candoo
|
|
September 21, 2013, 11:54:24 AM |
|
What if friedcat does that on purpose? It allows him to buy back the shares very cheap.
|
Einer trage des andern Last, so werdet ihr das Gesetz Christi erfüllen.
|
|
|
ex-trader
|
|
September 21, 2013, 12:00:50 PM |
|
What if friedcat does that on purpose? It allows him to buy back the shares very cheap.
This is nonsense. Friedcat and the others own huge amounts of shares 240,000 from memory, the idea that they'd drive prices to buy a few from the dozens that are traded each day is ridiculous. They have made a lot of money from dividends and I'm sure are rightly very happy with that.
|
|
|
|
SebastianJu
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2674
Merit: 1083
Legendary Escrow Service - Tip Jar in Profile
|
|
September 21, 2013, 01:03:36 PM |
|
Dude why are you always using wring numbers? Only 250 BTC per hour are generated, a bit more if the network speed is on the rise, slightly more because of fees, okay let it be 300 BTC/hour,
I hate to be that guy, but since you corrected his numbers: 150 BTC are generated each hour (6 blocks per hour * 25 btc per block) non adjusted. At a difficulty increase of roughly 33% average per period, we are closer to 200 BTC per hour in actual inflation. Shouldnt it be 5 blocks? One every 10 minutes? So if you start with 0 minutes you cant take the block at 60 minutes into that hour too since the next hour wouldnt have a 0 minute block than. In average 10min of course.
|
Please ALWAYS contact me through bitcointalk pm before sending someone coins.
|
|
|
binaryFate
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1512
Merit: 1012
Still wild and free
|
|
September 21, 2013, 01:07:46 PM |
|
Dude why are you always using wring numbers? Only 250 BTC per hour are generated, a bit more if the network speed is on the rise, slightly more because of fees, okay let it be 300 BTC/hour,
I hate to be that guy, but since you corrected his numbers: 150 BTC are generated each hour (6 blocks per hour * 25 btc per block) non adjusted. At a difficulty increase of roughly 33% average per period, we are closer to 200 BTC per hour in actual inflation. Shouldnt it be 5 blocks? One every 10 minutes? So if you start with 0 minutes you cant take the block at 60 minutes into that hour too since the next hour wouldnt have a 0 minute block than. In average 10min of course. one at 0 one at 10 one at 20 one at 30 one at 40 one at 50 = 6
|
Monero's privacy and therefore fungibility are MUCH stronger than Bitcoin's. This makes Monero a better candidate to deserve the term "digital cash".
|
|
|
SebastianJu
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2674
Merit: 1083
Legendary Escrow Service - Tip Jar in Profile
|
|
September 21, 2013, 01:15:38 PM |
|
Dude why are you always using wring numbers? Only 250 BTC per hour are generated, a bit more if the network speed is on the rise, slightly more because of fees, okay let it be 300 BTC/hour,
I hate to be that guy, but since you corrected his numbers: 150 BTC are generated each hour (6 blocks per hour * 25 btc per block) non adjusted. At a difficulty increase of roughly 33% average per period, we are closer to 200 BTC per hour in actual inflation. Shouldnt it be 5 blocks? One every 10 minutes? So if you start with 0 minutes you cant take the block at 60 minutes into that hour too since the next hour wouldnt have a 0 minute block than. In average 10min of course. one at 0 one at 10 one at 20 one at 30 one at 40 one at 50 = 6 *lol* youre right...
|
Please ALWAYS contact me through bitcointalk pm before sending someone coins.
|
|
|
SebastianJu
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2674
Merit: 1083
Legendary Escrow Service - Tip Jar in Profile
|
|
September 21, 2013, 01:42:41 PM |
|
|
Please ALWAYS contact me through bitcointalk pm before sending someone coins.
|
|
|
binaryFate
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1512
Merit: 1012
Still wild and free
|
|
September 21, 2013, 01:50:13 PM |
|
AM has a new account to follow: ASICMiner-PR
|
Monero's privacy and therefore fungibility are MUCH stronger than Bitcoin's. This makes Monero a better candidate to deserve the term "digital cash".
|
|
|
lophie
|
|
September 21, 2013, 01:52:03 PM |
|
AM has a new account to follow: ASICMiner-PR FRIEDCAT IS ALIVE!!!!!!
|
Will take me a while to climb up again, But where is a will, there is a way...
|
|
|
stefffe
|
|
September 21, 2013, 02:31:27 PM |
|
AM has a new account to follow: ASICMiner-PR FRIEDCAT IS ALIVE!!!!!! yes with some excellent news!!!!... ?
|
|
|
|
velacreations
|
|
September 21, 2013, 02:32:37 PM |
|
FRIEDCAT IS ALIVE!!!!!!
TO DA MOON!!!!
|
|
|
|
binaryFate
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1512
Merit: 1012
Still wild and free
|
|
September 21, 2013, 02:37:58 PM |
|
I could probably post this in Meta, but if it's ever possible some here should know how: Do you guys know if it's possible to watch a member posts the same way we can watch threads? How do you check if friedcat posted something? It's a pain to do it "by hand".
|
Monero's privacy and therefore fungibility are MUCH stronger than Bitcoin's. This makes Monero a better candidate to deserve the term "digital cash".
|
|
|
jboogie
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 38
Merit: 0
|
|
September 21, 2013, 03:07:38 PM |
|
I could probably post this in Meta, but if it's ever possible some here should know how: Do you guys know if it's possible to watch a member posts the same way we can watch threads? How do you check if friedcat posted something? It's a pain to do it "by hand". you use this thing called "bookmarks" in your browser
|
|
|
|
binaryFate
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1512
Merit: 1012
Still wild and free
|
|
September 21, 2013, 03:11:29 PM |
|
I could probably post this in Meta, but if it's ever possible some here should know how: Do you guys know if it's possible to watch a member posts the same way we can watch threads? How do you check if friedcat posted something? It's a pain to do it "by hand". you use this thing called "bookmarks" in your browser That does not tell me whether there is a new post or not.
|
Monero's privacy and therefore fungibility are MUCH stronger than Bitcoin's. This makes Monero a better candidate to deserve the term "digital cash".
|
|
|
jboogie
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 38
Merit: 0
|
|
September 21, 2013, 03:24:07 PM |
|
I could probably post this in Meta, but if it's ever possible some here should know how: Do you guys know if it's possible to watch a member posts the same way we can watch threads? How do you check if friedcat posted something? It's a pain to do it "by hand". you use this thing called "bookmarks" in your browser That does not tell me whether there is a new post or not. ?? just bookmark this
|
|
|
|
robix
|
|
September 21, 2013, 03:26:39 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
binaryFate
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1512
Merit: 1012
Still wild and free
|
|
September 21, 2013, 03:56:35 PM |
|
I could probably post this in Meta, but if it's ever possible some here should know how: Do you guys know if it's possible to watch a member posts the same way we can watch threads? How do you check if friedcat posted something? It's a pain to do it "by hand". you use this thing called "bookmarks" in your browser That does not tell me whether there is a new post or not. ?? just bookmark this Call me lazy, but I don't want to open a page if there is nothing to see. What I'd like to have is something as the watchlist for the threads, where you know whether there is something new without actually opening each single page. I've wrote this small script. If you're under linux, and KDE, you can use it as it is. If you're under gnome, you must change the notification to whatever you want. Every time friedcat write a new post, it will notify you. You don't even need to have your browser open. #!/bin/bash
UPDATE_TIME=3600 # Time between checks in seconds touch old
while : do # get last version (just a part of the html, where first post is) wget -q -O - "https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=49840;sa=showPosts" | fgrep -A 200 -m 1 "bodyarea" | fgrep -A 15 -m 1 "titlebg2" > new # different from reference version? diff new old > /dev/null if [ "$?" == "1" ] then # different! Let's update the reference one: mv new old # There has been a new post! Trigger whatever you want here, for KDE it can be: kdialog --passivepopup 'Friedcat has posted something! Check it out :)' 3600 fi
sleep ${UPDATE_TIME} done
I cannot believe I wrote this. Maybe I should just step back and relax a bit...
|
Monero's privacy and therefore fungibility are MUCH stronger than Bitcoin's. This makes Monero a better candidate to deserve the term "digital cash".
|
|
|
lophie
|
|
September 21, 2013, 04:51:47 PM |
|
I could probably post this in Meta, but if it's ever possible some here should know how: Do you guys know if it's possible to watch a member posts the same way we can watch threads? How do you check if friedcat posted something? It's a pain to do it "by hand". you use this thing called "bookmarks" in your browser That does not tell me whether there is a new post or not. ?? just bookmark this Call me lazy, but I don't want to open a page if there is nothing to see. What I'd like to have is something as the watchlist for the threads, where you know whether there is something new without actually opening each single page. I've wrote this small script. If you're under linux, and KDE, you can use it as it is. If you're under gnome, you must change the notification to whatever you want. Every time friedcat write a new post, it will notify you. You don't even need to have your browser open. #!/bin/bash
UPDATE_TIME=3600 # Time between checks in seconds touch old
while : do # get last version (just a part of the html, where first post is) wget -q -O - "https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=49840;sa=showPosts" | fgrep -A 200 -m 1 "bodyarea" | fgrep -A 15 -m 1 "titlebg2" > new # different from reference version? diff new old > /dev/null if [ "$?" == "1" ] then # different! Let's update the reference one: mv new old # There has been a new post! Trigger whatever you want here, for KDE it can be: kdialog --passivepopup 'Friedcat has posted something! Check it out :)' 3600 fi
sleep ${UPDATE_TIME} done
I cannot believe I wrote this. Maybe I should just step back and relax a bit... nah you just took "online stalker" to a new level. grats
|
Will take me a while to climb up again, But where is a will, there is a way...
|
|
|
jboogie
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 38
Merit: 0
|
|
September 21, 2013, 06:03:30 PM |
|
I could probably post this in Meta, but if it's ever possible some here should know how: Do you guys know if it's possible to watch a member posts the same way we can watch threads? How do you check if friedcat posted something? It's a pain to do it "by hand". you use this thing called "bookmarks" in your browser That does not tell me whether there is a new post or not. ?? just bookmark this Call me lazy, but I don't want to open a page if there is nothing to see. What I'd like to have is something as the watchlist for the threads, where you know whether there is something new without actually opening each single page. I've wrote this small script. If you're under linux, and KDE, you can use it as it is. If you're under gnome, you must change the notification to whatever you want. Every time friedcat write a new post, it will notify you. You don't even need to have your browser open. #!/bin/bash
UPDATE_TIME=3600 # Time between checks in seconds touch old
while : do # get last version (just a part of the html, where first post is) wget -q -O - "https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=49840;sa=showPosts" | fgrep -A 200 -m 1 "bodyarea" | fgrep -A 15 -m 1 "titlebg2" > new # different from reference version? diff new old > /dev/null if [ "$?" == "1" ] then # different! Let's update the reference one: mv new old # There has been a new post! Trigger whatever you want here, for KDE it can be: kdialog --passivepopup 'Friedcat has posted something! Check it out :)' 3600 fi
sleep ${UPDATE_TIME} done
I cannot believe I wrote this. Maybe I should just step back and relax a bit... well, I must admit that is pretty cool, simple and effective script. much better than a bookmark indeed
|
|
|
|
EskimoBob
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 910
Merit: 1000
Quality Printing Services by Federal Reserve Bank
|
|
September 21, 2013, 07:21:30 PM |
|
You can stalk friedcat as much as you want (script is cool, btw) but unless he is going to publish financial statements, it's useless, because you can not evaluate the AM not make any predictions for it's future.
I'll ask again: Please put pressure on Friedcat and get the numbers published. Only then start talking about what AM is worth now or estimate it's future value.
|
While reading what I wrote, use the most friendliest and relaxing voice in your head. BTW, Things in BTC bubble universes are getting ugly....
|
|
|
g83
|
|
September 21, 2013, 07:55:03 PM |
|
imo there has been a significant shareprice correction but 1.5 and lower seems absolutely undervalued.. hope i am right and we'll see >2.00 again soon
|
|
|
|
|