Bitcoin Forum
November 15, 2024, 04:13:57 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 28.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  

Warning: Moderators do not remove likely scams. You must use your own brain: caveat emptor. Watch out for Ponzi schemes. Do not invest more than you can afford to lose.

Pages: « 1 ... 857 858 859 860 861 862 863 864 865 866 867 868 869 870 871 872 873 874 875 876 877 878 879 880 881 882 883 884 885 886 887 888 889 890 891 892 893 894 895 896 897 898 899 900 901 902 903 904 905 906 [907] 908 909 910 911 912 913 914 915 916 917 918 919 920 921 922 923 924 925 926 927 928 929 930 931 932 933 934 935 936 937 938 939 940 941 942 943 944 945 946 947 948 949 950 951 952 953 954 955 956 957 ... 1348 »
  Print  
Author Topic: ASICMINER: Entering the Future of ASIC Mining by Inventing It  (Read 3917038 times)
minerpumpkin
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 686
Merit: 500


A pumpkin mines 27 hours a night


View Profile
March 27, 2014, 06:33:50 PM
 #18121

Well, no divs today... Doesn't matter, IMO...
In fact, I'd prefer AM to switch to monthly or at least bi-weekly payouts. If gen 3 is focussed on pure chip sales, this would adhere better to the production/sale-cycle.

I should have gotten into Bitcoin back in 1992...
aahzmundus
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 644
Merit: 500


Invest & Earn: https://cloudthink.io


View Profile
March 27, 2014, 06:39:14 PM
 #18122

Well, no divs today... Doesn't matter, IMO...
In fact, I'd prefer AM to switch to monthly or at least bi-weekly payouts. If gen 3 is focussed on pure chip sales, this would adhere better to the production/sale-cycle.

I also would not mind monthly payments... but I would prefer some sort of official update if this is what is going on.  To just not pay a dividend, and not say anything about it -_-

smilence
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 58
Merit: 0


View Profile
March 27, 2014, 08:08:17 PM
 #18123

A bit of miner pron before gen3:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oZavKweMrP4

immersion cooling is useless..
jimmothy
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 770
Merit: 509



View Profile
March 27, 2014, 08:09:39 PM
 #18124


Clearly not according to that video.
dhenson
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 994
Merit: 1000



View Profile
March 27, 2014, 08:12:21 PM
 #18125

immersion cooling is useless..

Care to elaborate or are you just blurting things out of your ass?
smilence
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 58
Merit: 0


View Profile
March 27, 2014, 08:16:43 PM
 #18126

immersion cooling is useless..

Care to elaborate or are you just blurting things out of your ass?

Just 1P ,  also allied control doesn't belong to Firedcat..

http://www.allied-control.com/about-us/allied-control
smilence
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 58
Merit: 0


View Profile
March 27, 2014, 08:18:35 PM
 #18127

Care to elaborate?
I assume that implies either ineffective, or unnecessary.  Since it appears to effectively solve a real problem, where do you see it as useless?  Perhaps for your pair of USB sticks...  At some point, the cost/scale lines will meet and make it viable, or 'not useless'.

The only problem is TIME, nothing else, the Gen 3 chips just taped out ..
dhenson
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 994
Merit: 1000



View Profile
March 27, 2014, 08:20:09 PM
 #18128

only problem is TIME, nothing else, the Gen 3 chips just taped out ..

Source?
smilence
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 58
Merit: 0


View Profile
March 27, 2014, 08:21:26 PM
 #18129

only problem is TIME, nothing else, the Gen 3 chips just taped out ..

Source?

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=99497.msg5867787#msg5867787


Not fast enough...
dhenson
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 994
Merit: 1000



View Profile
March 27, 2014, 08:23:25 PM
 #18130

immersion cooling is useless..

Care to elaborate or are you just blurting things out of your ass?

Just 1P ,  also allied control doesn't belong to Firedcat..

http://www.allied-control.com/about-us/allied-control

It was my understanding that those immersion cooling tanks WAS Asicminer.  We've seen photo's of a shareholder touring the Hong Kong high rise and taking pictures of himself between the racks.

That is a currently hashing Gen 1 bitcoin mining operation by Asicminer.


In order for the first wafers to have been delivered already, tapeout happened 6+ weeks ago.
jimmothy
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 770
Merit: 509



View Profile
March 27, 2014, 08:26:09 PM
 #18131


Nowhere does it say in that post that they just taped out. In fact it says packaged chips will be ready by tomorrow.

And how exactly is 10 times space density + saving $65,000/month in electricity useless?


Quote
It was my understanding that those immersion cooling tanks WAS Asicminer.

Video from allied control clearly says customer: asicminer
smilence
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 58
Merit: 0


View Profile
March 27, 2014, 08:28:02 PM
 #18132

immersion cooling is useless..

Care to elaborate or are you just blurting things out of your ass?

Just 1P ,  also allied control doesn't belong to Firedcat..

http://www.allied-control.com/about-us/allied-control

It was my understanding that those immersion cooling tanks WAS Asicminer.  We've seen photo's of a shareholder touring the Hong Kong high rise and taking pictures of himself between the racks.

That is a currently hashing Gen 1 bitcoin mining operation by Asicminer.


In order for the first wafers to have been delivered already, tapeout happened 6+ weeks ago.

immersion cooling data centre was Asicminer, but this company "allied-control" is not owned by Friedcat,

also the total hash power of that data centre  is just ~1P


and other companies are mining btc by using 28nm chips ,   Friedcat is still testing their chips.



smilence
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 58
Merit: 0


View Profile
March 27, 2014, 08:29:48 PM
 #18133


Nowhere does it say in that post that they just taped out. In fact it says packaged chips will be ready by tomorrow.

And how exactly is 10 times space density + saving $65,000/month in electricity useless?


Quote
It was my understanding that those immersion cooling tanks WAS Asicminer.

Video from allied control clearly says customer: asicminer


What I am trying to say is that TIME is more important than electricity cost

Also the immersion cooling data centre cost too much
jimmothy
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 770
Merit: 509



View Profile
March 27, 2014, 08:36:21 PM
 #18134

immersion cooling data centre was Asicminer, but this company "allied-control" is not owned by Friedcat,

also the total hash power of that data centre  is just ~1P


and other companies are mining btc by using 28nm chips ,   Friedcat is still testing their chips.

Nobody claimed allied control was owned by FC only the datacenter.

AM 40nm chips will be cheaper and more efficient than those 28nm chips.

I would go with 1PH in the size of a shipping container using only 500KW over a massive datacenter using 1500KW any day.

What I am trying to say is that TIME is more important than electricity cost

Also the immersion cooling data centre cost too much

Not true. Immersion cooled datacenter cost $100,000 and saves $65,000 per month.

Time is only important if you are using hardware that is going to be replaced.

At 0.2w/gh AM hardware will be doing the replacing.
KS
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 448
Merit: 250


View Profile
March 27, 2014, 08:47:08 PM
 #18135

They're both important.

Time to market because of the crazy high diff change (more profit per GH/s when you deploy sooner rather than later).

Immersion cooling because of the electricity and space savings (which can also be mitigated by moving to places where electricity is cheap and space is not an issue but AM's datacenter space is limited and its electricity costs are not the lowest).
smilence
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 58
Merit: 0


View Profile
March 27, 2014, 08:52:20 PM
 #18136

They're both important.

Time to market because of the crazy high diff change (more profit per GH/s when you deploy sooner rather than later).

Immersion cooling because of the electricity and space savings (which can also be mitigated by moving to places where electricity is cheap and space is not an issue but AM's datacenter space is limited and its electricity costs are not the lowest).

My Chinese friend rent some hydropower station for mining , better than expensive immersion cooling
jimmothy
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 770
Merit: 509



View Profile
March 27, 2014, 08:53:28 PM
 #18137

They're both important.

Time to market because of the crazy high diff change (more profit per GH/s when you deploy sooner rather than later).

Immersion cooling because of the electricity and space savings (which can also be mitigated by moving to places where electricity is cheap and space is not an issue but AM's datacenter space is limited and its electricity costs are not the lowest).

My Chinese friend rent some hydropower station for mining , better than expensive immersion cooling

Why not both?
smilence
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 58
Merit: 0


View Profile
March 27, 2014, 09:01:44 PM
 #18138

They're both important.

Time to market because of the crazy high diff change (more profit per GH/s when you deploy sooner rather than later).

Immersion cooling because of the electricity and space savings (which can also be mitigated by moving to places where electricity is cheap and space is not an issue but AM's datacenter space is limited and its electricity costs are not the lowest).

My Chinese friend rent some hydropower station for mining , better than expensive immersion cooling

Why not both?

Not sure what kind of "3M™ NOVEC™ ENGINEERED FLUIDS" they use  , but check this link , http://www.copsplus.com/prodnum5327.php

Is it cheap ?
antirack
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 489
Merit: 500

Immersionist


View Profile
March 27, 2014, 09:10:48 PM
Last edit: March 27, 2014, 09:42:10 PM by antirack
 #18139

They're both important.

Time to market because of the crazy high diff change (more profit per GH/s when you deploy sooner rather than later).

Immersion cooling because of the electricity and space savings (which can also be mitigated by moving to places where electricity is cheap and space is not an issue but AM's datacenter space is limited and its electricity costs are not the lowest).

My Chinese friend rent some hydropower station for mining , better than expensive immersion cooling

Immersion cooling is cheaper, that's the point of it.

A little bit of fluid in a bathtub with bare mining boards costs less than cases, heatsinks, fans, shelves, cables, screws, nuts, bolts, thermal grease, house, all that and people to put it all together.  You only need 200cc to cool 4kW.

If you have 1MW power and spend X kW on cooling that's X kW more mining gear you can deploy if you use immersion. No matter if you use hydro or burn coal for your power it's unrelated. Power is valuable.

And it saves possibly hundreds of board developers time to develop/test/source/buy/produce/ship all that. Miners are reduced to chips on boards, that's it.

Boards can be made smaller and have more chips on them because now there are no thermal issues.

All that in a shipping container instead of a complete building. If the IRS comes after you, you take your container and move ;-)

When new chips (28nm) come along, you throw away the old ones and stick the new ones in.

The boards make more Bitcoins because they run faster (performance increase).

The boards make more Bitcoins because they some online weeks earlier (board developers can focus on board and chips and get them out ASAP instead of doing all the thermal and other design and start looking for parts).

Unless you like Ikea shelves of course and/or you just deploy a few TH.

http://www.immersion-cooling.com/publications/Analysis_of_Large-Scale_Bitcoin_Mining_Operations.pdf

Quote
Example 2.4PH 1.2MW Mining Container (ASICMiner Gen3):

●   6 tanks per container, 200kW-240kW each
●   400 boards each tank, 500W per board, 2,400 boards total
●   Equivalent to 600 4U boxes
●   Shipping container footprint instead of 60 racks in high density facility
●   2-3PH/s at estimated hashrate (based on reports from China )
●   No thermal throttling, possible performance increase
●   Fixed and predictable cost, no matter if fully or only partially populated
necro_nemesis
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 224
Merit: 100


View Profile
March 27, 2014, 09:26:31 PM
 #18140


Immersion cooled datacenter cost $100,000 and saves $65,000 per month.


I don't understand why Rockxie stated immersion cooling is too expensive in his Q/A. Start up costs versus operating costs maybe? Q. 6.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=528464.msg5872404#msg5872404
Pages: « 1 ... 857 858 859 860 861 862 863 864 865 866 867 868 869 870 871 872 873 874 875 876 877 878 879 880 881 882 883 884 885 886 887 888 889 890 891 892 893 894 895 896 897 898 899 900 901 902 903 904 905 906 [907] 908 909 910 911 912 913 914 915 916 917 918 919 920 921 922 923 924 925 926 927 928 929 930 931 932 933 934 935 936 937 938 939 940 941 942 943 944 945 946 947 948 949 950 951 952 953 954 955 956 957 ... 1348 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!