazon- ever heard of an NDA?
Yeah, because NDA's cause secondary entities to outright DENY involvement and threaten legal action if the primary party continues to imply there is.
|
|
|
|
corygto
|
|
December 03, 2014, 08:37:51 PM |
|
Neither It hurts your case that you're only going after GAW. there are several(if not dozens) of other mining DC's in the US, and going after just one shows you're mad at that company, and just want revenge. Well all the HT kiddos seem to think this means nothing, so be on your way shill If this is all truly nonsense that will lead to nothing, none of you need to worry your pretty little heads. Just stay focused on renting more magic wallets that promise you %400 APY on a coin that doesn't exist yet.
|
|
|
|
bitpop
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2912
Merit: 1060
|
|
December 03, 2014, 08:38:13 PM |
|
Is the point of this to force GAW to disclose details of their operations? The "likely transmitting stray radio emissions" thing is kind of strange otherwise. I can see it if it's a way to impose transparency, but I don't see your standing. Did you find someone who lives next to the "data center" and can't get a cell signal? Yea I'm not sure I see the point in that. I say just wait for GAW to be investigated for securities fraud. It's only a matter of time. Foot in the door technique, when the fcc investigates and there's no miners, boom.
|
|
|
|
bitgeek
|
|
December 03, 2014, 08:42:51 PM |
|
Neither It hurts your case that you're only going after GAW. there are several(if not dozens) of other mining DC's in the US, and going after just one shows you're mad at that company, and just want revenge. Well all the HT kiddos seem to think this means nothing, so be on your way shill If this is all truly nonsense that will lead to nothing, none of you need to worry your pretty little heads. Just stay focused on renting more magic wallets that promise you %400 APY on a coin that doesn't exist yet. If somebody should be on your way is you. Take your pills and go to bed.
|
|
|
|
|