Bitcoin Forum
August 04, 2025, 09:29:33 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 29.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  

Warning: Moderators do not remove likely scams. You must use your own brain: caveat emptor. Watch out for Ponzi schemes. Do not invest more than you can afford to lose.

Warning: One or more bitcointalk.org users have reported that they strongly believe that the creator of this topic is a scammer. (Login to see the detailed trust ratings.) While the bitcointalk.org administration does not verify such claims, you should proceed with extreme caution.
Pages: « 1 ... 615 616 617 618 619 620 621 622 623 624 625 626 627 628 629 630 631 632 633 634 635 636 637 638 639 640 641 642 643 644 645 646 647 648 649 650 651 652 653 654 655 656 657 658 659 660 661 662 663 664 [665] 666 667 668 669 670 671 672 673 674 675 676 677 678 679 680 681 682 683 684 685 686 687 688 689 690 691 692 693 694 695 696 697 698 699 700 701 702 703 704 705 706 707 708 709 710 711 712 713 714 715 ... 1348 »
  Print  
Author Topic: ASICMINER: Entering the Future of ASIC Mining by Inventing It  (Read 3918301 times)
BitCsByBit
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 252
Merit: 250


View Profile
September 24, 2013, 12:10:57 PM
 #13281

"in 2 weeks" Cool

that's exactly what's not gonna happen with AM. It is happening and will happen with the competitors (BFL and other vaporware preorders) but when friedcat says it's in October, it's in October.

Didn't he initially say it's in September? So it's "two weeks" late.   Wink

Tipsy jar: 1HgfLMXiJQj9KZ7abLRh9rWuR7dgeSyub4
physalis
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 392
Merit: 250



View Profile
September 24, 2013, 12:18:53 PM
 #13282

"in 2 weeks" Cool

that's exactly what's not gonna happen with AM. It is happening and will happen with the competitors (BFL and other vaporware preorders) but when friedcat says it's in October, it's in October.
+1

Didn't he initially say it's in September? So it's "two weeks" late.   Wink

Did he? Where?

You guys are aware though that when he says we'll get 500TH, that doesn't mean 500TH will be mining for AM? Most of it will likely be sold. Like most of the previous 200TH has been.
VeeMiner
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 752
Merit: 500


bitcoin hodler


View Profile
September 24, 2013, 12:19:12 PM
 #13283

Didn't he initially say it's in September? So it's "two weeks" late.   Wink

give the guy a break Smiley
JimiQ84
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 406
Merit: 250


View Profile
September 24, 2013, 12:26:24 PM
 #13284

Project Timeline

August-September: Deploy/sell all hashpower arriving in July and early August.
September-November: Deploy/sell the hashpower ordered at early July.
November-December: Experimental products of 2nd-gen chips and modular large-scale deployment solutions.

I believe this refers to bolded part. Now it has been specified to be done in october.
ThickAsThieves
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 518
Merit: 500



View Profile
September 24, 2013, 12:28:38 PM
 #13285

Project Timeline

August-September: Deploy/sell all hashpower arriving in July and early August.
September-November: Deploy/sell the hashpower ordered at early July.
November-December: Experimental products of 2nd-gen chips and modular large-scale deployment solutions.

I believe this refers to bolded part. Now it has been specified to be done in october.

The sales have been happening all through that period, the 500TH info is merely saying that supply will be increasing. Note that blades are, and have been, available and selling.
JimiQ84
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 406
Merit: 250


View Profile
September 24, 2013, 12:33:24 PM
 #13286

Project Timeline

August-September: Deploy/sell all hashpower arriving in July and early August.
September-November: Deploy/sell the hashpower ordered at early July.
November-December: Experimental products of 2nd-gen chips and modular large-scale deployment solutions.

I believe this refers to bolded part. Now it has been specified to be done in october.

The sales have been happening all through that period, the 500TH info is merely saying that supply will be increasing. Note that blades are, and have been, available and selling.

I thought that was from 200TH/s batch. And now we are talking about final gen1 batch - 1000TH/s. But maybe first half of this batch has been completed, hence 500TH/s is still pending.
VeeMiner
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 752
Merit: 500


bitcoin hodler


View Profile
September 24, 2013, 12:36:19 PM
 #13287

I thought that was from 200TH/s batch. And now we are talking about final gen1 batch - 1000TH/s. But maybe first half of this batch has been completed, hence 500TH/s is still pending.

as far as I know there was 12 Thash, then 50 Thash, then 200 Thash and then there was supposed to be 1000 Thash. So I guess the 500 is part of the planned 1000 Thash. Correct me if I'm wrong please
JimiQ84
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 406
Merit: 250


View Profile
September 24, 2013, 12:49:19 PM
 #13288

I thought that was from 200TH/s batch. And now we are talking about final gen1 batch - 1000TH/s. But maybe first half of this batch has been completed, hence 500TH/s is still pending.

as far as I know there was 12 Thash, then 50 Thash, then 200 Thash and then there was supposed to be 1000 Thash. So I guess the 500 is part of the planned 1000 Thash. Correct me if I'm wrong please

yes, that's correct. What we don't know is if those 500TH/s are first half of 1000TH/s or second half. Meaning - if 500TH/s have already been produced, or not.
data
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 84
Merit: 10


View Profile
September 24, 2013, 12:50:32 PM
 #13289

Friedcat: Could you please specify where in the production cycle you are with the Gen2 hardware and what your current time projections are?
data
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 84
Merit: 10


View Profile
September 24, 2013, 12:53:18 PM
 #13290

Second question: None of my request for direct share transfers have been answered. Care to elaborate if there was a change in procedure?
BitCsByBit
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 252
Merit: 250


View Profile
September 24, 2013, 12:56:32 PM
 #13291

Friedcat: Could you please specify where in the production cycle you are with the Gen2 hardware and what your current time projections are?

Quote
• The size of the Gen2 order will be decided as appropriate, according to the
network difficulty when it is time to finalize the order size

Tipsy jar: 1HgfLMXiJQj9KZ7abLRh9rWuR7dgeSyub4
tarmi
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1232
Merit: 1011


View Profile
September 24, 2013, 01:03:04 PM
 #13292

@ tarmi, empoweoqwj, ninjarobot
Guys, you are so wrong...
Look, did you remember last time we discussed blade production costs?
(actually that's a recurring topic, like many in this thread; I guess today is just the time for yet another iteration)

So we concluded that the mass production costs for a blade should be like around $20.  That's a reasonable price if you compare it to consumer products of similar complexity (like graphics cards).  Remember it's China and Friedcat's prices are likely very close to the lowest available anywhere in the world, at least now that the volume became so high.  Okay, let's be very pessimistic and assume a ceiling of 30$, that's around 0.25BTC by current prices, and with a reasonable profit margin it would still be more than acceptable for them to sell the blades for less than 0.5BTC.  Now please reconsider if people would buy these blades in November, if they sell for 0.5BTC!  I bet they would even in December, even if most the competitors actually deliver in time with their currently announced prices.

Also note that most competitors are less likely to have production costs as low as Friedcat (you know, Chinese are very social people; the "connections" are very valuable for them so a foreigner cannot get as good deal as a local).

Also note that 55nm chip of the same die area is much more expensive than 130 nm chip.  Of course, it's still cheaper per Gigahash, but not as much as per more powerful and efficient.  Let's say, if the 55nm chip is 8x as powerful as 130nm, then it's likely about twice as expensive per chip, so only 4x as cheap per GH.

So don't underestimate the good old 130nm, it will last at least until the end of the year.
(EDITED: "at least")


500 TH = 50 k blades = 5 k blade kits

I am not sure that you are aware of logistic and scalability problems of deploying 500 TH of asic blades. Not to mention power consummation and cooling.   

They dont have gen2 chips, they are late, and are hoping to recoup that with old technology.
jammertr
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 100
Merit: 10


View Profile
September 24, 2013, 01:03:46 PM
 #13293

Friedcat: Could you please specify where in the production cycle you are with the Gen2 hardware and what your current time projections are?

Quote
• The size of the Gen2 order will be decided as appropriate, according to the
network difficulty when it is time to finalize the order size

Any idea when the order for the 2nd gen will be finalized

physalis
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 392
Merit: 250



View Profile
September 24, 2013, 01:11:49 PM
 #13294

500 TH = 50 k blades = 5 k blade kits

I am not sure that you are aware of logistic and scalability problems of deploying 500 TH of asic blades. Not to mention power consummation and cooling.   

They dont have gen2 chips, they are late, and are hoping to recoup that with old technology.

Nobody is takling about deploying 500TH.
Again: most of it will be sold, like it has always been the case with AM.
Strange Vlad
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 140
Merit: 100



View Profile
September 24, 2013, 01:19:22 PM
 #13295

500 TH = 50 k blades = 5 k blade kits

I am not sure that you are aware of logistic and scalability problems of deploying 500 TH of asic blades. Not to mention power consummation and cooling.   
First of all, not all 500TH are going to be deployed.  Actually, I believe it's not rational to increase AM's own farm with Gen1, so most if not all blades are going to be sold and franchised.
Second, of course I'm aware that huge volumes are not easy to handle.  However, ASICMiner has experience dealing with (slightly smaller) volumes, they have established relations with resellers worldwide, they already have franchising test-running, they have enough money.

Quote
They dont have gen2 chips, they are late, and are hoping to recoup that with old technology.
As if a new technology instantly kills old technology the moment it appears.  Again, think volumes and costs.

Do not try and bend the spoon. That's impossible. Instead... only try to realize the truth. There is no spoon. Then you'll see, that it is not the spoon that bends, it is only yourself.
1CdVTkA288cd3m1jkdqPjUfhQ5ebei8gVT
velacreations
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 476
Merit: 250


View Profile
September 24, 2013, 01:23:33 PM
 #13296

Quote
They dont have gen2 chips, they are late, and are hoping to recoup that with old technology.
As if a new technology instantly kills old technology the moment it appears.  Again, think volumes and costs.
+1
What matters is $/GH for 2013

JimiQ84
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 406
Merit: 250


View Profile
September 24, 2013, 01:24:08 PM
 #13297

I imagine 100TH/s could be deployed in franchises, let's say 1TH/s per one franchise. No scaling, cooling, powering problem
tarmi
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1232
Merit: 1011


View Profile
September 24, 2013, 01:29:06 PM
 #13298

so most if not all blades are going to be sold and franchised.


We are in ASIC bubble (which isnt sustainable) and people today are much more aware of the risks and implications of buying ASIC miners.  

I think that time of hysterical buys of overpriced hardware is over. why would anyone spend and risk their bitcoins to buy asic miner?
data
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 84
Merit: 10


View Profile
September 24, 2013, 01:35:08 PM
 #13299

Friedcat: Could you please specify where in the production cycle you are with the Gen2 hardware and what your current time projections are?

Quote
• The size of the Gen2 order will be decided as appropriate, according to the
network difficulty when it is time to finalize the order size
Was this supposed to be the answer? I wanted to know how far the design is, possibly projected energy usage, hashing power per Watt and chip, if similar delays as with gen1 can be expected or if it will go smooth and so on, not something like: we haven't yet decided on the order size, that's it.
muyuu
Donator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 980
Merit: 1000



View Profile
September 24, 2013, 01:39:46 PM
 #13300

so most if not all blades are going to be sold and franchised.


We are in ASIC bubble (which isnt sustainable) and people today are much more aware of the risks and implications of buying ASIC miners.  

I think that time of hysterical buys of overpriced hardware is over. why would anyone spend and risk their bitcoins to buy asic miner?

That's a problem mostly for sellers/retailers and for particular miners.

Most of the new players have not amortised their original investment yet. Be it time or money. They will have to face higher pressure than those who already have their infrastructure in place and have been long running on profit.

AFAIC, ASICMiner remains the apex predator in this industry unless a big corporation decides to invest heavily and join the race.

GPG ID: 7294199D - OTC ID: muyuu (470F97EB7294199D)
forum tea fund BTC 1Epv7KHbNjYzqYVhTCgXWYhGSkv7BuKGEU DOGE DF1eTJ2vsxjHpmmbKu9jpqsrg5uyQLWksM CAP F1MzvmmHwP2UhFq82NQT7qDU9NQ8oQbtkQ
Pages: « 1 ... 615 616 617 618 619 620 621 622 623 624 625 626 627 628 629 630 631 632 633 634 635 636 637 638 639 640 641 642 643 644 645 646 647 648 649 650 651 652 653 654 655 656 657 658 659 660 661 662 663 664 [665] 666 667 668 669 670 671 672 673 674 675 676 677 678 679 680 681 682 683 684 685 686 687 688 689 690 691 692 693 694 695 696 697 698 699 700 701 702 703 704 705 706 707 708 709 710 711 712 713 714 715 ... 1348 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!